≡ Menu

FIRE-side chat: contracting killer

Our regular FIRE-side chat image shows a crackling wood fire

Back in the mists of time (aka 2007) I planned Monevator to be as much about entrepreneurship as investing. That faded as we honed our niche, but I’m still delighted when I find a business success story in our ranks. Valiant has commented on Monevator for years, but I’d never guessed his background. It’s heartening to hear how achievement in the cutthroat world of business can dovetail with a commitment to passive investing, even with sums running into the millions. Enjoy!

A place by the FIRE

Hello! How do you feel as you take stock of your financial life today?

Rationally, I can see that I’m better-placed than 99% of people, and I’m very fortunate. I’ve worked crazily hard but I’ve also been the right person in the right place and should be financially secure for life.

But the same thought that’s driven me throughout my working life – fear of ending up living in a cardboard box – means that I’m never really content.

I tell my wife that if only I could win the lottery I would be truly content. She says I absolutely would not!

So you’re married… Children?

Yes, I’m in my early sixties and my wife is a year or so younger. We’ve two adult children. One is married and lives in London, not currently working. The other is single and lives and works in IT in Manchester.

Where do you live and what’s it like there?

We live in a small, rural village in Somerset. It’s very quiet, with quite an elderly population. We’re still amongst the younger ones. Wealthy incomers like us have driven prices up so not too many younger local families can afford to live here.

The nearest town is eight miles away and the broadband is rubbish, but overall we like it.

We also have an apartment on the river in South-West London, close to where my in-laws live.

When do you consider you achieved Financial Independence and why?

I left my last permanent job in the 1980s, aged 27, and have never had a ‘proper’ job since. I worked as an IT contractor for some years, then started my own businesses.

By the time I was in my mid-50s I’d paid off the mortgages on both my family home and a holiday home, had plenty of savings, and owned a company generating a million a year in earnings. So I was probably already financially independent by then. But then in 2016 a global IT company bought my firm for many – though not tens of – millions and I was surely set for life.

What about Retired Early?

After I got the final tranche of money for the business sale – at the end of a two-year earn-out – I did stop working full-time.

I now work as a non-exec director to some small companies in the cloud computing sector. That takes up two to three days per month. I don’t really do it for the money – just the interest.

My wife runs a holiday let which I help out with. I’m also the treasurer for a couple of charities.

Assets: super secure

What is your current net worth?

Including SIPPs, ISAs, other equities, cash, and properties, between us we are perhaps worth £9m.

How does that divvy up? Any debts?

We own three houses outright, one of which we run as a holiday let.

Between us we have two SIPPs with a value of £2.1m. ISAs holding about £1.8m. We also have dealing accounts holding equity and gilts with a value of £560,000, Finally, cash savings of £1.2m.

We lent each child about £350,000 some years ago to buy a starter home. I put a lien on each so it probably counts as a loan. We will probably soon write these liens off and make them gifts.

What’s your main residence like? Do you own or rent it?

We own it. It’s a three-bedroom house which we had built to our own specifications, having demolished the existing one on the plot ourselves. It’s got great views, is of modern design and very energy-efficient, but otherwise it’s fairly modest.

From a financial point of view, it’s a folly. It cost about twice as much to buy the plot and demolish the old house and build the new one as the house would probably sell for. (Although we largely did the demolition ourselves with a sledgehammer and a quad bike. I’ve never been fitter than that autumn!)

Folly or not, it should do us until we die or need care.

Do you consider your home an asset, an investment, or something else?

It’s somewhere to live. We’ll be here until we die or have to go into a care home…is the plan.

Earning: entrepreneurial adventures

Tell us a bit more about your career.

I worked for a year at a defence establishment before university – in the late 1970s before it was fashionable to take a gap year – and I got into computing there.

I did a very scientific degree but when I left I fancied a change. So I worked for a couple of years selling exhibition space for conferences, then organising conferences myself and selling attendance to them.

After that I took an IT job in the mid-1980s, stayed in it for three years, and then moved to Australia for a while where I started IT contracting. I did that for a few years before starting a series of IT service firms. I eventually rode the wave of cloud computing.

What was your annual income?

At its peak, in the years before the sale of the last business, I was earning hundreds of thousands a year. When it became apparent that we would soon get bought I cut back on the drawings to boost the cash position of the business.

How did your career and salary progress over the years – and to what extent was pursuing financial independence part of your plans?

By the mid-1990s I was earning £2,000 a week as an IT contractor. I just saved as much as I could! I was convinced my good fortune would soon come crashing down, and the current contract would be my last.

In reality, aside from a few months after first moving to Australia, I was never out of work. But it never occurred to me that the good times would continue. I never truly believed that I was financially secure until the last business was sold and I achieved the earn-out.

Did you learn anything in building your career and growing income that you wish you’d known earlier?

Obviously with hindsight I can see the good times did continue. I’d probably have borrowed more.

When we had our first child we were living in a tiny end-of-terrace house. We borrowed £70,000 from my mother-in-law to buy a £140,000 detached house, which we lived in for 22 years and eventually sold for a million.

We should have borrowed much more. But my glass-half-empty nature would never allow it.

I started a SIPP at the urging of my accountant. As with many people in their 30s I thought the day I’d need a pension would never come. With the benefit of experience I wish I had put more into it when I could, and that I’d managed it better in the early days. I just used to follow some model portfolios, and I did not pay enough attention to charges.

Do you have any other sources of income?

We earn a bit from the holiday let, and I pay my wife from my non-exec director business because for historical reason she still needs two more years of earnings to qualify for the full state pension.

I drawdown enough from my SIPP each year to use up my basic-rate tax allowance. We’re in the process of putting the holiday let into my wife’s name so she can use more of hers up.

Did pursuing FIRE get in the way of your career?

No. I had no structured career to speak of after age 27. I just freelanced or ran my own businesses.

How did running a business affect your attitude to personal finances?

I felt a big responsibility to my employees. We had very little staff churn so a lot were with me for many years. By the time I sold the last business we had around 50 employees. We didn’t take the highest offer, but the one that we thought best fitted our own ethos, and which would keep the most staff.

In the event only four were released. But even then one had also become a good friend and things have never been the same with her since, which is a source of regret.

By the end we were having to find a quarter a million a month in pay and employer’s National Insurance (NI), and £30,000 more for other overheads. That did concentrate minds, and sometimes led to sleepless nights.

I don’t think the current government understands how much small business owners are risking – although the previous government wasn’t great either.

What motivated you to leave paid employment to become a contractor?

In the mid-1980s I was working in the City of London – a real boom time. I was employed in a sought-after technical role earning £10,000 a year. I was surrounded by more experienced people getting £400 a day.  

After two years of that I thought I was as good as them, and left anyway to try my luck in Australia – where my role was also much sought-after, making immigration easy – and chanced my arm as a contractor. I stuck out contracting for ten years, though I came back to the UK after three years.

How did freelance contracting turn into a business with employees?

The transition came organically. I was already running a couple of contracts which I was largely sub-contracting to others. And I had a number of customers who wanted my technical and management skills. Down the years I’d met some really good people, and when one customer in particular asked if they could outsource the bulk of their IT to me – backed up by another contractor with whom I’d worked well – I took the plunge.

I never really looked back from there. Even so, in the early days there were just four of us and a handful of contracts. It was a long haul to use those original contracts (all with quite big names in their sectors) to acquire new customers and build a business with 50 employees.

We also had a big break in substituting for another supplier engaged to one of the big beasts in a particular new sector. We did a good job and so kept that partnership. Then that sector really took off and burned brightly for a while.

Did you offer anything unique?

In IT services there are literally thousands of small suppliers jostling for attention in a very crowded market. Our strategy, driven by our top salesman, was to present ourselves relentlessly both to customers and to the large vendors as THE people to turn to in that new sector I mentioned.

It sounds easy to stick to a strategy. But when you’re a small business struggling to boost sales and meet payroll and overheads every month it takes a great deal of self-discipline to persevere with your core messaging and to turn down easy money from ‘non-strategic’ sources.

Finally, my tech director spotted the potential of cloud computing and we rode that wave successfully too.

So some of our success was spotting a trend and exploiting it. But a large part was being in the right place at the right time!

What was the biggest challenge you encountered?

Sales was vital. Coming from a largely technical background I found managing techies quite easy. Ditto finance and admin, but sales is a different world.

Most sales people are quite avaricious and competitive (in a good way) but in my experience the best also at heart want to be valued. And like most people they perform best when they believe in the product and service they’re pushing.

Unlike most jobs, where there is to a greater or lesser extent subjectivity in assessing performance, there’s no hiding place in sales. You have a target and you either hit it or you don’t. There’s no ambiguity.

I felt I spent more time managing our 3-5 sales people – I never had a sales manager – than all the other teams put together!

Did FIRE-type thinking and business strategy gel at all?

My aversion to debt meant that we grew our businesses fairly organically. Occasionally I was tempted to borrow to buy a competitor but – with the exception of one small complementary business – we never completed on a handful of potential deals to do so. This may have been a mistake in the years after the Global Financial Crisis. We found ourselves competing with other companies much less well-run than us, but who were able to keep operating and competing fuelled by very cheap debt.

Should we have gone for it? Maybe, but I’m happy enough anyway.

So no regrets?

One of our largest customers was owned by a well-known billionaire, who had taken an interest in that business because it had great potential in the event of a regulatory change. Watching him at close quarters was breathtaking – the utterly ruthless elimination of every last bit of cost. They just slashed and burned, and somehow they kept going despite disillusioned staff, elderly technology, and poor customer service.

In fairness, the business they rescued from administration to become our customer would have failed without him. But he always paid late, and argued about every last penny. He personally authorised every invoice over £5,000, despite having a massive media empire.

I could never run my business like that. Probably in consequence I could never be a billionaire. But it was a window into the world of a true tycoon.

Do you feel entrepreneurs get the same acclaim in the UK as they do in the US, or even Australia?

I would say they do not.

It doesn’t seem to be much of a stigma to have a failed business on your CV in the US, but it certainly is in the UK. And  – perhaps this is just a function of some of the media I read, such as The Guardian – many people in Britain seem to openly despise anyone making profits and creating jobs.

The UK seems to have a mindset of preferring public sector jobs to private. In many parts of the country the pay scales and benefits in the public sector – which outside London have no local variation –  are so good that small businesses are frozen out, particularly in poorer areas where the public sector pay rates are thereby relatively high. Private companies can’t compete for good staff.

I was lucky in that by growing my businesses organically, we didn’t need much seed money. Where we did, I could fund it myself. But others I know have found it very difficult to borrow from banks and have been asked to put up a lot of security. 

That’s okay I guess if the rewards are there for the risks. But recent tax changes – especially the drastic reduction in Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) – must make potential entrepreneurs question whether it’s even worth bothering? 

I’m certainly not interested in starting another business that would involve employing people. Employer’s NI is too high. I’ve already used up my lifetime BADR allowance and I’d pay 24% CGT on disposal of any business I sold. 

I already have enough money. It’s no longer worth the heartache!

“Why didn’t I start Monevator in Australia?” mused The Investor, editing another article as a cold rain fell outside.

Saving and spending: living a quiet high life

What is your annual spending?

It’s been an unusual few years, as we’ve been building the house which, with the land, cost over £1.6m. But I would say that our run-rate spend is about £100k a year.

It’s really expensive running three properties. Almost £15,000 a year in Council Tax alone.

Do you stick to a budget or otherwise structure your spending?

No. Aside from the multiple homes we don’t have expensive tastes or hobbies. We’re not interested in cars (although we have a fairly new electric car, and we also have a 12-year old Mini and an elderly Land Rover). We don’t travel all that much (though I go First for long haul if we do). We eat out infrequently.

What percentage of your gross income did you save over the years?

I probably always saved at least one-third of what I earned.

Chunky! What’s your secret to saving?

I vividly remember a contract I was doing after I returned from Australia. At that point I was probably on £400 a day but driving a five-year old Cavalier. One of the other contractors had just got a really smart sports car and told me I was an idiot for living like – as he saw it – a hermit.

But to me it’s important not to spend every penny you have. Bad times could be just around the corner (although in fact they never were!)

Do you have any hints about spending less?

Don’t borrow, except a mortgage.

Do you have any expensive passions, hobbies, or vices?

No! I have a very dull life.

I go to a lot of live sport – lower league football and cricket – and I have subs for all the sports channels, so I suppose that’s an extravagance.

My last business was big in IT for sports and so the TV subscriptions used to be an allowable expense. No longer!

Investing: progressively more passive

What kind of investor are you?

Nowadays I’m almost entirely a passive investor, having recently sold a large chunk of Fundsmith that did really well for us.

What was your best investment?

Probably Fundsmith. My wife and I were in from almost the start – my account number is in the hundreds – and they turned a £100,000 investment into something north of half a million over ten years.

In terms of pure percentage appreciation, though… I bought a few hundred pounds worth of Bitcoin a few years ago, just to learn a bit about the process. I checked how it was doing for this interview and was amazed to see it’s valued at almost £22,000!

I’m still a sceptic, but might buy some more if and when the next crash comes. However my bank (First Direct) makes it very difficult to buy via reputable sources.

Also, not an investment but my accountant talked me into taking ‘2012 Protection’ on my SIPP. Although this is less of a boon that it was before the abolition of the Lifetime Allowance, it still entitles me – at the time of writing – to take an extra £182,000 tax-free from my SIPP.

Did you make any big mistakes along the way?

I probably didn’t look at costs enough early doors.

I had several million at once to invest after the last company sale. If I’d discovered Monevator by then I’d have done it myself. But instead I used an IFA who guided me into a fairly conservative fund with a big-name institution.

Now I know that – in terms of performance and low-cost – a DIY combination of tracker and gilts would have been the way to go.

I started to diversify into gilt funds a couple of years ago. In a fatal mistake borne of arrogance and laziness I didn’t take the trouble to understand how the funds worked properly, and I (deservedly) lost big money in 2022.

I still like gilts. But now I’ve taken the time to understand them, buy individual ones, and hold them to maturity.

I also sold a fair bit in a panic at the start of COVID. I should have held my nerve!

What has been your overall return, as best you can tell?

I’ve only really started to take notice since I got the big bucks when I sold the last business, and had to invest a very large sum at once. I took some advice and used a managed fund from a big bank, which I sold last year and reverted solely to trackers.

When I sold, the value of the fund had gone up by about 50%. Probably not as good as VWRP!

How much were you able to use your ISA and pension allowances?

My SIPP has done okay, given that I stopped contributing to it in 2012 in return for protection. I’ve withdrawn £200,000 from it over the past four years and it’s still worth £1.8m.

Given that I was planning around the now-defunct Lifetime Allowance of £1.8m I think I’ve managed it as well as I could have.

We’ve both contributed fully to ISAs, and PEPs before them, since inception.

Neither of us is an ISA millionaire though. In that respect we probably should have invested better!

To what extent did tax incentives and shelters influence your strategy?

We’ve exploited both SIPPs and ISAs fairly tax-efficiently. As I mentioned earlier I also cut back my drawings from my business in its latter years. This improved its cash position but it also meant that I was able to get out the free cash and pay just 10% CGT on it.

The limit on this relief has since been slashed from £10m to £1m, which I have already exceeded. That is one reason why I have not started another serious business.

How often do you check or tweak your portfolio or other investments?

I probably check once a month, and re-balance once or twice a year. Rarely anything dramatic. I did however sell that tranche of Fundmsith in anticipation of a large CGT rise in the recent Labour budget.

Were you ever tempted to apply insights you gained in business to active investing? It’s interesting that you worked in tech, but the active fund you mention – Fundsmith – is hardly a tech play

Never tempted, really. I’ve dabbled in the occasional stock or sector pick, but I’ve come to realise that I and most other people know nothing and can predict nothing. So I am happy with a passive style.

I do have a few VCTs and EISs which I didn’t mention before. Perhaps £100,000 and £60,000 of each respectively. In the EISs I do tend to pick sectors which I know something about. I have also invested a few tens of thousands in a friend’s cloud business.

Fundsmith was just a punt on a recommendation that paid off by Merryn Somerset Webb, whose podcasts and writing I enjoy almost as much as Monevator!

Wealth: mo’ money no problems

We know how you made your money, but how did you keep it?

Paying down debt, particularly mortgages, as soon as possible.

This may not always have worked to my advantage.

When I sold the business in 2016, the IFA who advised me on investing the lump sums was keen to have me borrow against these to invest further in equities.

In hindsight this would have been a profitable strategy. But I lack the mental attitude to take that kind of risk.

Which is more important, saving or investing, and why?

Well…both! Bigger picture, I am torn between two approaches, both of which I was introduced to by Monevator.

Nick Magulli wrote a book – which I bought because Monevator told me to – Just Keep Buying. As the title suggests, the ethos is to buy stock the minute you have spare cash, and don’t worry about it. The best time to buy equities is now.

On the other hand, another Monevator-recommended column (I forget whose) said that if you’ve won the game already, stop playing.

I think I probably have. There’s enough money to keep us comfortable. I don’t want to be the richest man in the cemetery. Nor am I obsessed with leaving my kids as much as possible. I can afford to buy pretty much anything I really want.

I don’t need large real-terms growth, so I should probably take a step back and be conservative.

Orthodoxy would have someone at my age – largely decumulating – being at most 50/50 equities/bonds. I think I can probably live with 60/40, or even 70/30. As long as I have, say, five years of anticipated spending money in cash or gilts to minimise the need to sell in a slump.

But right now we’re only about 30% equities (14% Gilts, 10% Gold and 46% cash). That’s because of the Fundsmith sale and – here I feel the wrath of Lars Kroijer et al at my back, asking why on earth I think I know better than ‘Susan’ – now just doesn’t seem like a good time to buy more global trackers.

There’s an interesting contrast between your relatively cautious stance as an investor and the riskier lifestyle of having been an entrepreneur…

I don’t think I am actually that cautious an investor!

I have fairly conventional assets (global trackers, gilts, cash, gold) but until quite recently I was pretty bullish on the percentage of assets I held in equities.

Even now am planning to get back to 60% equities – which is high for a decumulator I think?

When I started my IT contracting journey, my dad, who’d worked himself up from tea boy to sales director at the same business for 30-plus years, kept telling me I should ask for a permanent and secure job. But even by then – early 1990s – I think those days had gone.

Unless it’s in the public sector, is there a really secure job any more? 

I accept that employees in the UK have a reasonable amount of tenure after two years – which the current government plans to extend to all employees from day one. This will be a disaster through the law of unintended consequences! But even so, people can be managed out for relatively small sums.

So whilst as an an entrepreneur I didn’t have the security of a permanent job, I also kept a very close eye on the worst case at all times. I never put myself at risk of losing everything.

Many do of course, for example by putting up homes and so on as security. Some become billionaires through it. 

But I don’t think I ever had the risk-taking mentality to earn more-than-you-could-ever spend big bucks.

When did you think you’d achieve financial freedom – and was it a goal with a timeline?

I never thought I would until I did.

Even now I worry.

What would you say to Monevator readers pursuing financial freedom?

Be realistic, and have an enumerated plan.

I no longer use the IFA who helped me invest the proceeds of my last business sale, but he did one thing that really helped me. He sat me down with Mrs Valiant and we worked out a plan of expenditure over ten years – to take us to state pension age, when we’ll get a £25,000 a year injection I hope – and then used that to suggest the balance of income and investments needed to achieve it.

Of course that plan has required adaptation down the years and it’s far from perfect.

But I do believe that a clear, spreadsheeted plan – which like rules are for the guidance of the wise but the blind observance of fools – is a great help.

How long did you use an IFA for? Were they not helpful when the sums to manage got well into seven figures? Or did your accountant handle all your tax advice?

I had one or two IFAs after I started making decent money contracting. But I was an awful client really.   

The first one I had was a lovely guy and we talked football incessantly. But even when I asked him to his face he just couldn’t come up with firm recommendations. It was all: “on the one hand, on the other…” In the end I gave up on using him because of this.

Later on I tried an IFA that a non-exec director we used recommended, and he wanted to be wholly prescriptive. One time he wanted to put 10% into commercial property. I invited him to look out of our office window at the vast array of ‘For Let’ boards stretching to the horizon.

But I didn’t want to go with a managed approach either. I always resented the fees. I’m better off managing my money with simple Lars Kroijer-style strategies. If it goes tits I only have myself to blame.

Even as the portfolio grows so substantial?

When I sold my last business I had millions to invest, and wanted some help with the selection and the mechanics.

This was a decade ago. I’d have more confidence to do it myself now.

As mentioned my IFA was quite good at forcing us to sit down and work out our medium and long-term objectives. And he did negotiate a good management fee rate with a reputable supplier.

But in the end the performance wasn’t great. Also he kept suggesting more off-the-wall things that I was obviously never going to do – lending money to an ex-Premier League footballer was one highlight!

The IFA wasn’t earning much if I wasn’t re-investing or re-cycling the funds, so we decided to part company. I have been self-invested since.

I get most of my tax advice from my accountant. On occasion – when selling a business, for example – I use a specialist tax advisor recommended by my accountant.

I’m interested in this unusual and long-standing relationship you’ve had with your accountant. You must have both been very young when you first worked together. Presumably his career grew as your business expanded?

I needed an accountant when I started contracting in 1988, so in my mid-twenties. He’s probably about five years older.

After initially using a local accountant – who was used to Mr-Bun-the-Baker businesses and was fine getting me up-and-running – I felt I needed someone more specialist. I found an accountant writing in a specialist contracting magazine and I liked his straightforward, play-it-straight-on-tax approach. We’ve worked well together for over 30 years now.

The curious thing is that – as he’s based in the North and I’m in the South – I’ve only met him in person maybe a dozen times in all those years!

One of the best pieces of advice he gave was to take 2012 SIPP protection. Even though the Lifetime Allowance has been abolished for now, it still means I can take £450,000 from my SIPP tax-free rather than the new limit of about £290,000. That saving alone is probably greater than all the audit and advice fees I’ve ever paid him. He’s truly brilliant in my view.

His practice did grow as mine did, wholly incidentally of course, and he’s quite a big fish in his area now. The advice is all very conservative and we swing the lead very little. Although I may have missed out on some allowances and questionable wheezes, it’s worked well for me.

Any other business?

When did you first start thinking seriously about money and investing?

In my mid-thirties.

Did any individuals inspire you to become financially free?

My accountant, who as I say I’ve been with for over 30 years. And also my father, who was a salesman. My father taught me always to be as straight as a die with other people over money. And also to have self-awareness: £50 might not be that much to me but it might to an employee or a small supplier, so always pay expenses quickly. I hope I have lived true to this.

One of my businesses was started with a junior partner. We got on amiably enough but were never besties and didn’t socialise out of work. Nonetheless I trusted him implicitly never to f*** me over.

Trust is such a vital part of my work and my financial journey.

Can you recommend your favourite resources for anyone chasing the FIRE dream?

Lars Kroijer (writings and webinars), Tim Hale (book), and Monevator.

What is your attitude towards charity and inheritance?

I try to give generously, especially to smaller charities which get crowded out. I always try to support friends or acquaintances who are doing things to raise money (although I dislike people doing a bucket list entry they wanted to do anyway under the guise of charity). And I give a lot of time to the two charities for which I am a trustee.

I could and should probably give more money to charity, but I’m frightened I’ll end up needing all I have to avoid living in a cardboard box.

I don’t like this aspect of my personality.

And inheritance?

I’d like to leave some money to my kids but I also try to help them as much as I can now. One has a really good and well-paid job and the other is struggling financially. It’s difficult to remain even-handed.

What will your finances ideally look like towards the end of your life?

In reality I wouldn’t be surprised if I end up with as large pot as I have now. All will go to my wife, if I die first, or to my kids.

I probably should be doing much more planning and giving away now for tax efficiency. But I’m terrified that I will end up… well, you know the rest!

Now and then I’m reminded of the vast range of backgrounds behind the usernames I’ve interacted with on Monevator for years. Hearing Valiant’s life story and outcome has certainly been one of those times. Please remember Valiant is just another reader sharing his story, not a gnarly old blogger like me. Useful feedback and questions welcome. Personal attacks of any sort will be deleted. Read our other FIRE studies.

{ 49 comments }

The Japanese stock market crash: the bursting of a bubble [Members]

The Japanese stock market crash of the early 1990s is the investing equivalent of a scary bedtime story. “What about Japan?” the old hands mutter darkly whenever the youngsters get overly excited about their S&P 500 profits. As well they might, because the Japanese nightmare has an irreducible ‘There but for the grace of God…’ quality about it.

Partly that’s because the bursting of the Japanese bubble was such an extraordinary fall from grace.

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 19 comments }
Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Data from MoneySuperMarket on household disposable income was presented by This Is Money this week as a regional ranking of which city’s citizens have the most spending power:

Disposable income is defined here as what you have left to spend after paying some 31 kinds of outgoings – from rent to council tax to car fuel.

Hence why London is fourth on the list. Higher earnings are countered by higher bills, especially for housing.

Of course, many Monevator readers will look at disposable income not as money to be spent but to be saved.

That snowball won’t just roll itself you know.

Geo whiz

We probably haven’t sufficiently discussed this end of geo-arbitrage – that is, living somewhere cheap to save more – on Monevator.

We did see the post-FIRE angle in Jake’s FIRE-side chat. And Squirrel highlighted the financial benefits of living in her rather rundown Northern town in her interview, too.

But we’ve never, say, cranked hard numbers on pursuing FIRE in Cardiff versus Clapham.

Then again, how could we? Where you live is a pretty personal decision, and everyone’s numbers will be different. Especially as any impact of moving could quickly be overwhelming by upgrading or downsizing at your new destination.

Food for thought anyway – and comments welcome.

That Amundi ETF: ISA update

Finally, a bit of good news on Amundi’s pesky former favourite global tracker ETF, which we wrote about delisting from the LSE a few weeks ago.

Developments!

Firstly, a comment a few days ago from The Accumulator:

We’ve received word from an industry contact that the distributing version of the Amundi Prime Global ETF is now ISA eligible, and an LSE-listed version could be tradeable by the end of January.

The ETF is currently listed on the German exchange (Xetra) and trades in GBP.

The product has now received approval under the UK’s Overseas Fund Regime (OFR). Once Amundi receives the nod from the LSE then there should be a version on the London Stock Exchange.

The ISIN for the distributing version of Amundi Prime Global is IE000QIF5N15. Xetra ticker: MWOZ.

The pre-merger ISIN was LU1931974692.

The ETF is still listed by Amundi as ISA ineligible on their website but watch this space:

https://www.amundietf.co.uk/en/professional/products/equity/amundi-prime-global-ucits-etf-dist/ie000qif5n15

We don’t have any information on the status of the Acc / Capitalising version (Old ISIN: LU2089238203, new ISIN: IE0009DRDY20).

And it now seems – via the link above – that the ‘IE000QIF5N15’ ETF is indeed ISA eligible. At least that’s what this factsheet says, so show it to your platform if you need to.

Hopefully good news for some of you.

Have a great weekend!

[continue reading…]

{ 31 comments }

A better alternative to the myth of early retirement

Rob Dix book cover

Is FIRE – Financial Independence Retire Early – the best way for most of us to change our lives for the better? Author, podcaster, and entrepreneur Rob Dix is back to suggest another approach. Please enjoy this extract from his upcoming book: Seven Myths About Money: And The Truth About Finding Financial Freedom.

MYTH – If you work hard enough today, retirement will be your reward.

REALITY – It’s more realistic, and more satisfying, to find ways to earn indefinitely – just without the hard work.

Luke Pittard was 23 when he won £1.3 million on the lottery. Enough for him to immediately quit his job at his local McDonald’s in Cardiff, and enough – if invested wisely – for him to never have to work again.

And at first that was his plan – except it didn’t turn out that way. Within a few months Luke started to find his new life of luxury a bit dull. “To be honest, there’s only so much relaxing you can do. I’m only young and a bit of hard work never did anyone any harm.”

Eventually, he went back to his old job. “I enjoy going to work and all my mates work here,’ he said. The only change? Instead of walking to and from work, he now gets a taxi.”

Luke isn’t alone. Mark Brudenell won nearly a million pounds on the lottery and initially spent three years flying around the world on luxury holidays – but then got bored and set up his own double glazing business. He says he puts “more hours into the business than I ever did working before” and doesn’t even touch the remainder of his lottery winnings.

Roy Gibney won £7.5 million and said: “I gave up work for 14 years, but I got bored. I started a sheet metal business, and I’m fitter and happier than I’ve been for years.”

All in all, a third of lottery jackpot winners set up their own business, and almost the same amount again go back to life as an employee. And it’s not because they’ve foolishly blown it all: even if they don’t need the money, it turns out that work meets a deep-seated need for meaning and social connection.

Catching FIRE

This claim would be hotly disputed by advocates of a philosophy that revolves around escaping the world of work as quickly as possible.

Catchily entitled FIRE – Financial Independence, Retire Early – it would go from being a fringe lifestyle to a mainstreammovement in the wake of the 2007– 2008 financial crisis.

FIREites preach that you should spend a decade or two working insanely hard and saving the majority of what you earn, build up a big pile of investments, then quit work and live off that pile for ever.

The idea is basically to speed run the normal career path: by saving at far above the normal rate (it’s not unusual for hardcore FIRE followers to save more than 50% of what they earn), you can retire closer to your fortieth birthday than your sixtieth.

The trouble, as many of those who successfully FIREd themselves discovered, wasn’t the self-denial or the performance of the financial markets. It was this: the type of person who has both the type of job (a high paying, high status one) and the motivation to put themselves in a position to retire so young isn’t also going to be the type of person who enjoys unbroken decades of endless relaxation.

As one 51-year-old FIRE ‘success story’ put it in a blog post: “Now I’m living the Early Retirement dream. Guess what? I find myself fantasising about returning to work.”

A year of dabbling with badminton, joining a local book club and volunteering at the community garden later, and he did just that.

The myth of early retirement

Don’t get me wrong: there are elements of the FIRE philosophy that I strongly agree with, not least its focus on getting out of a job you hate and bringing your financial life under your own control as soon as possible.

But its fatal flaw is that it ignores the ample academic research indicating that retirement isn’t the rose- tinted dream most of us expect it to be – and can even be disastrous for our mental wellbeing.

For example, researchers from Binghamton University in New York looked at data from rural China, which historically lacked the structured pension provision available in urban areas. In 2009, a pension scheme began to be introduced that aimed to eventually cover all rural areas. But its gradual roll- out proved to be the perfect natural experiment: suddenly, retirement became a possibility for some elderly Chinese citizens but not others.

Surely, the researchers assumed, the people who retired would be happier and healthier than those who didn’t?

Not quite. In their analysis of more than 17,000 people, the researchers found that, ten years after the introduction of pensions, the rate of cognitive decline had greatly accelerated in the areas where people had been receiving the extra support. And it wasn’t just their cognitive abilities that suffered; it was their mood too. “It looks like the negative effect on social engagement [of retirement] far outweighed the positive effect of the program on nutrition and sleep,” one of the researchers concluded.

All in all, the evidence indicates that we shouldn’t find the stories of lottery winners as surprising as we do. Retirement, The Economist recently summarised, often leads to losses “of income, purpose or, most poignantly, relevance.”

Right to retire?

Except none of this has made much of a dent in the popular belief that we should build our lives around the desire to retire.

In the UK and US, policies to increase the age at which you can collect retirement benefits from 65 to 67 have been met with much grumbling and resistance. In France, more than a million people took to the streets when the government tried to increase the pension age from 62 to 64 in 2023.

And while governments are trying to push retirement age back, our general perception seems to be that mid-sixties is already rather too late: a study of Millennial Americans put the ideal retirement age at 61.

For many people, early – or at least early-ish – retirement is clearly the ultimate goal. But should it be?

The trouble is, earning is the most powerful of the financial levers we have – and so wanting to retire early means less time benefiting from this power as we try to compress our earning into as short a time as possible.

If there were another way to think about earning – one that emphasised making money without the endless grind – we might realise that there are some altogether more fulfilling (and lucrative) ways to think about our working lives.

The solution isn’t to escape the world of work as early as you can, or to cross your fingers and pray for a lottery win: it’s to find a way to sustainably live a dream life that has income- generation built into it. It’s not giving up on earning, but finding ways to earn that don’t monopolise your time.

And, fortunately, there are ways to keep on making money well into your seventies and beyond – offering all the leisure and free time we now associate with retirement, plus a dollop of extra personal satisfaction and mental reward on top.

Breaking the time–money connection

On Reddit, 279,000 people are members of a community called ‘Overemployed’. Its contributors have figured out that they’re able to meet the basic requirements of their job in half of a conventional working week – so rather than scrolling social media like the rest of us, they’ve taken on a second job to fill the other half.

Some take it even further. One user racked up four jobs, then quit one – complaining of ‘too many meetings’. Another has five ‘full-time’ jobs in tech, adding up to nearly a million dollars in combined salary.

One user summed up the sentiment of the subreddit: “don’t have to be perfect, no need to be the best, just do enough . . . And coast.”

Of course, this is only possible because they’re doing it covertly. If their bosses knew how efficiently they were fulfilling their duties, they wouldn’t be delighted – they’d be horrified, and probably cut their working days (and pay) in half. That sentiment is understandable: most of us instinctively feel that sneakily holding down two jobs at once is wrong.

When you think about it, though, if they can provide enough full-time value to satisfy two (or more) companies at once, why shouldn’t they?

It’s not their fault they’re not working at capacity: if their boss is happy, why should they ask for more work or twiddle their thumbs?

Compensation culture

The reason working two jobs simultaneously feels so immoral is our deeply ingrained sense that time is money. We’re used to compensation being based either explicitly on an hourly rate, or being paid a salary on the assumption that you’ll be working a particular number of hours.

Yet why should pay be determined by the hours you work rather than the value you provide?

If your car has broken down and it takes the repair guy five minutes to fix it, you don’t calculate a ‘reasonable’ hourly rate and try to pay a twelfth of it: you’re grateful he got you back on the road so quickly and pay whatever he demands. It took Ed Sheeran less than half an hour to write Thinking Out Loud, and he’s earned millions from that song alone. Does that feel unreasonable to you? Would you tap your toe more vigorously if he’d slaved over it for weeks?

These examples hint at another way to think about work, earnings and retirement. There is a way to keep earning money easily, without having to set an arbitrary retirement goal – and it involves breaking the connection between time and money altogether.

Admittedly, they are outliers: not everyone will achieve their level of success. But nor do they need to.

After all, if you could just earn as much as you do now while enjoying what you do and without needing to work anything close to forty hours a week, would you still feel under pressure to retire by a certain date?

The three levels of financial independence

Okay, this all sounds great – but how do you do it?

Well, I think of financial independence not as a result, but a process: one that typically involves moving through three levels.

Level 1: Embrace the connection

Inevitably, for most of us time and money start off being inextricably linked. You might only be paid once you’ve punched in and the clock starts ticking, or be required to sit in an office between certain hours if you want to keep your job (and therefore your salary). If you can work from home and sneak in the odd laundry load on company time, you’re one of the lucky ones.

But employment isn’t all bad. Think of it as an apprenticeship: a period during which you’ll have certainty about when and how much you’ll be paid, and be able to build your skills and hone your craft by getting involved in big projects with talented people. It’s a step that – even if we dream of escaping it from depressingly early on – most of us benefit from.

Even if you graduated top of your class from a prestigious university, when you move on to any real-world job you’ll start out being pretty crap at it. If you lived or died by your results, you’d probably die – so having some leeway to learn while still getting paid is exactly what you need. Even beyond the early stages of your career, there’s a benefit in learning from the people around you and getting in plenty of ‘reps’ at whatever you’ve chosen as the skill or area you want to master.

Yes, I’m painting the rosiest possible picture of the world of work here. Most people don’t float through the office door on a cloud of gratitude about all the opportunities they’re exposed to: they feel under-appreciated, sick of playing politics, and resentful.

But there are ways to maximise your opportunities in Level 1 while preparing yourself to move to Level 2: to be precise, three of them.

1: Re-frame

Most people, explicitly or implicitly, see their career as something that happens ‘to’ them, based on the actions of other people.

Your boss won’t give you a raise. You’re stuck on a dead-end project. Your ideas are always overlooked. If a better opportunity comes along, it’s pure luck.

The first step is to re-frame your career as something you’re in control of, and approach it strategically. You’re giving up a large proportion of your waking hours: what are you getting in return? If the answer is ‘not enough’, then you need to honestly assess whether you’re worth enough or whether you’re currently in the wrong place. Remember, your time in employment is your apprenticeship – and it falls upon you to get the most out of it.

What would you be doing differently if you were taking absolute responsibility for acquiring the skills you need to escape?

In the academic literature this sense of personal responsibility is known as ‘career self-efficacy’,
and research from around the world has demonstrated its powerful effects.

In one study, academics in Germany followed more than 700 people from the point of graduation, and found that high self-efficacy translated into better pay and higher work satisfaction seven years later.

This is not the same as deluding yourself that everything about your job is within your control: in reality, other people do have an influence and some things will affect you unfairly. You will, sometimes, be overlooked for a promotion because someone else has bonded with the boss over drinks after work, for example.

You don’t need to stare at yourself in the mirror and repeat ‘I am the prize!’ every morning, but merely acting as if everything is within your control will improve your results.

2: Keep learning

Your ability to break the time–money connection will rest upon the value of the skills you have developed. Some of these will come naturally from experience – but there are a few specific areas you can focus on to speed you towards Level 2, and give your earnings an immediate boost too.

One of these is to learn specialist skills that can lead you into particularly well-paying areas of your field. For example, according to a global report on the link between skills and earnings, IT professionals who earn a new certification can increase their salary by $12,000 or more. That’s one heck of a premium for taking some training courses or doing some self-study.

Similarly, a report from The Project Management Institute (who, I admit, may not be a wholly disinterested party) found that those with a project management qualification earn 22 per cent more than those who lack one. Whichever line of work you’re in, there will likely be an equivalent.

You can also develop ‘soft skills’ that transfer across roles and industries – and will also stand you in good stead if you strike out on your own when we move on to Level 2.

For example, a study from the University of California found that people who demonstrated leadership skills earlier in life earned up to 33% more as adults, even after controlling for differences in intelligence and other traits. Separately, a study of more than 42,000 people by TalentSmart found that employees with high emotional intelligence (EQ) earned an average of $29,000 more per year than those with low EQ.

How do you develop these skills? While there are formal courses and qualifications out there, the most effective way of learning is a mix of deliberate self-study (like reading books or listening to podcasts) and seizing opportunities to learn on the job.

This is why re-framing is a critical first step: by mentally taking ownership of your career, you’ll spot development opportunities that otherwise would have passed you by.

With minimal extra learning, you might even be able to take a strategic side- step.

For example, data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that journalists earn a median wage of $49,300, whereas for public relations specialists it’s $66,750. The skills involved? Very similar – I used to work in public relations, and journalists would move across to join us on ‘the dark side’ all the time, relying on their existing knowledge and networks.

3: Forget loyalty

An analysis of 18 million employment records by Yahoo Money found that job switchers routinely increased their pay by significantly more than those who stayed put.

The reason doesn’t take much figuring out.

When a company is hiring a new employee, they have no choice but to pay the market rate for someone with their desired level of skills and experience. Yet when they want to retain an existing employee, they can rely on inertia.

If someone enjoys their job and earns some kind of pay rise, are they really going to look around? Do they even know they’d earn more if they were newly hired into their current role?

Of course, happiness is important: if you like where you work, you might not want to take the risk of leaving for a role you end up hating. But you don’t need to leave; you just need to keep looking around.

For a start, actively looking will give you a sense of what you could or should be earning in your current role: if your company was hiring a replacement for you, how much would they pay? If you’re not being rewarded with the pay rises you think you should be, you can then take it a step further: be offered a role elsewhere, then ask your employer to match it if they want you to stay.

Put starkly, the key to higher earnings is to put yourself in a position where your employer needs you more than you need them. In every company there are a few people who by handing in their resignation could cause the CEO to cancel their plans for the day and throw everything at getting them to change their mind. Your aim is to be this person.

This largely comes down to solving problems that other people can’t (or won’t), and being a ‘safe pair of hands’.

The person in my company who’s risen through the ranks the fastest got there because she got the job done every single time – without drama or complaint. Every time a new area of responsibility came along it ended up with her, because we knew for sure it’d be done well. Sometimes that meant her working late, or scrambling to figure something out that she’d never done before – but it was worth it, because she made herself irreplaceable.

Making these three changes will shift the impact equation in your favour: you’ll be adding more value, and capturing more of it for yourself. The difference this makes to your earning power in the next three to five years could be enormous.

Earning is by far the most powerful lever you have – so taking a deliberate approach to your career can have a bigger impact than decades of disciplined saving or any amount of effort to transform yourself into an investing genius.

It might be that taking these steps is enough for you: you’ll be earning more, and be in a position to call the shots. This transformed power dynamic and a newly padded payslip may keep you happily clocking in all the way to the typical retirement age and beyond.

But if you do want to go further, the skills you’ve developed have set you up perfectly for Level 2.

Level 2: Loosen the connection

When Steve Jobs left Apple to start his new company, NeXT, he needed a logo. Being Steve Jobs, he wanted the best – so he approached legendary designer Paul Rand.

Rand knew his value: he demanded a fee of $100,000. There would be no consultation, and no revisions: he’d receive $100,000, deliver what he thought was the best visual concept, and that would be it. Jobs agreed – and Rand received $100,000 for two weeks’ work. (If you ask me, the logo was pretty awful, but that’s by the by.)

This is an extreme example of loosening the connection between time and money. Rand did, at some point, have to sit down and do the work. He did need to deliver by a particular deadline. But he didn’t send Steve Jobs an invoice listing the number of hours he’d worked: he was selling the result rather than selling his time.

A less extreme example of someone operating at Level 2 is my friend Richard. After twenty years working in finance roles at major banks, he struck out on his own as a consultant. He still sells his time – but as a consultant he sells it by the day, not as part of a salary. And because he’s proven himself to be able to deliver a certain result during that time, his day rate is what he likes to call ‘reassuringly expensive’. At the moment, he consults for a couple of different companies for a total of three days per week.

Every weekend is a long one, which – along with breaks between contracts – allows him to routinely rack up the type of unforgettable experiences that would normally have to wait until ‘retirement’. If his travel plans require more cash, he can take on more work for a bit – yet when he wanted to take the whole summer off and live on a Greek island, he did.

As anyone at Level 1 can attest, it’s rare to be able to achieve this level of flexibility from the outset of your career: when what you’re primarily selling is a result, you need to have demonstrated beyond doubt your ability to deliver that result on someone else’s terms before you get to do it on your own.

Trading certainty for money and freedom

Operating independently doesn’t just bring more flexibility – consultants tend to be paid at least 20% more than an employee in an equivalent position, and sometimes more than 50%.

Some of this difference disappears due to taxes and costs that would otherwise fall on the employer, but even so – operating at Level 2 gives you the potential to earn a lot more.

The trade-off is a lack of certainty, which is a big reason for why the pay differential exists in the first place. After all, you need to charge enough to compensate for vacations and time off sick (which you won’t be paid for), and to cover times when you can’t find work.

If you want to make the move to Level 2, you’ll need to plan ahead to make sure you have experience in the type of role that’s suited to being done as a contractor. Not all roles are.

In the corporate world there are a lot of jobs that exist in the context of a particular company because of the way they operate, but not anywhere else – so you could be phenomenal at it, but struggle to find other clients. There are also sectors, like investment banking or sensitive government roles, where you’ll have access to the kind of proprietary information that means an employer wouldn’t be happy to have you working elsewhere simultaneously or soon afterwards.

All this means that the roles most suited to Level 2 are those where you’re selling a distinct result or providing a widely understood and in-demand service.

Project-based work is perfect, because the defined end point means it often won’t make sense to hire someone in- house.

This is common in design, IT and marketing, as well as other fields. And although it might not seem like it, the more specific your area of expertise, the better – because you’ll be one of very few people who can be hired to solve a specific problem.

For example, my friend Mark is one of about five people in the country who understands an ancient programming language that major banks (worryingly) still rely on. This means he can pretty much name his price – whereas if he looked for work as a generalist IT contractor, he’d be competing in a deeper labour market with clearer norms around pay.

Moving on up

Once you’re in a role that lends itself to consulting, the easiest way of getting started – and an extremely common one – is to get hired as a consultant by the company you already work for.

But beyond that first role, you’ll need to put yourself out there. This takes you into the unavoidable and often uncomfortable world of ‘business development’: speaking to other people in the industry, showcasing your expertise, and letting it be known that you’re available.

For most roles there are agencies and recruiters who can help find you work, but this isn’t something you want to rely on. As time goes on, finding new roles becomes easier because you build a larger pool of colleagues you’ve worked alongside who can mention your name when something comes up: among the many consultants I know, word-of-mouth is by far the most common way to find work. This may sound extreme, but you might even need to start using LinkedIn

I hope I haven’t made this transition sound straightforward, because it’s anything but: it’s scary to voluntarily give up a secure income stream and not know when you’ll get paid again. But once you’ve established yourself, Level 2 is a pretty great place to be.

There’s nothing to stop you from hanging out at this level for ever, with no need to think about retirement as a one- off ‘event’ because you’re free to scale your volume of work up and down to match your energy levels and fit in with whatever else you want to do.

But if you’re up for taking another leap, you can graduate to Level 3: breaking the link between time and money altogether.

Level 3: Break the connection

The core requirement to reach Level 3 is to be able to deliver a result in a form that’s completely independent of your own time.

For example, if you’re a physical therapist specialising in shoulder pain, there’s only so much you can get paid for a session of digging your thumbs into someone’s trapezius – and only so many sessions you can do per day before you develop serious RSI.

But what if you could take your knowledge and package it up into a book that allowed someone to get the same relief at home by using some simple tools and following the steps you’d take?

By doing so, you’ve largely broken the link between time and money: you may still need to promote it or be involved in its distribution, but you could take weeks or months off without your income being affected. You could even formalise your unique ‘method’ and teach it to other therapists – requiring them to pay training and licensing fees. Eventually you could end up with multiple divisions and product lines, and hire dedicated teams to help with marketing, distribution, operations and finance.

There’s a limit – albeit a high one – to how much even the most sought-after professional (such as Paul Rand and his logo design) can earn in a year, and only so many years they can consistently deliver for.

But once you’re selling a product that doesn’t require your personal input, there are no such constraints. You build it once, then sell it countless times.

When time does not equal money

There are ways to break the time–money connection in almost every sector.

For example, Rachel Karten worked in social media at some of the most popular food and recipe websites. Then she made her move to Level 2 – transitioning to independent social media consulting, helping other companies to achieve the same results that she’d previously generated in-house and passing on her knowledge so they could continue doing it even after she’d moved on. Finally, she started Link In Bio – a paid newsletter and private community that teaches those same techniques at scale without Rachel needing to show up and do it one-on-one by the hour.

That’s Level 3. Rachel is now estimated to be making more than $200,000 per year, and if she wants to earn more it won’t necessarily require any more of her time.

Or take Ben Collins, a former forensic accountant. I don’t know much about accounting, but I know it involves a lot of spreadsheets – and after quitting his job he started picking up consulting work showing companies how to build performance-tracking dashboards in Google Sheets. Two years later, he packaged up this knowledge into a course that people can buy online, meaning Ben gets paid at all hours of the day and night, even when he’s out hiking with his family. Even if Ben never creates another course or takes on another consulting gig, he’ll keep on getting paid.

In each case the skill involved and delivery mechanism is different but the core principle is the same: identifying a result you know how to achieve and other people want, then packaging it up in a way that doesn’t involve your time every time.

That doesn’t mean once you’ve created something you’ll never work again: especially in the early days, most people find themselves working harder than ever to grow and stabilise a business of this kind.

But there are two important differences compared to working equally hard at Level 1 and Level 2.

Scale on your schedule

The first is that the financial return on your time can be dramatically higher: if you slave away late into the night on a marketing initiative that improves sales by 10%, you’ll continue to reap the rewards of that 10 per cent increase for years to come. Potentially, you can end up earning thousands of pounds for one hour of work.

The second important difference is you can do all this entirely on your schedule: not only can Ben and Rachel work on any days and times that suit them, they can also take extended blocks of time off without foregoing any income or asking anyone’s permission

Say that you build a tiny one-person business that brings in £1,000 per month (£12,000 per year). That probably doesn’t sound life- changing. But if you assume that a financial investment in real estate or the stock market would pay you an annual return of 5 per cent, your £1,000 in monthly income is equivalent to having £240,000 saved up and invested.

Is it going to be quicker and easier to package up a result and generate £1,000 per month or to build up nearly a quarter of a million pounds in savings?

Personally, I think it’s the former – and it also gives you a far higher level of control

With that money coming in independently of your time, who cares if the markets don’t perform so well or your house doesn’t go up in value as much as you’d hoped?

Work less, earn more

For the purposes of getting the concept across, I’ve made the process of breaking the link between time and money sound like a simple, predictable progression.

In reality, it’s no such thing. Whatever you try first probably won’t succeed. If you plug away for years at something – or skip between multiple ideas – without gaining any traction, that’s entirely normal.

But this isn’t a case of either/or: once you have the ability to provide a result that people want, you can work on your Level 3 solution simultaneously with Levels 1 and 2.

Because it will inevitably take time to figure out, the earlier you start the better – even if that just means spending a few hours per week learning new skills, researching the market and taking your first steps. And even if the worst happens, and you never succeed at all? You still haven’t really lost: the skills you’ll learn from trying will make you more valuable in your career and so you’ll position yourself for a boost in pay compared to your less enterprising colleagues anyway.

By progressively weakening the connection between time and money – and perhaps eventually breaking it completely – all concerns about retirement become irrelevant.

There’s no need to scrimp and save to extreme levels. No worries about your investments failing to perform. And no need to step off the career ladder only to suffer the mental downsides of a retirement that wasn’t, in fact, quite as rewarding as you’d expected.

Thanks to Rob for presenting us with some very actionable food for thought. For more of his myth-busting, pre-order a copy of Seven Myths About Money over at Amazon.

{ 83 comments }