≡ Menu

Should you hold cash instead of bonds?

Some Monevator readers question why they should bother owning bonds in their portfolio when they can earn higher yields with cash. They make a good point.

A competitive three-year fixed rate savings account bags you a 1.3% interest rate right now. Whup-whup!

Think that’s overenthusiastic? Well, a rate of 1.3% is positively Epicurean compared to the shoeing you can expect for offering your money to the bond market:

  • The yield on a three-year gilt is currently -0.1% according to the FT’s Bond Yields table. Robber barons!
  • The equivalent short-term gilt ETF will also steal your cash like an identity thief in the night. The SPDR 1-5 Year Gilt ETF is currently tempting punters with a -0.1% yield to maturity (YTM). They might as well offer to set your wallet on fire. Or send you on holiday to a wet market.
  • It’s no coincidence that this duration 3 gilt ETF has the same YTM as a three-year individual gilt.

If you compare the duration of any gilt ETF against the same length maturity on the FT’s Bond Yields table, you’ll see that the ETF’s YTM approximately matches the yield shown on the table.

Capiche? A gilt ETF is no more than the sum of its underlying gilts, after all.

That leaves our three-year cash option 1.4% ahead of its gilt equivalents. In cash terms, you’ll earn an extra £1,400 in interest per year for every £100,000 you have tucked away at that interest rate.

Meanwhile, taking on more interest rate risk does not look worth it – even 30-year gilts yield only 0.68%. As carrots go that reward is shaped like a particularly hideous load of old genitals.

And if you’re worried about inflation then the market is saying: “Don’t bother your head.”

What happens if interest rates rise?

Let’s say interest rates rise by 1%. That doesn’t seem likely any decade soon but bear with me.

Your old gilts immediately drop in price. That’s because their scrawny interest rates are forced to compete with the pumped-up coupons of shiny new bonds, which parade around the market like bodybuilders on Venice beach.

Our three-year gilt and short-term gilt ETF would fall about 3% in price to remain attractive to buyers. (As per the duration of 3 mentioned earlier).1

The three-year savings account would also drop its pants by about 3%, if there was an open market in fixed-rate savings bonds. You can instinctively tell that, by imagining how much interest you’d lose if rates rose by 1% the day after you opened the account.

A 24-hour delay would have netted you an extra £1 in interest per £100 saved for the next three years. Whipping out our compound interest microscope we can see:

£107.06 would be ours after saving £100 for three years at 2.3% interest per year –versus a paltry £103.95 in an alternative universe where we only earned 1.3% interest.

103.95 / 107.06 x 100 = 97.1%, or a 2.9% loss if you were condemned to life in that wrong universe.

Pop this battle royale into a duration calculator and you get a duration of 2.9 – confirming the 2.9% loss for the 1% rise in interest rate.

If you’re as anal as I am then you can put the very same particulars into a bond pricing calculator. The value of your £100 drops to £97.13 due to the 1% interest rise. High five! (C’mon, don’t leave me hanging…)

The savings ‘bond’ is essentially the same as the outmoded gilt. You’ll take a 3% loss if you stick with it. Except that on the bond market you’ve already taken that capital loss quicker than you can say, ‘Bond Apocalypse’. Whereas all you need do with the cash is foist the unwanted savings account back on to the bank. It’s like financial wardrobing.

If the switch costs you less than 3% (in this case) then that’s another win for cash over similar maturity gilts.

Suppose that busting out of your savings account incurs a penalty of 180 days interest.

180 / 365 x 100 = 49.3% (the percentage of your interest rate that you’ll lose that year).

0.493 x 1.3 (the account’s annual rate of interest) = 0.64% (loss of interest that year).

You’re paying a 0.64% cost to ditch the savings account versus a 3% loss on the gilts.

This calculator shows you the interest rate you’ll actually get on a fixed rate savings account if you take an early withdrawal charge.

And this early withdrawal calculator from the excellent Finance Buff goes a stage further if you can’t decide whether to stay or go.

The comparison between cash and gilt losses only worsens as maturities lengthen. If you’re the Nostradamus of interest rate forecasts then you know what to do…

Bonds in a crisis

Where gilts tend to excel – especially over the last two decades – is spiking in price when equities are jumping off a cliff.

Coronavirus crash: gilts vs cash vs equities

Chart of gilts versus cash versus equities during the coronavirus crash.

Source: JustETF.com

The chart shows gilt ETFs peaking in unison on 9 March 2020. The longer their maturity, the higher they surge:

  • Long gilts: +11.9% (red line)
  • Intermediate gilts: +7.2% (orange line)
  • Short gilts: +0.99% (blue line)
  • Money market (cash equivalent): +0.03% (yellow line)

When global equities hit bottom on March 23, a 60:40 portfolio (blue line) was in much better shape than a 100% equities portfolio (green line):

60:40 Global equities : Money market (cash)

Cash and equities portfolio versus 100% equities

The 60:40 portfolio was down 16% while equities face-planted -26%. Of course, -16% isn’t great, but you can see the ride is gentler and that can make the difference between panicking and holding on.

60:40 Global equities : Intermediate gilts

bond and equities portfolio versus 100% equities

The 60:40 intermediate gilt portfolio performed better than its cash cousin but not by much.

At the height of the crisis, this portfolio was down 14%. I was very glad I held gilts on 23 March but I doubt I’d have freaked out at -16% either. With that said, everybody has a tipping point…

Still, this is only one data point. Intermediate gilts did much better during the Global Financial Crisis when they rose 19% while global equities tanked -38%.

You could argue that the spike in gilts gives you more firepower when you rebalance. That’s true, although many studies have shown the rebalancing bonus to be small to non-existent. You also have to actually be able to rebalance into the teeth of the storm.

It’s worth noting that if your cash is in variable rate accounts then yields will most likely tumble during a recession (witness the rate slashing of the last few months). Your gilts can still make capital gains, which may be usefully rebalanced when you regain your poise.

Avoid binary thinking

It’s easy to forget in our polarised age that there is an alternative to ‘For’ versus ‘Against’.

Do we have to choose cash or bonds? The very point of diversification is that we place our chips on both.

120 years of UK asset returns shows that you were better off holding some cash in your portfolio 62% of the time when equities scored an annual loss. (Although cash has taken a beating every year since 2008 versus gilts and equities).

History also tells us that cash has been nothing but a drag on sustainable withdrawal rates if you want your retirement portfolio to last longer than 25 years.

I’m not attracted to this time is different theories but we are living through strange times. As yields fall below zero, cash and short-term gilts act like clapped out O-rings and lose their ability to contain losses. But long bonds (a proportion of which are held in intermediate gilt funds) can still make huge countervailing gains in sub-zero conditions.

It’s interest rate risk that looms largest in most people’s minds when they think about bonds, though. I know I didn’t want it holding me back when I first started investing. As a result, the defensive side of my portfolio was all in cash that doubled up as an emergency fund. Not best practice.

Back in those days I ignored two major risks:

  • I had no idea what my risk tolerance really was beyond some vague notion of ‘backing myself’ in a crisis. The reality is I didn’t know how I’d react.
  • The second problem is that at some point – without realising it – you’re no longer the devil-may-care desperado of old. You wake up one day with something to lose, but you never pass a road sign saying: ‘You’ve Made It. Caution Ahead.’

Without a plan to ease off the brakes, there’s every chance you could careen off the road during a future pile-up.

To that end, government bonds still provide the best stopping power you can buy.

And I’ll keep making room in my portfolio for gilts and cash because, well, diversification.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

Bonus appendix: miscellaneous ‘cash vs bonds’ tie-breakers


As everyone in the UK is aware since that incident with Northern Rock, banks can go bust. Up to £85,000 worth of your cash is protected per ‘authorised institution’ thanks to the FSCS compensation scheme.

That sounds pretty sweet until you find out that 100% of your readies are protected when you hand them over to the British Government in exchange for an IOU – aka a gilt. Her Majesty’s Treasury will definitely pay you back.2

That in turn sounds pretty sweet until you check out the investor compensation scheme and realise that your 100% protected gilt holdings could disappear in a puff of mismanagement if your fund or platform provider went down in mysterious circumstances.

Then you’re back to £85,000 compensation, or less if the FSCS scheme turns out not to apply. A disaster like this is not likely but it could happen and it casts new shade on the whole ‘backstopped by the UK’ promise.

The sweet spot is cash parked in the National Savings & Investments (NS&I) bank. NS&I savings are guaranteed by the government and there’s no other weak link in the chain forcing me to write several lines of warning.

Better still, NS&I savings products are hot right now especially as the government has a huge hole to plug in the public finances.

Even better than that, you can pop eligible NS&I products into your SIPP. Although it looks like only owners of expensive ‘full’ SIPPs and SSAS vehicles need apply. ‘Simple’ SIPPs – as offered by most platforms – don’t look like they co-operate.

But I’m not expecting NS&I index-linked certificates to come back any time soon. These amazing inflation shields – perfectly tailored for the little guy – are subject to a value-for-money test by the Treasury. That pits them against the cost to the public purse of raising funds in the wholesale markets using equivalent gilts.

As the government has been able to issue index-linked3 gilts at negative real yields for several years, I don’t think they’re likely to come to the likes of you and me for a few billion, even if we agreed to an interest rate of CPI +0%.

Taxes and other cost considerations

Cash in a savings account doesn’t incur dealing fees or OCF charges but that’s neither here nor there when you’re making strategic asset allocation decisions. Most passive investors can hold gilt index trackers extremely cheaply.

Individual gilts are not liable to capital gains whereas gilt funds are.

Interest paid by bonds and bond funds benefits from your tax-exempt Personal Savings Allowance and Starting Rate for Savings, just as cash does.

  1. The duration number tells us approximately how much a bond or bond fund will gain or fall in value for every 1% change in interest rates. []
  2. Although they do reserve the right to inflate away the national debt like a Chinese Sky Lantern if things ever get a bit much. []
  3. That is, a return that keeps the value of your investment unchanged in real terms after a particular measure of inflation. []

Receive my articles for free in your inbox. Type your email and press submit:

{ 53 comments… add one }
  • 51 JohnG July 27, 2020, 12:21 pm

    @TA – well 1.2% is more realistic (from £25 prizes only) and you only get an average amount by having a few thou over a few years, but I think MSE uses a bit of unfair bias in general in favour of fixed savings/ mortgage repayments – ie you never never never see Martin recomend the world of investments

    I’ll admit upfront that I’m a Martin Lewis fanboy. The amount he has done to help people is incredible, and he seems to have a strong ethic about giving honest advice.

    I wouldn’t describe his bias as unfair. I think he wants their advice to be beneficial to an extremely broad and financially ‘naive’ audience. In the same way that Monevator benefits from having a relatively clear passive focus, MSE benefits from being accessible money advice for the masses.

    I’m a higher rate tax payer in a stable financial situation who uses their ISA allowance and has interest beyond their tax free savings allowance; this means that for me premium bonds are a great option; but I’m not Martin’s target audience, I don’t need his help as badly as millions of others, and trying to provide advice that covers all bases would make it less effective for everyone.

    It will be interesting to see if he does start to advocate PBs more widely in the next few months if interest available on alternatives remains so poor or even gets worse; because I would agree that at the moment I think the case for PBs even for people with modest savings is pretty good.

  • 52 Matthew July 27, 2020, 1:18 pm

    @johng – I suppose my main worry about Martin Lewis is that he’s reinforcing a bunker mentality of zero risk, guarantee everything – you’ll get people overpaying their mortgage ‘cos Martin told them when they really should focus on pension (and as a result they never have enough savings to get signposted by their bank to investing), or likewise a poor person potentially has the most to hypothetically gain from premium bonds. I think its mostly a “dont sue me” problem but he IS giving finacial advice and that does not account for inflation, it won’t be appropriate for, lets say… the young

    Current invester education is going to great lengths to get people out of this bunker mentality. It can be hard when one family member wants to invest but the spouse is too worried about “the stock market” to ever allow it, or people start Buy to letting, because its the only investing they know, or put solar panels on their roof in England because they dont realise that renewable energy funds exist that could do it on scale where there is sun.

    There was a time when we’d look to Martin for the best accounts but he’s not the only comparison site nowadays, so to speak, and not the only place that’d alert you to tax breaks. If people really want to find out how to save money, they would find a way. Helping the average consumer could limit consuption when the economy – and their own jobs – need it to continue

  • 53 Beeka August 12, 2020, 12:06 pm

    @matthew I’d suggest monevator readers are not Martin’s key audience… although though they might be related to people who are: I know I am. I see him as educating those whose monthly spend includes £100 on Sky; £50 on latest phone; £120 on variable energy tariff; £10 for ‘premium’ banking; £?? minimum payment for credit card; plus renewing home and car insurance and then complain about not having any money. For these people, paying off the mortgage, along with the other zero-risk suggestions, will make a big short-term difference and build into a long-term one.

    Leveraging your shelter to invest in the market is fairly advanced stuff and only for people with a plan… most people I meet don’t have one. Few have nest eggs requiring jumps through tax-efficient hoops.

Leave a Comment