≡ Menu
Our passive investing logo: A slow and steady tortoise

When word gets around that you understand a little of the black art of investing, friends and family start to ask you about it.

Which is flattering, but it can also be rather scary and a little frustrating.

We’re not financial advisors for one thing. Also you’ll discover it’s a bit of lose-lose proposition.

People want two-minute solutions, not a reading list. They want to know how to get rich quick, not how to get comfortable in 30 years.

Some seem to believe you’re holding the good stuff back from them.

And even if your boring passive investing advice is implemented nothing good will happen quickly enough for most people to remember why you suggested it, whereas if a hot tip rockets to the moon and you swore someone off it they will remember that for the rest of your days.

Still, we get letters. Here’s a mildly re-jigged one I received very recently from a friend, who shall remain nameless, and my reply, which is more or less as sent.

(If this sort of thing is interesting perhaps we could make it a semi-regular feature?)

Hi [The Accumulator],

How’s life?

Anyway remember that time in The Fox and Duck when someone loud – probably [person X] but maybe [geezer Y] – went off about The Wolf of Wall Street and burning capitalists, and you sort of defended the bankers?

Which nobody expected, because most of the time you’re like us, but you sounded like you knew what you were talking about when it came to betting on the stock market.

WELL I was impressed anyway, and vaguely made a mental note to ask you if any opportunities came up.

So that day has come and I wondered if you had heard much about this block chain stuff…?

A mate was saying he’d already made a few thousand and that his next move was going to be into [obscure cryptocurrency venture redacted to protect the innocent] and I have to say investing in it sounds like a one way ticket to The Sunday Times Rich List

But maybe it’s not… and perhaps that’s where you come in!?

What do you reckon? Deal or no deal?

Cheers,

[A friend]

Dear [friend],

Please be very careful when you get these kind of tips. One-way trips to El Dorado are mirages 99.9% of the time.

Blockchain is hot. As in, off the back of Bitcoin, cryptocurrency is big news and everyone thinks they’ll make out like bandits.

Unfortunately, it’s more like a gold rush. A few early movers make it big and mostly everyone else gets buttons.

This sort of thing happens regularly. The process relies on a compelling story along these lines: investors believe that a particular section of the economy has excellent prospects and so bet big on firms that operate in that sector.

Early investors see success, latecomers get jealous and double or triple down. A few converts even ‘bet the farm’. (Luckily for our stomachs mostly farmers are less flighty folk).

Recent examples include green energy, robotics, 3D printing, and bitcoin. Back in the day it was gold, computing firms, and telecoms.

Go back far enough and it was railroads.

This kind of bet has historically been a bad one for most regular Joes.

Precisely because everybody thinks there’s huge profits to be made in a particular technology, firm, or sector, capital floods in.

This raises share prices. Share prices get so high that even fairly solid future returns can’t justify the prices paid. And so returns in the future are low, flat, negative, or CRASH.

Also, all the capital that’s pumped in is gladly accepted and put to work by those operating in the hot space. Most of them spend the millions as fast as they get it in an effort to outdo their rivals who are doing the same.

Competition is intense, but capital is wasted. There’s often plenty of innovation – but not enough to justify the gazillions pumped in. Bubbles can be good for humanity, but they’re bad for most investors.

This sort of thing happened in railroads, airlines, computing, the Dotcom crash of 2001 and most recently in crypto-currencies.

Essentially you have too much cash chasing the shares because of over-optimism about future prospects. The smart money identified the trend and got in early. The dumb money comes in later and gets burned.

The dumb money is ordinary mortals like you and me who can’t compete with the inside knowledge, research, analysis and computing power of the 24/7 City players that are the smart money.

It’s very hard to compete with people who were incredibly lucky, too. Buy your friend a congratulatory pint, but I’d talk about the football or the theater, not about his next hot tip.

High returns depend on the unexpected, not the expected. For example, everyone expected Facebook to soar into the distant future. Its share price was bid high.

When the Cambridge Analytica scandal broke, the share price fell because there was seen to be an increased chance of politicians imposing regulation on Facebook. That was unexpected news and the market for Facebook shares moved on it.

Today, some regulatory fear is in the price. How much? Haven’t the foggiest. But if you buy Facebook now then you’ll do well if that regulation does not happen – because some sort of regulatory cost to the company is expected. Conversely, you’ll do badly if the regulation has a bigger impact on Facebook’s prospects than predicted by the market.

There’s no sure way of predicting that outcome. That’s why everyone with experience diversifies. It’s also why a company can report amazing profits but the share price falls if they’re lower than expected. It’s fresh news and changing expectations about the future – good or bad – that truly moves the share price.

Over the very long-term it’s often unfashionable and boring sectors – for example tobacco companies – that have done well because nobody expects anything from them. Everybody was too busy throwing cash at the hot sectors. The unfashionable shares fall further than is warranted and strong profits can be made.

Academics have made careers out of showing we humans pay a premium for the new and shiny and overlook the unloved that’s available on discount.

Because we can’t predict, and to confound our natural inclinations, it’s generally better to spread your money across every sector, including all the snore-fests. That is, to invest in a total market index fund which basically buys and holds everything.

With an index fund you have exposure to hot sectors (they may do even better than expected after all) but also you’re snapping up bargains among the unfashionable sectors, too.

Tips from mates are dangerous because we trust our mates. But they’re usually acting on the same duff information and compelling story as anyone else is.

If you’re inexperienced and operating on the basis of a this-is-amazing story then that’s a massive red flag. It typically means you’re shark food for somebody else.

If you do venture into this then put in no more than you can afford to lose. And by that I mean if the entire investment went to zero. I am not saying it will. I’m stressing it could.

Even if block chain is a success as a technology (that’s not totally clear at the moment), nobody can predict whether this company will eventually be the Amazon of Blockchain or just another failed start-up that’s crushed by whatever company does become the Amazon of Blockchain.

Start-ups go to the wall all the time. The Facebooks and Googles of the world are very rare. The ratio of new companies touted as The Next Facebook or The Greatest Opportunity Since Google to, well, Facebook and Google would be similar to the ratio of many thousands of stars you can see on a clear night sky – with binoculars – to the lonely sole moon.

Single investments in individual companies are extremely dangerous to your wealth for this very reason. If it goes bust you lose all the money you put in.

If you must do something, think of it as like having a punt down at the dog-track rather than an investment. Bet a fiver, not your pension.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 36 comments }
Weekend reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

I wrote a big comment under Fire V London’s fascinating post about how a tech billionaire of his acquaintance goes about investing. But then the Blogger comment system thing caused problems, as it often seems to, and it ate my second attempt.

(Perhaps the billionaire could fix that technology?)

The gist was I found myself hugely jealous. Not of the billion quid – bizarrely enough to most of the world, but perhaps not to some of you – but of the billionaire’s lifestyle.

His gadding around the world investing in start-ups and staying engaged with the latest big trends sounds like my dream day job:

David specialises ‘value-added’ angel investing, mostly (or possibly exclusively) in the tech sector. His investments vary in size from $500k to €10m+.

He has 30+ such investments and is reasonably hands-on with several.

My impression is he is looking for visionary, ambitious businesses based in Europe, where he can put some serious money to work – and he is not afraid of being the biggest shareholder.

The only way I can really justify my dabbling in unlisted equities is because I want to try to develop some similar skills to do this. But I know I’m just a baby version of this bloke.

Of course I also need to develop the spare capital to put to work to fund such ultra-risky investing… but that’s where the rest of my portfolio comes in!

Fellow investing junkies can read the whole post here.

[continue reading…]

{ 12 comments }

Weekend reading: Investing wisdom from Jason Zweig

Weekend reading: Investing wisdom from Jason Zweig post image

What caught my eye this week.

Jason Zweig is an investment writers’ writer – the man my co-blogger The Accumulator models himself after, and the author of the only book @TA ever gave me as a present. (I’m hopeful the second one will be the completed draft of the Monevator guide to investing…)

Why, you might ask, does The Accumulator hold Zweig in such high esteem that he keeps a mugshot of the guy above the desk in his study, dotted with gold stars and a fake signature he forged by squinting his eyes and thinking of exorbitant expense ratios? (Probably).

I suspect it’s because the US veteran author has a similar ability to turn dry financial matters into pithy words of wisdom.

For a taster, here’s a few lines Zweig shared the other day:

  • In investing, as in life, too many people confuse wishes for beliefs and beliefs for evidence. Things aren’t valid just because you want them to be.
  • As you “learn” more, if your confidence doesn’t go down before it goes up, then you probably aren’t learning.
  • The future isn’t a straight line you can extrapolate from the past. The future is a storm into which we are blown backwards.
  • Walk as often as you can through the graveyard of your dead beliefs, especially the ones you murdered by your own hand.
  • Investing is a profoundly lonely activity, and it’s hard to pick your way through endless minefield of bullsh*t and boobytraps that the financial industry lays down unless you find a community of other investors at least as smart as you.

Those aren’t even particular meant as pithy one-liners by the way – they are all teasers to full articles that Zweig has written before.

See his post for the links – and set aside a couple of hours to devour them.

[continue reading…]

{ 33 comments }
Image of two property men in hard hats.

I last wrote in detail about commercial property as an asset class in 2009. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, half-finished towers and moribund building sites dotted London like the LEGO play of a child interrupted.

The towel had been thrown in. I saw an opportunity.

Over the next few years, property investments – stock market-listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) as well as old-style property investment trusts and funds – did better than anyone expected.

Helped by persistently low interest rates, property assets doubled or even tripled your money over the next few years, thanks to rising prices and generous yields. Skyscrapers soared.

Some property shares lagged the recovery, giving a chance to buy again in 2011 – especially as the recovery was slower to reach small cap property firms

However certain parts of the sector are now well down from those highs.

Industrial property companies are doing well thanks to the weak pound juicing manufacturing, and there’s a boom in the warehouses that support online shopping and other logistical operations.

But companies that own lot of office space in London trade at big discounts to their net asset value – due mostly, I think, to the ongoing Brexit fiasco.

The market also seems wary of second-tier retail exposure. That’s understandable in light of the many store and restaurant closures we’ve seen since we voted to shoot ourselves in the foot in 2016.

Bailing on Brexit

Long-time readers will know I think Brexit is our biggest unforced error since the Hundred Years War.

However everything has its price.

If I can buy prime London office space at 70p in the pound via the stock market, I have a good margin of safety. If property developers have curbed speculative ventures because they fear bankers will decamp to Frankfurt and start-ups to Lisbon, at least new supply will be limited. That should help the incumbents.

Also, I don’t think we’ve condemned ourselves to penury with Brexit. I just believe we’ll be poorer than we would have been, for the foreseeable decades to come, for little gain. (That’s bad enough!)

Jeremy Corbyn notwithstanding, the rich will still get richer, and London will remain the base of operations for most of them.

You can shake your fist from the provinces, but you can’t make an oligarch or a tech entrepreneur move their company to the middle of nowhere. (Movers and shakers are even more aghast at that idea in light of the social divisions revealed by Brexit.)

But before anyone sells their Facebook shares and plows it all into UK real estate, know three things.

Firstly, Monevator is not about share tips. At most, posts like this are just suggestions of areas worth exploring. Do your own research – and on your head be the results.

Secondly, you should know I’ve had this view about commercial property since quite soon after the Brexit vote, when traders dumped UK property faster than Boris Johnson shedding his principles.

As global money began fleeing UK PLC, property funds had to be gated so investors didn’t ask to withdraw money that the funds didn’t have. I thought this was a sign the panic was overdone, and flagged up the potential opportunity.

Since then some companies I mentioned have done okay, but others have fallen further.

Again, do your own research – because you will have to live with the consequences.

This time it’s different

The third thing to note is that back in 2009, property prices really had plunged.

If you wanted to go out and buy a London office following the financial crisis, it was cheaper than a few years before. Same with a new lease, too. Prime property was going cheap.

The falls in property investments on the stock market then reflected this gloomy reality.

That’s the standard cycle in commercial property. Boom years – in which money is easy to find and development rampant – followed by lean years where over-extended developers go bust.

Sell when the fat blokes in suits and hard hats in the business pages look smug and contented, that’s my rule of thumb. Consider buying when those CEOs have been shuffled away for wiry upstarts who appear in the same pages talking up the forgotten sector again.

This time – so far – it’s different.

London office space is holding its value, and rents remain high, too. Brexit fear has not yet dinged the hard bricks and mortar assets themselves, just their stock market proxies.

Those discounts to net asset value we see with certain REITs may reflect an irrational disconnect with reality on the ground. Perhaps some of the beefy property blokes will be proved right to be more confident about Brexit than the flighty liberal elite fund managers selling down REITs?

Alternatively – more technically – it may be that hedge funds and the like who are very pessimistic about Brexit have turned to shorting the shares of listed property giants as an easy way to express that view. (The funds are unlikely to own physical offices to dump).

Does this make the big London office REITs more of an opportunity this time – because it’s a phony war – or less so – because the usual cycle hasn’t yet played out from peak-to-trough?

It’s something to think about.

Commercial property and your portfolio

In my next post I’ll recap the broader investment case for commercial property, whether you’re an active or a passive investor.

Why do some model portfolios include specific commercial property exposure, and how does the asset class differ from equities and bonds? What if you already own your own home?

The exciting bit is over, but the important stuff is to come. Subscribe to catch it.

Disclosure: I have various beneficial interests related to London property.

{ 39 comments }