≡ Menu

Some ridiculous ETFs that we might as well market

Some ridiculous ETFs that we might as well market post image

From our coverage of sector and thematic ETFs, you may think we doubt the value of these exotic and expensive funds.

However following a phone call with our accountant, nothing could be further from the truth.

Indeed we’ve decided that if we can’t beat ’em, why don’t we compete with our own range of ultra-niche ETFs?

That’s one way to monetize our vast audience, right?

Five niche funds you never knew you needed

Today we present five ETFs we believe could be humongous – and we’re not just talking about the fees we’ll earn. (Though we mostly are).

Three of the fantasy so-bad-they-are-good exchange-traded funds are from my co-blogger, The Accumulator. They’re followed by two even more specialist vehicles conceived of by myself.

We’re pitching them to the ETF industry right now and expect to be rich by Christmas.

The AlphaDog Totalitarian ETF

Democracy just can’t compete in today’s fast-paced world. So this unequally weighted index backs regimes who know how to get things done. Our active management team will deliver skilfull execution (of opponents), exposure to alternative investments facts, and a flexible approach (to the truth). Past performance is not a guarantee of a future (for you). Indefinite lock-up periods likely. Expect to pay heavily. Capitalism at risk.

The iDespair Social Division ETF

Invest in the firms best-placed to profit from the most exciting social trends of our time. Think rancour, algorithmic hate, conspiracy theories, heavily armed law enforcement, tooled-up insurrectionists, and selfishness disguised as personal freedom. Available in Acc and Inc share classes because all Inc investors are scum and Acc investors are liberal snowflakes who hate their country.

The By Eck We’re All Doomed ETF

Everything is screwed so you might as well give us all your money. Using proprietary risk management woo-woo, we’ll sink your loot into booze, guns, and a sexbot colony on the dark side of the moon. Subscribers get a gold bar and a cyanide capsule by return of post. Friends and family discount available.

The Locked, Loaded, and Levered ETF of Levered ETFs ETF

Smart, switched-on Monevator readers demand – nay, deserve – something financially high-falutin’. Which is why I had this idea in the shower got my quant team to devise the leveraged ETF to end all leveraged ETFs (as well as your solvency). Despite us explaining how financial innovation and ETFs go together like a far right rally and the White House, people still buy them. Clearly there’s demand. So this fund makes it simple for you to get exposure (and us to get the shirt off your back). It invests in a basket of every 2x and 3x levered long and short ETF we can find. Don’t know what that means? You’re our ideal customer! (Excruciating charges apply. Please sign the attached waiver that permits us to raid your estate for exit fees. Anyone named Brewster may not invest their millions, because that’d be too easy).

The Out Of The Closet Shiny Wrapped Tracker Fund ETF

The wealthy have $3 trillion in hedge funds, despite them collectively doing worse than a cheap 60/40 portfolio. Everday investors are no better. They often buy closet index funds that charge more than a cheap tracker but hold the same assets. Clearly everyone wants to feel special. Well, why fight human nature? This ETF has just one holding – a super-cheap global index fund. However we promise to bury you in glossy quarterly updates, promotional videos extolling how our companies are fighting climate change, and to sponsor Manchester United. Naturally this all costs money, so we’ll charge you 1.75% a year for the privilege. But you’ll feel so good! (Investors who hoped from the name for a LGBTQ-friendly ETF should look into our queer-positive ETF – PINK£. It invests in a range of stereotypical and mildly offensive generic holdings but will give you a winning woke air when you hold forth about it at parties.)

Exotic funds are for flings, not marriage

You might think these five ETF suggestions are ridiculous.

But they’re only slightly more madcap than some of the funds we’ve seen hit the market. Especially in the US.

Everything from ETFs aiming to profit from the obesity epidemic to ways to play the tastes of millennials have been wafted before investors like roasted chestnuts in front of Dickensian street urchins.

Some of the less faddish ETFs may play a useful role, to be fair. Especially for macro investors who truly know what they are doing.

The iShares Automation & Robotics ETF (Ticker: RBOT) for instance attempts to address a big shift that’s underway in industry.

If you have a special insight into that sector’s prospects, it’s a cheaper and easier way to get exposure than by buying dozens of firms yourself.

But very few people do have such market-beating insights.

Remember, your chosen sector doesn’t just have to do well. The investments themselves need to outperform the market to make the allocation worth having.

At least stock pickers are less likely to get their hands blown off juggling diversified sector ETFs compared individual shares.

However for sensible passive investors who know what they know (and what they don’t know) such ETFs offer little beyond a fun side-flutter.

Far better to hold an ETF that gives you a bit of every sector and every fad under the sun. Like a global tracker fund!

Readers, have we missed a trick? Make your own exotic ETF suggestions in the comments below.

{ 28 comments }

How to invest in sectors, themes, and megatrends

Image of a section of a roulette wheel, to highlight the unpredictability of investing in sectors

Monevator reader Anna sent us a common question about investing in particular sectors of the stock market:

How should one behave if I would like to be overweight in a specific sector or theme, like clean energy or AI for instance, or perhaps being overweight in a specific country like Russia? Would it be possible to implement these themes in the global portfolio?

Our world is changing rapidly. The ground rules of our lives constantly shift beneath our feet as society is reshaped by geopolitical, socioeconomic, technological, and environmental transformation.

Surely we need to reposition our portfolios, then? Tweak them like wind turbines, pivoting to harness these powerful forces?

There’s an exchange-traded fund for that

The ETF industry certainly wants to help you feel like you’re in control.

For example a dozen climate change ETFs launched in Europe in 2020 alone, according to the ETF data service justETF.

Other ETFs enable you to invest in everything from cannabis to robotics, through esports, gender equality, genomics, and immunology.

Like fashion houses, fund providers know their job is to stay on trend.

Those options come on top of existing ETFs targeting sectors and industries, smart beta strategies, countries, and regions.

And that is but a cherry balanced on a giant fruitcake of investments of every candy-stripe – slicing and dicing the global economy into a pick ‘n’ mix cascade. 

All you have to do is predict which themes, megatrends, rising powers, and techno-tipping points will profitably rewrite the future.

(Ahem. “All”…)

Spread your bets

There was a similar explosion of ETFs in 2018 that enabled us to invest in exciting themes such as:

  • Blockchain
  • Cybersecurity
  • Artificial intelligence and robotics
  • Bio-tech
  • Battery tech

I picked a selection at random to see how they did.

It turned out that all these ETFs beat a plain old MSCI World ETF in the short-term1:

Source: justETF [Click to enlarge.]

  • The MSCI World ETF benchmark (orange line) falls flat into last place with a 28% cumulative return over two years.
  • The battery ETF (grey line) went from last place to third in just six months, with a 83% cumulative return. Hmm, volatile!
  • The blockchain ETF beat the World ETF by less than 2% despite Bitcoin going berserk.
  • Try tearing your eyes away from the towering 121% return of the artificial intelligence ETF in the no.1 spot.

First AI beat me at chess, next it’s having my job, and now it’s a better investor, too? Humans are yesterday’s news, baby.

Maybe, but it’s easy to get overexcited about new toys.

Let’s take a longer term view

Here’s some megatrends that I could get medium range data for:2

  • Big tech
  • Rise of China
  • Global water resources
  • Clean energy
  • Healthcare in the face of aging demographics
  • Global infrastructure fueled by urbanisation

Source: justETF [Click to enlarge.]

This time our MSCI World ‘accept you have no edge’ benchmark ETF (orange line) sits comfortably mid-table.

Three of the selected big trend ETFs beat the world market. Three under-performed.

Here are the scores (returns are cumulative):

  • Big tech – 931% – Win
  • Healthcare – 268% – Win
  • Global water – 267% – Win
  • World tracker – 213% – Acceptable
  • Global infrastructure – 114% – Fail
  • China – 101% – Fail
  • Clean energy – 14% – Fail

Are you surprised? Could you have predicted these outcomes in advance?

It’s not that the narrative behind the underperforming themes was wrong.

  • The world has continued to urbanise since 2007.
  • China has continued to rise.
  • Clean energy is a growing part of the world economy.

What then?

  • Was the importance of the theme overblown?
  • Were the companies overpriced?
  • Did the lion’s share of returns fail to accrue to shareholders – diverted instead to management, employees, customers, future investment, or private equity?
  • Was the industry hit by an ill-wind? Loss of subsidies, social backlash, constrained by regulation or the technology failing to fulfill its potential?
  • Was there something wrong with the index? Perhaps it wasn’t truly representative of the industry or country or was too concentrated in less competitive companies? Or did it include firms that jumped aboard a sexy new trend train but were mere passengers, not the real engines of growth?

Identifying a trend seems to be easier than profiting from it.

A much longer term view

To understand how the roulette wheel of progress affects market performance, I recommend reading Industries: Their Rise & Fall by the finance academics Dimson, Staunton, and Marsh.

Here’s their breakdown by industry sector of the US stock market in 1900 as compared to 2015:

Source: Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2015

You can see that the market has been radically remixed over a century.

According to the professors:

Of the US firms listed in 1900, more than 80% of their value was in industries that are today small or extinct.

For instance it’s hard not to notice the huge blue wedge devoted to the rail industry in 1900. That snake-jawed Pacman was worth 63% of the market at the dawn of the Twentieth Century.

But by 2015 rail made up less than 1% of the stock market.

Meanwhile 62% of the 2015 US stock market’s value lay in industries that were negligible or nonexistent in 1900.

Back on this side of the pond, 65% of the 1900 UK market value resided in industries that were marginal or had disappeared by 2015, while 47% lay in industries that were small or not yet invented in 1900. (More evidence that US capitalism has been more dynamic than its UK counterpart?)

Here’s how those 1900-era industries fared against the market during the upheaval of the subsequent 115 years:

Source: Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2015

The wider market is in dark red and is beaten by five industries.

Notice the market is beaten by rail (light green) despite its huge slice of the pie being reduced to crumbs by 2015.

But the runaway winner is tobacco.

What’s the story here?

Tobacco – addictive, cool, seductive as a ‘50s film star – so of course it won?

Given the number of kids in my school who couldn’t wait to drag on a fag, that was a plausible narrative up until the 1990s.

But few industries have taken such a cultural and regulatory battering in the developed world as tobacco since then.

The equivalent now would be placing all your chips on coal as the fuel of the future. Would you make that bet?

The Investor will pop a long in a moment to explain that pumping out cigarettes required little investment in innovation over the subsequent 100-plus years, and so it was wildly cash generative. Reinvesting that cash drove up returns. [Confession: I just popped along and did – @TI]

But multiplying the difficulty of picking a winning sector by the uncertain strength of its business models does not lead to odds I’m willing to take.

Here’s another counter-intuitive finding. The US rail industry was laid low by the rise of road and air, but rail is the only one of those industries that had beaten the market by 2015:

Source: Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2015

Rail had a torrid time for 80 years, especially over the 1960s to 1980s. But it emerged fit as a super-productive flea to overtake the market in 2013.

The road industry never beat the market. Air had a few golden ages but always returned to earth with a bump.

Think of how unbelievably exciting the air industry must have looked after the role it played in World War 2. You can see the value of aviation equities spike in the mid-1940s in the graph above.

Would you have predicted that the air industry’s promise would not be fulfilled for shareholders, as opposed to the rest of society?

Could you credit that you’d have been better off just staying invested in the broad market?

The cycle of rise and fall

The merry-go-round of modern capitalism hastens our desire to predict new dawns and to declare existing hierarchies dead.

Survival in the knowledge economy makes us desperate to stay ahead of the curve, after all. 

Dimson, Staunton, and Marsh highlight market historian Jeremy Siegel’s explanation of this anxiety from an investing perspective:

Investors have a propensity to overpay for the ‘new’ while ignoring the ‘old’ …

Growth is so avidly sought after that it lures investors into overpriced stocks in fast-changing and competitive industries, where the few big winners cannot compensate for the myriad of losers.

The academics observe how technology cycles through:

  • Scepticism
  • Over-enthusiasm, which can lead to a bubble
  • Sober reassessment once everyone cools off

Could the explanation for the outperformance of AI, robotics, and battery tech in our first example be that investors are caught up in the over-enthusiasm phase?

Dimson, Staunton, and Marsh advise:

Investors should shun neither new nor old industries.

There can be times when stock prices in new industries reflect over-enthusiasm about growth, and times when investors become too pessimistic about declining industries.

However, it is dangerous to assume that investors persistently make errors in the same direction: they may at times underestimate the value of new technologies and overestimate the survival prospects of moribund industries.

It’s clear the market can be beaten. If you’d backed tobacco equities in 1900 then you’d have smashed the market over the long-term.

But can you beat the market?

Remember, as a passive investor you don’t have to get involved in making these explicit bets.

You already gain exposure to AI, robotics, cybersecurity, blockchain, China, and every other plausible investment narrative through a broadly diversified global tracker.

By over-weighting any theme, strategy, or country you’re claiming greater insight than the aggregate of all investing decisions that make up the market.

A market that’s dominated by huge financial players rather than greater fools. A market even the world’s best investors struggle to consistently beat.

Your prospects rest on this key insight from our academics:

It all depends on whether stock prices correctly embed expectations.

Expectations amount to the market’s best guess, given current information.

The smart money has better information than you or I. It reacts to new developments with frightening speed.

  • Did you see a global pandemic coming in 2020?
  • Did you see shares rebounding right after the fastest crash in history?
  • Can you predict the winners and losers as Covid-19 reorders society?

Or, to highlight another sweeping change, will big tech be more or less profitable by the time the antitrust lawsuits have played out?

As ex-hedge fund manager Lars Kroijer wrote about overweighting:

What is it that you know that the wider market doesn’t?

The best strategy is to be humble

Plan A is to stick with a global tracker fund.

Can’t resist a wee flutter?

Plan B is to limit the damage of being wrong.

Just like you wouldn’t bet your house on the outcome of the Grand National, keep your stock market bets survivable.

Overweight 10% of your equity allocation, tops.

Enough to enjoy your win should you back the right horse. But not so much that the pain will unbearable if you invest in the next air industry or Argentina.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. The time frame chosen was simply the maximum span over which I could compare these ETFs. It was no more scientific than that, and I don’t think it tells us anything except that the short-term is no guide to the quality of investing decisions. []
  2. The time frame is the longest period I can compare the ETF selection against each other. []
{ 35 comments }

Weekend reading: Opinions, like markets, will fluctuate

Weekend reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Back in March 2020, I got more than a dozen texts and emails from family and friends worried they were going to lose a lot of money from their investments.

As it happened, their portfolios quickly bounced back.

Many markets are now at all-time highs, and certain individual stocks – not to mention Bitcoin – are flying into the stratosphere…

…and I’m again getting text messages and emails from friends worried they are going to lose a lot of money from their investments.

If this is euphoria then it’s with a peculiarly masochistic kink.

By this time next year, Rodney…

The debate rages. Are we in a bubble or set for a roaring Twenties of high returns?

There surely are portents of market madness out there.

Take this Tweet that did the rounds on Twitter this week:

Jason’s mega-gains from Tesla are one thing – and good for him. It was his follow-up comment that rings alarm bells:

Soon I’ll be able to margin borrow about $3 million at less than 1%, but I will probably only borrow up to 8% of the value of my liquid assets. This way I never have to sell my shares.

Borrowing $3m against $12m in a volatile stock like Tesla isn’t something you see in a bear market, that’s for sure.

Then there’s Bitcoin.

I was discussing whether Bitcoin was over-priced with a friend on Friday morning. Its price was approaching $40,000, after all.

We couldn’t agree on whether it was a classic Ponzi scheme topping-out or the world waking up to the future of money.

By the time our text chat was over the price was nearer $42,000!

Don’t ask me

I don’t have much appetite for debating short-term market moves – and definitely not for giving my friends advice, other than to use index funds.

As blogger Michael Batnick writes:

Nothing good can come from giving casual investing advice. Nothing.

Especially when it comes to the future direction of an individual security.

They won’t remember what you said. They’ll only remember what happens.

There are four possible scenarios to the question, “Should I buy x?”

  • You say buy, and it goes down. You were wrong, and they’ll never forget.
  • You say buy, and it goes up. You were right, but they’ll forget.
  • You say don’t buy, and it goes down. You were right, but they’ll forget.
  • You say don’t buy, and it goes up. You were wrong, and they’ll never forget.

In the words of Adrian Balboa, “You can’t win!”

This is my experience in real-life, and in 99% of Internet discussions.

Calling tops looks easy. Monevator is riddled with thousands of comments from confident-sounding readers wrongly declaring this or that is overvalued, cheap, a bubble, or doomed to go to zero.

I remember a wager made here in 2012 that gold would beat the S&P 500 by 2020. The price promptly crashed and it has barely broken even since.

I recall that US shares were “obviously” doomed to crash (2015–) or that government bonds were “guaranteed” to lose money (2010–).

Oops.

Vanishingly few of these people stand up to be accountable for their comments years later.

So be hyper-wary of any tips or warnings you read on the Internet.

Or anything that you hear in the pub (or on a Zoom call these days).

And be wary of getting caught up in the debates.

It’s infinitely more important that you have a solid financial and investing plan than that you have an opinion.

Meanwhile if you’re paying somebody for advice or stock tips – or even just following them freely on the Internet – then judge them over the long-term.

That means years.

Not the last 12 crazy months, let alone their last Tweet.

One-off statements on Twitter or in a blog comment can be discounted to near-zero.

I say, I say, I say

Of course I’ve got plenty wrong, too, during my time spouting my thoughts.

However sharing your views on the same website for 13 years does make you somewhat more accountable.

If you’re paying attention to yourself, it makes you (slightly) more humble, too.

You eventually come to know that you don’t really know. Nobody does.

I have long believed Tesla is likely to be a $1 trillion company some day.

But after its recent vertiginous gains I’d agree it looks more likely to go back to $500bn before it gets there.

Will it? Who knows!

Bitcoin’s speedy price rise is equally astonishing.

It’s up 30% since New Year’s Day, and more than eight-fold since its coronavirus crash lows.

Bitcoin is weird. To my mind it gets more valuable as the price goes up. This should attract more people to the network, and also increases trust in it as a store of value. Which, in turn, are both supportive of the price.

Obviously this virtuous circle can’t go on forever.

However there’s around $10 trillion of gold out there, compared to Bitcoin’s $700bn pseudo-market cap. If we are seeing the birth of ‘digital gold’ then there could be a way to go.

Might it crash tomorrow, though? Wallow in the doldrums for years?

Absolutely.

As for stock markets generally, most do look superficially expensive – but that’s on the basis of depressed sales and profits.

If we see off Covid, earnings should bounce back. I believe rising bond yields are much more of a worry than high P/E ratios for global stocks.

But shares can do anything they fancy over the short-term. They could slump on Monday and not come back for years.

You see? Having opinions is easy.

You’ll know if you were right

All of this speculation is fun if you’re an active investor. Perhaps it’s even more fun if you’re a passive investor munching popcorn from the sidelines.

But what it isn’t, for me, is an argument.

Indeed I’ve probably debated politics more than this or that share in the Monevator comments over the years.

Investing is a wonderful hobby for me exactly because opinions come and go – as do those voicing them – but the market always keeps your score.

Have a great weekend, wherever you’re locked down.

[continue reading…]

{ 87 comments }

Should you sell your global tracker fund for UK shares?

Image of a British bulldog to illustrate the UK market strength

What a difference three vaccines, a trade deal, and the imminent eviction of a narcissistic would-be despot can make!

For five years readers have asked us in comments and over email whether they should reduce their exposure to UK assets.

Doing a Brexit will tend to have that effect.

But in the past few weeks we’ve been getting new queries. Readers asking whether – given the stronger UK pound – British investors are taking undue risk by having so much money invested overseas?

Just this week Bob wondered on our Slow & Steady Passive Portfolio update:

I have become increasingly aware recently of the the pound strengthening against the dollar.

Given this portfolio is heavily invested in US equities, would you be concerned about currency risk? (Especially now the immediate impact of Brexit has taken its course…).

Could some of the gains over the past 10 years be attributed to the weakening pound? And would you be concerned about the opposite effect now?

(I haven’t come across any hedged equity funds in my platform, but I believe they do exist elsewhere…)

These are all valid concerns. But should we do anything in response to the answers we come up with?

The short answer: probably not.

Are you George Soros?

Passive investors with a diversified global portfolio signed on for ups and downs on their way to enrichment.

Getting there with the minimum of mishap and hassle means striving not to second guess the market at every turn.

Even active investors should be wary of churning their portfolios on currency speculation. Stock picking skill is rare, and most people who think they have it likely don’t.

And even if you can select outperforming shares, the chances of you also being able to outsmart the highly liquid and capricious currency markets are slim.

With that said, UK shares on their own merits might be worth an extra look if you’re a naughty active sort.

If UK shares were battered by global capital having put UK PLC into the loony bin, then emerging signs of sanity – such our avoiding a no-deal Brexit – could prompt a revaluation.

Then again the trade deal is hardly breaking news. So it may already be in the price.

Why British shares are rallying

Big UK shares have spent years in the doldrums – topped off by London being one of the worst markets in the world for most of 2020.

Our poor performance against the US market was particularly stark:

Source: Nasdaq

Against this backdrop, the recent strength of UK shares is notable.

  • In 2021 alone an ETF that tracks the FTSE 100 total return1 is up 5.2%

  • In contrast a global tracking ETF2 has delivered just 1.6%

This is after barely a week of trading of course, but it comes on the back of a similar trend in recent months.

Brexit resolution is part of the reason for UK shares moving higher. But there are other factors, too.

Made in Britain

It’s important to understand the UK market is dominated by its largest firms.

Many of these are big, international behemoths in established industries like banking, energy, pharmaceuticals, and mining.

This style of company has been out of fashion for years. They’re typically what we call ‘value’ stocks. As a group they’ve offered little prospect of growth in low return world.

Sectors such as High Street banks and oil companies have faced their own particular headwinds, too.

Even the ‘growthier’ large caps the UK does boast – consumer giants such as Diageo and Unilever – have found the going tough in a global pandemic. Consumers have spent far less time in pubs or even in the supermarkets.

Recently though there have been signs of some of these factors abating.

The Covid vaccines should eventually mean a way out of the global pandemic. With it will come a sharp jump in global economic growth.

Such an economic upturn would be good news for UK giants that can profit from a cyclical recovery, such as energy and mining firms.

Meanwhile the Democratic victory in the US presidential race could also be positive for global growth.

A Biden administration is likely to favour more stimulus, even at the (potential) risk of higher inflation.

That’s good for value shares, too.

The very recent news – overshadowed by this week’s lunatic insurgency in Washington – that the Democrats had won control of the US Senate only reinforces this narrative.

These factors have lately seen yields on US government bonds creep higher. All things equal, higher yields should be good for big financial firms like UK banks.3

Last month’s trade deal between the UK and the EU shouldn’t be discounted as a factor too, of course.

In fact it has a double whammy benefit.

First and foremost it means the UK avoided a no-deal crash out of the EU, with all the attendant chaos.

Lorry jams at Dover and the Cava running out at Sainsbury’s wouldn’t have mattered too much for our big multinationals. But it would have dinged more domestically-orientated UK stocks.

Perhaps more importantly, the deal signals that the UK is ‘investible’ again.

Without wanting to turn this into a piece about the rights and wrongs of Brexit, it’s undeniable that global financial managers voted with their feet and ditched UK assets in the wake of the Referendum in 2016:

Source: Schroders

The UK-EU trade deal, skimpy as it is, demonstrates the UK hasn’t completely lost the plot.

Remember, global fund managers buying big UK multinationals aren’t professionally much concerned about whether Brexit is good for factory workers in Sunderland, fisherman in Hull, or even bankers in the City.

They want to know that their investments are safe from the prospect – however remote – of anti-capitalistic populist moves, exchange controls, or a currency crisis on the back of economic chaos.

The trade deal took that off the table in practical terms. It also proved the UK establishment hasn’t fatally succumbed to fantasy.

The UK’s legal framework and shareholder protections have long been admired around the world.

With the orderly resolution of Brexit at last, global investors can again buy into companies like Vodafone, HSBC, and Unilever and sleep soundly at night.

Reasons to do nothing

Of course none of this really addresses the concerns of our reader Bob or other UK passive investors.

Properly diversified passive investors only have a small allocation to UK assets, reflecting the modest size of the UK market as part of the global whole.

Such investors aren’t worried about how well the FTSE 100 will do, but rather how poorly their world index fund could fare if the pound continues to climb.

This is a very valid short-term concern.

Currency risk is the prospect of your overseas assets losing (or gaining) value as a result of changes in foreign exchange rates.

If the pound strengthens against the US dollar, then all else equal the value of your US funds in sterling will fall.

US shares make up more than half of the world index. And that isn’t the end of the story, as the pound could rise against other currencies, too.

Remember it doesn’t matter what currency your fund is denominated in. Your exposure is to the currency of the underlying assets it holds.

Given everything I said above, it might seem a no-brainer to sell your global shares and load up on British stocks.

However nothing is so easy in investing. Let’s count the reasons why most passive investors are best off doing nothing.

Strategic ignorance The whole point of passive investing is you know you don’t know better than the market. Why do you now think you understand the prospects for the UK pound and stock market better than the combined wisdom of the world’s investors? You probably don’t. Stick with the plan.

Easy come, easy go UK passive investors with global trackers enjoyed a big windfall back in 2016 when the pound devalued on the surprise vote to Leave. If some of that now reverses, well, so what? There will always be wins and losses in a diversified portfolio. It’s unrealistic to hope to only grab the gains.

You already have lots of UK exposure A diversified passive portfolio would usually have a big slug of British assets in the shape of UK government bonds. You may well own your own home in Britain, too. Nearly all of us are paid in pounds. Overseas exposure can arguably be a counterweight to all this.

A strong pound can be bad for British shares Suppose you do dump your global tracker and switch it into one that follows London’s FTSE All-share or FTSE 100. Are you aware that at least 70% of the earnings of UK-listed firms are generated overseas? This means that as the pound rallies, those earnings are worth less. That in turn could cause UK share prices to fall. See? Swings and roundabouts.

We don’t know where the pound will go This is important to reiterate. It may seem obvious that the pound go higher from here, especially against the US dollar. When I used to visit the US a lot for work 20 years ago, I always felt rich. That topped out with the the pound buying more than $2 in 2007! But there’s no law that says we have to revisit those exchange rates. A UK pound bought $5 in the early 1900s. It’s been weakening for more than a century. Even in the short-term, rising yields in the US could support the dollar over a more moribund UK outlook for rates.

The time to switch might have passed The market looks into the future, to the confusion of many. For example rapidly rising share prices after the crash in early 2020 seemed preposterous to some. But the clever market had weighed the evidence and decided Covid wouldn’t cause a depression, especially not with all the money being thrown at it. Similarly the picture for UK assets began to brighten months ago, as the market foresaw a trade deal and liked the look of the vaccines. By the time most investors think about something, it’s already happened.

As always it comes down to this: what do you know better than the market?

Pay your pound of flesh

With all that said, I happen to believe markets are not totally efficient.

There is strong evidence for momentum in share prices, and some evidence that investors are slow to discount all the changes from news events.

The pound could have further to go even on the back of what we already know – and UK shares could continue to do better, too.

One option for passive investors who do decide to meddle would be to hedge out a portion of their overseas exposure using hedged ETF tracker funds. There are various options out there.

You should be doing this already with any overseas fixed income you own. (If you’re not then take a look at this roundup of cheap index trackers, which includes some hedged bond ETFs).

Alternatively, if you really, really must you could increase your allocation to UK shares. But don’t go all-in! Switch say 25% of your global fund into a UK tracker, not 100%. (And do remember that you’ve now given yourself the problem of having to decide when to switch back…)

As a naughty active investor I’ll admit to speculating on the back of Brexit, exchange rates, and much else besides. But I was doing this five years ago, too, and I expect to be doing it in another five years’ time.

Do you honestly want to sign up to that? Are you prepared to pay for being wrong?

Most passive investors should just keep on keeping on.

Be glad we’ve avoided the worst that Brexit might have thrown at us, and focus on the long-term big picture, even if UK assets do get their moment in the sun.

  1. LSE: CUKX []
  2. LSE: SWDA []
  3. Strictly speaking it’s a steeper slope on the yield curve that’s most important for banks. But I believe at these near-zero interest rate levels, any broad uptick in yields is supportive to their business model. []
{ 43 comments }