≡ Menu

Review: Smarter Investing by Tim Hale

Smarter Investing by Tim Hale (Fourth Edition)

If you live in the UK and are looking for a ‘How to manage your investments’ book then you can’t do better than Smarter Investing by Tim Hale.

Now in its fourth edition, Smarter Investing remains as on-point as ever for anyone looking to successfully navigate the investing swamp.

In some ways investing resembles a ‘Choose Your Own Adventure’ exercise.

Many paths lead – well, if not to death, then to painful mistakes, regret, and lost time and money. And most of us lose a few lives as we find our way through. 

But Smarter Investing is effectively a cheat sheet that maps out the best route forward in advance.

Follow Hale’s guidance and you stand an excellent chance of avoiding the perils that beset so many on their investing quest.

You could go buy the book right now. But why not read our Smarter Investing review first and feel even more confident in your purchase?

Passive voice

Hale’s prescription is a comprehensive passive investing strategy. This was near-heresy in the UK when the book’s first edition arrived – only a few months before Monevator – in 2006. But now the passive approach is mainstream and recommended by heavyweights like Warren Buffett.

However two things still set Smarter Investing apart as the go-to-book for UK investors:

  • The coherent way Hale lays out the investing journey, from underlying strategy to product picks
  • The level of detail. Enough to help you understand why this is the way ahead. Not so much that it’ll overwhelm a diligent newbie

Hale’s approach takes time to build, but in doing so he cogently explains:

  • What good investing looks like, what it can achieve, and what the risks are
  • Why passive investing works
  • Why active management and big bets aren’t likely to pay off
  • How to develop your strategy and asset allocation
  • How to calculate how much to invest, in what, and for how long
  • The investing behaviours to cultivate and, perhaps more importantly, those to avoid

By the end of the book, you’ll have a sound idea of what you’re up against, what needs to be done – and even whether you’d do better to outsource the work to someone else. 

Our Smarter Investing review: a hearty thumbs-up

Part of the reason Smarter Investing is invaluable to a DIY investor is because Hale clearly describes the many choices you’ll have to make, and how to think about resolving them. 

So while the text may be dry, it’s resolutely evidence-based, rational, and practical. 

To that end, Hale does us DIY-ers a great favour by drafting in more rules of thumb than a multi-armed manga monster could muster.

Harvested from the crowd-sourced wisdom of the financial planning industry, these time-honoured heuristics serve far better than magical thinking or over-complicated solutions posing as science. 

Indeed, Hale’s experience in financial planning means that reading (and rereading) this book is akin to having your own advisor dispensing eternal investing gems for just £20 all-in. 

If in doubt, break Hale out

Because it’s so process-driven, Smarter Investing’s value lies more in having it to hand as a reference manual, rather than in its power of revelation. 

Even the most dedicated passive investing monk can be easily blown off course by events, hype, and this-time-it’s-different rubber-necking. 

But sitting down with Smarter Investing enables you to recalibrate and remind yourself that you’re most likely to succeed by keeping things simple and doing the basics right. 

Use it to reset yourself to factory settings whenever you find your mind or portfolio is cluttered up with investing clag. 

Smarter Investing 4th edition changes

I think the fourth edition is notably stronger than the third. It contains more illuminating examples, pithy quotes from investing greats*, and expanded explanations of key points.

The section on investing philosophy is much improved. 

There’s also an excellent new section on Sustainable Investing.

Hale gently breaks the news that you’re unlikely to save the planet through your portfolio. But he brings us back to burning Earth without underplaying the importance of action, or leaving us despondent about our chances of making an impact.

In this, as throughout the book, Hale focuses on the art of the possible, and leaves his readers better informed about how to achieve their goals. 

That said, I don’t think you need to read Smarter Investing 4 if you’ve got one of the previous editions.

Much of the material, structure, and guidance remains unchanged because, like passive investing itself, the book has stood the test of time.

Textbook execution

If DIY investing were taught in schools then Smarter Investing would be the core textbook. Indeed because it’s your money on the line you’ll surely be more motivated than any class of 16-year olds.

Moreover, some problems are just better solved with a good book. I believe embarking on your investment journey is one of them. 

The Internet is all very fine – please stick with us – but it’s endless, fragmentary, and polarised. 

Hale’s work, meanwhile, is less than 400-pages, systematic, focussed, and on a singular mission to equip you with the investing values and knowledge you need to thrive. 

I heartily recommend it. It’s hard to imagine a more useful or empowering book for UK investors. 

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

P.S. If you’re fixing your financial life for the first time then I’d pair Smarter Investing with How to Fund the Life You Want. The latter offers a bigger picture view of the UK’s personal finance universe. The former is more your investment 101 course.

P.P.S. The first reader comments below will refer to our earlier review of a previous edition. We’ve kept them for posterity. Check the dates if in doubt.

*Note: What The Accumulator has not mentioned in his Smarter Investing review is that the fourth edition also features an endorsement written by him. I’m sure TA is modestly not counting that in the improvements column! 😉

{ 32 comments }

Weekend reading: fractional infighting

Weekend reading: fractional infighting post image

What caught my eye this week.

The tussle between HMRC and the fintech share dealing platforms over whether to enable the holding of fractional shares in an ISA may be reaching a climax.

To summarise, these typically app-based brokers enable you to gain exposure to less than a whole share and to hold these in your ISA account.

For instance Amazon shares currently trade at around $132 a pop. With Freetrade, say, you could invest $66 (ignoring FX fees) and get exposure to just half an Amazon share.

Sounds like a win-win, right? Well the taxman doesn’t approve.

From The Financial Times:

HM Revenue & Customs held a meeting with industry figures and Treasury officials last week, during which it maintained that this type of investment could not be held within a tax-free account despite platforms disputing this interpretation of the rules.

Platforms had hoped that chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s desire to simplify “a complex landscape” of Isa products and encourage more people to save and invest would soften HMRC’s position. They have urged the chancellor to clarify his position in next month’s Autumn Statement.

Moneybox, Trading 212, and the aforementioned Freetrade1 all enable customers to invest in fractional shares in their ISAs.

As far as I’m aware you can currently only invest in US fractional shares, and not UK ones. I’m not au fait with the underlying mechanics but imagine the apps are riding on the US exchanges’ rails.

Half a chance

The platforms argue that enabling fractional shares is a more democratic way to invest, because it allows people to put small amounts of money into individual (US) shares.

Sure, though I suspect it’s also so they can better maximise smaller trade sizes.

In my example you could put £400 into Amazon shares without the broker having to round down your order to the nearest share.

That makes it easier to get all your money invested. A win for the broker as well as the investor.

So what’s the problem? The issue is to do with what counts as a ‘qualifying investment’ in the ISA rules.

From HMRC’s perspective, that’s a fact and not an opinion. And the ISA rules which HMRC is following no doubt pre-date trading in fractional shares in the UK. They were written with some consumer protections in mind, so everyday ISA investors wouldn’t be encouraged to go spreadbetting or similar.

(Of course an ISA investor is free to put their money into spivvy small-cap mining stocks, but that’s a different kind of risk…)

Freetrade’s CEO Adam Dodds is quoted in the Investor’s Chronicle as saying:

Our fractional shares give retail customers ownership of a portion of an actual company share. They are not a derivative contract.

The protections and benefits for retail investors are effectively the same as for whole shares.

I guess I can see both sides.

The tax authority surely must uphold the rules as it sees them.

But it’s hard to see how its current interpretation serves anyone’s best interest, and it would surely be trivial for the government to fix.

On that note Freetrade has created a template letter that you can use to lobby the Treasury on the issue.

I’ve just noticed Freetrade suggested the deadline was yesterday. Oops! However I’ve clicked through and the Treasury still seems to be taking online representations.

If you want to give it a crack:

  1. Download/save a copy of Freetrade’s template letter.
  2. Go to the Treasury’s portal for submissions for the Autumn Statement
  3. Select ‘Personal’ and ‘Savings’ tax
  4. Attach the template letter and submit

Have a great weekend!

[continue reading…]

  1. Disclosure: I’m a shareholder in Freetrade. []
{ 31 comments }

Succession plan: could your partner manage the family finances without you? [Members]

Image of the author – and architect of the family finances – being hit by a bus

Does your partner leave you to run the family finances and investments while they get on with the rest of life?

It wouldn’t be surprising. Many couples split household tasks into distinct spheres of influence. And you, as a Monevator reader, are surely more into investing and personal financial management than is the norm. 

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 38 comments }

Weekend reading: System addicts

Our Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Those of you who frequent the naughty side of town – indulging in active investing despite being clued-up followers of a website that urges a passive approach – will enjoy Conor Mac’s reflections over on Investment Talk this week.

Why doesn’t he just sell all his individual stocks and go buy an ETF, Conor asks?

He’s no dummy. He knows the odds against outperformance and understands that:

To a layman, an investor’s dedication to beating the market over their lifetime appears absurd. The trade-off, time spent doing other things, is huge.

We each have a finite amount of time on this earth. To spend countless hours which I assume add up to years of one’s life, only to underperform the market, may appear wasteful. Insanity is repeating the same thing hoping for different results. Consider the aggregate of individual investors trying to beat the market. Most will fail.

Thus, on the aggregate level, these people look crazy.

So why indeed?

But for the benefit of newer readers –  please know that I’m not judging.

I’m an active investor myself, and long ago debated the reasons why with my sensible and purely passive co-blogger.

Five star generalisations

Moreover something I love about the active investors among our Mogul membership is how self-aware they (you?) seem to be too.

Of course we’ve filtered hard for this kind of member. Both by sneaking them in through the backdoor of a blog about using index funds and also by stressing Moguls will not be promising Five Stocks To Pay For Your Porsche or the like.

I’m also aware that more than a few Moguls members just wanted to send a few extra quid our way, despite being entirely passive investors themselves. For which, enormous thanks!

Anyway, the end result is I don’t get the impression that our members expect easy or even especially probable wins.

Rather, active investing for them is a challenge or a passion or a hobby – but one with the tantalising if slim potential to deliver life-changing results on the side.

Indeed it’s possible Moguls will turn out to be a multi-year version of Conor’s reflective post.

For my part, active investing – stock picking – has been an endlessly fascinating game, that’s also gamified my wondering about the world around me. For most of the time I was fortunate that it was more profitable for me, too, though as I’ve conceded elsewhere the last 18 months has been testing that one hard.

Perhaps for you there are different motivations?

Or more likely you’re one of the Monevator majority who’s sensibly all-in on a global tracker fund and you think we’re crazy.

Which is more than fine, too, if expressed politely. Broad church here!

Active addicts should go feel seen at Investment Talk. I hope the rest of you enjoy cracking into this week’s links below.

Best of luck to Wales, England, Scotland, and Ireland in the games today!

[continue reading…]

{ 35 comments }