≡ Menu

Entrepreneur characteristics

Steve Jobs had several notable entrepreneurial characteristics, but not every self-made billionaire is the same.

The death of Steve Jobs saw huge media coverage and an outpouring of emotion across Facebook and Twitter.

For those of us who were geeks before most people had heard of the word – let alone before it became a bit cool – it was all rather surreal.

Don’t get me wrong – I was adding to the eulogies, too. Steve Jobs has inspired me since I first encountered the Apple story back in the early 1980s, when I was reading books like The Hacker’s Handbook and programming my dad’s clunky PC to simulate a Pentagon computer. It began a love/hate relationship with technology that continues to this day.

Steve Jobs was the inspiration behind my attempts at entrepreneurship, too. If it weren’t for Jobs, Branson, and a handful of others, I’d never have considered that business could be as revolutionary as art or rock and roll.

Most people saddened by the death of Jobs don’t think about business like that, of course. They simply buy the products and feel a kinship, in defiance of Douglas Coupland’s prescient warning that: “shopping is not creating”.

The genius of Jobs’ Apple was that he made consumption feel like creating.

Once only a small band of Apple aficionados felt this way when they used Apple products, but now half the world does.

Hence the adulation and grief people expressed at the passing of a fairly ruthless businessman whom they’ve never met, and maybe never even thought that much about.

The characteristics of entrepreneurs

One positive side to Steve Jobs’ death is that many more people will hear his inspirational messages. Perhaps a few will then go on to become entrepreneurs.

My favourite of his quotes comes from his now widely cited speech to graduating Stanford University students in 2005:

Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything ­– all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure – these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important.

Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.

Yet while many will be inspired to ‘go it alone’ by Jobs’ bold words and the driven way he lived his life, others may be less likely to try, because Jobs’ C.V. reinforces a narrow view of what an entrepreneur should be.

People who might be very credible in business could look at Jobs’ showmanship and his manic obsession with quality and secrecy and think: “Nah, that’s not for me”.

But that would be very wrong.

The reality is there is more than one way to skin a cat – and there’s more than one way to skin a hundred cats a week to turn a profit.

There’s no ‘one size fits all’ entrepreneur. Steve Jobs was no pile-them-high box shifter, Richard Branson is no mild millionaire next door, and Warren Buffett is definitely no gruff Duncan Bannatyne.

And that’s worth stressing because the popular media’s view that an entrepreneur must be a swash-buckling thrill-seeker or else a dedicated nerd puts off many people from considering starting a business.

I’m the first to stress the many reasons not to start a business. But thinking you’re missing out on some clichéd entrepreneur characteristics isn’t one of them!

Role your own mogul

We humans love to categorise, though, and we also like to have role models. It’s usually the same for those who start businesses.

True, a few entrepreneurs grow unthinkingly into the role from their everyday activities, while others become entrepreneurs because they just couldn’t work for someone else. They’re unemployable!

Yet even these ‘accidental tycoons’ usually cite success stories – if not outright role models – that they admire.

For this reason, I’d suggest that anyone thinking about starting a business gets reading. After digesting a few good biographies, you’ll appreciate there’s a wealth of different entrepreneur characteristics, and no billionaire can claim to have even half of them.

Here are ten good books – and ten very different entrepreneurs – to get you started:

Like anyone else, entrepreneurs have a huge variety of flaws too, but I think we’re all best concentrating on our strengths and finding people who can compensate for our weaknesses, rather than trying to do everything.

That said, you can flip most entrepreneur characteristics to reveal a potential failing – so risk-takers can be overconfident, numerical people too obsessed with detail or budgets, and so on.

Finally, I don’t think a ‘huge desire for money’ is the defining characteristic for most entrepreneurs.

Obviously it’ll be in the mix for many, but there are quicker and easier ways to make a bit of cash than starting a business if that’s your main goal.

Most people driven primarily by money will go into sales, property, or finance, depending on their aptitude, rather than risk having no money at all due to a failure in business.

And there’s no shame in that, as long as it’s true to their desires. As Jobs (and many before him) also said:

“Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life.”

Part Two will be a spotter’s guide to common types of entrepreneurs. Subscribe to make sure you read it!

{ 7 comments }

How small investors can drip-feed into Vanguard index funds

DIY passive investors have a new option when it comes to getting their mitts on ultra-low cost Vanguard index funds – Bestinvest’s select service.

And because Bestinvest don’t charge dealing fees on OEIC funds, Vanguard index trackers are now a plausible option for drip-feeding investors on a budget.

Previously the best choice for Vanguard index funds was Alliance Trust or Sippdeal. But those companies charge dealing fees on every purchase and sale, which puts a big dent in the return of small investors who make monthly contributions to take advantage of pound-cost averaging.

By going the Bestinvest route, you can now invest your monthly sum in a diversified selection of Vanguard index funds as long as you make at least the minimum fund contribution of £100 (which is very high as it goes).

Which is the best investment platform for Vanguard index funds?

There’s always a but…

But the reason a mass decamp to Bestinvest is NOT a no-brainer is because it levies a charge known as the custody fee.

If an investor holds any funds from a firm that doesn’t pay Bestinvest commission, then Bestinvest charges the investor a custody fee of £12.50 + VAT per quarter (that’s £15 per quarter), and double that for a SIPP.

Bad news, but at least it’s more transparent than when a portion of the fund’s management charges are siphoned off without the investor having any idea how much commission they are paying out to the platform.

Vanguard doesn’t pay commission, so holding any number of its index funds with Bestinvest amounts to an annual management charge on your account of £60, or £120 for a SIPP.

The upshot is that if you want Vanguard index funds then your ideal investment platform depends on how often you trade.

Let’s compare the options.

Which Stocks and shares ISA?

Bestinvest Sippdeal Alliance Trust
AMC* £60 £50 £48
Dealing fee £0 £9.95 £12.50
Regular investing n/a n/a £1.50

*Alliance Trust levy an AMC while Sippdeal and Bestinvest impose a custody fee for non-commission paying funds i.e. Vanguard. As far as we’re concerned, these mechanisms amount to the same thing: an AMC. 

Bestinvest’s annual management charge (AMC) is £12 more per year than Alliance Trust’s. If you used Alliance Trust’s regular investing service (£1.50 a pop) then you could make 7 trades over the course of the year before annual costs were equal. That’s barely than a trade every 2 months, so it doesn’t take long before Bestinvest becomes the more cost-effective option for a drip-feeder.

If you wanted to sell a fund to rebalance, that would cost you £12.50 through Alliance Trust, so a single sale would wipe out its AMC cost advantage.

Which SIPP?

Bestinvest Sippdeal Alliance Trust
AMC £120 £50 £162
Dealing fee £0 £9.95 £12.50
Regular investing n/a n/a £1.50

We can write-off the Alliance Trust SIPP straightaway as it charges a greater AMC than Bestinvest and it is saddled with dealing fees. Sippdeal offers more resistance this time and you could make seven trades in the year before Bestinvest comes out ahead.

Which standard investment account?

Bestinvest Sippdeal Alliance Trust
AMC £60 £50 £48
Dealing fee £0 £9.95 £12.50
Regular investing n/a n/a £1.50

The deal is exactly the same as with ISAs. Alliance Trust wins up until the point you’ve made 7 regular monthly purchases.

Spreadsheets at dawn

Of course, the permutations are potentially endless and torturous. But at least now there are a few different Vanguard DIY options available to investors depending on their circumstances.

Paying £60 per annum for an ISA is not to be sniffed at by a small investor. That would slice 1% off a £6,000 investment pot, so you may well be better off with a no-charge ISA and a non-Vanguard fund portfolio if you’re not investing for the very long haul.

There is another… Since I wrote this article, Hargreaves Lansdown now offer Vanguard funds too. Again, there’s no clear winner, the best choice depends on how many funds you hold, in which account, and how often you trade. See here for the update.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 26 comments }

The Slow and Steady passive portfolio update: Q3 2011

Passive portfolio update

No prizes for guessing which way our Slow and Steady passive portfolio went this quarter.

We went south. Deep south.

Us and the rest of the world were up against a global backdrop of fear and loathing that can be summed up in three words:

SOVEREIGN DEBT CRISIS!

Let’s do a breathless recap of events since the beginning of July.

The Slow and Steady model portfolio was set up at the start of the year with £3,000. An extra £750 is invested every quarter into a diversified set of index funds, heavily tilted towards equities. You can read the original story and catch up on all the previous passive portfolio posts.

July jitters

  • The Greek contagion laps at the shores of Spain and Italy, sending their bond yields above an eye-watering 6% – a Euro era record.
  • US GDP figures are revised down, consumer spending is down for the first time in two years.
  • The showdown between US lawmakers spooks markets with fears of a US debt default.
  • Growth stagnates across Europe. UK growth undershoots government predictions and gilt yields fall to a 50-year low.

August agony

  • US loses its Triple A rating after a downgrade by debt rating agency S&P.
  • Equity markets fall steeply as global recession fears stalk investors.
  • IMF revises down growth expectations for much of the developed world.
  • The Federal Reserve declares that interest rates are on hold until 2013.

September seizures

  • Greek debt default now assumed to be inevitable.
  • Poor US employment figures.
  • US housing market down.
  • UK retail sales fall.
  • Federal Reserve announces Operation Twist instead of QE3. Markets slump and keep on slumping.
  • Eurozone politicians still trying to pass measures agreed in July to tackle Eurozone crisis. Measures widely agreed to be already obsolete.

Blood on the carpet

Obviously that’s not intended to be a comprehensive round-up of market influences. It’s a broad-brush summary of the incessant drip-feed of bad news that’s got investors grinding their worry beads into dust.

So where does all that leave our portfolio?

Well, for the first time, we’re up to our waists in red ink. Passive investing may be wise but it can’t insulate investors from a global rout.

We’re down 9.32% since January and have lost £419.43 on the £4499.95 invested so far.

Passive portfolio latest

Equities have taken an all-round kicking. The FTSE is down nigh on 14% this quarter and the French and German bourses are down by over 25%.

Our gilt allocation is valiantly pulling the counter-weight in the opposite direction but it’s little more than a sticking plaster over a severed artery. The Slow and steady portfolio is aggressively tilted towards equities (80%) and we’re paying the price in volatility now.

The good news is we’re on a 20-year plan so the portfolio has plenty of time to recover and indeed be buffeted by quarters far worse than the last one.

We have to view this as an opportunity to buy equities on the cheap – our rebalancing strategy and regular contributions enable us to buy more units when prices are low, so the portfolio should do well when stock markets recover.

New purchases

With slightly shaky hands it’s time to throw another £750 into the mixer:

UK equity

HSBC FTSE All Share Index – TER 0.27%
Fund identifier: GB0000438233

New purchase: £180.18
Buy 59.1905 units @ 304.4p

Target allocation: 20%

Developed World ex UK equities

Split between four funds covering North America, Europe, the developed Pacific and Japan.

Target allocation (across the following four funds): 50%

North American equities

HSBC American Index – TER 0.25%
Fund identifier: GB0000470418

New purchase: £204.96
Buy 119.2296 units @ 171.9p

Target allocation: 27.5%

(Happy note: The fund TER has been cut from 0.28% so we’re losing less to costs).

European equities excluding UK

HSBC European Index – TER 0.31%
Fund identifier: GB0000469071

New purchase: £171.18
Buy 43.2919 units @ 395.4p

Target allocation: 12.5%

(The fund TER has been cut from 0.37%).

Japanese equities

HSBC Japan Index – TER 0.29%
Fund identifier: GB0000150374

New purchase: £23.59
Buy 39.0699 units @ 60.37p

Target allocation: 5%

(TER has increased from 0.27%. Boo.)

Pacific equities excluding Japan

HSBC Pacific Index – TER 0.37%
Fund identifier: GB0000150713

New purchase: £57.10
Buy 28.6055 units @ 199.6p

Target allocation: 5%

Emerging market equities

Legal & General Global Emerging Markets Index Fund – TER 0.98%
Fund identifier: GB00B4MBFN60

New purchase: £122.32
Buy 297.189 units @ 41.16p

Target allocation: 10%

(The fund TER has been cut from 0.99%).

UK Gilts

L&G All Stocks Gilt Index Trust: TER 0.25%
Fund identifier: GB0002051406

Rebalancing sale: £9.31
Sell 5.4026 units @ 172.40p

Target allocation: 20%

Exciting development: Our equity losses have been so bad that for the first time we need to sell gilts in order to keep within our 20% asset allocation for government bonds. This may seem counter-intuitive, but it’s the essence of rebalancing.

We’re pruning back the over-performing asset in order to raise the funds to buy under-performers – in other words we’re selling high and buying low.

Total cost = £750

Total cash = 5p

Trading cost = £0

A reminder on rebalancing: This portfolio is rebalanced to target allocations every quarter, mostly using new contributions. It’s no problem to do as our vanilla index funds don’t incur trading costs.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 10 comments }
Weekend reading

Some good articles from around the Web.

The uproar this week over the frank revelation from a trader interviewed by the BBC that he planned to profit from a massive market crash (and that you can too!) was revealing.

Here’s the video:

Thanks to the combination of a suited trader dreaming of another Depression, an astonished BBC newsreader, and even a name check for Goldman Sachs, the video went viral.

Thousands of people watched in astonishment at – apparently – the notion that there are two sides to a market.

I am the first to condemn the financial industry as overpaid and overvalued, but trading is what traders do! Condemning this chap for taking a view is ludicrous – like condemning your plumbing for bringing some rubber gloves just in case your drains are blocked.

Remember that there’s another party on every side of the trade, who will be losing if this guy wins. Does that make the loser morally superior? Nonsense. A bearish trader buys a credit default swap betting on a Greek default, and another sells that insurance. Numbers, not morals, drive their decisions.

Active traders come a long way down the list of culpability for the woes felt by the public today – well behind dreadful over-leveraged banking, short-sighted politicians, slack rating agencies, and the greedy man in the street. The trader is just the final piece in the picture, mopping up the outcomes of decision making by the great and the good, and usually as much to blame as a beetle feasting on a carcass is for Mad Cow Disease. Neither bad nor good, and often not pretty, but pretty irrelevant.

Wishful thinking is what dominates our nursery rhyme news agenda, however. The newsreader wanted a few soundbites about ‘decisive action’ and ‘settling the markets’. Encountering a foot soldier from the front line of a market economy Did Not Compute.

Hilariously though, as The Telegraph discovered this new era Gordon Gecko turned out to be less a City bestriding big swinging dick, and more simply a… good talker:

“They [the BBC] approached me. I’m an attention seeker. That is the main reason I speak. That is the reason I agreed to go on the BBC. Trading is a like a hobby. It is not a business. I am a talker. I talk a lot. I love the whole idea of public speaking.”

Which capped it all off perfectly.

The BBC betrayed its agenda, the terrified public that spread the video wanted to blame the middleman rather than their propensity to take on debt for 30 years, to abandon prudent financial planning, and to ignore rigorous thinking – whether it be the flimsiness of the Euro framework or sky-high house prices – and the middleman turned out to be a muppet.

[continue reading…]

{ 12 comments }