≡ Menu

How much wealth do I need in my ISA versus my SIPP to achieve financial independence?

How much wealth do I need in my ISA versus my SIPP to achieve financial independence? post image

This is part three of a series on how to maximise your ISAs and SIPPs to achieve financial independence. Part two explained why the tax advantages of personal pensions make them superior to ISAs later in life. Be sure to also read the first part of the series.

To make the most tax efficient use of your savings, your ISAs need only fund the years between early retirement and your minimum pension age.

Obviously it’d be marvellous if our ISAs piped hot income streams into our lives long after that, but our primary concern is to fund them so we’re unlikely to run out of money before our personal pensions take over.

That’s because there’s no point oversaving into our ISAs, either. That would see you delay financial independence by paying tax that would have instead been clawed back through pension tax relief and added to your growing nest egg.

The ISA/pension balancing act

Should investment returns turn out to be poor, we would expect our ISAs to be running on empty as we dock with our SIPPs.1

We would then discard the ISAs like empty booster rockets and ride on using our SIPPs, and eventually a State Pension slingshot.

To put that plainly:

Phase 1 – You need to be able to draw all your income needs from your ISA / taxable accounts without fear of running out of money,2 until you reach the minimum pension age.

Phase 2 – You need to be able to draw all your income needs from your personal pension, once you can access it, without fear of running out of money until you die.

Lifeboat – It’s quite likely the State Pension will provide some support later in life. The lower your income, the older you are, and/or the sketchier your plan, the more important the State Pension becomes.

We’ll construct the plan so the State Pension is primarily a back-up and, later in the series, we’ll draw upon research that shows how you can adjust your plan to account for it.

How much income and for how long?

How much annual income do you need in retirement? And how many years do you need it to last?

These are the big two questions to answer for each phase of our plan.

Guesstimating your required retirement income is not so hard, especially if you already track your expenses.

Let’s say you’ve decided you’ll need £25,000 per year for the rest of your life. (We’ll assume all calculations are in real terms, so we’re accounting for inflation.)

How much wealth do you need in your ISA to sustain £25,000 in annual income?

It depends on how long you need that income to last (Phase 1) before your pension income becomes available (Phase 2).

There are two basic ways to fund your Phase 1 pre-pension, post-retirement income:

1. The usual sustainable withdrawal rate (SWR) approach – a portfolio of mixed assets in your ISA that you ‘create’ an income from by selling a planned proportion each year.

2. Liability matching – a big pot of cash or bonds3 that won’t grow much or at all after-inflation, but that starts out big enough to take your desired income from each year until you can crack open your pension.

Let’s look at both in turn.

Method #1: Drawing down an ISA portfolio

The infamous 4% rule says we need to build wealth that’s worth 25 times our annual income requirement to become financially independent.

25 times your assets comes from: 1 / 4 x 100 = 25

£25,000 x 25 = £625,000

So we need £625,000 to take an annual, inflation-adjusted income of £25,000 at a 4% sustainable withdrawal rate (SWR).

But the 4% rule applies specifically to 30 year time frames.

What if you only need your ISA to last ten or 20 years until your personal pension comes on stream?

Then your sustainable withdrawal rate (SWR) from your ISA can be higher.

Let’s say you can use an 8% SWR to sustain spending from your ISA for ten years.

We can save much less into our ISA in that scenario:

1 / 8 x 100 = 12.5

£25,000 x 12.5 = £312,500

Now we only need ISA wealth of approx £312,500 to draw an income of £25,000 for ten years. After that, we will look to rely on our personal pension income, if our ISA is exhausted.

Bear in mind that a SWR calculates the maximum amount you can take from your portfolio without running out of money, based on historical returns data. (Terms and conditions apply.)

In most scenarios, you actually end up with a healthy surplus in your account when you use an appropriate SWR, even if your retirement was blighted by economic times of darkness such as the Great Depression, Stagflation, and the World Wars (provided you were on the winning side).

Nonetheless, we want a plan that minimises the chances of being forced back to work against our will.

We’ll therefore use cautious SWRs throughout this series that suit our possible timeframes – no matter if we need our tax shelters to last ten years or 50.

Method #2: Liability matching

The safest way to fund your retirement is to match your future expenses (liabilities) with a treasure chest of near risk-less, guaranteed income.

A ladder of inflation-linked bonds would be ideal.

In the ISA example above, a tranche of your bonds would mature every year, depositing £25,000 of inflation-adjusted income into your account for each of the ten years until you can access your pension.

Alternatively, you could save up enough cash to cover the ten years, remembering to factor in an allowance for inflation.

Liability matching with low risk assets generally requires more capital than investing in an equity heavy portfolio. The more resources you have, the less growth you need, and the less risk you need to take. It’s a trade-off.

My assumptions suggest that it’s likely quicker and safer for everybody to save cash4 to bridge an eight-year gap or shorter, between Phase 1 and Phase 2.

I’ll go into more detail on this later in the series.

Minimum pension age

Our ISAs need to span the gap between our early retirement age and our minimum pension age – the latter being when we can officially smash open our defined contribution pensions like piñatas.

Which will be when exactly?

Unbelievably – ahem – that’s not so easy to pin down.

Currently you can get into your defined contribution personal pension from age 55.

But the 2014 Coalition Government (remember them?) indicated that the minimum pension age would rise to 57 in 2028. Your minimum age would then be set to ten years before your State Pension age, from then on.

Thing is, they didn’t get around to legislating the minimum pension age change. So it’s not yet law. And then Brexit happened. Eyes were taken off the ball. Now no one knows what’s going on.

We don’t know whether the rise in the minimum age will take place as mooted. But many industry insiders say the change is still coming and can be legislated whenever the government likes, so it’s best to assume the worst.

If you were born in 1972, you will be 55 in 2027, so you should be fine, right? You can tap your pension in 2027 before the minimum age hikes to 57 in 2028.

Not so fast. There has been talk of tapering the change in. It could be you’re still caught out, even if you’re 55 a few years before 2028.

It’s a mess.

We’ll play it safe by assuming that our minimum pension age is set to ten years before our State Pension age for the purposes of the upcoming and unbelievably exciting case studies we’ve got planned for this series.

These case studies will also show how to calculate how long your ISAs will need to last (roughly), given your current circumstances.

How much do you need in your personal pension?

By the time you retire, your portfolio – when combined across all accounts – should be funded to last the rest of your life. How long might that be? If you’re age 60 or less today then you have at least a 10% chance of living to age 98 according to UK life expectancy data – unless you have good reason to think otherwise. There’s an even greater chance that one of you could survive if you’re part of a couple.

SWRs tend to reduce over longer periods of time, but the curve flattens out. Multiple research papers point5 to a 3% SWR being suitable for retirements of forty years and over – which likely accounts for the majority of people on the FI fast track.

Carrying on the £25,000 retirement income example, the wealth needed to sustain lifetime spending for over 40 years at a 3% SWR is:

1 / 3 x 100 = 33.333

£25,000 x 33.333 = £833,325.

We’ve established that the ISA portion of this wealth target needs to be £312,500 to ensure it doesn’t run out before the pensions come on stream ten years later.

Therefore, your personal pensions need to be funded to the tune of:

£833,325 – £312,500 = £520,825 by the time you pull the trigger.

My thanks to Monevator readers Aleph, Naeclue, and Oxdoc whose dogged persistence corrected my mistaken assumptions when this article was originally published.

Other income streams – So you’ve got other income streams like buy-to-let property and defined benefit pensions to tap into? Lovely. Just deduct those additional income streams from your assumed retirement income when they’re available. Your portfolio will only need to cover the remainder. We’ll cover the State Pension and DB pensions that become available further down the track at a later point in the series.

In the next post, we’ll cover how to choose a credible SWR that matches your personal timeframe and accounts for a low interest rate world, non-US investment returns and the implications that has for your asset allocation in retirement.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. Self Invested Personal Pensions. []
  2. We mean without fear on a practicable level. Ultimately there is no absolute safety. []
  3. We’re talking a ladder of individual bonds (not a fund) with staggered maturity dates. Each tranche of maturing bonds delivers a payload of capital to match your income needs per year you need to fund. Inflation-linked government bonds are best. A Purchase Life Annuity could also conceivably fit the bill. []
  4. A lack of suitable bonds makes it hard to build an inflation-linked bond ladder in the UK. []
  5. We’ll cover the research in more detail in the next episode in the series. []

Receive my articles for free in your inbox. Type your email and press submit:

{ 108 comments… add one }
  • 101 Sparschwein February 9, 2020, 3:22 pm

    Another excellent article and discussion. This is such a great blog.

    @ZX is raising an important point that I too haven’t seen discussed anywhere else. Those who just rely on CPI may be caught out. Housing and healthcare come to mind; these costs can hardly be mitigated just by being frugal and ignoring the neighbours’ standard of living. Healthcare is more of a risk in the US, but it also matters in the UK. (I know people who needed expensive medication that the NHS would not cover.)

    Estimating “personal CPI” is a good idea, it just seems difficult to do in practice (perhaps another Monevator topic?)
    So, when the time comes I may use CPI and SWR-1%, or add lump sums to cover the major personal inflation risks. Better work a few more years in the chosen profession than being forced back into work at older age, at uncertain terms.

  • 102 Sparschwein February 9, 2020, 3:38 pm

    For higher-rate taxpayers who are well below LTA, I’d suggest it is a simple decision between pensions and ISAs: Make use of the maximal higher-rate tax relief as long as you can. Fund the pension generously (see previous discussions about SWRs and inflation uncertainties).
    It is not a given that the high income will persist – permanent employment is just an illusion nowadays. And the government may remove the tax advantage.

  • 103 Sparschwein February 9, 2020, 4:45 pm

    Re Liability matching – I’m curious how this can work when all safe(ish) bonds have negative real returns, and many have negative *nominal* returns.

  • 104 The Accumulator February 9, 2020, 6:41 pm

    @ ZX – thank you for the link and additional thoughts.

  • 105 Scott February 11, 2020, 2:01 pm

    I’m really confused now, by all the talk that led to changes to the article. I can no longer see the original article so don’t know what’s changed, but in the figures used, where does 8% withdrawal rate come from for the 10-yr ‘living from ISA’ period come from? The way it’s written, it looks, to me, like wishful thinking, but I presume there must be some rationale behind it?

  • 106 P February 12, 2020, 11:33 am

    So with the rumoured pension relief changes I was wondering whether we can take advantage of carry over allowance from previous years to top up and still get higher rate tax relief after the changes are introduced?

  • 107 Al Cam February 13, 2020, 1:36 am

    So, in summary, it is all a bit of a dilemma; and should we plan to age and:
    a) spend the same – simplest to model, but there are difficulties around the choice of deflator; or
    b) spend more – issue of relative income, or, if you prefer, keeping up with the Smiths; or
    c) spend less – in accordance with more recent [sometimes even longitudinal] studies

    I have spent a fair bit of time and effort over several years looking at all of these issues (and others) and have come to the following somewhat less than profound conclusion.

    Nobody knows the future, and the best we can hope for at this distance is a route map that we may just live long enough to revise along the way. Trying to predict even a few months ahead to n decimal places is pretty impossible, so 40+ years is ….

    As usual, lots of people far cleverer than me reached this conclusion years ago. Perhaps the best known is Bill Bersteins 1998 series of 5 articles about the Retirement Calculator from Hell. A punchy summary written by Wade Pfau is given at:
    https://www.mcleanam.com/william-bernsteins-the-retirement-calculator-from-hell/

  • 108 Hare May 3, 2020, 2:55 pm

    @TI 97 Really looking forward to that natural yield article. It puts a name on what I’ve been doing without knowing what it was called.

    As food for thought, what happens here is that platform fees for SIPP/ISA/taxable account are all taken from cash capital in taxable account (the cash is a buffer not sitting there waiting to be spent if market drops. I am sure there is a fancy name for this). Maximum income is taken from natural yield in taxable account and used to fund expenses, along with a DB, Premium Bond wins etc. Every year enough is sold in taxable account to max out ISA and SIPP contributions (£20k plus £2,880 x 2) and capital gains used to create cash buffers or finance extra spending (the DB isn’t much). ISA and SIPP yield is retained, although ISA yield is dipped into for an occasional month.

    We prefer to keep spending down and have buffer upon buffer upon buffer, both of us having previously been in situations where we were in a bad financial place due to random life factors.

    I was curious to see what would happen now we are all in an economic ‘big thing’ and okay so far. It’s reassuring knowing there is so much room for maneeuvre if necessary.

Leave a Comment