≡ Menu

Enough with the self-flagellation: We’ve just lived through a ten-year bear market

We’ve been in a ten-year bear market

A few people over the past 18 months have shaken their heads sadly when I’ve said I’ve been buying shares during the bear market.

You might think they were proven right when I was buying in early 2008.

Or you might think I proved them wrong when I was bought at the bottom in March 2009.

Actually, I don’t think either view is right: it’s all hindsight speaking. Timing market direction to pick the exact bottom is near to impossible, which was why I bought throughout the slump.

But I’ve also realized more recently that I’ve got a fundamentally different view on where the stock market is compared with most CNBC pundits, fund managers, and Internet share traders.

Some of these people are clearly suffering from recency bias, and need to read their long-term market history. They’ve forgotten bear markets end.

Many of the others seem to think an 18-month bear market isn’t long enough (although actually it’s plenty long, compared to most downturns).

They ask if we ‘perma-bulls’ think we can escape with just a mild spanking, as if that’s all that’s been suffered by investors (and as if the market has a morale compass. It doesn’t!)

The view that share investors have had it easy floors me, because from where I’m standing we’ve been in a wider bear market for the past 10 years – and an almost flat one on an 15-year view.

Too many look at the peaks in 2007 or 2008 and argue the bear market that followed was too short. They forget that in the UK at least, the heights were first reached a decade ago.

(Click to enlarge all graphs).

The UK FTSE 100 is down 30% over 10 years

If you'd invested on June 11th 1999, you'd be down 30% (ignoring dividends)

If you invested everything on June 11th 1999, you'd still be down 30% (ignoring dividends)

The UK FTSE 100 delivered only 10% over 15 years*

10% over 15 years, excluding dividends (but see note below)

10% over 15 years, excluding dividends (but see note below)

*Okay, I’ve been a bit cheeky here and picked a local high in 1994 and compared it to the recent March lows to derive my 10% over 15 years statistic.

On the other hand, you can bet that when you read about previous terrible bear markets, those statistics are based on extremes, too.

The important point is that the high 3000s were first tested in 1994, and again in 2009, some 15 years later – but from the other direction.

A true bull market: Up 550% in 15 years

1984 - 1999: Up 550%. That's what a bull market looks like.

1984 - 1999: Up 550%. That's what a roaring bull market looks like.

I’ve included this graph because I think some people have forgotten what a bull market looks like.

Timing piffling 30% rises is not the point when compared to catching a ride on a big bull run. (To be fair, the early 1980s to late 1990s bull market was about the biggest, but there have been plenty of other big moves upwards over the past 100 years).

Being over gloomy can damage your wealth

We can’t know whether this current rally will be sustained, although I’m guessing it will.

To pick just a few of many positive signs:

  • The worst of the banking crisis is over
  • Credit markets are returning to normal
  • Earnings are rising
  • GDP has been revised up in Asia
  • Government bonds are getting sold off, which may indicate a return to risk-taking (provided it doesn’t hint at fears about quantitative easing)

But I’m not saying we definitely won’t retest March’s lows, and I’m not saying we’re going to enjoy a multi-year bull market starting 12 weeks ago (even though some signs point to a decade of 20%+ returns). Such predictions are impossible to make with confidence.

What I am saying is that if you shift your perspective to understand we’ve been in a long bear market since the dotcom crash in 2000, it might make it easier to believe the recent share slump has neared an end.

Even if the FTSE 100 went up 50% from here over the next two years, we still wouldn’t be back to the March 2000 highs.

The time to get scared we’ve had it too good is when the FTSE 100 hits 10,000, or 15,000, or even 20,000. It will someday.

I’ll try to juggle my asset allocation a bit more cautiously when the market next looks peaky (clue: not now!) but I won’t try to deal in and out on a wholesale basis. I’ve seen the damage it can do to other investors.

Many have missed out on the sharp rally in the past three months because they wanted to see blue skies before investing.

But it’s inevitable that the market will rally before the economy does – the investment gods don’t tend to give signposts.

A reminder from my three-part post about investing in bear markets:

According to a MarketWatch report, in a study of 12 post-World War II bear markets:

  • Investors who held their stocks through the bear market gained an average of 32.5% during the first year of recovery.
  • Investors who bought one week after the market rally began saw a 24.3% return.
  • Those who waited for three months before jumping back in achieved only 14.8%.

Missing bull markets can seriously damage your wealth. Better for most of us to drip feed our money in all the time, and ride out the highs and the lows.

Receive my articles for free in your inbox. Type your email and press submit:

{ 5 comments… add one }
  • 1 The Investor June 25, 2009, 12:10 am

    Business Week now agrees with me:

    “We need a 63.79% advance just to break-even for the decade,” Silverblatt says. That’s not going to happen by Dec. 31. “The last negative decade was the 1930s, -41.77%,” according to Silverblatt. Annualized, stocks lost 5.12% so far this decade; in the 1930s decade of the Great Depression they lost 5.26%.”

    (http://www.businessweek.com/investing/wall_street_news_blog/archives/2009/06/stock_market_ch.html?campaign_id=rss_daily)

  • 2 MoneyEnergy April 16, 2010, 2:02 am

    It’s certainly what I do – drip in as I get the money… I can’t time or even pick out bull/bear markets anyways – these are just categories placed on the data after the fact – better to just look at fundamentals and whether there’s a good growth story going forward for each stock. I certainly hope you’re right – and the one “good” thing about inflation is that it would lift all the stocks, too… it’s about time we had some more dividend increases!
    .-= MoneyEnergy on: The US Will Never Again Run A Balanced Budget =-.

  • 3 The Investor April 16, 2010, 6:09 pm

    Hi MoneyEnergy – Remember this article is 9 months old… I posted it on Twitter as a reminder of how far we’ve come in less than a year. I’m not quite so gung-ho after a huge rally in 12 months. I do think the ten years following the March lows will be good for shares, but we could well have had a few years worth of gains already…

    Absolutely agree that trickling in an eschewing timing is the way to go. Unfortunately I dabble with timing and trading around the edges of my portfolio.

    I say unfortunately not because it hasn’t been profitable *so far*, but because a little luck is a dangerous thing 😉

  • 4 caronia November 4, 2012, 1:31 pm

    Hi,
    I’m a new investor and I constantly read about ‘dripping’ money into investments.
    As a novice, I have opened a tracker fund,but to drip money into it would cost me £12.50 a time.
    Could anyone suggest a more economical way of adding small amounts each month without being stung for charges.
    Many thanks
    caronia

  • 5 The Investor November 4, 2012, 10:17 pm

    @caronia – Welcome to Monevator. You’ve made a good start choosing passive products to get going with — but you needn’t be spending *any charges* just to drip money into a tracker fund.

    Have a read of this article –> investing on a budget.

    Hope that helps. 🙂

Leave a Comment