≡ Menu

The facts of investing life

Which is more important in your world: knowledge or skills? This question is the fulcrum of an ideological battle being fought over our education system, and it’s a debate that also has ramifications for DIY investors.

  • The champions of knowledge believe we need to command certain basic facts to operate effectively in society – the essentials of science, literature, history, and geography. Without these fundamentals, you’re like a driver who can’t read road signs or markings.
  • The advocates of skill argue that a robotic recall of verb conjugations and the Kings of England should take a back seat. They favour building prowess in problem-solving, debating, hypothesising, and so on.

While the obvious answer to my opening question is “Can I have both, please?”, I believe that knowledge is far more important to a DIY investor than skill.

What most people want to know about investing

Licence to skill

I spent a long time at the beginning of my investment journey furrowing my brow over the fact that I didn’t know how to read company accounts, or work out the discount rate of future cash flows, or have the seemingly God-given ability of my peers to declare the market ‘fair value’.

Such skills seemed like concealed weapons. You’d only glimpse a flash, enough to let you know ‘they’ could slip through the investing maze like ninjas. But the application of these powers was as shadowy as their utterances of success.

Now I just don’t worry about it.

Even talking heads in the fund management industry are happy to go on record to say that skill is so abundant in their field that the winners and losers are mostly separated by luck.

And that suits me. Because whereas skill might let you play in the deep end of the pool, knowledge enables you to stay safe in the shallows.

It’s the difference between taking a couple of martial arts lessons and walking in to the wrong pub shouting “I’ll take you all on”, and knowing enough to avoid staring at the shaven-headed gentleman with a spider-web tattoo on his face.

The basic facts are much easier to acquire for an amateur than superior skills. Knowledge is an all-you-can-eat buffet in the digital age. You can stuff your face with it via blogs and books.

The only question is what you choose to swallow.

Knowledge Base Alpha

My research quickly taught me to stop asking the question that all my non-investing friends ask:

“What’s hot?”

It doesn’t matter. By the time an asset class is hot, it’s probably already too late to make big money.

I don’t worry about tips from commentators or newspapers. Even if they throw the dart in the right direction, the smart money has already moved on.

The market is the consensus of expectations on the future of a stock. Only unexpected events can shift the price. How can you predict the unexpected? The short answer is: you can’t.

I know that diversification is the only free lunch going. I load up on all the useful asset classes while resisting the siren call of ‘the next big thing’.

I understand how asset classes work. I know that equities are volatile and that nothing is truly safe. If the market crashes I won’t panic because I know it will probably recover. I won’t hunker down in cash, refusing to believe in inflation.

BRICs? Gold? Hedge funds? The Fear Index? Low vol ETFs? High yield funds? I know that keeping up with fashion and labels will cost me dear.

Behavioural finance tells me that I’m a pitiful collection of psychological defects, about as capable of self-discipline as a bonobo at a swinger’s party.

The more we learn, the less we know

In the face of all the evidence that I can’t market-time, pick winners or even trust myself, passive investing using index funds is the only strategy I feel confident enough to stake my financial future on.

Sure, I love reading yarns about the prospects for gold, timber, or Lego bricks, but I now know that’s no basis for a portfolio.

My best bet is to invest in a diversified portfolio of low-cost trackers and sit tight.

Doing very little sounds too easy. In some ways it is. Portfolio maintenance costs me less than an hour a month.

But it’s simultaneously the hardest part of passive investing.

Surely I should be doing something? Anything? Surely I’ve got enough skill by now to test my mettle in the market with more active investment strategies?

No. I’d be better off composing a passive investor’s prayer that wards off temptation.

Staying on the straight and narrow is hard, but knowledge and education are the best way to keep on track.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 26 comments }

Weekend reading: Here’s one we made earlier

Weekend reading: Here’s one we made earlier post image

What caught my eye this week.

Rummaging around to select an old post from the Monevator ‘archive-ator’ each week can be bittersweet.

On the one hand, it seems I used to be smarter, wittier, and more productive.

But a compensation for these memento mori moments is coming across those little nuggets that have aged rather better than me.

Take these comments on tech stocks from December 2010, in a post about what I called the investor sentiment cycle:

For a contrasting unloved sector, consider technology companies.

It’s hard to remember a time when half the office owned shares in nonsense companies like Baltimore, Webvan, and NTX. Yet it was only a brief decade ago that the Dotcom stocks were doubling in a month on a good press release and a name change.

Today roughly nobody except institutional investors bothers with individual technology shares.

Yet the Nasdaq tech market in the US has been quietly beating the Dow and the S&P 500 for months.

Maybe the seeds are being planted for a new boom in technology share investing:

  • The first shoots will be obscure magazine articles on the Nasdaq’s recovery.
  • Then you’ll discover a friend or a bulletin board poster who has tripled his money betting on cloud computing micro-caps.
  • Perhaps Facebook or Twitter will float for what will seem a crazy valuation, but will look positively modest a few years later.

…and so on.

It was very hard for most people to care much about tech stocks in 2010. That was why I used them as my illustration.

Yet by the end of 2019, the tech sector had proven the best place to have been invested for a decade.

And 2020 has only kept that up with knobs on!

I don’t bring this up (entirely) to blow my own trumpet. Digging through the archives also reveals plenty of howlers. (London residential property is massively over-priced in 2007, anyone? Oops.)

Rather, it’s fun to see that Monevator is now so old we’ve actually been around to see some of these cycles play out.

Tech’s unexpected recovery since 2009 proves the point I was making. Investing and the economy are cyclical, and investor sentiment can be downright faddish.

Never expect the status quo in the markets to hold forever.

It won’t.

Working from home poll

Exciting additional news: the results are in from last week’s poll. Over 2,000 of you voted to say you would prefer to work from home:

So two-thirds of Monevator readers would like to work from home most or all of the time. Interesting!

I guess the remaining 4% are brain surgeons worried about the carpets.

Have a great weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 45 comments }

Weekend reading: Does working from home work for you?

Weekend reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Fashion shop ASOS reported full-year results this week. Revenues were up a fifth and profits surged, as the online retailer found itself with a – cough – captive audience during lockdown.

In the mercurial way they are wont to do though, its shares actually slumped despite this good news.

Everyone knows business is booming for online retailers, and ASOS shares have been on a tear for months. So like a seasoned Tinder swiper, investors focused on the negatives.

ASOS’s management fears its 20-something customers are set to suffer more job losses. That’s even assuming they’ve got anywhere to get dressed up to go to, with much of the country lurching into increasingly ubiquitous ‘local’ lockdowns.

Also, customers have begun to return a lot of what they buy, just like they used to in the good old days.

For a few months earlier this year, a sort of Blitz spirit saw most shoppers buy only what they felt most likely to keep. But more than a few have now resumed their habit of ordering with abandon like Julia Robert’s Pretty Woman run wild in Rodeo Drive, only to return most of it to ASOS. That’s a big drag on margins.

I suppose it’s encouraging in a sense. A hint from the resilient younger generation that things will go back to normal someday, spendthriftery and all.

Office politics

I wondered about whether we’ve changed and what will go back to normal before. It still seems up in the air, at least from the perspective of UK citizens who find themselves restricted again. (I daresay the existential questions are less prevalent in virus-free South East Asia.)

One place where the narrative is especially all over the place is working from home.

I’ve read countless reports from property companies this year that talk a good game before admitting their offices are open, yes, but mostly empty.

And it wasn’t long ago that Boris Johnson was urging people to go back to work, eyeing city centers that remained more ring doughnut than jam-packed.

But even before the second wave, it wasn’t clear whether people actually wanted to go back to the office.

A study by UK academics found that 88% of employees who’d had a taste of working from home during lockdown wanted to continue to do so, at least in some capacity.

Nearly half said they wanted to mostly work from home in the future.

Set against that are regular soundings from those who are finding working from home a strain, if not depressing or distracting.

As one person quoted by Slate put it this week:

I didn’t think I would miss the office because I’m an introvert … until I was a few months deep into full-time WFH. I almost need the external accountability of going into the office.

Otherwise I tend to procrastinate and lose focus, and as a result I’ve really seen my work quality dip and my stress level go up as the months have gone on.

I recently got the opportunity to come back into the office on a part-time basis and I feel so much more productive and happy.

I have worked from home for most of the past two decades. I’ve long considered it one of the secret joys of modern life. (I did break the omertà and tell you so).

Everything is easier without a commute or crowds at the shops, and with most of your chores done during screen breaks.

Not to mention you’re more likely to be in for those online deliveries!

Well, that cat is out of the bag. We’ll see how many newfound freedom lovers can transition to at least partially working from home, and how many are made miserable when the option is snatched back from them.

What do you think? Let’s have a rare Monevator poll:

I don’t expect our readership to mirror the general population. But it’ll be interesting to see what you all think.

If homeworking is here to stay, then some companies face a reckoning. You can definitely run a business with many or even all your workers at home (I have) but it must be set-up that way for the long-term. Institutional memory and goodwill got firms through the first lockdown. But those are wasting assets.

Have a great weekend, as best you can where you are.

[continue reading…]

{ 112 comments }

Pension transfers: everything you need to know

Pension transfers: everything you need to know post image

You know you’re getting on a bit when YouTube targets you with pension transfer ads. At least it’s not burial plots I suppose. And the algorithm must know something about me, because I’m definitely feeling the urge to demystify the pension transfer process.

In principle you can transfer your UK pension to another registered UK pension scheme in your name without breaking the rules and getting clobbered with a massive tax charge.

In reality, the pension transfer rules vary between pension types and providers. The whole area is a minefield blanketed in a fog, mapped by Mr Muddle.

But the big question is: just because you can transfer your pension, does that mean you should?

This post is about transferring your defined contribution pension. You have come to the right place if you are considering transferring a SIPP, an occupational money purchase pension, personal pension, stakeholder pension, Nest / People’s Pension, and every other stripe of retirement money pot that doesn’t offer you a guaranteed income for life. What this post is not about is transferring a defined benefit pension. That is rarely a good idea, according to the FCA.

Should I transfer my pension?

It is often worth transferring your pension when you can access a cheaper, better scheme elsewhere, but there is no need to transfer it just because you have, for example, left your job. Your defined contribution pension is your personal money pot. It belongs to you regardless of whether you leave it alone to build up value until your retirement, or whether you move it with you to a new workplace scheme. There’s also no limit to the number of pensions you can have, bar being able to remember where they all are.

Good reasons to transfer your pension include:

  • Moving all or some of your pension to a cheaper scheme that’ll save you a fortune in charges. Savings can include keener platform fees, fund management charges, or drawdown fees.
  • Moving to a scheme with a better choice of investments, customer experience, or retirement options.
  • Consolidating your pensions with a couple of providers because it’s easier to keep track of them and/or you’re charged less for a bigger pot.

Consolidation may not be a good idea if it means relying on a single provider to safeguard too much of your wealth. The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is likely to cover only the first £85,000 of your pension lost to fraud or some other form of mismanagement at each provider you’re with.

While such a disaster is unlikely, it’s worth thinking twice about single points of failure before succumbing to the siren calls to simplify your life.

It’s a very bad idea to transfer your pension if you’ll lose valuable benefits that aren’t supported by your new scheme. More on this in the next section.

Some people moving overseas also explore transferring their UK pension to a qualifying recognised overseas pension scheme (QROPS). This is a complex area where it’s worth getting advice.

Can I transfer my pension myself?

Yes, you can transfer your pension yourself by filling in a pension transfer form with your new provider. It will then scamper off like an enthusiastic St Bernard and drag your old pension bodily to its new home.

However, it’s worth holding your St Bernards if your existing pension comes with any of the following benefits:

  • More than 25% tax-free cash (available under pre-2006 rules)
  • Loyalty bonuses
  • Enhanced life insurance
  • Additional death benefits
  • Early retirement benefits (some old pensions allow you to access your cash before age 55)
  • Guaranteed annuity rates
  • Guaranteed returns
  • Fund value underpins
  • Fixed or enhanced Lifetime Allowance (LTA) protection
  • Annual or maturity bonus

Your existing pension provider can tell you whether any special benefits apply to your scheme.

Typically your new provider won’t support these benefits. They are generally legacy perks that have been squeezed out of modern life, just like boozy lunches, flirting in the workplace, and hugging your nan.

It’s worth seeking financial advice before you give up any of these extra benefits. In some cases you may be required to show you’ve consulted an advisor before you can move your funds.

Transfer pension from a previous employer

There is no need or requirement for you to move your old workplace pension just because you’ve changed jobs. It may actually be against your interests as described above. You don’t lose the value of the assets you’ve accumulated up to your leave date. And your holdings will continue to grow in line with investment returns, even though you’ve moved on.

Your provider may still allow you to contribute to the pension, you just won’t get a leg up from employer match or salary sacrifice anymore.

You should check that your pension won’t be charged higher fees once you leave your job, though.

Many people have left behind a trail of legacy pensions like buried treasure as they’ve sought adventure across different workplaces. Often a pension that looked competitive a decade ago may be subject to high-fee banditry today because nobody’s checking in on it.

Put a note in your digital calendar to review your legacy pensions every five years. Make sure the charges and benefits are still competitive versus your next best option. Check that your fund choices are still appropriate as the years fly by. Devil-may-care funds that made sense in your twenties could probably do with a downshift in your fifties.

Many pension providers now offer target-date funds that automatically lower the risk of your holdings as you glide towards retirement. These funds weren’t widely available a decade ago. It’s not inconceivable that the pension industry may come up with another useful innovation or two in the next ten years.

How to transfer a pension

To transfer your pension, check that your existing scheme allows you to transfer some or all of your pension pot, and check that your new scheme will accept the transfer.

When you’re ticking boxes on your pension transfer form (provided by the new provider) it’s particularly important that your assets are transferred in specie and not as cash.

In specie means that your funds and shares are transferred without being sold to cash first. In other words, they remain invested throughout the process.

If your investments are sold to cash, then you will be out of the market. That means you will miss out on gains if the market rises while you sit in cash. (It also means you’ll avoid losses if the markets fall, but we live by The Law Of Sod.)

If your new provider doesn’t offer the same funds as your old one, then those investments will be sold to cash and leave you out of the market.

In this instance, it’s worth doing a little research to see if equivalent funds exist that are supported by both providers. Then you can sell your old funds, buy into the new funds, tick the ‘in specie’ box, and probably spend much less time out of the market.

N.B. Some providers describe an in specie transfer as ‘re-registration’.

Other things to watch out for:

  • Some new providers require you to transfer a minimum amount, especially if you’re in drawdown.
  • Yes, you can transfer your pension once in drawdown. In fact you’ll probably be welcomed with open arms.
  • You won’t be able to add new money or trade until the transfer is complete.
  • Tell your old provider to close your account once the transfer is complete.
  • Cancel your old direct debit.
  • Your new provider should tell you when your account has transferred.
  • Make sure you understand the charges that apply to your transfer. See the charges section below.

How long do pension transfers take?

Pension transfer times vary but most of the main platforms claim that electronic cash transfers will take around two weeks. Fund transfer times are quoted as 6-12 weeks, depending on the providers involved and how manual the process is.

AJ Bell Youinvest has published a reassuring table of transfer times, as below. Take it with a grain of salt because much depends on how efficiently and accurately the paperwork is exchanged between your providers. (As you can imagine, nobody over-staffs their transfer department, and regulation on transfer times is weak.)

Type of investment Time taken to transfer
Cash only 2-4 weeks
Shares 4-6 weeks
Funds 6-8 weeks
International shares 10-12 weeks

Source: AJ Bell YouInvest

Even though cash transfers are much quicker, it’s still better to transfer in specie. That way you remain invested at all times regardless of whether your funds spend several weeks in a nether zone between providers.

Pension transfer charges

There are some specific fees that providers charge when dealing with pension transfers. It’s a good idea to ask each provider to list the charges that will apply.

Look out for:

  • Exit fees: Your provider may charge you a lump sum for transferring your account, and/or closing your account, and a fee per investment you move e.g. per fund or stock. Often these fees are higher if you move your pension overseas.
  • Entry fees: This is a pretty old-school fee. It is only levied by providers who aren’t that keen on new business.
  • Dealing charges: You may be charged by both providers if you have to sell assets at one end, transfer cash, and buy again at the other.
  • Platform fees: It’s possible to be charged two sets of platform fees as one provider claims they have received your funds while the other claims they haven’t let them go yet. This happened to me! I just shouted at them both until one eventually refunded. Obviously your new provider has the greater incentive to keep you happy.

Check how and when your old provider will refund your platform fees.

Ask your new provider if it will cover your transfer fees. It doesn’t hurt to ask. Also see if they’re running any cashback offers on transfers, or waiving platform fees for the first six months or so.

Pension transfer troubleshooting

Check that the right investments appear in your new account. Note your assets may not all materialise simultaneously. That can be as terrifying as a Star Trek transporter accident if you’re not expecting it. (Where’s my goddamn money gone?) I’ve had a tail-end fund turn up a month after the first. More rearguard than Vanguard!

To reduce stress:

  • Record your holdings at your old provider before you start the transfer. Take a screenshot, or download a statement or spreadsheet of your investments.
  • Record fund names, codes, prices, and quantities held. If there should be a dispute later then you will know exactly what you own. You can kick up a stink if anything’s gone walkies.
  • When your funds arrive, match the new provider’s ‘buy’ price against the ‘sell’ price on your old provider’s exit statement. You can cross-reference those against prices quoted by an independent financial data provider like Morningstar.

Having a full record of ownership will neutralise the anxiety if you get caught in a ‘he said, she said’ dispute between two providers eager to blame each other if things go awry.

Some Monevator readers have reported transfers taking months to complete due to foul-ups. You can spend hours on the phone talking to inexperienced call centre agents about where the hell your fund is, or you can wait a while on the assumption that the fund exists somewhere and it will turn up again sooner or later.

The best bet is to keep your instructions as simple as possible. Document everything, create a paper trail, and don’t expect the customer service dept to be staffed by Jeeves-level problem-solvers.

Ask your old provider to confirm in writing how it will treat tax relief and dividends that are paid to them after your account has transferred. They may receive cash on your behalf after your online account has disappeared. Check in and chase any cash payments you believe you’re owed.

Be sure you definitely want to transfer if I haven’t put you off already. Although you do have 30 days to change your mind, the FCA say that your old provider does not have to take you back. Even if they do return you to the fold, they do not have to honour any special benefits you were previously entitled to.

Don’t transfer your whole pension if your employer is still making contributions to it. You are allowed to partially transfer any amount of your current employer’s pension, subject to your new provider accepting the transfer. This can set up some sneaky cost arbitrage that we’ll come back to in a follow-up post.

Don’t try and market time your move. You should be invested the entire time anyway if you transfer in specie. Otherwise, don’t imagine you can predict how tensions in the South China Sea or the next mad presidential tweet will affect the stock market. Transfer for rational reasons, take the precautions above, and otherwise let the process run its course.

Small Pots: If you transfer small pot pensions worth less than £10,000 into an account valued at over £10,000 then you may lose the option to take the small pots as a cash sum. It’s also possible there may be issues with taking small pots from certain pension types if they’ve been transferred within the last five years. Check this with your providers before transferring small pots.

Death or divorce!

…as Mrs Accumulator often exclaims of an evening.

You can’t transfer your pension to another person except through death or divorce.

You may have trouble transferring your pension if it’s subject to a court order – perhaps because it’s being divvied-up in a divorce settlement.

The two-year pension rule: If a person in serious ill-health dies within two years of transferring their pension then HMRC may claim they only did it to avoid tax. Some people! Such a verdict can create an inheritance tax liability on the pension.

To save myself from crossing the event horizon of a tax law black hole I’m going to transfer you to a nightmarish article on the topic and a report on a Supreme Court ruling that may make the issue go away. (It’s really impossible to tell though as with any black hole the laws of physics seem to break down once inside.)

Lost pensions: You can track down your scattered pots using the government’s pension tracing service. Hopefully it works better than that other tracing service it runs.

Happy transferring! Please tell us about your pension transfer experiences in the comments.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 69 comments }