≡ Menu
Weekend reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

I wrote a big comment under Fire V London’s fascinating post about how a tech billionaire of his acquaintance goes about investing. But then the Blogger comment system thing caused problems, as it often seems to, and it ate my second attempt.

(Perhaps the billionaire could fix that technology?)

The gist was I found myself hugely jealous. Not of the billion quid – bizarrely enough to most of the world, but perhaps not to some of you – but of the billionaire’s lifestyle.

His gadding around the world investing in start-ups and staying engaged with the latest big trends sounds like my dream day job:

David specialises ‘value-added’ angel investing, mostly (or possibly exclusively) in the tech sector. His investments vary in size from $500k to €10m+.

He has 30+ such investments and is reasonably hands-on with several.

My impression is he is looking for visionary, ambitious businesses based in Europe, where he can put some serious money to work – and he is not afraid of being the biggest shareholder.

The only way I can really justify my dabbling in unlisted equities is because I want to try to develop some similar skills to do this. But I know I’m just a baby version of this bloke.

Of course I also need to develop the spare capital to put to work to fund such ultra-risky investing… but that’s where the rest of my portfolio comes in!

Fellow investing junkies can read the whole post here.

[continue reading…]

{ 12 comments }

Weekend reading: Investing wisdom from Jason Zweig

Weekend reading: Investing wisdom from Jason Zweig post image

What caught my eye this week.

Jason Zweig is an investment writers’ writer – the man my co-blogger The Accumulator models himself after, and the author of the only book @TA ever gave me as a present. (I’m hopeful the second one will be the completed draft of the Monevator guide to investing…)

Why, you might ask, does The Accumulator hold Zweig in such high esteem that he keeps a mugshot of the guy above the desk in his study, dotted with gold stars and a fake signature he forged by squinting his eyes and thinking of exorbitant expense ratios? (Probably).

I suspect it’s because the US veteran author has a similar ability to turn dry financial matters into pithy words of wisdom.

For a taster, here’s a few lines Zweig shared the other day:

  • In investing, as in life, too many people confuse wishes for beliefs and beliefs for evidence. Things aren’t valid just because you want them to be.
  • As you “learn” more, if your confidence doesn’t go down before it goes up, then you probably aren’t learning.
  • The future isn’t a straight line you can extrapolate from the past. The future is a storm into which we are blown backwards.
  • Walk as often as you can through the graveyard of your dead beliefs, especially the ones you murdered by your own hand.
  • Investing is a profoundly lonely activity, and it’s hard to pick your way through endless minefield of bullsh*t and boobytraps that the financial industry lays down unless you find a community of other investors at least as smart as you.

Those aren’t even particular meant as pithy one-liners by the way – they are all teasers to full articles that Zweig has written before.

See his post for the links – and set aside a couple of hours to devour them.

[continue reading…]

{ 33 comments }
Image of two property men in hard hats.

I last wrote in detail about commercial property as an asset class in 2009. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, half-finished towers and moribund building sites dotted London like the LEGO play of a child interrupted.

The towel had been thrown in. I saw an opportunity.

Over the next few years, property investments – stock market-listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) as well as old-style property investment trusts and funds – did better than anyone expected.

Helped by persistently low interest rates, property assets doubled or even tripled your money over the next few years, thanks to rising prices and generous yields. Skyscrapers soared.

Some property shares lagged the recovery, giving a chance to buy again in 2011 – especially as the recovery was slower to reach small cap property firms

However certain parts of the sector are now well down from those highs.

Industrial property companies are doing well thanks to the weak pound juicing manufacturing, and there’s a boom in the warehouses that support online shopping and other logistical operations.

But companies that own lot of office space in London trade at big discounts to their net asset value – due mostly, I think, to the ongoing Brexit fiasco.

The market also seems wary of second-tier retail exposure. That’s understandable in light of the many store and restaurant closures we’ve seen since we voted to shoot ourselves in the foot in 2016.

Bailing on Brexit

Long-time readers will know I think Brexit is our biggest unforced error since the Hundred Years War.

However everything has its price.

If I can buy prime London office space at 70p in the pound via the stock market, I have a good margin of safety. If property developers have curbed speculative ventures because they fear bankers will decamp to Frankfurt and start-ups to Lisbon, at least new supply will be limited. That should help the incumbents.

Also, I don’t think we’ve condemned ourselves to penury with Brexit. I just believe we’ll be poorer than we would have been, for the foreseeable decades to come, for little gain. (That’s bad enough!)

Jeremy Corbyn notwithstanding, the rich will still get richer, and London will remain the base of operations for most of them.

You can shake your fist from the provinces, but you can’t make an oligarch or a tech entrepreneur move their company to the middle of nowhere. (Movers and shakers are even more aghast at that idea in light of the social divisions revealed by Brexit.)

But before anyone sells their Facebook shares and plows it all into UK real estate, know three things.

Firstly, Monevator is not about share tips. At most, posts like this are just suggestions of areas worth exploring. Do your own research – and on your head be the results.

Secondly, you should know I’ve had this view about commercial property since quite soon after the Brexit vote, when traders dumped UK property faster than Boris Johnson shedding his principles.

As global money began fleeing UK PLC, property funds had to be gated so investors didn’t ask to withdraw money that the funds didn’t have. I thought this was a sign the panic was overdone, and flagged up the potential opportunity.

Since then some companies I mentioned have done okay, but others have fallen further.

Again, do your own research – because you will have to live with the consequences.

This time it’s different

The third thing to note is that back in 2009, property prices really had plunged.

If you wanted to go out and buy a London office following the financial crisis, it was cheaper than a few years before. Same with a new lease, too. Prime property was going cheap.

The falls in property investments on the stock market then reflected this gloomy reality.

That’s the standard cycle in commercial property. Boom years – in which money is easy to find and development rampant – followed by lean years where over-extended developers go bust.

Sell when the fat blokes in suits and hard hats in the business pages look smug and contented, that’s my rule of thumb. Consider buying when those CEOs have been shuffled away for wiry upstarts who appear in the same pages talking up the forgotten sector again.

This time – so far – it’s different.

London office space is holding its value, and rents remain high, too. Brexit fear has not yet dinged the hard bricks and mortar assets themselves, just their stock market proxies.

Those discounts to net asset value we see with certain REITs may reflect an irrational disconnect with reality on the ground. Perhaps some of the beefy property blokes will be proved right to be more confident about Brexit than the flighty liberal elite fund managers selling down REITs?

Alternatively – more technically – it may be that hedge funds and the like who are very pessimistic about Brexit have turned to shorting the shares of listed property giants as an easy way to express that view. (The funds are unlikely to own physical offices to dump).

Does this make the big London office REITs more of an opportunity this time – because it’s a phony war – or less so – because the usual cycle hasn’t yet played out from peak-to-trough?

It’s something to think about.

Commercial property and your portfolio

In my next post I’ll recap the broader investment case for commercial property, whether you’re an active or a passive investor.

Why do some model portfolios include specific commercial property exposure, and how does the asset class differ from equities and bonds? What if you already own your own home?

The exciting bit is over, but the important stuff is to come. Subscribe to catch it.

Disclosure: I have various beneficial interests related to London property.

{ 39 comments }
Weekend reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Royal Wedding day, and this week’s money and investing links will flutter by you like confetti in the wind. Before becoming confetti stuck between your teeth. After becoming confetti that snagged in your hair. And then becoming confetti that falls into your glass of bubbly before the speeches.

Or is that just me?

I like confetti at a wedding as much as the next temporary hedonist – when it’s spiraling through the air and framing the happy couple and everyone inhabits in a Disney movie for an instant, or at the very least an episode of Emmerdale.

But then the confetti falls to the ground. The newlyweds go off on honeymoon to argue about whether they should get out of bed to eat the complementary breakfast they’ve already paid for. And the guests go home to nurse their credit card bills.

Weddings are great fun. But unless you’re rich, they’re too often an extravagance.

Even if a parent is paying, that’s money they might have given you instead to go towards a home – or to invest in a pension for those long distant post-youthful years when you’ll really need a party.

I’ve been to several weddings where I’ve guiltily winced at what it cost because I knew they couldn’t afford it. Not in the sense of they wouldn’t pay the bills and we’d all end up in the kitchen doing dishes in our suits and frocks. Just that it’d be a five-figure sum dogging them for years to come.

According to the BBC, today’s event will boast 600 guests, with another 200 coming along to the evening bash. The Financial Times puts the cost at around £32m, which seems low, especially as it reckons £30m of that will go on security.

I liked the sound of Claer Barrett’s £10,000 affair, recounted in the FT [search result]:

“I would have got the number 26 bus to the wedding, but my dad insisted on a taxi.”

I’ve also given some tips on a better value wedding in the past.

True, I’ve never gotten married (and not only because I’m too tight) but the perspective of someone who has been a guest at a couple of dozen weddings could be useful if you’re trying to save a few quid.

Not a churlish guest, I stress – as I say I love weddings.

At the very least the music today will be amazing, even if you’re no royalist. The money is spent, so let’s enjoy it. And I wish Harry and Meghan the best of luck in a life you couldn’t pay me £30m to take on.

Did you get married on the cheap – or blow the budget? Was it worth it? Could you have done anything cheaper, in retrospect?

Let us all know in the comments below.

[continue reading…]

{ 33 comments }