≡ Menu

Seven shares trading at a big discount to NAV

Some London-listed shares going at big discounts

Important: What follows is not a recommendation to buy or sell shares in any companies or trusts. I am just a private investor, storing and sharing my notes. Read my disclaimer.

I have the impression the stock market has currently taken a dislike to private equity and unlisted holdings, as well as any ambiguity or a lack of transparency (although the latter is usually partly in the eye of the beholder).

It won’t be like this forever. A few years ago, the big growth and income investment trusts were trading at a sizeable discount, whereas now they’re all on a premium. Investors today want income. Fashions change.

I suspect that someday, all other things being equal, the following companies will be more favoured and the discounts will be smaller – hopefully because the Net Asset Value (NAV) at least held up, and the share price rose.

But nobody can be sure – the discount could narrow instead because the NAV falls – and I certainly have no timetable in mind in most cases. As ever do your own research and make your own mind up if you’re interested in pursuing these discount to asset plays.

Daejan

Ticker: DJAN

Many commercial property companies are now trading close to NAV again, but not Daejan. It’s a property company run and partly owned by the founding Freshwater family. It owns commercial and residential property in the UK and the US, and it tends to issue very scanty releases. I get the impression most of its portfolio is not prime, though I think it has some prime assets, including in London. A good run had taken the share price to well over £32 by the start of April, but it’s now back at £27. At the interim stage last September the company said it had assets of £51.53 per share. Assuming no change since then, that’s a 47.6% discount to book. The shares tend to trade at a big discount, mind, but they did climb to a premium in the last property boom.

Electra Private Equity

Ticker: ELTA

Private equity trusts were hit hard in the downturn, as some private equity companies collapsed or were heavily diluted by the sheer weight of their debt. Electra Private Equity has come through fairly well, and recovered from a sell-off that took its discount to NAV to over 60% in 2009. As I write the discount is estimated at 31%, according to Trustnet, and it was recently even bigger 1. Private equity should trade at a discount due to the uncertainty about valuations, but a smaller discount of 15% to 20% is feasible in better times. Electra says it’s cautiously picking up good deals, including the assets of deleveraging banks. You’ll definitely want to dig into its reports; the very recent presentation to analysts [PDF] is a good start. Note that while Electra itself doesn’t have much debt, most of its portfolio companies do.

Caledonia Investments

Ticker: CLDN

I have written about Caledonia before. Ten months on, the discount has widened from 20% to over 30% according to Trustnet. If the share price was to rise to the current NAV, an investor would see a nearly-45% gain. If it rose because the NAV was rising too, the gain would be even greater. Unfortunately, according to its latest annual results Caledonia’s NAV declined 7% in the past financial year on a total return basis, compared to a 1.4% rise in its benchmark. I still have money in Caledonia, but so far the market has been right. With even blue blood RIT Capital Partners recently flirting with a discount again, less illustrious Caledonia is probably one to tuck away and forget about for five years.

Gresham House Investment Trust

Ticker: GHE

I said above that there’s not usually a timetable with an asset play, but that’s not quite the case with Gresham House. Its managers have decided they can’t make its brand of property investing work in shareholders’ favour in the current climate, so rather refreshingly they’ve decided to liquidate the portfolio and return all cash to shareholders. Recent full-year results put basic net assets at 427p per share, compared to a mid-price of £2.82 as I write. There’s a horribly wide spread, which could see you pay £2.95. On that basis there’s a 30% discount to NAV, or a gain of 44.5% in maybe one to three years. Management will still be drawing expenses, however, which could reduce the NAV; set against that a recent disposal went above book value.

Hansa Trust

Ticker: HAN / HANA

This is a similar deal to Caledonia – a big and old family-founded investment trust that is trading on a steep discount despite a very good long term record. Hansa was at least beating its benchmark over the latest six month period it officially reported to investors, though admittedly that takes us all the way back to September 2011. Its portfolio is more straightforward than Caledonia’s, except that roughly 40% is in one listed company, Ocean Wilsons (Ticker: OCN), a Brazilian tug operator that has its own emerging market portfolio. According to Trustnet, Hansa’s non-voting shares are on a 25% discount.

Jellybook

Ticker: JELY

Jellybook Limited is a cash shell that raised money last year to buy into a social network company. It has yet to make its investment, and as of 31 December 2011 it was sitting on £10.5 million in cash, against a market cap of £7.45 million as I write. That means there’s a near-30% discount on cash here – and cash is cash. Of course the manager plans to pump the money into a currently unknown company that I think is unlikely to be bought cheap, though with Facebook shares declining perhaps the shine has come off the sector. In any event, in the dotcom days (when the manager was also active) a shell like this might have traded at a premium. Despite the discount on cash it’s probably the highest risk of all these shares, as we have no idea where the money will go.

Ventus 2

Ticker: Ven2

Another very high risk share, this backer of wind turbine projects is suffering from multiple simultaneous reasons for its discount: It’s a little understood VCT, it’s horribly illiquid, a couple of its investments have been written down to near-zero, management has changed – oh, and the wind didn’t blow so much in the UK in the past couple of years, making potential investors lairy of the historical data. Other less cultured blogs would use a colourful term for multiple adults enjoying sexual relations at once to describe this confluence of negative influences, but I’ll just call it the group hug from hell. The bottom line is that the shares are trading at a 37% discount to a marked-down NAV. The potential catalyst for change is that new management says it’s cleaned the stables, and now hopes to deliver a dividend of 3.5p a year for the next three years, rising to 4p to 6p within five years. A disastrous foray into non-wind energy means its original investors will probably never see the 6p to 8p annual payout first targeted, and the high TER means there’s little chance of NAV growth, but a nimble nibble might secure a long-term tax-free income of around 10%. Ventus 1 shares once traded (ludicrously) at a premium to NAV, but I’d personally only invest from here in the hope of perpetual junk bond-like income.

Note: As I write I own shares in Caledonia Investments and Ventus 2, and may or may not buy or sell shares in all these companies. I take no responsibility for any decisions you make as a result of this post – read my disclaimer and do your own research. Remember most people will do better investing passively.

  1. Note that Trustnet uses an estimated NAV figure. For greater confidence when buying into a discounted trust, you need to wait until the company issues an up-to-date NAV, and then time your purchase accordingly.[]
{ 7 comments }
Weekend reading

Good reads from around the Web.

The advanced cloud-based super-server infrastructure that powers Monevator (i.e. two tin cans with a bit of string tied between) almost melted down this week, thanks to the follow-up from iii’s surprise fee hike.

Last week we were bombarded with readers alerting us via email to the cost-grenade lobbed into the midst of their best-laid plans.

They were angry and confused, but this week they fought back, swapping strategies in the comment sections of our first and second posts about the iii whammy.

If you’re one of the thousands of subscribers who now reads Monevator through your email in-box, you may not know that many of our posts get dozens of comments. Those two posts about iii now have nearly 100 between them.

What’s great about the comments on this website, so far at least, is that they are overwhelmingly constructive and polite, whether it’s feedback on our articles or readers helping each other out.

Having seen discussion forums ruined by abusive posters and the comment sections of online newspapers turn into a cesspit of bigotry and abuse, I show zero hesitation in deleting rude and willfully misleading or antagonistic comments. But so far I haven’t had to delete more than a couple a month.

In fact, the iii incident has made me wonder again about whether to introduce a discussion forum on Monevator.

One reason not to do so is there’s plenty of places where money-minded folk can swap tips across the Internet.

Another forum would hardly fill a void – it’d be more like elbowing your way to the bar!

The other reason is I’m pretty sure it’d be a time sink. A financial website forum isn’t like a discussion board for cat lovers. The potential for dangerous misinformation is vast, making timely moderation vital.

On the other hand, I imagine a simple board split across three or four sub-sections – Passive, Active, Financial Freedom Strategies, and Money Making Tips, or similar – could grow into something quite nice.

What do you guys think?

[continue reading…]

{ 23 comments }

The impact of Interactive Investor’s fee hikes felt akin to a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions (give or take) of Monevator voices cried out in great annoyance…

As well they might. Discount broker Interactive Investor (iii) had previously been our go-to no-fee broker. Now it wants to bombard us with account management charges and dealing fees that put a big brake on the returns of passive investors with small portfolios.

You can read the what, why, and how bad here. This post is all about alternative no-fee discount broker options. The community is frothing with anger and people want away from iii. So where to go?

The good old days of fee-free accounts – that let you buy and sell index funds without paying a brass wazoo – are still in full swing, although complications abound.

Should I stay or should I go

Top pick: TD Direct Investing

There’s a lot to like here.

No management fee…

  • … if you have a regular investment ISA or trading account.
  • …or you have over £5,100 in a trading ISA.
  • …or you have over £7,500 in a trading account (or you have made a single trade in the previous quarter).
  • Otherwise you’ll be charged £36 per year for the trading ISA and £15 per quarter for the trading account.

You don’t even need to trade every month to qualify for a regular investment ISA, so this is a great option for most passive investors.

No fund trading fees

  • Unit Trusts and OEICs (i.e. all index funds) trade gratis.
  • Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) trade at £12.50, or can be bought for £1.50 through the regular investment scheme.

Retail Distribution Review (RDR) adapted

  • The main reason I favour TD Direct is because it’s already made its RDR move.
  • The platform fee of 0.35% is only charged if your fund pays over 0.5% trail commission. Otherwise the charge is zero.

I have yet to find an index fund that pays over 0.4% trail commission. Most pay 0.1% to 0.3%, including all the funds in The Slow and Steady portfolio.

As a result, passive investors shouldn’t get whacked for a platform fee with TD Direct. What’s more, you should get a little back, as all trail commission will now be rebated. And if you’re guiltily hiding a few active funds that do pay over the 0.5% threshold then your trail commission rebate will more than cover the 0.35% platform fee.

While there’s no guarantee that things won’t change, it’s worth underlining that TD Direct has decided to rebate 100% of trail commission even before the FSA has made a final decision on whether execution-only platforms can keep it or not.

That means TD Direct should be prepared if the FSA decides to end trail commission. And its solution is far more favourable to small investors than either iii or Hargreaves Lansdown has managed.

Should you want to leave though, TD will transfer out the entire account for £55.

Selftrade

Selftrade is another good choice, because it has also recently changed its pricing structure. The following package applies from 1 July.

No management fee

  • Beware there is an inactivity fee of £10.50 per quarter.
  • It’s easily avoided if you make a single trade (even reinvesting a dividend) in the previous quarter.

No fund trading fees

  • Funds are free to buy – although they cost £12.50 to sell.
  • ETFs can also be bought for £1.50 in the regular investment scheme.
  • You could argue the selling price is actually a barrier to churn, putting investors off whimsical performance chasing.

Exit fee cashback

  • Selftrade will pay up to £100 per account you transfer to it (maxing out at £300). That could make a swift exit from iii relatively pain-free, as its transfer fees are £15 per investment.

Transfer fees (to leave) at Selftrade are £15 per investment. There’s no mention of trail commission rebates and it doesn’t peddle any of that platform fee / custody fee aggro.

iWeb

iWeb is the best ‘clean’ discount broker choice available. There’s no management fee excuse-me of any sort. The only snag is that it hasn’t responded to RDR yet.

  • No management fee.
  • No fund-dealing fee – ETFs are £10 to trade, regular investment is £2.
  • No platform fee, no custody fee.
  • No trail commission rebate.
  • Transfers out – £25 per investment.

This is execution-only as it used to be. A no-frills service, but that’s what you’re paying for.

Cavendish Online

I tend to be drawn to discount brokers over fund supermarkets because they generally offer ETFs as well as index funds.

If you’re not bothered about ETFs, then plenty of fund supermarkets – such as Cavendish Online – offer no-fee accounts where you can trade funds without charge.

Most offer some level of trail commission rebate, although they may yet have to change their terms pending the outcome of RDR.

Note that Cavendish doesn’t have the L&G All Stocks Gilt Index fund. Replace it with the HSBC UK Gilt index fund instead.

Hargreaves Lansdown

If all this fee-fighting faff makes you think, ‘Soddit, I just want life to be simple,’ then you can buy a complete, diversified, off-the-shelf portfolio in the shape of a Vanguard LifeStrategy fund.

You’ll pay a platform fee for the fund of £24 per year in a Hargreaves Lansdown ISA, and that’s it (other than the fund’s TER et cetera). Trading is free and Vanguard will even rebalance your fund-of-funds automatically.

But if you want to build your own portfolio of Vanguard funds then your best option may be to bring Alliance Trust or Bestinvest into play.

A major downside of Hargreaves Lansdown is that it levies an extra 0.5% charge (max £45) if you hold ETFs, bonds, shares, or investment trusts in an ISA. This charge does not apply to the Fund & Share account.

The upside is that the platform fee is Hargreaves Lansdown‘s response to RDR.

Bestinvest

Bestinvest is interesting because it enables you to avoid fees initially, but offers the option to add Vanguard funds later, if you’re prepared to accept a custody charge. But keep in mind that Bestinvest hasn’t reacted to RDR yet.

No management fee

  • If you buy from an approved list of funds that stump up trail commission.
  • The entire Slow & Steady portfolio is on this list, bar the L&G All Stocks Gilt Index fund. Replace it with HSBC UK Gilt Index instead.
  • The custody charge is £15 per quarter if you buy any Vanguard funds, other funds that don’t pay enough trail commission, ETFs, or shares.

No fund trading fees

  • ETFs trade at £12.50 and there’s no mention of regular investing.

Exit fee cashback

  • Bestinvest will give you a golden hello worth up to £500 to cover your exit fees from another platform.

Bestinvest doesn’t muck about with trail commission rebates. Instead it offers cashback through a loyalty scheme. El cheapo passive investors don’t count as loyal citizens of the Bestinvest kingdom.

Transfer fees are £25 per investment plus £60 to close an ISA account.

Should you move?

Switching platforms is not something to be done lightly. The costs and hassle mount up.

It would cost £105 to get the seven-fund Slow & Steady portfolio out of iii, due to its transfer fee of £15 per investment. That’s versus £80 to stay put for a year, plus any trading charges incurred on top of that.

UPDATE: iii waive transfer fees. Since this post was written, it looks like iii’s customer service department has been napalmed by angry soon-to-be-ex customers as they’ve decided to drop their transfer fees, if you ring 0845 200 3637 by 31 July 2012.

Needless to say, virtually all platforms charge zip to transfer in.

If you do go for it then make sure you ask for an in specie transfer (sometimes known as reregistration).

That way your funds aren’t caught out of the market for any period, and you don’t miss the massive rally that’s bound to be just around the corner if you cash out.

You’ll also retain the goodness of your ISA wrapper that you’d lose if you manually sold up to avoid transfer fees.

But the big question is whether it’s worth moving before the FSA has decided to ban trail commission or not. See here for a fuller discussion of this issue.

That decision is due before the end of 2012, and may yet shift the landscape for execution-only platforms running to catch up.

At worst, iii customers will pay £40 in management charges during that period, so it could be worth waiting to see where the chips fall rather than constantly chasing after the last free platform in town.

Don’t want to wait? Then platforms that already charge a fee and rebate 100% of trail commission seem best positioned to deal with the post-RDR world without more major upheaval. Ask your choice if it will cover your transfer fees away from iii.

In the meantime, you could join the ranks of angry Interactive Investor customers pressing the company to waive its fees. 1

With any luck, if the FSA does ban trail commission then our fund TERs will deflate a bit, and we’ll still be able to find a good quality platform that doesn’t penalise small investors with infernal flat-rate fees.

Until then…

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. Look out for forum member Fagun’s complaint template in particular.[]
{ 171 comments }

Thursday saw the Monevator inbox swell up like a Spanish housing bubble. Email after email came in from dedicated readers horrified by the price bomb dropped on their heads by Interactive Investor (the discount broker commonly known as iii).

In one fell swoop, iii swung from being one of the cheapest execution-only brokers around into being about as suitable for small passive investors as mood-altering dance music concealing subliminal BUY / SELL messages.

Let’s quickly recap on what iii has done and why, look at how bad that actually is, and then you can consider some F U iii responses here.

A bad day for passive investors

What has iii done?

The investor anguish is palpable, not far off Charlton Heston’s fist-pounding “God damn you all to hell” moment in Planet of the Apes. From 1 July, iii is introducing the following price changes:

£20 quarterly fee

  • This is an £80 per year flat-rate charge for holding an ISA or trading account.
  • Only one fee is paid per customer even if you have multiple ISA and trading accounts.
  • Family members can link their accounts so that one fee covers the lot.
  • New customers won’t pay this fee if they invest using the regular monthly scheme and have contributed less than £5,000. 1
  •  iii is reportedly refusing to apply this waiver to customers who joined before May 30 2012.

£10 trading fee for all funds

  • Or £1.50 per fund purchase through the regular monthly investment scheme.
  • Trading fees are deducted from your £20 quarterly fee. i.e. You get two £10 trades for free per quarter.

100% trail commission rebates

  • …but this makes little difference to passive investors who have already chosen low TER funds that pay next to nothing in trail commission.
  • You’ll need about £80K in your portfolio for rebates to outweigh the new quarterly fees if you use the kind of index funds recommended in our passive Slow and Steady portfolio.

Previously, iii did not charge a quarterly fee and you could trade funds for free.

Ah, the good old days.

How bad is it?

Frankly, it’s pretty grim. Flat-rate charges always hit small investors hardest. Here’s how much you’ll lose from your return if you pay £80 in extra management charges per year:

Portfolio size (£) Cost of £80 charge (%)
2,000 4
4,000 2
8,000 1
16,000 0.5
32,000 0.25
64,000 0.125
80,000 0.1

The UK stock market has historically offered a real return of 5% per year. A loss of 1% in fees would rob you of 20% of that gain.

That’s why fees matter, even if the percentage cost seems trivial. The loss is potentially huge for current iii customers who are struggling to build up their investments, and there are plenty of Monevator readers in that boat.

If you hold a Slow & Steady style portfolio then you’ll dilute the above costs by around 0.13% a year, thanks to trail commission rebates. 2

Then we get to the impact of trading fees

The Slow & Steady portfolio holds a diversified suite of seven index funds that could previously be traded for free with iii.

Contributing to each fund every quarter would cost an additional £50, according to iii’s new pricing plan.

That’s £200 per year – without even thinking about rebalancing sell trades.

If we switched to iii’s monthly investment scheme, we would make £10.50 worth of purchases every month. That would mean paying out £11.50 every quarter on top of the management fee, or an extra £34.50 per year (again without rebalancing).

It’s all far too much to give away. I wouldn’t now give iii a second look unless I had a portfolio worth over £32,000. Even then, there are plenty of better alternatives available.

Infuriatingly, iii has given customers just a month to react to these sweeping changes. I’m sure that fulfills the requirements of its terms and conditions, but it hardly smacks of a firm that cares for its customers. And neither does the disingenuous justification that coats iii’s explanatory email like a layer of slime.

You can read the letter and enjoy it being taken apart by one outraged customer at the Simple Living In Suffolk blog.

We all know that brokers love churn but iii’s claim that its move is in the interests of investors, who it ‘believes’ should ‘actively manage’ their portfolios, feels to me about as sincere as Peter Mandelson thanking his aunt for a Christmas present of Argyle socks.

Why is this happening?

It seems likely that charging higher fees is less to do with an ingenious attempt to help customers ‘engage’ than it is connected to the Retail Distribution Review (RDR).

The RDR is the FSA’s regulatory tsunami that’s been rumbling towards the financial services sector for a couple of years. It finally hits on 1 January, 2013.

A major part of the RDR brief is that product costs should be transparent to investors. That means financial advisors will no longer be able to collect trail commission paid for by investors through fund TERs that see us skip home thinking we somehow got the nice man’s advice for free.

Critically, the FSA has not yet decided whether to ban the trousering of trail commission by execution-only platforms like discount brokers and fund supermarkets. That decision is due before the end of 2012.

Currently, execution-only platforms hoover up trail commission from funds, even though they dispense no advice. That enables the platform to turn a profit while leaving us in a blissful state of ignorance about the true cost of its services.

Brokers like iii and Hargreaves Lansdown appear to have decided it’s game over for trail commission and we might as well all get used to it.

Sadly while this financial glasnost makes a lot of sense, it bizarrely works against passive investors who know how to take on the system.

We aren’t about to get a windfall from active funds full of trail commission fat. Instead, we’re getting stung by the disinfectant of financial reform – just as somebody who’s inoculated themselves against bank overdrafts and loans will when free banking finally comes to an end.

Still, there are plenty of other platforms that are keeping their powder dry, or reshuffling their fees in a more passive investor-friendly way than iii. Take a look at your options here.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. The fee waiver comes with other conditions attached as outlined towards the bottom of this page.[]
  2. Assuming you hold around 10% in the L&G Global Emerging Markets index fund. That fund offers trail commission of around 0.4% while the other funds come in around 0.1%.[]
{ 40 comments }