≡ Menu

The Slow and Steady passive portfolio update: Q3 2012

The portfolio is up 7.45% on the year to date.

Ever since we started tracking the Slow & Steady portfolio, I’ve been able to fill up my notepad with pages of economic woe between updates.

And even though real news – such as which semi-naked royal has been caught in front of a zoom lens this time – is now making a comeback, my trusty misery detector tells me:

  • The US economy grows like a malnourished child whose mum smoked 60 a day during the pregnancy.
  • Europe and the UK continue to wallow in recession, while Spain dithers over its bailout.
  • Food prices are on the rise after US crops wilted during the summer drought.
  • Petrol prices tick up every time the Israelis and Iranians beat their chests.
  • Emerging market growth has sagged.

But all that creeping doubt was blown away by Draghi’s promise to hoover up European debt, the Fed priming the QE3 pump, and Britain coming third in the Olympic medal table.

How else do you explain the Slow & Steady portfolio’s surge to an all-time high of a 5.22% gain since purchase? That’s a year-to-date gain of 7.45% and a 14% improvement on the situation 12 months ago.

If we fancied a Demi Moore-style roll in our riches, then we’d be smothering ourselves in a pile £391.77 deep!

These are heady days, my friends.

The portfolio is up by 5.22%

The Slow & Steady portfolio is Monevator’s model passive investing portfolio. It was set up at the start of 2011 with £3,000. An extra £750 is invested every quarter into a diversified set of index funds, heavily tilted towards equities. You can read the origin story and catch up on all the previous passive portfolio posts here.

Still, the annualised gain of 2.56% means we’re down after inflation. That means we’re not doing any better than an instant access savings account.

Hey, where did Demi go?

We must learn to enjoy this period of stagnation as an exercise in self-discipline, remembering Warren Buffett’s observation that, “The stock market is designed to transfer money from the active to the patient.”

News slash

One development I was hoping for was a cut in our cost base, after HSBC announced major price slashery for its index funds.

However, as usual, the investment picture is about as clear as a smartphone contract covered in mud. HSBC have not cut the Ongoing Charge Figure (OCF) – the new name for TER –  for the retail index funds we’re familiar with in the Slow and Steady portfolio.

Instead, they’ve created a new incarnation of their index funds, called the C class. The OCFs are very low – try 0.18% for the FTSE All Share index C fund.

DIY investors can get these funds from some execution-only brokers that use Cofunds to power their platform.

So far, I’ve found the C class funds via Clubfinance and Commshare. However, other Cofunds platforms like Cavendish Online and Bestinvest aren’t registering the C class online yet.

This may change and you may get a better result if you phone directly. I’m going to do some more digging into this and report back next week.

However the whole point of the C class is that HSBC have stripped out any allowances for platform fees from the OCF. That’s why the funds are so cheap, that’s why they’re referred to as ‘clean’. (Hmm, that’s probably what C class stands for?)

I personally find it difficult to believe that any platform isn’t going to levy some kind of fee on top for hosting these funds. Otherwise they’re not going to make any money.

So until the confusion fog clears, the Slow & Steady portfolio will stick with the regular retail versions of the HSBC index funds. And, sadly, the OCF has actually crept up on all six of our equity funds. The average OCF of our portfolio is now 0.37%, up from 0.35%.

That’s still going to be cheaper for most small investors than the Vanguard LifeStrategy ready-made option, once you take into account platform fees. But the gap is closing.

Incoming

On a cheerier note, we were blessed by the chinkity-chink of tiny dividends rolling into our kitty.

The Slow & Steady Portfolio is invested in accumulation funds that automatically reinvest our dividends, but it still helps to know that we’re benefiting from a little corporate largesse every now and then.

Our funds yielded the following payouts last quarter:

  • HSBC American Index: £24.98
  • HSBC European Index: £28.40
  • HSBC FTSE All Share Index: £23.86
  • HSBC Japan Index: £6.28 (Wow. Thanks, Japan)
  • HSBC Pacific Index: £9.80
  • L&G All Stocks Gilt Index: £19.43
  • L&G Global Emerging Markets Index: £15.20
  • Total income: £127.95

Comparing that £127.95 payout against our total portfolio gain of £391.77 (which includes our reinvested income) only serves to underline the importance of dividends to a portfolio’s growth story.

New purchases

Every quarter we offer another £750 to the money gods.

UK equity

HSBC FTSE All Share Index – OCF 0.28%
Fund identifier: GB0000438233

New purchase: £125.13
Buy 34.8937 units @ 358.6p

Target allocation: 19%

OCF has gone up from 0.27% to 0.28%.

Developed World ex UK equities

Split between four funds covering North America, Europe, the developed Pacific and Japan.

Target allocation (across the following four funds): 49%

North American equities

HSBC American Index – OCF 0.3%
Fund identifier: GB0000470418

New purchase: £204.67
Buy 96.1788 units @ 212.8p

Target allocation: 26.5%

OCF has gone up from 0.28% to 0.3%.

European equities excluding UK

HSBC European Index – OCF 0.35%
Fund identifier: GB0000469071

New purchase: £41.93
Buy 9.3879 units @ 446.6

Target allocation: 12.5%

OCF has gone up from 0.31% to 0.35%.

Japanese equities

HSBC Japan Index – OCF 0.33%
Fund identifier: GB0000150374

New purchase: £70.92
Buy 124.8750 units @ 56.79p

Target allocation: 5%

OCF has gone up from 0.29% to 0.33%.

Pacific equities excluding Japan

HSBC Pacific Index – OCF 0.46%
Fund identifier: GB0000150713

New purchase: £27.90
Buy 11.881 units @ 234.8p

Target allocation: 5%

OCF has gone up from 0.37% to 0.46%.

Emerging market equities

Legal & General Global Emerging Markets Index Fund – OCF 1.06%
Fund identifier: GB00B4MBFN60

New purchase: £66.863
Buy 148.0580 units @ 45.16p

Target allocation: 10%

OCF has gone up from 0.99% to 1.06%.

UK Gilts

L&G All Stocks Gilt Index Trust: OCF 0.23%
Fund identifier: GB0002051406

New purchase: £212.6006
Buy 114.24 units @ 186.1p

Target allocation: 22%

Total cost = £750

Trading cost = £0

Platform fees = £0

Average portfolio OCF = 0.37% up from 0.35

A reminder on rebalancing: This portfolio is rebalanced to target asset allocations every quarter, mostly using new contributions. It’s no problem to do this, since the vanilla index funds we’ve gone for do not incur trading costs, so long as you choose the right platform.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 19 comments }
Weekend reading

Good reads from around the Web.

Next week my co-writer The Accumulator is back from his month-long blogging holiday (as opposed to a real holiday – we know he only enjoys short breaks to abandoned seaside towns in the North).

To celebrate his return, I’ve decided to reformat these regular Saturday links in order to separate the passive and active articles.

While The Accumulator tells me he enjoys reading (and presumably chuckling over) the active stuff – in fact, he thought I shouldn’t turn the blog into a passive-only site when I mooted it earlier this year – I do worry the active links are noise for sensible index investors focusing on the really important stuff like asset allocation, cutting costs, and counter-party risk. And getting out more.

So for a while at least, I’ll try splitting these out, for both the blog links and the mainstream media links, to facilitate easier scanning.

Doing so does remind me how few passive articles there are for UK investors. No wonder our passive investing HQ is so popular!

[continue reading…]

{ 9 comments }
Trade as rarely as a tortoise and you could reduce your capital gains tax bill

Despite my enthusiasm for tax shelters, I didn’t get religious about taking up my annual ISA allowance until 2003.

As a result I hold a lot of unprotected shares that are liable for tax on dividends and on capital gains.

More fool me!

If you’re a higher-rate taxpayer, you can’t escape being taxed on dividends outside of tax shelters, short of earning less income to take you down a tax bracket. Rather counterproductive.

A better solution is to invest in non-dividend paying shares outside of tax shelters and to hold your income shares inside them.

But it’s not as good a solution as using tax shelters for everything in the first place!

With capital gains, you have more flexibility. As a semi-active investor, I’ve been using my annual CGT allowance to defuse taxable gains. I’ve then used the proceeds to fund next year’s ISA allowance.1

I’ve also offset gains with losses (like all investors I definitely have my share).

In the past I’ve even turned to VCTs for tax relief, though I wouldn’t recommend it. Some wealthy individuals might also consider Enterprise Investment Schemes.

Meet an investor who never trades

There is another way to deal with capital gains. It’s a method of tax avoidance beloved of Warren Buffett, who has touted the strategy many times.

The idea to sit on your gains – i.e. not sell them – for as long as you can, in order to put off crystallizing your tax bill.

You may be surprised by how much this can reduce the tax you pay.

Let’s consider a hypothetical investor. His name? I don’t know – Indolent Eric.

Indolent Eric receives £10,000 from an insurance company, because he was too lazy to wear his seat belt during a turbulent aircraft landing and so was bumped on the head by a passing slice of cheesecake.

“What shall I do with the loot?” Eric asks his friend, Flamboyant Freddie. “I really can’t be bothered with all this bother.”

Freddie suggests Eric buys shares in a particular investment trust. This trust doesn’t pay a dividend.

Eric does what Freddie recommends, mainly because he can’t muster up the energy to research anything else. He then forgets all about it.

Naturally, Eric doesn’t use tax shelters – it sounds too much like hard work.

Let’s say Eric doesn’t look at his shares for 20 years, and that over that time they deliver a 10% annual return.

That’s the same return, conveniently for our purposes, as Flamboyant Freddie, who buys and sells shares in a normal account and pays taxes. It’s also the same as Canny Christine, who holds her investments in an ISA. (You may remember these characters from my earlier article on how tax reduces your returns).

Since Eric does not trade his shares and they pay no dividend, he pays no tax over the years. The trust’s share price – and thus his holding’s value – just zigzags higher over the two decades.

No tax to pay (yet) for 20 years of doing nothing

A quick calculation reveals that after the 20-years are up, Eric’s investment is worth £67,275.

That’s exactly the same amount as Canny Christine, who traded shares and received dividends to get to her 10% per year return – but who did it in an ISA so also paid no tax.

So far so good for Eric’s lazy strategy.

Flamboyant Freddie also generated a gross 10% annual return trading shares, but he paid taxes every year.

Freddie therefore ends up with just £42,479, which is much less than his untaxed friends. (See my previous article for the maths).

Deferring capital gains reduces the final tax bill

Indolent Eric’s investment has done well, but he has a problem. He’s too tired to go to work anymore, and he needs a luxury waterbed to laze about on all day once he quits.

Only now does Eric remember his investment! He logs in via his iPad 13 and sees his shares are now worth £67,275.

Naturally he rushes to sell (over a period of weeks, punctuated with three-hour TV sessions and a bout of hibernation).

When Eric eventually does sell, the ‘rolled-up’ capital gain that has been accruing over the decades finally becomes due.

Let’s say Eric pays tax on capital gains at 20% – a fictitious rate I’ve chosen to keep the maths simple.2

Eric doesn’t pay tax on the £10,000 he first invested, only on the gains, so:

  • Taxable gain = £67,275 minus £10,000 = £57,275
  • CGT tax due is 20% of £57,275 = £11,455
  • After-tax sum = £67,275 minus £11,455 = £55,820

Eric’s final pot of £55,820 is a pretty good result from doing nothing for 20 years.

More pertinently, shoot back up the page and you’ll be reminded that tax-paying Freddie – who earned the same 10% return per year, but who paid tax every year – ended up with £42,479.

By delaying paying tax for 20 years, Eric ends up with 31% more money than Freddie even after he settles his tax bill – despite earning the same 10% per year return!

Deferring capital gains: Another miracle of compound interest

How did this happen?

Well, Eric has effectively had a loan from the taxman every year that he delayed paying tax – a loan equivalent to the tax he would have paid that year.

Each year’s ‘loan’ has gone on to compound alongside his initial investment. Even though this pseudo-loan and the gains on it are taxed at the end of 20 years, the maths mean it all adds up to a higher tally.

Like Warren Buffett, I think that’s a pretty good deal for doing nothing – if you can find a share you’re happy to hold for 20 years.

Doing nothing will obviously reduce your trading costs enormously, too.

You might even see a better result, depending on your circumstances. In some cases it might be possible to pay a lower rate of tax on gains in the future than you would have paid in previous years.

For example, when you begin to sell down your holding, you might start liquidating just a portion of your rolled-up investment each year – an amount that keeps you under the annual capital gains tax threshold – in order to release funds without paying tax on them.

Alternatively, you might pay a lower rate of capital gains tax because your annual income fell when you retired.

Remember, too, that tax policy can and does change.

Even though the UK government no longer treats long-term capital gains more favourably than short-term gains via lower tax rates, I wouldn’t be surprised to see this change again in the future, for instance.

Taxi!

The bottom line is there’s plenty of ways to legally and easily avoiding paying tax on your investments, and that doing so can make a big impact on your returns.

For all but the wealthiest, ISAs and pensions are the easiest way to do this. Using them needn’t change how or what you invest in – so you’re not letting tax concerns interfere with your other investing priorities.

Beyond that, you can use CGT avoidance strategies, such as the one I’ve outlined here, to further reduce the tax you pay.

Even if you’re an active share trader with holdings outside of ISAs and pensions who can’t abide the idea of owning a share for a month let alone years, you can consider spreadbetting to avoid paying tax.

Best of all, none of these tax avoidance methods involve dodgy off-shore schemes, or paying an adviser to put you into an opaque product you don’t understand.

Work out your real tax bill

Do you think I’m too determined to avoid being taxed on my share gains?

Well, if you pay tax on your investment gains or income, try sticking the amount you hand over into a compound interest calculator, then set it to grow for two or three decades.

You’ll find that a significantly bigger number is returned.

That’s what paying tax on your share gains is really costing you!

  1. Sadly I am saving and growing my money faster than I can fill my ISAs, so I will never catch up now. Learn from my former folly! []
  2. I am fully aware of the real-world CGT rates. Please see my comments in my first article on paying tax on investments to understand to why I am using this arbitrary rate. []
{ 3 comments }

Weekend reading: Sex, love, funds, and finance

Weekend reading

Good reads from around the web.

I am grateful to a Monevator reader who tipped me off about this new TED video on the “psychological bias in financial decision making”.

It’s much more fun than it sounds. Watch and see!

It’s not a classic, but it is a very enjoyable walk through psychological flaws (except when he pronounces “buoy” as boo-y instead of boy).

And anything that warns you about bouncing giddily into marriage as well as financial bubbles is fine by me.

[continue reading…]

{ 3 comments }