≡ Menu

Weekend reading: On 2009 and 2010

The FTSE 100’s performance in 2009, via the BBC

Everyone with an opinion about the stock market was confounded in 2009 – even those of us who thought shares were cheap in March covered our backs with long-term caveats.

Nobody predicted markets would bounce back 50% by December, proving again the adage that stock markets always do what will surprise the most people.

I’ve pontificated like everyone else in 2009, and while I think my commentary was pretty reasonable, nobody can predict markets in the short-term. A focus on valuation and contrarian thinking provides some defense, but it doesn’t make you Mystic Meg.

With that said, here’s some views on 2009 and 2010 from around the Web.

BBC

In London, the FTSE saw its biggest annual gain since 1997, rising 22% over the course of the year. Germany’s Dax rose 23% while France’s Cac added 22.%. US share prices also performed well: the broad-based S&P 500 index was up nearly 25%.

As far as 2010 goes, experts say those percentage gains are not likely to be repeated. Governments are expected to withdraw economic support and there are concerns that businesses and consumer may struggle without it.

Saving to Inve$t

Even with a 60% gain since the lows in March, stock investors have lost money this decade when total returns (including dividends) are taken into account. Few will be overwhelmed with the long-term performance of their portfolios.

Wealth Pilgrim (via Frugal Dad)

Exactly one year ago, did you predict that the market would do so well by the end of the year? I sure didn’t. While we face real challenges ahead as a nation and as investors, it would fly in the face of all the facts to become pessimistic right now.

CityUnslicker

The QE rally is just getting under way but there will be a big bump due to the end of QE and the election. I expect another rollercoaster year which will be great for trading, if a bit stressful. However, by the year end people will buy into stocks as they prepare for the coming inflation.

The Telegraph

Corporate earnings are likely to be higher this year, but most of these gains will be down to cost-cutting rather than a significant boost in sales. That is why it is important to have a global perspective.

Motley Fool (UK)

2010 is the year of metal tiger according to the Chinese five element astrology calendar. Ergo, being contrarianly minded, I can safely say that gold will have a bad year, unlike other metals and commodities in general.

Robert Peston (via the BBC)

First, the Chinese currency must surely rise. China’s authorities will surely be unable to keep the cork in the bottle, when their economy looks so much stronger than the US’s.

Second, even without a sterling crisis, the interest rates paid by the British government must surely increase and the price of gilts (of all maturities) must surely fall.

The Independent

Fund managers tip that emerging markets will be the top performers in 2010 while resources will be the best-performing funds sector. Around a quarter also predict that gold will be the top-performing asset of the year.

Financial Times (with cool graphics!)

This decade in markets has been turbulent to say the least. The markets have absorbed the end of the technology boom, the effects of the September 11 attacks on the US and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Markets recovered and were inflated by the boom times of high house prices and record corporate results only to be shocked by the credit crunch, sending indices around the world sharply lower and instilling fears of a second great depression…

The Economist

[On Japan’s dire performance] In the third quarter of 2009, nominal GDP sank below its level in 1992, reinforcing the impression of not one but two lost decades. Deflation is back in the headlines. On December 29th the Nikkei stood at 10,638, 73% below its peak. Urban property prices have fallen by almost two-thirds. Some ski apartments are worth just one-tenth of what the “bubble generation” paid for them

The Psy-Fi Blog

The uselessness of these predictions was carefully explained by the Ancient Greek philosopher Socrates, two and half thousand years ago. Not letting death, the lack of Ancient Greek stockmarkets or the fact he lived in an economy based on slavery get in the way of a good analogy, Socrates noted that he, at least, knew what he didn’t know. Which in investment analysis terms is about as close to an epiphany as you’re likely to get.

Many money bloggers wrote more personal reviews of 2009, including Amateur Asset Allocator, Financial Samurai, Fabulously Broke and Get Rich Slowly, while Len Penzo did his own inimitable thing!

Finally, an unrelated bonus link for anyone who made it this far: Mike at Oblivious Investor put me onto this great conversation between Charles Kirk and the Coffeehouse Investor.

Happy 2010, and do read my article on making new year’s resolutions work if you’re feeling resolute.

Like this roundup? Subscribe to get a list of great links to read every Saturday.

Receive my articles for free in your inbox. Type your email and press submit:

{ 7 comments… add one }
  • 1 Financial Samurai January 2, 2010, 5:11 pm

    If only I took out a 2nd, 3rd, 4th mortgage on my properties and dumped it all in the stock markets last March! lol.

    Just gotta stay in the game I guess!

    What’s your one strongest gut prediction for the UK? I have a feeling it’s that you believe your investment bankers will make big fortunes again!

  • 2 Financial Samurai January 2, 2010, 6:36 pm

    Oh, btw… I’m wrapping up the Samurai Fund launch tomorrow for Monday. I’m sure you will be able to come up with another idea instead of MON!

  • 3 The Investor January 2, 2010, 7:44 pm

    What’s your one strongest gut prediction for the UK?

    Well, it might not translate too well across the pond where perhaps you haven’t been exposed to the dire news about the UK, but my main contrarian gut feeling is that economic growth in 2010 here will be much stronger than is currently forecast by most commentators and City analysts, though not by the Treasury itself.

    It’s a similar situation to the US; people are mistaking the debt burden the country has to carry forward with its capacity to generate output. The trouble for both the UK and the US is that like a person who bought a house at the top of the bubble with an expensive mortgage, we’re going to take years to pay down our debts and won’t be able to spend the money on other things (new TVs / new hospitals) — not that we’ll find it impossible to generate the income to pay down those debts.

  • 4 The Investor January 2, 2010, 7:46 pm

    Re: The fund, I’ve submitted another entry already — Monster Worldwide! 🙂

  • 5 Mat January 4, 2010, 3:11 pm

    I felt a recovery was headed our way in 2009. But the only reason I thought it would recover is because the drop was a little too extreme.
    I have to admit that the current recovery in the market may overshoot it’s true value.
    Except, of course, Monster Worldwide, which I believe will outperform.
    : )

  • 6 The Investor January 4, 2010, 5:07 pm

    @Mat – I wouldn’t say “the only reason”… valuation is the best reason if you’re going to be foolish like us and try and have an opinion on the market. What gets dangerous is when people start to use off-market metrics, like “the Internet” or “India” or “plastics” or “the railroads” or “mysterious operations in the South Seas” 😉

  • 7 Rob Bennett January 4, 2010, 5:22 pm

    There are lots of people who say that short-term market predictions are a waste of time. Yet just about everyone continues making them and reading them. Huh?

    The reason (I believe) is that today’s conventional wisdom on why stock prices change suggests that short-term price changes reflect economic realities — and thus are of great significance to investors. It’s like telling a dog not to bark to tell an investor to ignore price changes that hhe believes reflect economic realities.

    I think that the way to truly ignore short-term price changes is to accept that they really are of no significance. In the short-term, prices are set by emotion. It is only in the long-term that prices reflect economic realities. And in the long-term stock prices are highly predictable!

    We should be predicting what we can predict effectively. We should drop the Buy-and-Hold model of understanding how stocks work and move on to more realistic ideas and strategies.

    Rob

Leave a Comment