≡ Menu
Picture of some little houses and hands moving them around to stand in for remortgaging, with the caption “The Rate Escape”

Apparently hundreds of thousands of Brits don’t ever switch their mortgage. This is despite the fact that staying on an old deal instead of remortgaging promptly can be horribly expensive.

And I don’t mean ‘splurging on a fancy lunch’ expensive, either. More like ‘buying a brand new VW Golf and driving it straight into the sea’ expensive. Even delaying remortgaging by just a couple of months could cost you the same as a family holiday.

As a Monevator reader, you presumably don’t enjoy setting tenners on fire!

Interest rates can change very rapidly. 2026 began with mortgage rates creeping down, and so any delay in remortgaging didn’t matter much.

However in the past month or so, ‘politics’ has caused mortgage rates to spike. The difference in interest payable between someone who locked in a mortgage rate early and someone who is just getting around to it could be pretty chunky.

So what’s to be done?

Planning ahead to find a good new deal before your old mortgage expires is obviously ideal. But even if the end of your deal is fast approaching – or it’s passed already – you can still take some of the sting out of recent rate rises.

How mortgages catch people out

In some countries, all mortgages are fixed products. You take out a 30-year mortgage at a 5% interest rate, and if you do nothing else then you pay that 5% interest for 30 years.

Job done.

But in the UK? Not so. Though fintech start-ups occasionally tout fixed-for-life mortgages as the future, the idea still hasn’t caught on.

Instead, many of us buy mortgages the same way we get our broadband. We find a good deal for the first few years, and then when we’ve stopped paying attention our charges are whacked up.

Sure, a bank will reel you in with an attractive 3.5% fixed rate. But that rate won’t last more than a few years before it shoves you on to what they call the Standard Variable Rate (SVR).

Which perhaps we should rename the SVR the ‘Seriously Villainous Rate’ – because despite the Bank of England’s Bank Rate being just 3.75% as I type, the SVR at some lenders exceeds 8%!

Now, that SVR will rise and fall with Bank Rate. So even on an SVR you might see your repayments fall.

You might also ask: do a few percentage points really matter in the grand scheme of things, anyway?

Well, yes, when you’re borrowing hundreds of thousands of pounds. Small differences add up.

The cost of higher rates can be colossal

Let’s meet Bill.

Bill is a smart guy. He gets his favourite craft beer delivered. It’s cheaper and better that way than the pub. Bill also loves trading stocks on his phone. He thinks he’s pretty savvy.

But Bill spends all day in meetings and on calls, so he doesn’t really want to deal with more admin when he gets home. He’s not sure where ‘sort out the mortgage’ comes on his To Do list – but it’s definitely below ‘veg out on the sofa with an Uber Eats and Young Sherlock.’

Back when he bought his house, Bill borrowed £750,000 over 25 years on a two-year fixed rate deal. (Yes it’s a lot of money. Bill works in London and he likes a garden. It’s expensive out there.)

  • For the first two years, at 3.5% interest, Bill repaid £3,755 per month.

But recently, Bill has seen a couple of emails from his bank that hasn’t got round to reading…

…and wham, bam, now he’s paying 8% as his fixed rate deal expires and he drops onto the bank’s SVR.

  • Bill’s bank will draw £5,789 from his account next month. And he’ll continue to pay £2,034 extra every single month on his mortgage until he sorts it out.

That’s enough to buy a new car over a full year. And this is just to service the higher interest cost, remember – Bill is not paying off his mortgage any faster.

Delaying remortgaging by just a few months is bad enough

We can all see how this should go.

You’re switched on about your mortgage options. So six months before your cheap rate expires, you’re already looking out for deals. Perhaps you’ve got a mortgage broker on the case, too.

The result: everything is sorted ahead before the deadline, and neatly tied with a bow.

But what if that doesn’t happen? Or if life took over for a while, and you find yourself in Bill’s situation?

Perhaps you’ve been dealing with a sick relative, or trying to dig your way out of some nightmare at work? You know the mortgage needs to be sorted. But you’ll get to it when you’re ready.

Most people would think that’s a reasonable decision during a stressful time.

But let’s go back to Bill’s £750,000 mortgage and look at a few potential increases when on an SVR:

Initial Rate SVR Repayments
(Initial Rate)
Repayments
(SVR)
Monthly Increase
3.50% 8% £3,755 £5,789 £2,034
3.75% 8% £3,856 £5,789 £1,933
4.00% 8% £3,959 £5,789 £1,830
4.25% 8% £4,063 £5,789 £1,726
4.50% 8% £4,169 £5,789 £1,620

Even when you start on a higher initial rate of 4.5%, that SVR hike still stings.

It’s the definition of paying money for nothing.

Switched on

I understand why most ‘switch to save money’ messages get drowned out amid the noise of daily life.

Even I’m not very motivated to pocket an extra 20p by switching to a different brand of baked beans.

But given that being just a month late with your mortgage switch could cost you a four-figure sum, I’d say this is one opportunity to keep track of.

Wealth warning Mortgages are big and complex and mistakes can involve life-changing sums of money. Seek professional advice if you need it. For instance from an FCA-regulated mortgage broker. Some brokers may charge a fee, but others will not charge you and instead get a commission from the lender.

Why doesn’t everybody switch?

If it’s such a no-brainer to switch, then why do hundreds of thousands of people routinely pay the SVR?

Perhaps some customers just don’t know any better. They haven’t realised they can switch to another lender. After all, they took out a 25-year mortgage, and their bank probably won’t fall over itself to tell them how to reduce their interest payments.

For other people, remortgaging is just on the back burner. Something to deal with when life is quieter.

Maybe people believe that they owe so little that there’s no point in remortgaging? That’s a personal decision, but it’s worth knowing that various lenders do offer mortgages for very small sums. Barclays and TSB, for example, offer mortgages for as little as £5,000.

People might also have seen their financial situation change for the worse. For example, they lose their job. It could be impossible to move to a new lender.

Even so, in the vast majority of cases, people can still remortgage onto a new deal with their existing lender. 1

In all these cases, it can’t hurt to ask a broker what your options are to get you off the SVR and onto a more competitive deal.

Remortgaging takes time

If you’re switching to a new lender, there is legal paperwork that takes its sweet time to resolve.

For starters the new lender probably wants to make sure that the house they’re lending against actually has four walls and a door. Perhaps they also want to verify you have an income to pay them back.

They’ll also want to get their name recorded with the Land Registry so you can’t sell the house and flee to the airport with a suitcase full of cash.

So it can take several weeks to switch mortgages. Even if you’re fairly on top of things, you might end up on the SVR for a period.

I once spent a month on the SVR simply because the solicitors took so long to process the paperwork.

Thankfully – after a fairly stuffy email to their complaints department – the solicitors coughed back up the additional interest I’d incurred. But it was hardly ideal.

If you do want to play the field with different lenders, get the ball rolling early on. Six months before your deal expires is recommended. That gives you three months or so for the legal gremlins to sort themselves out after you’ve made your decision.

If you haven’t got that much time

What if you’ve already found yourself on a SVR? Or you will be on one in a few weeks’ time?

Trying to tie down the best possible deal from a range of lenders could see you paying bucketloads of interest on that higher SVR whilst you wait for the cogs to slowly turn.

Instead the quickest solution, generally, is to swap to a new deal with your existing lender, typically via what is known as a ‘product transfer’.

Your current bank won’t need mountains of new legal paperwork. They validated your financials when they first offered you a mortgage.

According to an expert writing recently in the Financial Times:

…the product transfer [has] come into its own since the pandemic.

In 2006, when there was a far smaller proportion of fixed-term deals, there were 1.14mn remortgages. Last year, there were 320,000 remortgages – and over 1.54mn product transfers.

Rather than borrowers being left to drop on to typically much higher revert-to rates or arranging a remortgage, they are now incentivised to transfer to a new fixed rate with their existing lender.

The main benefit is that you don’t need to pass any additional affordability tests – which can be tricky, given the higher interest rates, and the fact that high house prices and stricter lending criteria mean buyers’ finances are typically stretched to begin with.

The downside? It might not be the cheapest mortgage offer you could get.

Another option is to again quickly switch to a new mortgage with your existing provider, but then to start that longer process of looking at other lenders.

Your current lender probably won’t appreciate you setting up a mortgage that you’ll ditch in a few months, but hey ho. That’s their problem, not yours.

Although…you’ll need to be wary of Early Repayment Charges (ERCs).

The too-early bird gets a worm

ERCs are used by banks to stop their customers playing both sides.

If you could take out a fixed rate mortgage, see rates drop, and then switch to a lower rate elsewhere, your original lender wouldn’t make the profit it anticipated when it originally offered you a mortgage.

So on some products (especially fixed rates) you’ll incur percentage-based charges for paying off the mortgage early. However there are plenty of mortgage deals around that don’t come with such penalties.

If you switch from your SVR to a cheaper product with no ERC, then you’ve dealt with the sky-high SVR. Now you can scour the market for the very cheapest deal at your leisure.

And when the time comes to move to your new lender, your ‘No ERC’ mortgage can be settled without incurring thousands in penalty charges.

Don’t let product fees stop you

You might now be thinking, “but a new deal will come with a £999 product fee!”

And sure, some do.

But using this as a reason to delay switching might not make much financial sense. You could be incurring thousands of pounds in extra interest just to avoid a £999 fee.

What’s more, there are plenty of mortgages out there with no or negligible upfront fees. The trade-off typically being a higher mortgage rate.

In some cases, such no-fee deals are your best option – especially if you’re only planning to pay that higher rate for a few months.

Brokers can advise you on all of these scenarios and figure out which will ultimately be cheapest. Though if you are thinking of making two switches, it’s worth mentioning this to them from the get-go.

Remortgaging when you have plenty of time

There are some considerations for people with more time to think about, too. For one thing, the government’s Mortgage Charter remains active – for the 49 lenders that signed up to it, anyway.

(What do you mean you never heard of the mortgage charter?)

For our purposes when remortgaging, one important aspect of the charter is it says customers can lock-in a new deal up to six months before their fixed rate deal ends.

Until very recently, mortgage rates were gradually easing down. Hence this flexibility wasn’t really a big deal. But now, with mortgage rates flying up, securing a ‘good for now’ rate ASAP has become another key weapon in your money-saving arsenal.

If the market moves in the following months and a better deal becomes available, you can swap to that better deal. Hence this way you’re protected against rates rising in the final three to six months of your deal’s term, but you’ve got a backstop to avoid landing on the SVR if something changes in the meantime.

With lots of time to spare you can also consider whether you want to work directly with a lender’s advisers, or go with an independent broker.

Personally – after a two-hour grilling from a building society about when I might be replacing my sofa and endless questions about obscure items on payslips – I’d pick the broker every time.

At least when my broker rants about how idiotic the underwriters at my bank are, he’s the one that spent hours bashing his head against the wall, not me.

A remortgaging checklist

Given that being a couple of months late to remortgaging might cost more than your summer holiday, I think it’s fair to suggest we should all plan ahead.

Here’s the steps to take:

  1. Check the expiry date of your mortgage’s initial rate. Put it in the calendar or write it on the kitchen wall.
  2. Don’t wait for your lender to nudge you. Get the ball rolling six months ahead of the expiry date.
  3. Approach your lender or a broker. See what deals you can lock in now, and check any penalties for cancelling.
  4. Remember to re-check. Make sure there isn’t a better deal out there as the switch date approaches.
  5. If you’re particularly keen, continue to recheck every few months or annually. Consider any fees you’d pay for settling the mortgage early – those ERC penalties – if better rates emerge.

And if you’re reading this on an SVR, then don’t delay getting onto a new deal. Get on your phone and start making calls! I’m sure your bank will keep making money without your help.

  1. There are a number of people known as ‘mortgage prisoners’ who cannot switch. This is often because their mortgages are owned by firms that don’t offer new mortgage products. MoneySavingExpert has lots more on this.[]
{ 6 comments }

Best global tracker funds – how to choose

A global tracker fund simulates the total world investment market.

A global tracker fund takes care of all your equity diversification needs in a single investment product.

In this post, we’ll explain how to choose the best global tracker fund for you. We’ll also list our top picks from the choices on offer. 

What is a tracker fund?

A tracker fund is an investment fund that tracks an index like the S&P 500 for the US or, in the case of a global tracker, an index such as the FTSE All World. 

Your money is pooled alongside the global tracker’s many other participants. Together this capital is invested by the fund’s management team into every major stock market on the planet. 

As an investor in an index fund, you get a slice of ownership in thousands of world-class firms. As a result you buy into the prospects of entire industries, countries, and continents at a stroke. 

An index followed by a global tracker fund is essentially an international league table of the world’s leading companies, from Apple to Nvidia to Taiwanese semiconductor giant TSMC. 

Global tracker funds hold stocks 1 to replicate their chosen index as faithfully as possible. The index meanwhile is driven by the fortunes of its constituent firms. Over the long-term, company valuations rise and fall consonant with their performance, investor sentiment, and global capital’s best estimate of their future earnings. 

Investing this way is known as index investing or passive investing. We believe it’s the best strategy for most people to choose to maximise their chances of meeting their financial goals. 

Investing giants like Warren Buffet recommend index funds. Even some ex-hedge fund managers have switched sides and urge everyday investors to pick global index trackers!

Global tracker funds – what really matters?

All-World – Most products labelled world index funds only encompass developed world countries. They skip the emerging markets, including the likes of China and India.

Such ‘world index trackers’ are less representative of the global economy. Instead look for ‘All-World’ or ‘Global’ index funds that include emerging markets.

Alternatively, if you do choose a developed world solution, you can add an emerging market index fund to your portfolio to make up the difference.

Diversification – Following on from the above, compare how many stocks your shortlist of global tracker funds includes. The more the better, because your index fund will then do a better job of representing the global stock markets that it follows.

Cost – This is the most important factor that will impact your returns and that you can control. There’s often little performance differential between global index trackers. If in doubt, pick the cheapest by Ongoing Charge Figure (OCF)Total Expense Ratio (TER)

Reassuringly-expensive price tags will not secure you a better global equity tracker fund. Go for cheap, vanilla flavour trackers. Don’t worry about bells and whistles. 

Don’t fret about small changes in cost, either. An OCF differential of 0.1% on £10,000 is just £10.

For example, if you had £50,000 in a fund with an OCF of 0.25% that would cost you: 

£50,000 x 0.0025 = £125 annually. 

Whereas a similar fund rocking an OCF of 0.15% would set you back £75 per year in charges.

Of course, only you can know your personal hassle threshold. Try to work out whether the impact of costs over your investing lifetime is worth switching.

Investor compensation – You’re covered for up to £85,000 if your global index fund is based in the UK. ETFs are not included. Note, investor compensation schemes only kick in if fund manager goes bust and your money disappears. Stock market losses are not covered! (Your broker is also covered by the same FSCS scheme. If the broker goes pop then ETFs and offshore index trackers are protected, so as long as your platform qualifies for the scheme.)

The index – You should look up the tracker’s index to make sure it’s truly global. If it isn’t, find out what’s missing. Check your product’s factsheet, too.

Global index fund or global ETF?

Disclosure: Links to platforms may be affiliate links, where we may earn a commission. This article is not personal financial advice. When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. With commission-free brokers other fees may apply. See terms and fees. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.

ETFs and index funds are both types of index tracker. They’re both excellent ways of diversifying your investments across the globe for an amazingly low cost. 

We’re equally happy using ETFs or index funds. We include both in our best global tracker fund table below. 

The only time the fund type is a deal breaker is if:

  • You want your tracker to be covered by the FSCS compensation scheme. If so, then check this list of UK-domiciled index funds, including global options
  • Your stockbroker charges an ETF dealing fee that costs more than 1% of your typical transaction value.
  • The same broker enables you to trade index funds for free. 

In the latter case, we’d invest in a global index fund in preference to the global ETF. That’s because the impact of a high dealing fee is surprisingly damaging over the long-term. 

See our cheap broker comparison table for more. Percentage-fee brokers often allow you to trade global index funds for nothing. 

Quite a few brokers also enable you to trade global equity ETFs for £0, too. Check out InvestEngine, Freetrade, Vanguard, Dodl, Prosper, and Lightyear for that option. 

Best global tracker funds – compared 

Tracker Cost = OCF (%) Index Emerging Markets (%) No of holdings Domicile
SPDR MSCI ACWI ETF 0.12 MSCI All Country World (ACWI) 7.4 2,295 Ireland
HSBC FTSE All-World Index Fund C 0.13 FTSE All-World 8.2 3,480 UK
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF 0.2 MSCI All Country World (ACWI) 7.5 1,725 Ireland
Vanguard FTSE All-World ETF 0.19 FTSE All-World 8.5 3,761 Ireland
Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap Index Fund 0.23 FTSE Global All Cap Index 8 7,153 UK

Source: Morningstar and fund provider’s data

There is very little to choose between these five global equity trackers:

  • SPDR’s All Country World Index tracker is the cheapest. Hence it tops the table.
  • The SPDR and iShares ETF follow MSCI indexes whereas the others follow a FTSE index. The indexes vary somewhat in country composition but have performed identically over the past decade.
  • Vanguard’s Global All Cap index fund has about 6% small cap exposure. It’s therefore more diversified than the rest.  

The reality is these shades of grey haven’t made much difference to results over the longer term. More on that in a moment.

Ch-ch-changes…

There are two relatively new entrants into the global tracker fund market to keep an eye on. They’re low cost but they haven’t had time to build a track record yet:

  • Amundi Prime All Country World ETF – OCF 0.07% (The cheapest global tracker fund available.)
  • Invesco FTSE All World ETF – OCF 0.15%

I’ll also throw two other choices into the pot because they do something a little different:

Vanguard’s LifeStrategy funds include a UK equity bias of around 20%. That compares to a 3% UK allocation for the true global index trackers in the table. You could choose LifeStrategy 100 if home bias suits your situation. Go for LifeStrategy 20-80 if you want an all-in-one fund that includes government bonds. 

(Vanguard has also recently launched a ‘LifeStrategy Global’ range. These funds are the same deal as the regular LifeStrategy range, minus the home bias.)

The Fidelity fund is actively managed. It features a REIT exposure and small cap allocation of about 10%. 

Both are funds-of-funds. They manage their asset allocation by holding other index trackers instead of trading the shares of listed firms. 

Here’s a useful piece on how to compare index trackers.

Best global tracker funds – results check 

Source: Trustnet’s Multi-plot Charting tool

I’m most interested in the 10-year annualised (nominal) returns for the global tracker selection above because that’s the longest comparison period we have for most of the funds in the mix.

I’ve underlined the 10-year returns of the MSCI ACWI and FTSE All-World indices in magenta. A well-functioning passive fund should perform in line with its benchmark – which this selection does.

In fact, most trackers should lag their index because the fund pays fees. The index doesn’t bear that cost. (Intriguingly, only the iShares ETF currently trails its index. Whereas three of the top four were lagging as recently as February 2026.)

In any event, there’s no need to pay attention to performance differentials that lie within a few tenths of a percentage point.

A tracker may eke out a small lead for a while, but it’s usually temporary. For example, the HSBC All-World fund was ahead by a nose over the last couple of years. But the fund has been reeled in by the others in just the past month.

Hence it’s just not worth sweating any marginal differences. They can quickly be reversed by short-term market moves.

Stress-free investing

If you’re starting from scratch then by all means choose the leading fund of the moment.

But there’s no need to switch out of the other top five funds because of the result in the table.

Index trackers are typically cookie-cutter products. Mostly the results just demonstrate our top five all work fine. They are practically interchangeable.

We’re not checking performance to crown the one, true, best global tracker fund.

With me-too products, you don’t have to over-optimise. Any candidate from a field of well-matched rivals will probably be good enough.

Our performance check simply ensures that nothing on our shortlist is broken, or isn’t what we think it is.

A world of difference

Here’s a few other things to note.

Fund sizes – All five index trackers in our top table have hundreds of millions in assets under management (AUM). Efficiencies of scale typically kick in above £100 million. Beyond that threshold, size is not a big deal. The iShares ETF is three times the size of the SPDR ETF, but its performance is neck-and-neck over ten years.

Fixed income – The trackers in our table are purely equity funds. Owning additional high-quality government bonds is crucial to help you not to freak out during a stock market crash.

Check out our best bond fund choices to find your fixed-income Venus for your equity Mars.

Understanding how to build your asset allocation will help you work out how much you need to put into such diversifying defensive assets.

Income versus accumulation – All of our best global index tracker picks come in both Inc and Acc flavours, except the iShares and SPDR ETFs. They are only available as accumulating funds.

World and World ex-UK – I excluded these trackers, because it makes no sense to only include the Developed World, or to skip the UK when you’re trying to diversify across the whole world.

K.I.S.S.

The beauty of the single global equity tracker strategy is its simplicity.

Yes, you could shave away a little cost by building a similar portfolio from separate regional trackers.

But is it worth the aggro in time and dealing fees? And can you trust yourself to stick to the global market’s verdict? Or will you justify trimming back on Japan or the US or wherever because you can apparently spot a bubble that everyone else has missed?

Fill your boots if you psychologically need the control. But know that you don’t have to.

Nobody can predict which strategy will win over your investment lifetime. But putting a global tracker fund at the core of your asset allocation is a rational choice in an increasingly insane world.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. Or an equivalent financial product.[]
{ 290 comments }

Weekend reading: National scandal

Our Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Considering the high hurdle that politicians and business leaders have set themselves for something to be considered a sacking offence, I was surprised to see the boss of National Savings & Investments (NS&I) resign this week.

Of course, the NS&I FUBAR was a rough experience for the 37,500 people affected. NS&I’s mistakes saw bereaved families facing delays accessing their relatives’ Premium Bonds with a total value of up to £476m.

To give just one example from a BBC report:

Tracy McGuire-Brown from Newbury in Berkshire […] took six years to claim £2,000 in premium bonds her late father had left in his will.

The 61-year-old former care home manager says she “cannot describe how upsetting and frustrating” it was to deal with NS&I, and that she had to send in her father’s will and other original documents at her own expense.

“It was the most awful, awful experience,” she says.

No doubt – and not what anyone wants to deal with in the wake of the death of a loved one.

However, NS&I has more than 24 million customers holding £240bn with the institution, so the number affected is relatively small. According to Which the problems were caused by administrative failures – bad, certainly, but not malicious. The long delay between problems emerging and NS&I coming clean is problematic, but again the scale of the operation mitigates this to some extent.

With all that said – and, again, not to make light of having to fight to get your own money back – I think the real reason boss Dax Harkins had to go was because NS&I is held to a higher standard than a typical High Street bank, on the basis of its 100% government backing.

Trust buster

I’ve often recommended NS&I savings or Premium Bonds to fretful – but essentially financially uninterested – friends and relatives looking for somewhere safe to put their cash. Especially after the financial crisis.

No worries about bank runs with NS&I, or Financial Services Compensation Scheme limits, or your savings somehow getting muddled up in riskier lending. Just okay interest rates, the infinitesimal chance to win big with ERNIE, and a recommendation made in the same vein as nobody getting fired for buying IBM.

Also, faith in NS&I’s systems underwrites the Premium Bond draw.

There are already conspiracies about which Bonds win and who gets what prizes. NS&I can do without incompetence creeping into the mix, too.

Further reading:

  • A terse apology from National Savings & Investments – NS&I
  • NS&I boss replaced as savers left waiting for millions of pounds – BBC
  • What caused the missing NS&I savings, and what you should do – Guardian
  • Another take on the scandal and next steps if you’re affected – Which
  • NS&I will have to pay compensation in some cases, say ministers – This Is Money

Have a great weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 45 comments }

The natural yield model portfolio wheels are turning [Members]

Monevator Moguls logo

Remember my natural yield model portfolio that I kicked off in May last year? I know that many of you do, because you keep emailing me about it!

In the spirit of art imitating life, I wasn’t planning to revisit this model portfolio – dubbed The Living is Yield-y – until its one-year anniversary.

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 8 comments }