≡ Menu

Pay off your mortgage or invest? This calculator will help you decide

When interest rates are high or rising, you might wonder: “Should I pay off my mortgage or invest? Which strategy will put me financially ahead in the long run?”

Very low interest rates following the global financial crisis made larger mortgages much more affordable.

At the same time, strong returns from investing trounced the relatively low savings you made from paying down your mortgage instead.

With hindsight then, investing in the markets during the very low interest rate era was much more profitable compared to paying off your mortgage early.

However this comfy state of affairs was upended when rates rose fast in 2022.

Anyone who hadn’t properly stress-tested whether they could handle higher interest rates had a rude awakening when, say, their 2% five-year fixed rate deal expired and they had to remortgage at 6% or more.

It was a reminder that paying off a mortgage will always be worth considering. Debt can be deadly. Owning your home outright can be financially liberating, whereas running a mortgage comes with risks.

Very few people who pay off their mortgage regret it.

But this is Monevator. We like to kick things around – and sometimes to do things differently.

Where do we stand today? I’ve updated this article and our spreadsheet to reflect higher interest rates since it was last updated in January 2022. But remember mortgages are a long-term commitment – you’ll probably see multiple cycles of rate rises and cuts over the full term. Assess the risks accordingly! Only you can decide what’s right for your situation.

Better to pay off the mortgage or invest?

Borrowing to invest is typically a bad idea.

  • Returns from investing are uncertain and volatile.
  • Debt – and the cost of debt – is a certain liability.

However mortgage debt is relatively cheap and manageable. I believe it’s the only way most people should consider borrowing to invest.

A mortgage is money rented from a bank. Typically we use that money to buy a property. But if we delay repaying the mortgage to build an investment portfolio, we’re effectively using the mortgage to invest.

In this scenario our home stays mortgaged for longer, like an investment property.

It’s almost as if you’re a landlord – someone who borrows money from a bank on your behalf – except you’re your own tenant.

If you trust yourself to meet your mortgage payments whilst also saving into an investment portfolio for the next 25 years, then with average investing luck you’ll probably end up better off investing versus repaying the mortgage.

However there’s a lot to think about when deciding whether it’s better to pay off the mortgage or invest. The decision is as much about risk – and emotions – as any reward.

Come with us via the scenic route! We’ll tour the landscape, and wind up at a calculator that enables you to further explore the options.

First things first: Non-mortgage debt must go

Have you got credit card or store card debt or any personal loans? Get rid of that debt first.

Student loans may be an exception, as MoneySavingExpert explains. Think carefully before repaying any student loans.

The interest rates on credit cards and loans are much higher than on a mortgage. Credit cards typically charge 25% or more.

That rate is almost triple the average returns you could expect from the stock market.

The risk/reward equation of trying to grow your money faster than you’re losing out due to expensive debt is terrible.

Running a credit card debt at 25% while investing in shares is like rowing across the channel on a raft made from chicken wire.

At 7% or even 8% – a very cheap personal loan – the maths might work. (Though I don’t think it’d be worth the risk).

At 25% it definitely doesn’t.

If your already-optimistic 10% stock market returns are sapped by taxes and costs, then even loan rates of 7% aren’t worth thinking about.

And many people would expect much lower returns from a diversified investment portfolio – perhaps as little as 4% to 6% from today’s levels, though investment giant Vanguard for one is a bit more optimistic.

In short – unless you’re Warren Buffettonly mortgage debt is cheap enough, given the risks, costs and taxes, and likely returns from investing.

What about margin? Some gung-ho sophisticated investors use margin debt from a broker to fund property. The risks are magnified because unlike with a mortgage, margin debt is marked-to-market. This means that if stocks fall, you must stump up more assets or else repay the debt. The strategy can work, but it’s well beyond the scope of this article. I suggest 99.9% of readers push away thoughts of margin debt. With a 20-foot barge pole.

Pay off your mortgage: a good, safe option

If you can pay off your mortgage early, you’ll be in a great place financially.

There is no law of smart investing that says you should do anything other than pay off your mortgage first.

Many people would kill to be mortgage-free.

Crucial point alert! Repaying a mortgage is a form of saving. If you pay £10,000 off your mortgage with a cash windfall, it has the same impact on your net worth as putting it into a savings account. When you pay down the debt, your (negative) mortgage balance is made £10,000 less negative. When you save the money, your (positive) cash balance is £10,000 higher. Your net worth – assets minus liabilities – is the same in both cases.

Repaying your mortgage is usually a better option than saving in cash.

The average cash savings account pays 3% as I write – and you can do better if you shop around.

Most new mortgages charge a lot more. So unless you’re still on some dreamy super-low fixed mortgage rate from the old days, you’ll probably earn a higher return paying off your mortgage and avoiding interest compared to earning interest on cash.

Taxing matters

Indeed depending on your personal tax situation and where you hold your savings, the benefits of paying down your mortgage can be even bigger.

Once your personal savings allowance is exceeded, interest income on cash outside of an ISA is taxed.

In contrast, paying down your mortgage delivers a tax-free return via those future interest payments that you’ll never need to pay.

Note that you should still have an emergency fund before investing or making over-payments on your mortgage. Just in case you need cash in a hurry.

If you for some reason you want to hold even more cash at the same time as a mortgage – say if your income fluctuates a lot – then consider an offset mortgage.

Pay off your mortgage to get out of debt early

Paying off a mortgage early will slash the years you’ll live in debt.

Imagine you borrow £250,000 at 4% over 25 years.

  • According to the Monevator mortgage calculator, you’d pay £1,320 a month, give or take a Mars Bar.
  • Our calculator also handles over-payments. Let’s say you can bring your monthly payment up to £1,600 by overpaying £280 a month.
  • You’ll save £42,151 and cut nearly seven years off the life of your mortgage.

The red line in the graph below shows how overpaying accelerates your mortgage repayment schedule:

I’m ignoring a few things here, especially inflation and the time value of money.

If you go shopping with £280 today it’ll buy much more than in 25 years time.

But that would be true too if you kept that £280 in cash or invested it in a fund. So we can ignore inflation when comparing these options.

More reasons to murder your mortgage

Paying off a mortgage early is a great aspiration, and for good reason.

Being debt-free is mentally liberating. Pay off your mortgage early and you experience that benefit sooner and enjoy it for longer.

Other pros of paying off your mortgage include:

  • It’s a guaranteed return. You’ll earn whatever interest you save, unlike the variable and unknown returns from the stock market.
  • It reduces risk. The smaller your mortgage, the less chance a financial upset like unemployment, illness, or divorce sending your finances spiralling out of control.
  • It’s simple. There’s no fussing with funds or shares or anything else. Just throw any spare money at your mortgage!
  • You may be happier investing in volatile shares when you have no mortgage. You should have more spare cash to do so, too.
  • Selling your home is tax-free. If you sell up and go traveling, say, you’re not taxed on any gains you make on realising your own home investment. If you’d instead invested spare cash outside of an ISA or a SIPP, you might. True, the ISA and pension contribution limits are very generous – £80,000 in total in a year – so that usually won’t matter. But it may be best to put big windfalls like bonuses or inheritances into paying off your mortgage, rather than investing outside tax wrappers.

You can be too clever in life. Paying off the mortgage is hard to beat. I’ve never met anyone – aside from online commentators – who regretted it.

Now, personally I run an interest-only mortgage in pursuit of higher returns. While this got hairy in recent years when rates rose, I don’t regret it.

But I would never chastise anyone who chose to clear their debts ASAP instead.

For the average wage slave, being mortgage-free is one step to nirvana.

Invest instead: risks and rewards

Okay, let’s look at the case for investing.

There’s only one reason to invest instead of paying down your mortgage.

You hope investing will leave you richer!

The long-term average return from developed world stock markets depends on how you measure it. But it’s in the ballpark of 7-10% a year.

Real or nominal returns? The 7-10% returns I quoted are in nominal terms – with no adjustment for inflation. Often we prefer to talk about real (that is, inflation-adjusted) returns with investing. But it makes more sense to use nominal figures when comparing whether to pay off your mortgage or invest, because your mortgage calculations will also use nominal figures. Indeed you might even consider your mortgage a hedge against inflation, since inflation erodes the real value of your debt over time.

Returns of 7-10% returns from investing (if achieved) compare well even to mortgage rates of 4-6%.

The catch is you can’t get a mortgage to buy shares.

However by running a 4% mortgage, say, and investing spare cash into the market instead of paying off your mortgage, you might earn 7-10% over the long-term from your portfolio, and pocket the difference.

Is it worth it?

At the very least your portfolio needs to deliver higher returns1 than your mortgage rate for investing to be profitable.

But considering the risks of investing, you’ll want to do much better than just scraping ahead for the uncertainty to be worth it.

Aiming for a high return means investing in riskier assets – specifically shares.

And shares are volatile. Your portfolio’s value will fluctuate. You could suffer a deep bear market where you’re down 50%.

Over a typical 25-year mortgage term, you’ll likely see a couple of very big declines.

Worst of all, there’s no guarantee that even a globally diversified equity portfolio will do better than paying off your mortgage. Only historical precedent.

This is all very different to the certain return you get from paying down a mortgage.

House prices are volatile, but your mortgage balance isn’t. It’s irrelevant if house prices fluctuate when it comes to the returns you see from paying off the mortgage or investing. You’ve already locked-in the purchase price of your home. Paying off the associated mortgage delivers a known return. Investing earns an uncertain one. House prices fluctuate regardless.

How to invest instead of repaying your mortgage

Regularly investing into index funds is the best approach for most.

Investing globally diversifies your money across many stock markets. That way you’re not exposed to any one country, sector, or region.

Index funds will get you the market return at the cheapest cost.

We think a global tracker fund is the only equity fund most people need.

If you wanted to try for higher returns, you could tilt your passive portfolio towards value shares and small caps, especially early on when you’ve more time to make good any disappointments.

There’s no guarantees you’ll not do worse for trying to do better, though.

If you’re a naughty active investor, you’ll have your own ideas about how to invest to beat paying off your mortgage.

Just remember that the ownership of your home could be at stake if you can’t meet your mortgage payments. This should influence the risks you take!

Interesting choice

Suppose you have an interest-only mortgage.

If you can’t repay it at the end of the term because your bets on Bitcoin or blue-sky biotechs blew up, you’ll probably have to sell your home to repay the bank.

Invest wisely!

More commonly you’ll have a repayment mortgage.

Here it’s only your potential over-payments on the mortgage that you’re instead directing into investing.

You’ll still pay off your mortgage over 25 or 30 years with regular monthly mortgage repayments.

So investing whilst running a repayment mortgage is less risky than opting for an interest-only mortgage.

True, if your investing does well you’ll make less money with a repayment mortgage than if you’d gone interest-only.

But it may still have been worth it to reduce risk. You’re already taking on risk by investing in shares instead of clearing your mortgage, remember.

Equities are your growth engine

What about other assets – like bonds? They’re usually part of a passive portfolio, right?

The trouble is that as you add safer assets to counter the volatility of your equities, you also reduce expected returns.

And this really matters here, because you’re pitting investing against the certain return you can get from repaying your mortgage.

Is it sensible to put 40% of your portfolio into a bond ETF returning 4%, when you could use that money to pay off mortgage debt costing 5%?

On the face of it, no – except there’s more to diversification than that.

Up to a point, adding safer government bonds to an equity portfolio will reduce risk (volatility) more than it reduces returns.

And a smoother ride can make it easier to stick to your investing plans.

Still, if you’re going to invest instead of taking the safer return earned by repaying your mortgage, you’ll probably want to invest pretty aggressively.

Equities should probably comprise at least 70% of your portfolio if you’re to have a good shot of making all the risk and uncertainty worthwhile.

On which note…

You might regret investing, if you’re unlucky

Know that there’s no guarantee you’ll do better by investing.

Sure, historical stock market returns suggest that over a mortgage term of 25 to 30 years you’d be unlucky to lose out.

That’s assuming you invest regularly, mostly in equities, and stick with it through the tough times.

But the past is no guarantee of the future.

Also, just like retirees you face sequence of returns risk, especially with an interest-only mortgage.

Because what if the stock market crashes a year before your debt is due?

Course correct as you go

Luckily you have some flexibility over a long mortgage term.

For example, if your investing portfolio shoots the lights out for a decade, you might change gears and shift to paying off your mortgage instead. (As opposed to pushing your luck into a stock market bubble.)

You could even sell some of your bulging portfolio to repay your mortgage early. The best of both worlds!

Avoid early repayment charges. Take note of your mortgage’s fine print. Most lenders only allow a portion of the balance or initial advance to be repaid each year without penalty – for example 20%. You can still sell down your portfolio by more than this if it seems appropriate. Just keep the proceeds in cash, and pay off your mortgage as the terms allow.

Alternatively, you could simply use new cash from your salary to overpay your mortgage. Your existing portfolio could then be left to (hopefully) keep growing.

Watch the direction of interest rates! What made sense with mortgage rates at 4% will look very different if you must remortgage at 7%.

It’s essential to use tax shelters

You’ll want to invest in a tax shelter to keep all your returns. Either an ISA or a SIPP2.

If you pay tax on your investing gains then your subsequently lower returns will struggle to beat paying off the mortgage. Once you take risk into account, it’s almost certainly not worth it.

Note though that there’s a snag with relying on a SIPP to shelter your investments, especially if you have an interest-only mortgage. Access to pension cash is restricted by age.

What if you find you want (or need) to repay the mortgage sooner than you’d expected to, and all your money is in a SIPP?

In that case you’d have to wait until you’re allowed to withdraw money from the SIPP – so into your late-50s. You might then use your pension’s tax-free lump sum to pay down your mortgage.

But until then you’d be stuck.

Investing while running a mortgage for normies

Of course, most people have a mortgage whilst they earn a salary and pay into a pension – and for much of their working life.

Like this they too are funding their pension via that mortgage debt, as we’ve discussed above.

But few will ever think of it that way. Including many of those who criticise articles like this one!

As for ISAs, their tax-free status is such a boon we’ve suggested that opting not to repay a big debt – like a mortgage – or even taking out new debt might be worth it just to use as much of your annual ISA allowance as you can. This way you can best build up your tax-shielding capacity for the future.

ISAs are accessible at any time, too. This flexibility might be crucial if your plans change.

Long story short: think carefully about how and where you run your assets. If you decide to invest instead of paying off your mortgage, you’ll probably want to use both ISAs and a pension.

More reasons to run a mortgage and invest

  • Time diversification. Investing in equities is for the long-term. But if you wait until you’ve paid off your mortgage before investing, you’ll have a shorter time horizon.
  • Experience. You need to get used to volatility in risky assets. Starting young helps.
  • Asset diversification. There’s much more to the economy than house prices. Do you want all your eggs in the property basket while you pay off your mortgage?

For my part, I run an interest-only mortgage while investing mostly in equities. I’ll probably keep doing this until either my mortgage rate rises substantially or I can’t find any markets worth investing in.

Higher rates since 2022 have made it a tougher decision for sure. But I judge it’s still the best long-term strategy for me. As for the near-term, interest rate cuts are coming.

Investing will not be the right choice for everyone – or even most people – and this is not personal advice!

So do your own research. Properly weigh up the many benefits of paying off your mortgage instead.

Mortgage repayment calculator/spreadsheet

To help you decide whether to pay off the mortgage or invest, we’ve created a calculator embedded into a Google spreadsheet that can help you calculate and visualise the potential returns.

(Thanks to Monevator reader ArnoldRimmer for the initial work here.)

Open the spreadsheet in a browser. Then make a copy of the sheet. You can now edit your copy to play with the numbers for yourself.

If you share the sheet with friends or family we’d love it if you’d send them to the original sheet please. It includes a link to this article, so they can read all the important background information.

The six yellow cells are the ones to edit to try out different outcomes.

The spreadsheet runs the numbers on four scenarios:

  1. Repayment mortgage. No extra savings – you spend your spare cash.
  2. Repayment mortgage with mortgage over-payment.
  3. Repayment mortgage, but investing instead of making over-payments.
  4. Interest-only mortgage. Investing instead of any mortgage payments.

You input the mortgage size and term, interest rates, amount of cash directed to either over-payments or investing, and your expected return.

The table below plays out those numbers over 30 years.

The first four columns shows your growing net worth from repaying the mortgage and/or investing. The final two columns shows your portfolio growth, without netting off the mortgage balance.

The cells flip to green when your net worth becomes positive and you repay your mortgage – or you could do so from (tax-free) investments.

Remember: real-life returns are not smooth. Calculations like this can only give an indication of how an annual return would compound over time. In reality annual returns would be lumpy. Some years they will be negative. Perhaps very negative. Your investment portfolio will go down, maybe by a lot! Do not expect an easy ride.

Our spreadsheet lets you explore what’s possible – but it cannot map the future, which is unknowable.

Scenario planning 101

For example, the spreadsheet tells us that a £250,000 mortgage charging 2% over 25 years with £250 a month in either over-payments or investing at a 7% return delivers:

You can see with this example that investing whilst running the mortgage would leave you much better off (Scenarios 3 and 4).

But simply over-paying your mortgage is financially good, too (Scenario 2).

And even in the first scenario you had £250 a month extra to spend on fun. The extra gains in the other three scenarios didn’t come for free.

Perhaps you object to this interest rate or investment return? After all, mortgage rates are now much higher than 2%, and are probably set to stay higher.

That’s fine and I agree. It’s the whole point of making this spreadsheet editable.

With this update I’ve increased the default mortgage rates to 4.5% and the mortgage size to £300,000.

But you can create your own copy and try out whatever figures you think are realistic. 

Remember real-life investing is volatile and uncertain, whatever numbers you use. If it wasn’t then this strategy would be a no-brainer. It’s not, because the potential downside is real, especially over shorter periods.

Our spreadsheet is a guide to what might play out over 25-30 years – a hypothetical future seen through a rear-view mirror.

You mileage will definitely vary.

So… pay off the mortgage or invest?

The decade or so after the financial crisis was very kind to investors. Most markets did well, especially the heavyweight US.

At the same time – and not coincidentally – interest rates stayed low.

In hindsight it was a great time to invest rather than pay down a mortgage.

I’d even argue this wasn’t completely unforeseeable.

After the March 2009 rout, the odds of superior returns – greater than 10% – from shares over the medium-term looked pretty good.

I wrote that year that a decade of 20% a year returns seemed possible, given the crash we’d just seen.

If you invested the money you saved in lower mortgage payments in those gloomy times, you deserve applause – or maybe your own hedge fund!

But were the record numbers then paying off their mortgages chumps?

I don’t think so.

As I said at the start, paying off your mortgage is never a bad idea. There are financial benefits, and it reduces risk. There are non-financial wins, too.

One lump or two?

Remember our spreadsheet only shows smooth growth over the years.

In reality it would be a wild ride of unpredictable annual highs and lows.

And markets today look much more expensive. Interest rates are higher. It does not seem such a propitious time to fund an investment portfolio via a mortgage, compared to 2012 say.

For disciplined investors with broad shoulders and girded loins, running a mortgage while investing will probably still win in the long run.

But do your research, think about risk tolerance, and make your own mind up.

Note: This article was first published in 2011, heavily updated in January 2022, and updated again in September 2024. As usual I’ve retained all the reader comments below – they provide fascinating insights as rates fall and rise over time. But do check when a comment was posted for full context.

  1. After taxes and fees. []
  2. Self-Invested Personal Pension []
{ 119 comments }

Weekend reading: oh what can ail thee, knight-at-arms?

Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Our piece on the potential for a rise in capital gains tax (CGT) kicked off a great discussion. We’re at nearly 100 comments now, almost all thoughtful and articulate. Check them out.

Plenty of you voted in our poll, too. Here are the results:

It’s good to hear 40% of Monevator readers have no CGT-chargeable gains to worry about.

(Hopefully that’s because you’ve been using ISAs and SIPPs – not because you’ve no investments and you only read Monevator out of a morbid masochism!)

It’s also no surprise that so few people are thinking about emigrating to escape a potential CGT hike.

However perhaps more than you’d expect are selling positions ahead of what’s still only a rumour.

I can see a case for it, though. Not only because any changes to CGT will probably come into force before Rachel Reeves has even finished her bedtime cocoa for the day, but also because it’s hard to imagine lower CGT rates anytime soon, even if they don’t go up in 2024.

If you’re sitting on gains that you’ve hitherto failed to defuse – and you see little prospect of doing so now, given the already dramatically-lowered annual CGT allowance – then maybe it is rational to sell up, take your tax lumps, and reinvest into something else?

Preferably within an ISA or SIPP this time, obviously.

Yes it’s usually better to delay taxes savaging your returns for as long as possible, all things being equal.

But long-term demographics and the UK state’s finances suggest today’s status quo won’t endure indefinitely – even if CGT rates do get through October unscathed.

Under the weather

Perhaps it’s all part of Rachel Reeves’ cunning plan? To scare us into paying more capital gains tax before she speaks, only to leave things as they stand on Budget Day.

If so that would be a textbook case of winning the battle but flunking the war.

We don’t need any more political gamesmanship, nor obstructive and punitive taxes if we can help it.

Rather, what we need after almost a decade of foot-targeting self-harm and knee-jerk populism is joined-up thinking that encourages for long-term growth.

And a just-released report – The Capital Markets of Tomorrow [PDF] – has some ideas on that.

Get past the report’s strangely 1970s-style cover art, and inside you’ll find the thoughts of various City Grandees recruited back in 2022 to look into what ails UK growth, productivity, and the London Stock Market.

Make no mistake, as we’ve said many times there is a problem. Ignore jingoistic pundits who accuse those of us who say so of just talking the country down.

It might feel like the UK has been a sick man forever. But Britain’s relative decline – at least post-WW2 – only really began 15 years or so ago.

For most of the post-War period the report claims we kept up even with the mighty United States.

Take me back to dear old Blighty

The report says that from the mid-1950s up until the Global Financial Crisis, UK and US growth metrics across real wages, productivity, and real GDP per capital were similar.

Moreover, between 1955 and 2005 it puts the UK real equity average return at 6.6% – slightly outperforming even the US’s 6.2%.

Unfortunately:

…since the Global Financial Crash (GFC), between 2010-23, the USA has delivered 8.4% and the UK only 2.2%, a significant and possibly ’embedded’ outperformance. […]

ONS data demonstrates how poorly the U.K. economy has performed since the GFC.

There has been no growth in real wages or real GDP per capita and small growth in productivity.

As the TUC and several academics have commented, average wages in the UK would have been £10,000 per annum higher if they had matched their performance prior to the GFC.

ONS data also shows that real GDP per capita was £27,218 in 2007 and £27,819 sixteen years later in 2023, so no annual growth. In Q1 2024 it was £6,903 compared to £6,850 in Q1 of 2007, again no growth. Productivity is only around 5% higher in 2023/4 than it was in 2007, much lower than the pre GFC trend growth of around 1.5% per annum.

This poor performance was against the background of Government debt increasing from £1 trillion in 2010 to £2.7 trillion in 2023/4, i.e. 100% of GDP, which is also £2.7 trillion.

Given the UK’s prior credible performance then, the last 15-20 years do look more like an aberration than our natural state of being – although of course we have recently had a meaningful structural change with Brexit that’s still playing out, for good (ahem…) or ill.

For their part the grandees are optimistic. They believe the UK can revert to ‘its pre-existing parity’. But they reckon it’ll require £100bn a year of capital inflows to achieve this.

And not just into the capital markets either, but also infrastructure such as water, transport and housing.

Their ideas concerning our pointy-end of the issue include scrapping stamp duty on UK share trades and encouraging or even mandating pensions to invest a minimum amount into UK private business.

The report also notes the UK has 20-30 high-quality unlisted growth companies worth tens of billions.

These unicorns could help revitalise the UK stock market were they all to float in London.

London calling

By the way, if you’re wondering what a capitalist revitalisation of the UK would look like if represented on a flyer created by a student activist from the 1970s channelling The Good Life, then The Capital Markets of Tomorrow has you covered:

My cynicism aside, it’s refreshing to hear the case made for capitalism, investment, and the UK economic engine firing together, and all without anyone wrapping themselves in the flag.

This report won’t change the world, or even our corner of it. But hopefully it will get more of us thinking.

Have a great weekend!

[continue reading…]

{ 34 comments }

Are you selling ahead of a capital gains tax rise?

I hated school. So as a 12-year old I took the rumours of a ruthless new headmaster to heart:

  • “He’s going to make us all wear bright blue blazers, bow ties, and caps.”
  • “Girls will be separated from boys except at break and lunchtime.”
  • “At his last school they had extra classes on Saturday mornings.”
  • “He’s into caning, and we’re all going to get it.”

Of course none of this happened when the incoming man took up his thankless position. Though, looking back, the level of lawlessness at my big comprehensive did decline once the top slot was occupied.

As a nerdy if rebellious pupil, a stricter headmaster was good for me.

More physics, less fistfights.

But then we typically dread what might happen more than we suffer when it does.

Our imaginations – whatever our age – are uncapped by mundane reality.

Not my precious!

Alas, the new Labour government – and their nightmare-conjuring critics – are not dealing with fantasy.

Hemmed in by politically-motivated red lines on income tax, national insurance, and corporation tax, if chancellor Rachel Reeves wants to raise revenue then she has to go for somebody’s favourite tax relief, shelter, or break.

That might be inheritance tax. Or higher-rate pension tax reliefs, as debated in Monevator comments. Niche areas like ‘entrepreneur’s relief‘ or the way that private equity income is taxed as gains. The still fairly niche capital gains tax (CGT). Restrictions to ISA pot sizes or the annual ISA allowance.

Pick your poison: “Somebody is going to get it”.

The struggle is real

Let’s agree we don’t yet know what’s coming for sure.

These people aren’t idiots, unlike their predecessors from two or three administrations back. Their politics might not align with yours – nor mine exactly – but they’ve seen austerity has its limits and know growth is what the UK needs.

Yet they’ve inherited an impaired public sector where for a while people even wondered if an ambulance would show up in an emergency – versus expectations inflated by Brexit baloney about £350m a week for the NHS.

That didn’t happen. Just like immigration is higher, there’s no trade deal with the US, and any real economic benefit that might have eased giving up frictionless trade with Europe is notably absent.

The State collects around £40bn a year less in taxes than we’d have expected if we’d stayed in the EU.

I know some of you don’t like to hear it. But the impact doesn’t go away just because it’s boring.

Economists said Brexit would damage the UK economy, and here we are scrabbling for cash.

Of course there’s also been the massive hit from the pandemic, higher borrowing costs with higher interests rates, an increasingly job-shy population, and the energy market roiling war in Ukraine.

Oh, and the pensioner ranks continue to swell, leaving fewer workers to foot a growing welfare bill:

Source: ONS

Beyond the Punch and Judy show

Whatever your politics, it’s clear the UK is living beyond its means.

The Conservatives froze tax thresholds for years and dragged millions into the higher-rate tax bracket.

We all know they’d have cut taxes if they could.

Yet they left office with the NHS elective care backlog approaching a record 8m even while the tax burden was at the highest level for at least 70 years:

Source: ONS

There’s undeniably an issue here.

You want higher economic growth instead of tax increases? And something done about UK productivity?

You and me both. And Reeves and Jeremy Hunt for that matter.

But it’s far easier said than done.

Reversing Brexit would help, eventually, if we ignore the impact of all the division it would cause, and the further cost to business of undoing the border-related investments it had to make.

But frictionless trade with Europe is surely off the table for a generation.

The State could be shrunk, but goodness knows what’s actually achievable.

Perhaps we could throw in the towel on military spending? Accept we’re a middle-order player on the global stage, with influence that will only shrink as China, India, Indonesia – and eventually even the likes of Nigeria – advance?

Good luck getting that past Barry Blimp. Even I don’t think it’s wise while war rages in Europe.

As for trimming welfare spending, just look at the pushback against means-testing the winter fuel allowance for pensioners.

Logically a sensible measure, if we have to cut spending. Yet so unpopular it will possibly be reversed.

There’s a reason the state tends to grow inexorably over time.

The precautionary principle applied to taxes

Personally, if I was Reeves I wouldn’t change anything, except perhaps some loopholes such as carried interest on private equity.

(Even that’s of debatable benefit – it would surely lead to capital flight, and perhaps lower tax revenues in the long run. But it would throw a bone to the notion of taxing the richest, without doing too much wider damage.)

Instead I’d probably rely on extending the freeze on tax thresholds, and the resulting drag bringing yet more workers into the higher-rate tax bracket – even as inflation also pushes up the price of everything they need to pay for.

I’d borrow to make up the difference, at the cost of slightly higher yields and rates.

No, I don’t like it either. But it’s probably better than throwing cold water on the economy with taxes that target wealth creation.

Because we really really need to grow GDP.

Do we face a capital gains tax rise?

Maybe all this pre-Budget fear and loathing isn’t entirely bad news for the state coffers.

If people see less point in saving because of higher taxes or lowered reliefs to come, they’ll spend more money today.

That could boost growth now, at the cost of future gains. And at the cost of future tax receipts too, as a smaller pool of pension assets, say, will ultimately mean less pension income to tax in the distant future.

But Reeves might decide that’s a problem for next generation.

This logic – more money now, and hang the long-term consequences – is why there’s so much noise about capital gains tax (CGT) rates being lifted.

CGT is only paid in any given year by a small slice of the population – fewer than 3% in any given year.

So the vast majority of people who will never pay CGT can take an “I’m alright, Jacinda” attitude to the wealthy getting clobbered – and presume it’s a costless tax hike to them.

Rich versus poor. Elite versus everyone else.

It makes CGT the perfect battleground tax.

Rates up, receipts down

Of course, we know that there will be a cost for everyone to jacking up CGT rates, whatever the offsetting rewards that HMRC is able to collect.

For starters, take the notion that equalising CGT with a person’s income tax rates – so 40/45% at the highest band, from 20% today – will simply double CGT revenues towards £30bn.

Even in the short-term, some people simply won’t sell if rates rise. They’ll hope for better rates to come – or find another way to realise their assets, such as running their business for income.

Others will sell in advance of higher rates if they’re given advance warning. They’ll take a 20% tax hit upfront instead of a future 40% whack.

This might seem helpful to a cash-strapped government in a hole today. But it probably won’t do much for long-term revenues, unless we presume any realised gains will go back into investment, rather than being spent on foreign imports and holiday homes abroad.

A heroic presumption, given the climate will be seen as increasingly hostile to investment, at the margin.

You can see how higher CGT rates could eventually reduce the total capital gains tax take.

A rich take on a capital gains tax rise

Talking of overseas, while I’ve been told ‘the rich’ are set to leave the UK every year since I was a nipper – even as we gained more than our fair share of millionaires – it’s true capital is flightier than labour.

Monevator readers with perhaps a few tens of thousands invested outside of tax shelters will find the notion of re-domiciling overseas to avoid a 40% CGT hit an easy pass. It won’t be worth the hassle.

But if you’re a business owner, say, with seven/eight/nine figure assets that you expect to dispose of someday – or even to reduce steadily over time – then the equation is very different.

Moving to Monaco or the Bahamas to save millions could be the easiest money you ever make.

It’s complacent to assume the UK is such a great place to live that they won’t do it.

At the least it’s less attractive to the mobile wealthy than it was when a British passport enabled you to live anywhere in Europe – and potentially arbitrage over time into other European countries’ tax regimes, too.

Schools are often brought up as an obstacle. But there’s already an army of foreign kids in our public schools. Why wouldn’t our own wealthy would-be emigres do the same? Sending your kids abroad is very normal in wealthy circles elsewhere in the world.

True, ISAs are peerless tax shelters that lose their tax-shielding status under other jurisdictions.

But again, ISAs are far more meaningful to the averagely wealthy than the properly rich.

Will a hedge fund manager, pop star, or factory owner really be swayed by losing a £20,000 a year ISA allowance (and the wrapper around whatever is in their pot) if faced with a multi-million pound CGT hit?

From the LSE:

More than half (52.2%) of all taxable gains in 2020 went to just 5,000 people, who received an average of over £6.8m per person in gains.

That’s really not many people deciding to move abroad to make a difference in the numbers.

Squeeze them until the pips squeak!

Some people will say “sod them”. Paying taxes is your patriotic duty, they’ll argue.

A cynic would note they’ll argue this less when HMRC comes for them. (Pension relief, anyone?)

But for now, losing a few oligarchs and other pampered princelings (yes I know this isn’t accurate) may seem a small price to pay to ‘save the NHS’.

Well… fine.

Except that firstly, even doubling the CGT take to £30bn a year won’t fix the public sector. Were it even possible from jacking up rates. Which it’s not, for the reasons I gave.

And secondly, long-term we need economic growth and that means we need a dynamic risk-taking economy that encourages entrepreneurs and investment.

I’m not one who says all tax is theft or whatnot.

But when even a Tory government just left office with taxes at the highest since World War 2, we must ask whether enough is enough.

If not for moral or philosophical reasons, then simply out of self-interest.

The best – and I’d suggest only – way to generate CGT receipts of £30bn a year sustainably is to grow the economy such that many more of us are making big capital gains (and higher incomes for that matter), and paying taxes at reasonable rates where we don’t blanche and decide to take cover instead.

In the long-run, economic growth (with productivity growth) is everything.

And a capital gains tax rise will hardly encourage the investment Britain needs to further that agenda.

But that doesn’t mean politicians won’t do it. Plenty of countries have higher headline CGT rates than us:

Source: FT

Higher earners versus the wealthy versus the rest

The counterargument that justifies a CGT hike is that you must fish where the fish are.

Britain is a mediocre country for wealth, outside of the London and the richest cohort. And the latter have been getting ever richer.

Yet the better-off – as defined in income terms – are already paying a vast share of income tax:

Source: TomHCalver / Sunday Times

What is arguably undertaxed in Britain – whether by design or the machinations of those affected – is wealth.

And while hiking CGT has its issues, it does at least target (some of) those with the most assets.

Reeves has previously made comments that she understands a capital gains tax rise isn’t optimal, stating on the BBC’s Today programme in March 2023:

I don’t have any plans to increase capital gains tax. There are people who have built up their own businesses who maybe at retirement want to sell that business. They may not have had huge income through their life if they’ve reinvested in their business, but this is their retirement pot of money.

But maybe she’ll decide she has no choice.

Action stations ahead of a capital gains tax rise

We’ve written a lot about capital gains tax over the years.

Have a read of:

If you’re thinking about selling buy-to-let property ahead of a CGT rise, look for articles from specialists. Property is lumpy and illiquid and you can’t stick it in an ISA. But other measures may apply.

Clearly all our CGT information could be out-of-date once we see Reeves’ autumn statement.

Set a calendar reminder for Budget day on Wednesday 30 October!

Action stations

Should anyone take action ahead of knowing whether we’ll actually see a capital gains tax rise?

My crystal ball is as foggy as yours.

We do get these fears about inheritance tax, pension reliefs, and the rest every year. Scaremongering is an asset-gathering strategy of the financial services industry, even when its claims are well-founded.

I’m sure everything being fretted about won’t come to pass. But too much has been floated without official pushback for something not to happen.

If you do believe you’ll be in the CGT firing line and you want to take action, act sooner rather than later.

Reeves might impose any changes from midnight on Budget day. There’s a precedent – George Osborne did it with his CGT hike in June 2010.

Clearly the aim would be to stop tax mitigation if the changes were scheduled for the new tax year, starting 6 April 2025.

But again, nobody – probably still not even Reeves and Starmer – knows exactly what is coming.

Big picture, it seems counterproductive to me to forestall investment or have people dump unsheltered AIM shares, say, if you’re also trying to promote a vibrant UK economy.

But politicians follow a different calculus.

Perhaps they hope the fear of a vicious budget will offset teeth-gnashing over a mildly unpalatable one.

What are you doing ahead of a capital gains tax rise?

I’m curious what the Monevator massive is thinking.

We do have a few multi-millionaires in our ranks – and a majority of our readers declared themselves to be higher or additional-rate taxpayers.

We’re clearly wealthier than average, and we’re into investing. Squarely in the firing line, if wealth tax worries prove accurate.

Let’s have a poll:

As always, I know this is a crude approximation of a complex array of choices. Just pick the nearest and most honest answer. Ideally give your reasons in the comments. And please don’t bluster about moving to Singapore to avoid a feckless socialist takeover if you know you’ll never go anywhere in practice.

Looking forward to a constructive discussion!

{ 159 comments }

Better than buy-to-let [Members]

What if you could earn an income and long-term capital gains from residential property without scrabbling around with shady agents, unreliable tenants, and overpriced, untrustworthy tradespeople?

The historical attractions of UK property are clear (albeit past performance is no certain guide to future returns). Owning houses has made many people rich, as some of them never tire of reminding us.

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 12 comments }