≡ Menu

Weekend reading: recovering from regrets

Weekend reading: recovering from regrets post image

What caught my eye this week.

A couple of weeks ago Nick Maggiulli of Dollars and Data fame conceded that lately he’d been writing for the Google’s search algorithm, rather than about what really interested him.

And doing so was destroying Nick’s passion for blogging:

I can’t keep doing this and preserve my creative sanity.

One of the reasons I’ve been able to blog consistently for nearly seven years is because I’ve always chosen what I write about.

I’ve been able to follow my curiosity wherever it has led me. Unfortunately, this year I strayed a bit from that path.

And while I don’t consider it a major mistake, I’m glad I realized what was going on before it was too late.

Happily this change of direction has immediately paid off with one of the best posts he’s ever written (and that’s saying something…)

Exploring why you should never look too far down roads you didn’t take – in life or investing – Nick argues:

I’m here to tell you that this kind of thinking is a mirage. It’s pure fantasy. Because the way you think things would’ve turned out is not the way they actually would’ve turned out.

How you imagine an experience is a theoretical exercise. It’s a mental simulation of your past. But, how you live through that experience in real-time tends to produce very different results.

Nick illustrates his point with a graph that shows why basketball star Magic Johnson’s alternatively lived experience where he chose sponsorship by Nike over Converse – thus supposedly ending up $5bn richer – would have at least felt very different over a long reality, and may never have happened at all.

Anyone who invests actively knows about these lost fantasies all too well.

I wrote about it with respect to my hugely costly Tesla sale a few years ago, for instance.

Others mourn the house they didn’t buy or the job they didn’t take – or outside of the financial realm, the person they didn’t marry or the musical instrument they gave up on despite some talent.

I wouldn’t say that thinking about these missed opportunities is entirely pointless, or even that they’re somehow not real decisions and outcomes.

In many cases they are all too real. Maybe we did make a mistake.

I should have held onto Tesla – and I should have bought my first flat in London in 1998, not 2018!

But it’s that the way we think about them is so often faulty. A lot of the time the motivation is to make ourselves feel bad, not really to learn anything.

In that case it’s better to look forward, not back.

Searching questions

As for writing for the search algorithm instead of for real readers, I see that temptation too.

At Monevator we lost about half our search traffic overnight in summer 2021, due to a capricious-seeming Google change that appears to have nothing to do with the quality of our content.

It’s been hugely frustrating.

There’s a balance to be struck, of course. Google needs to have guidelines, for the sake of a good searching experience.

But I can’t help thinking the tail is too often now having to wag the dog. And nobody starts blogging – or doing any other sort of creative endeavour – to please a robot. (At least not yet!)

I might also add that if you subscribe to get our articles as free emails, then you’re one fewer reader we have to try to recapture again via the harsh lottery of Internet search.

Anyway, do read Nick’s post – and have a great and balmy weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 18 comments }

Maximising FSCS protection for your investment portfolio

Maximising FSCS protection for your investment portfolio post image

A little-known fact is that most investment types are not protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS). Yes, your broker is likely covered. But what happens if the firm that actually manages your investment funds blows up?

In that scenario, the only kind of vehicle you can expect to be protected is a UK domiciled Unit Trust or OEIC (Open-Ended Investment Company). 

Offshore funds aren’t covered by FSCS compensation. Neither are ETFs or Investment Trusts. 

In practice this means there’s no FSCS protection for a broad swathe of funds marketed to UK investors, because they’re either the wrong type or they’re domiciled in exotic, far-off lands like… Ireland.

Now you may be entirely comfortable with that, because your assets are lodged with a financial titan such as Vanguard or BlackRock. The chances of such a giant being wiped out – and so vaporising 100% of your assets in a hot mess of scandal and fraud – are exceedingly small. 

But you can never rule out the possibility entirely. Which is why some Monevator readers prefer to invest in funds that should benefit from the FSCS scheme in a nightmare scenario.

If having the FSCS scheme as a backstop helps you sleep at night, then read on for our pick of low-cost UK domiciled funds provided by FCA1 authorised and regulated firms. 

These funds should all be eligible for FSCS compensation (though it’s not an absolute certainty as we’ll explain in a sec), enabling you to build your passive investing strategy – as per our previous investment portfolio examples – with the knowledge that you couldn’t be any more protected. 

Caveat Time!

The FSCS bends over backwards (and you might wonder why) to point out that compensation is not guaranteed just because a firm is FCA authorised and regulated. 

The most reassurance you’ll get on each fund provider’s Financial Services Register page is:

The FSCS may be able to provide compensation if this firm goes out of business owing you money.

Hmm. Doesn’t exactly sound cast iron, does it? Moreover, check out the following piece of advice plastered liberally across the FSCS website:

Ask your firm to confirm that the activity they are carrying out for you is a regulated activity and FSCS protected.

Given that’s the lie of the land, then the best your plucky DIY investor champ Monevator can do is to say the following funds are all UK-domiciled Unit Trusts / OEICs, offered by fund firms that were FCA-authorised at the time of writing.

In other words, please follow the FSCS’ advice above to maximise your chances of being eligible for compensation, should you ever need it. 

Beware too that compensation tops out at £85,000 per firm. 

If Vanguard went bust, for example, the most you could claim from the FSCS is £85,000 – no matter how much you had invested in different Vanguard funds. 

That won’t be a problem for some people, but 100% protection could become pretty laborious to maintain for those investors with larger portfolios. 

At the very least it may require some creative juggling between different fund providers. Hence our selection focuses on enabling you to diversify your choice as much as possible.

Incidentally, you could go even further by including active managers in your scope. But on Monevator we typically major on keenly-priced index trackers, so that’s our focus today.

Enough with the ambling pre-amble, let’s get into our list of FSCS-eligible funds.

Global / All-World equity (Developed world and emerging markets)

  • HSBC FTSE All-World Index Fund C
  • OCF 0.13%
  • Fidelity Allocator World Fund W
  • OCF 0.2%
  • Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap Index Fund
  • OCF 0.23%

Developed world equity

  • L&G Global 100 Index Trust C Inc
  • OCF 0.09%
  • Fidelity Index World Fund P
  • OCF 0.12%
  • L&G Global Equity Index Fund
  • OCF 0.13%
  • Vanguard FTSE Dev World ex-UK Equity Index Fund
  • OCF 0.14%
  • Aviva Investors International Index Tracking Fund 2
  • OCF 0.25% (ex-UK fund)

UK large cap equity

  • HSBC FTSE All Share Index Fund Institutional
  • OCF 0.02%
  • iShares UK Equity Index Fund (UK) D
  • OCF 0.05%
  • Vanguard FTSE UK All Share Index Unit Trust
  • OCF 0.06%
  • Fidelity Index UK Fund P
  • OCF 0.06%

Emerging markets equity

  • Fidelity Index Emerging Markets P
  • OCF 0.2%
  • iShares Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (UK) D
  • OCF 0.21%
  • L&G Global Emerging Markets Index I
  • OCF 0.25%

Property – global

  • iShares Environment & Low Carbon Tilt Real Estate Index Fund (UK)
  • OCF 0.17%
  • L&G Global Real Estate Dividend Index Fund I
  • OCF 0.22%

UK government bonds 

  • Fidelity Index UK Gilt Fund P
  • OCF 0.1%
  • iShares UK Gilts All Stocks Index Fund
  • OCF 0.11%
  • HSBC UK Gilt Index C Acc
  • OCF 0.13%
  • Vanguard UK Long-Duration Gilt Index Fund
  • OCF 0.12%
  • abrdn Sterling Short Term Government Bond Fund
  • OCF 0.25% (Active management)

Global government bonds hedged to £

  • abrdn Global Government Bond Tracker B
  • OCF 0.14%

Global inflation-linked bonds hedged to £

  • abrdn Short Dated Global Inflation-Linked Bond Tracker Fund
  • OCF 0.13%
  • L&G Global Inflation Linked Bond Index Fund I
  • OCF 0.23%
  • Royal London Short Duration Global Index Linked Fund M
  • OCF 0.27% (Active management)

Useful pointers

As always, make sure you do your research to ensure these funds are the right fit for your portfolio. Morningstar and the fund provider’s own factsheets are good starting points.

We’ve ranked our selection purely by cost (as measured by OCF). Check out other Monevator pieces for more on how to choose the best global tracker funds and the best bond funds.

You’ll often find more index funds available in each category if you need them. There’s a good slate of US tracker funds available too – but nothing doing for gold or commodities. 

You can quickly tell if a fund is UK domiciled by checking its webpage or by looking out for the designation GB in its ISIN number. 

Market-leading index fund providers

To diversify your passive fund holdings as much as possible, check out these investment firms for your FSCS-eligible OEIC / Unit Trust needs:

  • Vanguard AKA Vanguard Investments UK Limited, FRN2 494699
  • iShares AKA BlackRock Fund Managers Limited, FRN 119292
  • Fidelity AKA FIL Investment Services (UK) Ltd, FRN 121939
  • HSBC AKA HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Ltd, FRN 122335
  • L&G AKA Legal & General (Unit Trust Managers) Ltd, FRN 119273
  • Abrdn AKA abrdn Fund Managers Limited, FRN 121803
  • Royal London AKA Royal London Unit Trust Managers Ltd, FRN 144037
  • Aviva AKA Aviva Investors UK Fund Services Limited, FRN 119310

You can investigate a firm’s FSCS particulars by typing its FRN into the Financial Services Register page.

Bear in mind that the FSCS scheme kicks in only if a firm fails and the value of your assets is otherwise irrecoverable. (And it only protects you up to the exciting £85,000 limit, of course). 

The Financial Ombudsman holds sway in other scenarios. 

Do you need to go to these lengths?

Personally, I don’t worry about whether my funds are FSCS protected. Insisting upon it would cause a level of stress (induced by excessive portfolio management) that isn’t worth it to me. At least versus the low probability of ever calling upon the scheme for a bail out.

But all that really matters is that you are comfortable with your investing choices.

If you’d like to create a ‘It helps me sleep at night’ portfolio then I hope the fund list above speeds you on your way to the Land of Nod.  

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. Financial Conduct Authority []
  2. FCA Firm Reference Number []
{ 36 comments }
Our Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Morning all. I’ve got to admit that after writing 5,788 words for this month’s member post for Moguls – trust me, I counted them – I’m out of puff for the week.

(While I do aim to go into depth with these reports, I agree that 5,788 words is not sustainable! Perhaps not even for busy members. Must cut harder…)

So before the links I’ll just point you to this chart that was highlighted to me by Monevator member Mark:

Source: Trustnet

The chart is taken from this year’s Credit Suisse Equity Yearbook. It was flagged up in the Trustnet article I’ve linked to by Martin Currie’s chief investment officer, who describes it as the most helpful guide to investing he’s come across in his career.

What does it tell us? Nothing more – but also nothing less – than that since 1900, equities have beaten bonds for returns in all economic environments except when lower growth coincides with lower inflation.

And even then, there’s only a whisker in it.

It’s simply a reminder that for all the good reasons we have for diversifying our portfolios, shares should be the engine. At least until you’re getting ready to start spending. Even then you should almost certainly keep a decent-sized wodge in them.

Not a revelation to many Monevator readers perhaps. But tell it to the millions with collectively £1.5 trillion sitting in cash savings accounts.

(Yes, having some cash is great. But cash won’t be a driver of wealth).

Eat up your house deposit

Oh, before I go here’s a menu entry shared by a Monevator reader holidaying in Amsterdam:

Very droll. If you’d like to pay homage to these personal finance ironists on your next visit, the restaurant is called Box Sociaal.

Have a great weekend!

[continue reading…]

{ 60 comments }

And now for something completely different [Members]

The Mogul membership logo

What if I told you that you can easily invest in something that’s historically done very well when the stock market has collapsed? And even better – that it’s currently going cheap?

If you’re a fan of diversification then you’re probably already salivating.

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 45 comments }