≡ Menu

Weekend reading: On the silver scream

Our Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Where were you for the Great Crash of 2026? Cowering behind the sofa? Or toasting your short positions in the back of an Uber on the way to snag a Lambo?

[Lamb-OH, dear. It’s a car, not a quadruped. Eh? Yes I know we usually have roast dinner on a Sunday.]

Not a crash in the stock market. Don’t panic! Equities continue to chug along in a Schrödinger Bubble.

No, I’m talking about the Great Silver Crash of Friday, 30 January 2026:

Down over 30% at one point. That’s almost the entire Covid crash in the stock market in just one day for the ‘other’ precious metal.

Silver surfer

Gold and silver had been on a tear for months, of course – silver had pretty much gone parabolic. (See the second graph in my links below.)

So to see a blow-up is hardly unexpected, even if – as usual – there seems no certain reason why it crashed from a ludicrously overbought position today as opposed to a week ago.

[Yes dear, I know the man on CNBC said he knows. Why’s he on the telly then and not on his private island? And no I didn’t sell grannie’s silver spoons like you told me to.]

Clearly Trump choosing a non-crazy for the next Federal Reserve chair must have been the catalyst for lesser paranoiacs to start dumping their precious metals and bunker down payments.

But you don’t need to be George Soros to suspect a lot of leverage was involved to create carnage on this scale – and that the ferocity suggests a big squeeze.

Maybe the crazy run-up to this plunge was all due to a handful of hedge knights funds jousting with each other? The Benighted of the Seven Kingdoms having at it?

Paging Michael Lewis!

[No, MICHAEL Lewis dear, not John Lewis. Yes, him who wrote the film about Christian Bale.]

Have a great weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 1 comment }

Don’t tell me your opinion, show me your portfolio [Members]

Our Moguls logo

Wealth warning: This is not financial advice. It’s one man’s mildly obsessive system for herding family wealth across multiple wrappers, generations, and episodes of the long-running saga ‘Finumus Predicts Poorly’. Your tax situation, access to financial products, and tolerance for faff will differ. Possibly dramatically.

The Finumus Family Office (me, hunched over a spreadsheet like Gollum with a Bloomberg terminal) manages assets across three generations of the Finumus family.

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 13 comments }

Our updated guide to help you find the best online broker

Attention UK investors! Remember our massive broker comparison table? Well, we’ve rolled up our sleeves and updated it again to help you find the best online broker for you.

Cleaning up a mass spillage of Smarties with chopsticks would be less tedious. But it would not have produced a quick and easy overview of all the main execution-only investment services.

Investment platforms, stock brokers, call them what you will… we’ve stripped them back to basics for you to eyeball over a cup of cocoa and a handful of your favourite stimulants.

Online brokers laid bare in our comparison table

What’s changed with this update?

Disclosure: Links to platforms may be affiliate links, where we may earn a commission. This article is not personal financial advice. When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. With commission-free brokers other fees may apply. See terms and fees. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.

UK platform behemoth Hargreaves Lansdown has remixed its fee schedule for the first time in years. It seems even the mightiest are not immune to downward price pressure on investing charges!

Whether Hargreaves Lansdown is now any more competitive or not depends on how you use its services. The headline platform charge was cut along with trading costs for ETFs, shares, investment trusts, and gilts. But fee caps rose along with trading costs for funds.

The Hargreaves Lansdown price changes go into effect on 1 March.

Meanwhile, Freetrade has fully ditched SIPP charges for its Basic plan customers. This Basic plan looks pretty good so it could be worth a nosey.

IG scrapped its standing charge as well, and so joins Freetrade among the swelling ranks of UK brokers who don’t sting you for platform fees or trading commissions – just so long as you can avoid the lure of its more exotic temptations.

If zero fees make you queasy then Interactive Investor looks very competitive for flat-rate SIPPs now it has cleaned up what was one of the most bewildering fee schedules in the industry.

Meanwhile Scottish Widows (formerly iWeb) is keenly priced for GIAs and stocks and shares ISAs, so long as you trade as rarely as a camel drinks water.

Who’s the best broker?

It’s impossible to say. There are too many subtle differences in the offers. The UK’s brokers occupy more niches than the mammal family. And while I know which one is best for me, I can’t know which one is right for you.

What we have done is laser focus the comparison onto the most important factor in play: cost.

An execution-only broker is not on this Earth to hold anyone’s hand.

Yes, we want their websites to work. We’d prefer them to not screw us over, go bust, or send us to the seventh circle of call centre hell. These things we take for granted.

So customer service metrics are not included in this table. It’s purely a bare-knuckle contest of brute cost for services rendered.

On that basis we’ve updated our ‘Good for’ column as below.

Commission-free brokers

These are commission-free brokers. It’s always worth looking at a commission-free broker’s ‘How we make money’ page because – rest assured – they will be earning a buck, one way or another.

Just search that topic on their websites.

If you find commission-free brokers unsettling, then stay under the FSCS £85,000 investor compensation limit or use a broker that charges fees directly. You’ll find some very competitive offers in our table.

Prefer paying directly?

ISAs and GIAs

  • Scottish Widows

SIPPs

The best choice for you depends on how often you trade and the value of your accounts, plus your personal priorities around customer service, family accounts, flexible ISAs, multi-currency accounts, and so on.

Our ‘Good for’ choices are purely cost-based. We assume 12 buy and four sell trades per year. Buy trades use a broker’s regular investing scheme when available.

Using the full table

We divide the major UK brokers into four camps:

  • Flat-fee brokers – these charge one price for platform services, regardless of the size of your assets. In other words, they might charge you £100 per year, whether your portfolio is worth £1,000 or £1 million. Generally, if you’ve got a large portfolio then you definitely want to look here. Bear in mind that fixed fee doesn’t mean you won’t also be tapped up for dealing monies and a laundry list of other charges.
  • Percentage-fee brokers – this is where the wealthy need to be careful. These guys charge a percentage of your assets, say 0.3% per year. For a portfolio of £1,000 this would amount to a fee of £3 – but on £1 million you’d be paying £3,000. Small investors should generally use percentage-fee brokers. However even surprisingly moderate rollers are better off with fixed fees. Many percentage-fee brokers offer fee caps and tiered charges to limit the damage.
  • Commission-free brokers – these upstarts apparently don’t charge you at all. Their marketing departments have it easy, simply pointing to £0 account charges and trading fees costing diddly squat. So why don’t these firms go bankrupt? Because they make up the difference using other methods. Revenue streams can include higher spreads, no interest on cash, and cross-selling more profitable services.
  • Trading platforms – brokerages that suit active investors who want to deal mostly in shares and more exotic securities besides. Think of noob-unfriendly sites like Interactive Brokers, Degiro, and friends.

Our table looks complex. But choosing the right broker needn’t be any more painful than checking it offers the investments you want and running a few numbers on your portfolio.

Help us find the best online broker for all of you

Our table’s ongoing vitality relies on crowd-sourcing.

We review the whole thing roughly every three months. But it can be kept permanently up-to-date if you contact us or leave a comment every time you find an inaccuracy, fresh information, or a platform you think should be added.

Thanks to your efforts as much as ours, our broker comparison table has become an invaluable resource for UK investors looking to find the best online broker.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 395 comments }
Our Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Were you one of the millions who a few years ago became obsessed with the fall of the Roman Empire?

Being stuck inside during the pandemic saw minds of a certain age turn to the rise of Julius Caesar, the demise of the Republic, and how Rome was eventually overrun (and run by – IYKYK) the barbarians.

Theories abound when it comes to explaining Rome’s collapse: populism, a reliance on slavery, imported decadence, outsourcing the military, debasing the currency. All more than enough to keep anyone in podcasts for a year.

However, if the collapse of the Roman Empire is hard to figure out, then the reasons for the decline and fall of another once all-conquering force – the UK property market, especially in London and the South East – and its prospects for recovery are equally contested.

You’ll recall prime prices in London are flat over the past ten years and well down in real terms.

The rest of the capital hasn’t fared much better – one in seven property owners in the capital sold at a loss last year, according to the Land Registry – and the Covid-migration price bounce in the more scenic regions of the South East long ago unwound, too.

It’s largely only in the Midlands and the North of England where prices are still advancing.

And mostly that’s because they took so long to recover from the crash of 2008/2009.

Barbarians at the front gate

Who should disappointed homeowners blame for the down valuations, gazundering would-be purchasers, and houses that fail to sell amid a glut of similar listings?

Well, themselves in the first instance for pricing their homes too highly, of course.

But as for what did for the UK property market more generally – take your pick.

Interest rate rises surely did the most damage recently. But London was soggy long before the five-minute reign of Empress Liz Truss spiked mortgage rates up.

Higher transaction taxes and a decade-long effort to make buy-to-let less attractive to casual investors? They must be in the mix.

The overall tax take is up too. That leaves less to spend on property.

Then you have Brexit and its aftermath, and the exodus of non-dom money in London.

Most recently, Labour has thrown a wet blanket over any sparks of life in the UK economy, not least with its interminable Budget speculation. (It’ll be ‘interesting’ to see the impact of its new mansion tax on homes above £2m.)

Bread and circuses

On the other hand, incomes have risen quite a bit in recent years – in nominal terms at least – and years of price attrition has surely taken the froth off most property valuations.

The FT’s graph below shows that first-time buyer affordability has improved. Those of us who own our homes thanks to a mortgage are also typically in a better spot, as inflation has eroded the real value of our often nominally-monstrous debts.

And – whisper it – Rachel Reeves and her wonks have gone for more than a month now without floating a trial balloon to send would-be homebuyers back under their blankets.

Finally, we’re building far fewer new homes than we need to. This should help support prices, especially in London.

All that adds up to what counts for optimism in UK property these days!

Caveat emptor

Talking of the chancellor, if I were her I would have simplified and slashed stamp duty on residential property in the Budget, with the expectation it would be at worst revenue neutral.

Maybe it’s a South of England thing, but nobody thinks about moving without looking at the stamp duty bill – easily tens of thousands for a three-bed terrace in London – and quailing. And often opting not to move as a consequence.

Something needs to get the UK growing again, and everyone playing swapsies with property – and revamping kitchens and bathrooms as they do so – has helped before.

If we could have an activity boom without prices taking off again, so much the better.

As things stand though, moving home remains dauntingly expensive. And there’s far less confidence in the property market than you’d expect, given relatively low unemployment and interest rates off their highs.

Consider this selection of the week’s relevant reads:

  • Homes for sale reach eight-year high as competition intensifies – This Is Money
  • UK property market ‘on the up’ amid bump in housing prices – Guardian
  • Is now a good time to sell your home? – Which
  • What’s behind London’s house price slump? – This Is Money
  • The problem with the mansion tax is it’s badly designed [Paywall]FT

The UK property market nearly always sees an optimistic asking price bump in January. But beyond that, who knows what 2026 will bring?

Feel free to place your bets in the comments – but personally I doubt we’re off to the chariot races.

(Sorry, I’ll get my toga.)

Have a great weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 43 comments }