Find the cheapest investment platforms in the UK and make broker comparison easier with our tables below. Investment costs are all-important, so we’ve placed the cheapest brokers at the top of each table.
Disclosure: Links to platforms may be affiliate links, where we may earn a small commission. It doesn’t affect the price you pay nor how we judge the brokers. This article and the comparison table are not personal financial advice. Your capital is at risk when you invest.
Get cashback by opening new accounts
In terms of promotions, this is usually a quiet time of the year for special offers.
And sure enough, most of the investing platforms have toned down their marketing efforts.
Such offers target customers transferring big ISAs and SIPPs to new brokers, which many of us are more minded to do in the final few months of the tax year. So that’s when more brokers are ready to pay big bonuses to win chunky accounts.
However a few deals are still available. Note terms and conditions apply with all offers, and your capital is at risk when you invest.
For instance, you can get up to £1,500 cashback when you transfer your cash and/or investments to Charles Stanley.
Or what if rather than a SIPP deposit or transfer, you’re just looking to start investing with a new platform?
Well, open an account with low-cost InvestEngine via our link and you can get up to £50 when you invest at least £100.
Follow the links to jump to the relevant pages. But do remember sign-up bonuses should be seen as an added bonus – not the sole reason to choose a broker.
How to compare brokers using our table below
Use our three broker comparison tables like this:
- Beginners – start with the percentage-fee brokers table.
- If your portfolio is worth over £12,000 (or £80,000+ in a SIPP) – consider the flat-fee brokers table.
- Active traders – compare brokers on the trading platforms table.
- Type your favourite broker into the search field and the table collapses to just that broker. (Assuming you know which table it’s in.)
- Mobile users: to see all the columns of our broker comparison table, please rotate your phone to landscape view.
Flat-fee broker comparison
Platform | Annual fee | Fee notes | Trading: Funds | Trading: ETFs, ITs, & shares | Regular investing | FX fee | Entry/exit fee | Good for |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
InvestEngine | £0 (DIY service) | ETFs only | n/a | £0 daily fixed times | £0 | £0 | £0 | Good for beginners |
Shares ISA | £0 | n/a | n/a | As above | £0 | £0 | £0 | ETF portfolios |
Trading | £0 | n/a | n/a | As above | £0 | £0 | £0 | ETF portfolios |
SIPP | 0.15% <£133,333, 0% >£133,333. Max £200 | n/a | n/a | As above | £0 | £0 | £0 | ETF portfolios <£80k |
Interactive Investor | £143.88 Investor plan (1 free monthly trade, 2 free friends/family) | £59.88 Essentials plan for <£50k portfolios. £239.88 Super Investor (2 free monthly trades, 5 free friends/family) | £3.99 | £3.99 | £0 | 1.5% <£25k transaction. Cheaper tiers above | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | Investor/Super Investor fee includes ISAs, JISAs and trading accounts. Essentials plan includes ISAs and trading | +£60 SIPP if all accounts <£75k. Otherwise +£120 SIPP | As above | As above | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | As above | As above | As above | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
SIPP | £71.88 if SIPP <£50k (Pension Essentials plan). £155.88 if SIPP >£50k (Pension Builder plan) | £0 drawdown/UFPLS. +£48 for ISA & trading if all accounts <£75k (Pension Essentials plan) | As above | As above | £0 | As above | £0 | Unrestricted fund portfolios >£25k (£115k vs Vanguard) |
Lloyds Bank Share Dealing | Single £40 fee if you hold ISA & trading account | Free if you're age 18-25 or a premier/private banking customer | £1.50 | £11* | £0 | 1% | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | £40 | n/a | £1.50 | £11* | £0 | 1% | £0 | Unrestricted fund portfolios >£11k, (£27k vs Vanguard) |
Trading | £40 | n/a | £1.50 | £11* | £0 | 1% | £0 | As above |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
Halifax/Bank Of Scotland Share Dealing | Single £36 fee if you hold ISA & trading account | Free if you're age 18-25 | £9.50 | £9.50 | £0 | 1.25% | - | - |
Shares ISA | £36 | n/a | £9.50 | £9.50 | £0 | 1.25% | £0 | - |
Trading | £36 | n/a | £9.50 | £9.50 | £0 | 1.25% | £0 | - |
SIPP | £90 if SIPP <£50k. £180 if SIPP >£50k | +£180 p.a. drawdown, £90 per UFPLS | £9.50 | £9.50 | £0 | 1.25% | Entry: £60 per transfer. Max £300. Exit: £0 | - |
iWeb | £100 fee for opening your first account. Does not apply to SIPP | Fee waived until 31 December 2024 | £5 | £5 | n/a | 1.5% | - | Large unrestricted portfolios if you rarely trade. Check vs ii and Lloyds |
Shares ISA | £0 | n/a | £5 | £5 | n/a | 1.5% | £0 | Cheapest stocks and shares ISA hack |
Trading | £0 | n/a | £5 | £5 | n/a | 1.5% | £0 | - |
SIPP | £90 if SIPP <£50k. £180 if SIPP >£50k | +£180 p.a. drawdown, £90 per UFPLS | £5 | £5 | n/a | 1.5% | Entry: £60 per transfer. Max £300. Exit: £0 | - |
Freetrade | - | Securities lending except on ISA. Opt in only | n/a | £0 | Standard & Plus only | 0.99% Basic, 0.59% Standard, 0.39% Plus | £0 | - |
Flexible shares ISA | £71.88 (monthly sub), £59.88 (annual sub) | Free with SIPP | n/a | £0 | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
Trading | £0 | n/a | n/a | £0 | £0 | As above | £0 | ETF portfolios |
SIPP | £143.88 (monthly sub), £119.88 (annual sub) | No drawdown, £240 per UFPLS | n/a | £0 | £0 | 0.39% | £0 | ETF portfolios >£80k if you pay £119.88 annual sub |
ShareDeal Active | - | - | £9.50 | £9.50 | n/a | Variable | Exit: £12 per holding +£60 per account | - |
Flexible shares ISA | £60 | £18 per cash withdrawal | £9.50 | £9.50 | n/a | Variable | As above | - |
Trading | £0 | £18 per cash withdrawal | £9.50 | £9.50 | n/a | Variable | As above | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
X-O.co.uk | - | - | n/a | £5.95 | n/a | Variable | - | - |
Shares ISA | £0 | n/a | n/a | £5.95 | n/a | Variable | Exit: £18 per holding +£60 | Cheapest stocks and shares ISA hack |
Trading | £0 | n/a | n/a | £5.95 | n/a | Variable | Exit: £18 per holding | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
HSBC Invest Direct | Single £42 fee if you hold ISA & trading account | n/a | No funds | £10.50* | n/a | Variable | Exit: £15 per holding | - |
Shares ISA | £42 | n/a | n/a | £10.50* | n/a | Variable | As above | - |
Trading | £42 | n/a | n/a | £10.50* | n/a | Variable | As above | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
Money Farm Share Investing | - | ETFs, UK shares and individual bonds | n/a | £3.95 (£5.95 for bonds) | - | 0.7% | - | - |
Flexible shares ISA | 0.35% | £45 fee cap | n/a | £3.95 | - | 0.7% | - | - |
Trading | £0 | - | n/a | £3.95 | - | 0.7% | - | |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
Flat-fee investment platforms charge a fixed cost for their services. This pricing model is typically better for investors with large portfolios.
That’s because percentage fees can carve off huge chunks of cash from your wealth if your platform doesn’t cap them.
Percentage-fee broker comparison
Platform | Annual fee | Fee notes | Trading: Funds | Trading: ETFs, ITs, & shares | Regular investing | FX fee | Entry/exit fee | Good for |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Investor | 0.15% <£250k, 0% >£250k. Max £375 | Tiered fee charged on sum of all accounts | £0 | £0 at fixed times, otherwise £7.50 | £0 | £0 | £0 | - |
Flexible shares ISA | As above | Vanguard investments only | £0 | As above | £0 | £0 | £0 | Restricted fund portfolios <£27k |
Trading | As above | Vanguard investments only | £0 | As above | £0 | £0 | £0 | As above |
SIPP | As above | Vanguard investments only. £0 drawdown/UFPLS | £0 | As above | £0 | £0 | £0 | Restricted fund portfolios <£115k, ETF portfolios <£80k |
Dodl by AJ Bell | 0.15%. Min £12 p.a. per account | Restricted fund/ETF list | £0 | £0 | £0 | 0.75% <£10k transaction. Cheaper tiers above. 0.5% dividends | £0 | - |
Shares ISA/LISA | As above | n/a | £0 | £0 | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | n/a | £0 | £0 | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above | No drawdown | £0 | £0 | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
AJ Bell | 0.25% <£250k, 0.1% £250k – £500k, 0% >£500k. Tiered fee per account | 0.25% on ETFs, shares, ITs, & bonds, capped as below | £1.50 | £5* | £1.50 | 0.75% <£10k transaction. Cheaper tiers above. 0.5% dividends | £0 | - |
Shares ISA/LISA | As above | £42 fee cap as above | £1.50 | £5* | £1.50 | As above | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | £42 fee cap as above | £1.50 | £5* | £1.50 | As above | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above | £120 fee cap as above. £0 drawdown/UFPLS | £1.50 | £5* | £1.50 | As above | £0 | - |
Fidelity | £90 <£25k, 0.35% £25k – £250k, 0.2% £250k – £1m, 0% >£1m | Fee not tiered below £1m, charged on sum of all accounts | £0 | £7.50 | £1.50 (£0 for funds) | 0.75% <£10k transaction. Cheaper tiers above | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | As above. 0.35% <£25K with monthly savings plan. JISAs are free | £90 fee cap ETFs, ITs, shares | £0 | £7.50 | £1.50 (£0 for funds) | As above | £0 | Unrestricted fund portfolios <£11k on monthly savings plan |
Trading | As above. 0.35% <£25K with monthly savings plan | £0 fee for ETFs, ITs, shares | £0 | £7.50 | £1.50 (£0 for funds) | As above | £0 | As above |
SIPP | As above. 0.35% <£25K with monthly savings plan. Junior SIPPs are free | £90 fee cap ETFs, ITs, shares. £0 drawdown/UFPLS | £0 | £7.50 | £1.50 (£0 for funds) | As above | £0 | Unrestricted fund portfolios <£25k on monthly savings plan |
Bestinvest | 0.4% <£250k, 0.2% £250k – 500k, 0.1% 500k – £1m, 0% >£1m | Tiered fee charged per account | £0 | £4.95 | £0 | 0.95% | £0 | |
Shares ISA | As above | n/a | £0 | £4.95 | £0 | 0.95% | £0 | |
Trading | As above | n/a | £0 | £4.95 | £0 | 0.95% | £0 | |
SIPP | As above. Min £120 charge | £0 drawdown/UFPLS | £0 | £4.95 | £0 | 0.95% | £0 | |
Charles Stanley Direct | 0.3% | Min £60. Max £600. £50 of trades free every 6 months | £4 | £10 | £10 (£0 for funds) | 1% <£10k transaction. Cheaper tiers above | Exit: £10 per holding | - |
Flexible Shares ISA | As above | As above | £4 | £10 | £10 (£0 for funds) | As above | As above | - |
Trading | As above | As above | £4 | £10 | £10 (£0 for funds) | As above | As above | - |
SIPP | As above +£120 - waived if all accounts sum £30k+ | +£60 p.a. drawdown | £4 | £10 | £10 (£0 for funds) | As above | As above +£150 | - |
HSBC Global Investment Centre | 0.25% on all investments | Restricted number of non-HSBC index funds | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | As above | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | £0 | n/a | n/a | - |
Close Brothers | 0.25% <£500k, 0.2% £500k – £1m, 0.1% 1m – 1.5m, 0% >£1.5m | Tiered fee charged on sum of all accounts | £0 | £8.95 | £8.95 (£0 for funds) | Not mentioned | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | As above | n/a | £0 | £8.95 | £8.95 (£0 for funds) | Not mentioned | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | n/a | £0 | £8.95 | £8.95 (£0 for funds) | Not mentioned | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above +£180 | £0 drawdown bar £60 set up, £60 per UFPLS | £0 | £8.95 | £8.95 (£0 for funds) | Not mentioned | £0 | - |
Santander Investment Hub | 0.35% <£50k, 0.2% £50k – £500k, 0.1% >£500k | Tiered fee charged per account. Funds only | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | As above | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | Unrestricted fund portfolios <£11k |
Trading | As above | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | As above |
SIPP | As above | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | n/a | £0 | Unrestricted fund portfolios <£25k |
Hargreaves Lansdown | 0.45% <£250k, 0.25% £250k – £1m, 0.1% £1m – £2m, 0% >£2m | Tiered fee charged per account. Fee cap on ETFs, shares, ITs, & bonds | £0 | £11.95* | £0 | 1% <£5k transaction. Cheaper tiers above. 1% dividends | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | As above except LISA is 0.25% <£250k. JISAs are free | £45 fee cap as above | £0 | £11.95* (£0 for JISAs) | £0 | As above. £0 for JISAs on standard trades | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | £0 fee cap as above | £0 | £11.95* | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above | £200 fee cap as above. £0 drawdown/UFPLS | £0 | £11.95* | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
Aviva | 0.4% <£50k, 0.35% £50k – £250k, 0.25% £250k – £500k, 0% >£500k. Tiered fee charged on sum of all accounts | 0.4% on ETFs, shares, and ITs, capped as below | £0 | £7.50 | £7.50 (£0 for funds) | n/a | £0 | - |
Flexible Shares ISA | As above | £45 fee cap as above | £0 | £7.50 | £7.50 (£0 for funds) | n/a | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | £45 fee cap as above | £0 | £7.50 | £7.50 (£0 for funds) | n/a | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above | £120 fee cap as above. £0 drawdown/UFPLS | £0 | £7.50 | £7.50 (£0 for funds) | n/a | £0 | - |
Plum | Varies by account type | 0.15% + £119.88 Premium plan (+26 funds, UK shares) | £0 | £0 | Premium only | 0.45% | Exit: £25 per holding | - |
Shares ISA | 0.45% + £35.88 Basic Plan, US shares, no funds | 0.45% + £59.88 Pro Plan (+17 funds) | £0 | £0 | £0 | 0.45% | As above | - |
Trading | £35.88 Basic Plan, US shares, no funds | Percentage fee charged on funds not shares | £0 | £0 | £0 | 0.45% | As above | - |
SIPP | 0.45% (no plan required) | Choice of 3 funds. No drawdown | £0 | £0 | £0 | 0.45% | As above | - |
NuWealth | 0.1% + £12 per account | Restricted ETF list | n/a | £0 at fixed times | £0 | 0.75% | £0 | - |
Shares ISA | As above | - | n/a | As above | £0 | 0.75% | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | - | n/a | As above | £0 | 0.75% | £0 | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | £0 | n/a | n/a | - |
Barclays Smart Investor | 0.25% <£200k, 0.05% >£200k | - | £0 | £6 | £0 | 1% <£5k transaction. Cheaper tiers above | - | - |
Flexible Shares ISA | As above | As above | £0 | £6 | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | As above | £0 | £6 | £0 | As above | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above +£150 | As above +£120 p.a. drawdown, £90 per UFPLS | £0 | £6 | £0 | As above | Entry: £90 per transfer, £450 max. Exit: £90 | - |
Percentage-fee platforms are best for people starting out with relatively little invested. That’s because you’re only losing a modest amount of actual cash when a percentage charge is skimmed from your small pot.
Conversely, flat fees take a disproportionately large bite out of a diminutive portfolio. That sets you back because you’ve got less wealth compounding.
We’ve previously explained how to calculate whether or not you should use a flat-fee or percentage-fee broker.
Trading fees are also typically charged at a fixed rate. Try to keep these costs under 1% of your monthly investment contributions. Look out for cheap regular investing plans and zero commission trading in funds or ETFs to staunch your percentage loss to dealing fees.
Trading platform comparison
Platform | Annual fee | Fee notes | Trading: Funds | Trading: ETFs, ITs, & shares | Regular investing | FX fee | Entry/exit fee | Good for |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interactive Brokers | - | £1 per monthly BACs cash withdrawal after first | Varies | UK shares: 0.05% of trade, £3 minimum. Rates vary by country. Also see tiered option | UK shares: 0.05% of trade, £3 minimum. Rates vary by country. | - | £0 | International shares |
Shares ISA | £3 monthly inactivity fee | £3+ monthly trades = £0 inactivity fee | As above | As above | As above | 0.03% | £0 | - |
Trading | £0 | As above | As above | As above | As above | 0.03% | £0 | - |
SIPP | Varies | n/a | As above | As above | As above | 0.03% | £0 | - |
Trading 212 | £0 | - | n/a | £0 | £0 | 0.15% | £0 | - |
Flexible Shares ISA | £0 | n/a | n/a | £0 | £0 | 0.15% | £0 | - |
Trading | £0 | Securities lending scheme. Opt in only | n/a | £0 | £0 | 0.15% | £0 | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | £0 | n/a | n/a | - |
Degiro | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Shares ISA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
Trading | £0 with securities lending. 0.2% for funds | No securities lending: €1 + 3% (max 10%) per dividend distribution | €4.90 | €1 core ETFs, €3 other ETFs, £2.75 UK shares, €2 US shares | n/a | 0.25% | Entry/exit: €20 per holding | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
IG | £96 (£24 per quarter minus trade fees) | 3+ quarterly trades = £0 fee | n/a | £8* | n/a | 0.5% | £0 | - |
Flexible Shares ISA | As above | As above | n/a | £8* | n/a | 0.5% | £0 | - |
Trading | As above | As above | n/a | £8* | n/a | 0.5% | £0 | - |
SIPP | As above +£210 | As above +£150 p.a. drawdown, £100 per UFPLS | n/a | £8* | n/a | 0.5% | Entry: £240 | - |
Saxo | 0.12% <£1m, 0.08% >£1m | Funds only: 0.4% <£200k, 0.2% £200k – £1m, 0.1% >£1m | £0 | 0.08% of transaction, min £3** for LSE (varies by stock exchange) | n/a | 0.25% | - | |
Shares ISA | As above | As above | £0 | As above | n/a | 0.25% | £0 | |
Trading | As above | As above | £0 | As above | n/a | 0.25% | Exit: €50 per holding. Max €160 | |
SIPP | As above + £426 | As above +£186 p.a. drawdown, £248 per UFPLS | £0 | As above | n/a | 0.25% | Exit: €50 per holding (Max €160) + £389 | |
Robinhood | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Shares ISA | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
Trading | £0 | US shares only, securities lending scheme | n/a | £0 | £0 | 0.03% | £0 | - |
SIPP | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | - |
We define a trading platform as a stock broker that encourages its users to buy and sell frequently.
To this end, some trading platforms promote speculative instruments such as Contracts For Difference (CFDs), currencies, and crypto.
They also provide a fast-moving, information-saturated environment that emphasises hyperactivity.
Platform fees are low-to-zero in this space. Revenue is instead generated by trading fees, spreads, and other methods.
Stick to the top two tables if your focus is on investing for the long-term in funds and ETFs.
Investment platforms comparison notes
Charges may actually be due per month, quarter, six-monthly, or annually. Our broker comparison tables simplify that into an annual cost of service, including VAT.
Other charges may be applicable that aren’t included.
Asterisked (*) trading fees indicate that a frequent trader rate is available. (**) Transaction price cheaper when account balance passes certain thresholds.
Zero commission brokers generally make money from spreads, foreign exchange fees, and cross-selling of other services. (You’re not getting something for nothing!)
Accounts held with Halifax / Bank Of Scotland, Lloyds Bank, and iWeb count as one for the purposes of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
Like other price comparison websites, we may be paid a bonus if you sign-up via a link. This does not affect what you pay.
This table is edited by fallible human beings. Do your own research. We fix mistakes as soon as possible but we cannot be held liable or accountable for any errors. Please add updates or erratas in the comments below.
Cheap investment platforms: Good for column
The Good for column indicates the cheapest investment platform for each account type (ISA, Trading and SIPP) depending on whether you invest in funds or ETFs.
The cheapest percentage-fee broker for funds is Vanguard. However, it only stocks Vanguard funds.
If you’d prefer a broker that also offers non-Vanguard funds, then look out for the Unrestricted fund portfolios label in the Good for column.
The portfolio value (e.g. £18k) indicates the approximate threshold at which an investment platform is cheaper than its rivals. In each scenario:
- The flat fee broker is cheaper than its percentage fee competitor above the given value (e.g. £18k).
- The percentage fee platform is more cost effective below the given value.
This broker comparison is offered for ISAs, SIPPs, and trading accounts. We also show the breakpoint vs Vanguard’s cheaper rate.
Our calculations assume one purchase per month and four sales per year. And also that you take advantage of lower-priced regular investment schemes when available.
The investing platform comparison threshold shifts, depending on how much you trade.
Cheapest broker FX fees
Foreign exchange charges are paid for trading in securities that are listed in currencies other than sterling (GBP). Typically those securities are international shares and some ETFs.
FX fees are also due when a broker converts overseas dividends and interest into GBP.
- These costs are levied as a percentage of each transaction.
- Assume they’re layered on top of the FOREX spot price.
- If we list an FX fee of £0, you’ll still pay the spot price where FX fees are applicable.
Please see our tips for avoiding FX fees. If your fund’s base currency is GBP then this cost won’t apply at the broker level.
Variable FX fees means you’ll have to contact the broker for its in-house rate before every trade if you want to know exactly how much you’ll pay in advance.
Not mentioned in the table means the platform does not disclose FX fees prominently on its website. It has also not responded to our enquiries about its rates.
FX fees aren’t an issue if a broker only stocks funds with a GBP base currency. This should be noted on a fund’s factsheet.
Some brokers use a tiered FX fee rate card. In other words, the percentage rate decreases on the amount of a transaction that falls into higher tiers. Please refer to your broker’s website for its full schedule where our table indicates it operates tiered pricing.
What matters when comparing brokers
Investment platforms, stock brokers, and share dealing services are interchangeable names for websites or apps that enable you to trade and manage your portfolio of shares, funds, ETFs, and other investments online.
When you compare brokers, bear in mind that there isn’t a best investment platform out there that suits everybody. The stock broker market is competitive. Players try to standout by offering different pricing models and market niches.
The total price you pay for brokerage services is critical. That’s because controlling costs is a crucial factor in determining your long-term investment performance.
As investing luminary John Bogle said:
The two greatest enemies of the equity fund investor are expenses and emotions.
Our UK stockbrokers list can’t take the emotion out of investing but it can help you find the cheapest investment platform.
The best UK broker for you is likely to provide:
- Low fees for the services you use most.
- The shares, funds, ETFs, and other investments you want. Platforms do not all carry the same range of products.
- The right level of customer service for your needs – don’t expect the lowest-cost platform to respond like lightning when you want it to handle complicated arrangements over the phone.
- The right user experience – if you want a flashy website and app then you’ll be able to tell who provides that from its home page. A broker with a clunky website and dirt-cheap fees is unlikely to prioritise investing in cutting-edge tech.
Check your investment platform is authorised by the FCA
If your investment platform is authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) then you may be entitled to compensation using the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS). Check a broker’s status using the FCA register.
Some platforms are owned by the same financial group. You do not diversify your risk by splitting assets across brands owned by the same group. Our investor compensation scheme guide (linked to above) explains how you can identify these brands.
Some brokers are based abroad – especially those listed in the Trading platforms table. Double-check they’re eligible for the FSCS compensation scheme.
Broker comparison: costs and fees
The annual fee category is intended to capture the various types of service fee typically levied by investment platforms. For example custody fees, platform charges, administration fees, inactivity fees and so on, until the end of time / your tether.
Fee notes includes extra charges, options, inclusions, and exclusions that make a material difference to the price you pay.
A tiered fee means you’ll pay different amounts depending on the total value of your account(s).
For example:
- 0.25% <£250,000 (tier 1)
- 0.1% £250,000 – £500,000 (tier 2)
If your account was worth £250,500 then you’d only benefit from the lower charge on the £500 that fell into tier 2. The remaining £250,000 would still be charged at the tier 1 rate of 0.25%.
Some brokers add up the total value of all your accounts with them when applying their tiers.
However others assess each account separately.
In this scenario (still using our tiered example rate above), you’d pay the tier 1 rate of 0.25% on your entire balance if you had £200,000 in an ISA and £200,000 in a SIPP.
Assume brokers count joint accounts separately from your individual account balances.
SIPP charges on the table don’t include all the various additional fees levied for services once you’re in drawdown.
The drawdown figure we do include is the annual charge you’ll pay for flexi-access drawdown. We’ll also include the fee for taking 25% tax-free uncrystallised funds pension lump sum (UFPLS) payments, if available.
Platforms levy various additional costs for extras such as telephone trading.
Check their full rates and charges schedule before committing.
Brokers also run temporary offers and discounts from time-to-time. Don’t let these sway your decision.
(Obviously they’re a lovely “How Do You Do?” if you were going to choose that brokerage anyway.)
Investment fees for funds, ETFs, and other products
Stockbroker charges come on top of the investment fees you pay to fund providers for the management of their funds, ETFs, and investment trusts.
To ensure you’re paying competitive management fees compare:
- Low cost index funds and ETFs
- Best global tracker funds
- Best bond funds and ETFs
- Best multi-asset funds
- Vanguard LifeStrategy funds
Certain big name brokers sometimes negotiate small discounts on fund charges. If you’re tempted by those ‘bargain’ offers then make sure that your total cost of investment isn’t more expensive once you load on the investment platform’s fees.
This post shows you how to calculate a total portfolio cost for all the products you own.
Understanding account names
Accounts names vary across the online broker universe. However they typically conform to the following types:
- Trading – a taxable account often known as a General Investment Account (GIA) or brokerage account. Your investments are not tax-sheltered as they would be in a stocks and shares ISA or a SIPP. You will incur dividend income tax and capital gains tax on your investments if you exceed your allowances.
- Shares ISA / Flexible Shares ISA – a stocks and shares ISA. Tax-sheltered. Sometimes known as a Self-select ISA. A Lifetime ISA (LISA) is a special variant of a stocks and shares ISA.
- SIPP – Self-Invested Personal Pension. Tax-sheltered.
Switching investment platform
Once you’ve decided to move, it’s fair to say that switching investment platforms isn’t as simple as it is with bank accounts.
For starters, beware of entry and exit fees when transferring your investments. These charges are shown in our broker comparison tables.
Entry fees may be charged by your new platform and exit fees may be charged by your old one.
You can expect a transfer to take several weeks and involve some form filling.
- Always tick the box that requests your investments are transferred ‘in specie’ rather than sold down to cash as part of the switch.
- Make a record of everything you own in your portfolio, including how many shares / units you have.
- Finally, double-check your instructions have been carried out to the letter. Mistakes are surprisingly common.
Take a look at our specialised guides before you make a move:
Why are there only links to some brokers?
Links to brokers and investment platforms are affiliate links, where we may be paid a fee if you go on to open an account with them.
However we do not choose to include platforms in our table based on whether such affiliate fees are on offer, nor does the existence of such an arrangement change the fees you pay. It is a marketing payment made by the companies as an incentive for websites to drive traffic to their site.
We’d like more brokers to pay us when we introduce new customers. It helps us pay our way on Monevator!
Including all brokers – but only linking where an affiliate agreement is in place – is the best compromise we could come up with.
What this UK stockbrokers list won’t tell you
For in-depth customer feedback on individual platforms, ask away in our comments or at Money Saving Expert’s Savings & Investments board, the ex-Motley Foolers on the Lemon Fool board, or reddit for a broader opinion.
Where is my missing trading platform?
We haven’t included every last option in our broker comparison table but we have included the most competitive players in the market.
We filter out any broker that:
- Is too expensive
- Excludes index funds and London Stock Exchange ETFs
- Provides an extremely narrow investment range to the point that diversification is hampered
We also don’t currently include platforms that exclusively provide managed investment services such as ‘robo-advisors’.
That’s because we believe most people are better off managing their own investments at a lower cost using a DIY passive investing strategy.
Do let us know if you think we’ve missed anyone or anything important.
@fussie There is an article on the site about ISA transfers which may be helpful if you haven’t read it; I’m afraid I don’t have the link handy and I’m on my phone so can’t search easily.
I have done a number of ISA transfer over the last few years as I sorted out a legacy portfolio of overcharging ISA platforms. I always do an in specie transfer – i.e. transferring the fund as is, not selling, transferring the cash and buying back – as the transfer can be slow and I don’t want to be out of the market. (Admittedly cash transfers are a bit faster.)
I always e-mail the target ISA provider a list of the funds (giving the ISIN of each to avoid ambiguity; a given fund will exist in loads of variants with different fees sometimes) and ask explicitly if they can accept an in-specie transfer of those funds. You can save some time by pre-checking on the target ISA provider’s site but I always like to get confirmation in writing before going ahead with the move, so I can complain if they sell out a fund to transfer it and claim they couldn’t accept it in specie. (This has never happened, I’m just paranoid. 🙂 )
With so many funds you may struggle to find a provider who will accept all of them. I suggest if that’s the case you consider selling the ‘awkward’ holdings and buying an equivalent fund at the current ISA provider before doing the transfer – obviously choosing an equivalent fund which the new provider can accept. You might also want to consider simplifying to hold fewer funds in the first place, ideally before the transfer, but it’s obviously your call.
The other thing I’d recommend is taking a screenshot of the holdings on the current ISA platform before the transfer. That way it’s easier to stay calm when the holdings disappear from the old platform but haven’t yet appeared on the new one, as you have some kind of proof that they did exist. A paper statement would be even better but I must admit I’ve never bothered.
The transfer process is tedious and slow but not really difficult.
@Kraggash Thanks for throwing some light on these mysterious letters: “P” class, “Y” class, “W” class. I spent a few minutes googling on this today, to no avail, which is an indication of something in this day and age (I mean, where information is not exactly in short supply!). Do you have a link which talks about this? As for logging on directly to Fundsupermarket, I was intrigued and did so… so, if I understand you right, we’re talking about a login page where there’s a picture of a peaceful foresty valley… i.e. very similar to the Cav login page? So I managed to log in there… but the page of my holdings etc. seemed exactly the same. Actually it’s of somewhat academic interest as I’m moving to Motley Fool because of the flat-rate charges, so it makes sense to transfer everything from my percentage platforms (HL & Cav) and consolidate everything at MF really… But it might help someone like Todd…
From what I can see IG’s ISA is no admin fee and only £8 to trade UK shares.
i made a mistake by submitting my mobile number on ig website.i ended up receiving about 50to 60 calls in a span of one year regarding short trading.
@Trevor – IG is fine for short-term stock trading, but I found it irritating for long-term holdings. They’re set up as a spread-better, not a stock dealer, so their reporting systems are irritating, to say the least (they issue a statement every time you make any purchase or sale, so you could have dozens of separate statements for a year’s activity!). They also don’t do stop-losses, which I find a pain. But yes, they’re practically free.
I was looking at the Lloyds Bank charges for their sharedealing accounts (trading and ISAs). The table seems to suggest in the fee notes that if both an ISA and trading sharedealing accounts are held , then the £20 per six months charge for the ISA applies, but the separate £20 per six months for the trading account is waived. So in total £20 per 6 months or £40pa is the total cost, regardless of whether an ISA only, trading only or both accounts are held . So should the wording in ‘fee notes’ say ‘only one £40 charge applies if both ISA and trading accounts are held’. Or have I just misunderstood their charges?
https://www.lloydsbank.com/share-dealing.asp
I’m completely confused about their funds offering. If you click on the green ‘Share Dealing ISA’ or ‘Share Dealing Account’ boxes, that has an openable box titled ‘Funds Supermarket’ where it says you can choose from over 3,000 funds through your share dealing account, and says ‘enjoy low initial charges of only 0.5% with most fund managers’ (what is that all about, most clean funds, in particular trackers are usually 0%, so what funds are they actually offering?), and then if you click on ‘find out more’ that takes you to another page that says under the FAQ tab that funds cost £10 to trade (vs £11 for shares). It also says there in relation to the initial charge ‘some are even offered at 0%’ so is that 0.5% comment earlier just a red herring?
Can anyone clarify?
Meant to say the table seems to read as saying no charge if both ISA and trading accounts held, but should it be £40pa in total instead?
@Snowman I agree with you on the description of the Lloyds Share Dealing platform fee description.
As for the “0.5%” initial charge, put that down to the bank having too many subpages on their website and not keeping them properly up-to-date. I would be astonished if they were charging anything other 0% initial charge on most funds and applying only the standard initial charges on the funds where those are still applied by fund managers. The giveaway is the “We have negotiated initial charges of only 0.5% with most fund managers and some are even offered at 0%.” statement that I see on one of those pages – that smacks of old school as I very much doubt that Lloyds have any “negotiated” initial charges these days.
Snowman – if it were me I’d simply ring them up and ask them.
I am an existing client of Alliance Trust Savings with 2 online execution accounts.One personal £40 k,second UK reg Ltd Co £1.2m.
With a months notice they are going to apply a £375 pa charge per portfolio, on top of the existing £120 platform fee.
This will effectively swallow entire years dividend income on the personal portfolio.
Enquiry TO ATS lead to suggestion “you might like to find a new provider ” and waiver of opt out charge if before June 1. (5 weeks )
Problem.I am ex Pat .Despite UK Bank accounts, 30 years same address.It seems IMPOSSIBLE to find online provider without a UK post code and a recent utility bill..Any suggestions welcome.There must be thousands of us in same situation.
Try ‘the share centre’ at http://www.share.com
@Gordon – What’s your citizenship(s) and country of residence? Do you have a UK ISA and/or SIPP or is it just a sharedealing account? It makes a big difference if you are US, European or ‘other’. Most platforms will require you to be UK resident, but not all (e.g. iDealing I believe). Never pretend to be resident if you are not. Might have worked in the past, but not these days.
@Gordon – If you’ve lived outside the UK for more than 30 years you are unlikely to be able to qualify as a UK tax resident, which will make things more difficult if you want to keep a UK share-dealing account. A charge of 0.08% on assets of £1.24million does not sound unreasonable if they are willing to keep you as a client.
@Gordon – An interesting and relevant article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/isas/ask-expert-can-still-have-isa-move-abroad
Thanks for suggestions
@Ruby—Share centre want UK address.
@Jeffrey—-Do not have an ISA as non resident.Tried iDealing who on website say that they will accept EU citizens and Companies.
They have just replied to my mail to say “in a restricted list of 7 countries UK,Ireland,France,Netherlands,Belgium,and Portugal.” No explanation given.Very strange —-it was the UK that voted for Brexit, what will happen then.
In relation to the fees from ATS i agree that £495 is not unreasonable for a portfolio of £1.2m.However it is exorbitant for £40k of my personal money, and i object to only 5 weeks notice.I am now faced with disposing of all the holdings (12 trade fees to ATS ! ) and swallowing a 30% loss as it is a very speculative portfolio thanks to oil price, Brexit, Donald Trump and the chance of a war in Korea !
Even Next turned into a spec !
Alternatively I can opt for certificates of (12 x£20 ) or a combination of these.
My research (Google) reveals 900,000 Brits in EU countries so this must be the basis for a thriving online business if someone can work out that we are not all seeking offshare tax havens.In which case coming to live in Denmark was a mistake as we are amongst the highest taxed in the world.
My search goes on, thanks for contributions.
Readers may be interested to know I was contacted by Youinvest this morning after previous feedback that I wanted Two Factor Authentication as an option, to ask if I wanted to test it out!
How close this is to general release I don’t know, but my experience so far has been seamless. I’m pretty pleased with this, I must say.
Out of interest, do any others on the list above offer 2FA?
I’ve heard of SFA (!), what’s 2FA?
Are you sure about the share centre? I am non-UK resident and opened an account with them just over a year ago. They asked for a certified copy of my passport in addition to the 2 other forms of identification specified on the application form. They also asked for my tax identification number for the country in which I am resident. Take a look at their application form. It still looks pretty non-UK resident friendly to me. Why not phone them to check, as they suggest?
In addition to your normal username and password, a code generated by an app on your phone (for example) is needed to log in. It’s just another layer of security that makes it more difficult for people to get into your account if they aren’t meant to.
Just gives me that extra peace of mind considering the sums of money involved…
Ah! Yes. I know that HMRC does this as does Investec. Which is fine until you change your mobile number!
DW
iWeb
DW
iWeb have a username & password, then ask a security question from a selection chosen when you register. Does this qualify as 2FA?
Multiple knowledge questions does not strictly speaking lead to multi-factor authentication. Multi-factor is based on something you know (e.g. passwords), something you have (e.g. a separate device such as a mobile phone), and/or something you are (e.g. fingerprint).
@Ruby,
Pleased to say you are absolutely correct.I have also spoken to them–no problems,
You can only apply on line if you are UK resident–otherwise there are some forms to download.
Thank you for taking the trouble to put me right.I am very relieved as I thought we were forced to stay put.
Presumably you are satisfied as a customer to forward the link ?
Regards,
Glad it’s looking feasible for you. As you’ve discovered, there aren’t many options for non-UK residents. The joining process was reasonably quick. Fund purchases were straightforward. Web-site is simple and intelligible. It’s probably less sophisticated than others but more than adequate for my needs. Response to a telephone query was adequate. I find costs very reasonable. So satisfied, yes. I’ll be interested to hear how you find them.
@Gordon As a Brit living overseas in Malaysia, I use TD Direct Investing International which is based in Luxembourg and have found it very good. The only thing is that it’s been recently sold to Interactive Investors so don’t know what implications it will have for the cost and service. Nice perk with Luxembourg is that capital gains are not taxed (nor are they in Malaysia).
@Mr WG.
Thanks for suuggestion.Have already enquired to TD Direct by email.They replied that personal a/c no problem but they say they can not take a corporate one.
Actually suggested that I first transferred all the stocks over to a personal A/C and then transferred that account !
Pointed out that it would probably be accompanied by a spell sewing mailbags.At the very least banned from holding a directorship.
Have actually made an 2 applications to Share Centre, fingers crossed that problem is sorted.Thanks again.
Hi Gordon, just wondering if you have a Danish preferred broker/platform? I’m in Denmark – actually have account with HL in UK which I brought with me, don’t think they allow you to open them from abroad though, but I’m looking for something similar here now.
Also interested in any similar Monevator-type blogs with DK focus too. I speak/read Danish, just haven’t found anything similar here.
Cheers!
@Helen — I’ll ask friend-of-Monevator Lars Kroijer if he knows of any Danish investing blogs! 🙂
For other curious internationalists, we did our last global blog round up at the link below (best to add new suggestions there, and to keep this thread focused on platforms if possible please. With an exception for Helen if you *do* know a Danish blog, since she’s already asked):
http://monevator.com/blogs-for-international-financial-freedom-seekers/
@Helen,
My son and Son in law are both with Nordnet.It is very simple i think you can use your nemID.
I am not too sure of their terms (I advise but try not to pry !) But certainly they do not have much money at stake -but as i say to them if you do not have much it can hurt more ! I love the freedom of execution only dealing (and the price) and i am old enough to remember when all you had was the days closing price and a percentage ( buy and sell) to add to injury.
The Danish stock market does not interest me so much though.I have noticed that if you got 10 investors together their combined portfolios would have 80% of the same shares.London SE has so much more to get your teeth into.
I think there is plenty of blogs, threads,whu, etc though if you are interested. To be honest i am not too interested in most of it,
but that is because I am not dealing 5 shares each time.No doubt there is something to glean from it but i think you are better to use your own common sense,i subscribe to Investors Chronicle and a big fan of Simon Thompson.
I have dual UK/Canadian citizenship but am resident in Canada. With money in NatWest getting virtually no interest I am interested in getting in to the British market but have met a succession of roadblocks. My Canadian funds are with TD but when I contacted their office in Luxemburg I was told that as a non-resident U.K. citizen I was not eligible for making investments. Comments on the blog seem to indicate that this is not true. Help please!
Roy Godber
@Roy
There is TD Direct investment platform which is the UK branch. I believe you have to be UK resident to use.
However there is also TD Direct International platform which is based in Luxembourg. Expats can use that.
http://int.tddirectinvesting.com/td-difference/empowering-expatriates
I’m thinking about it myself. I have my ii which I opened while resident and I can legally put money into to that (its not SIPP or ISA wrapper). However as my pot has grown I’m thinking it might soon be worthwhile opening an off-shore trading account and put my monthly investments there for a few years. Need to weigh up the pro’s / cons of the TD International.
Hi. Does anyone have recent experience of using x-o.co.uk, particularly for a SIPP? Such as ease of use of the platform, availability of common passive funds (HSBC, iShares/Blackrock and Vanguard), reliability of platform and customer service. Many thanks.
Yes, I use X-O for my SIPP. Their customer service is pretty responsive and the user interface is perfectly acceptable IMO. Just a point to note, though, which you are probable aware of – they are exclusively a share dealing site, so no funds. I can find ETF alternatives for all the funds I would otherwise buy, but obviously if you just want a Vanguard Lifestrategy fund you’ll need another provider.
@Conor – thanks, that’s helpful.
Generally, why do brokers allow investors to sidestep all/most/some of their platform charge if buying ETFs rather than OEICs/Mutuals? Is it just because of the share dealing charge?? That doesn’t seem enough to compensate.
I’ve used X-O for a long time for ISA and sharedealing. Very good value for money. I’ve traded LSE shares, ETFs and ORB bonds with no problems. Website is very basic, payments in via debit card, payments out and transfers require you to send an email. SIPP appears to be managed by Gaudi to keep costs down, but I have no direct experience.
@Jeffrey – thanks for that.
@Jamie
I have been looking at X-O as well for an ETF only ISA. I sent them an e-mail this afternoon with a list of ETF’s to make sure that they carried them, received a reply within the hour! If every thing they do is as efficient they might be worth considering, but I’ll wait to see what other posts have to say .
While I’m here, I opened an ISA with iWeb in April and just bought a couple of funds and did not pay any dealing charges I’ve just topped them up and still no charges. Lifetimes brokerage for £25?
@CRG – Thanks. Yes, I also contacted them and heard back within the hour. I similarly contacted AJ Bell who took 4.5 hours, but that’s fine.
x-o are certainly the cheapest for my SIPP needs, and their apparent simplicity is appealing, but I wonder whether they (i.e. Jarvis) are big (‘safe’) enough? I’ve read their section on protection (http://www.x-o.co.uk/investor-protection.htm), which I’m sure is typical, but I’m wondering whether it is worth paying more for a bigger player…
Jamie
Fidelity charge 0.35% for a SIPP with no other charges if you just buy ETFs & investment trusts.(£5 dealing charge) Vanguard have an all world ETF that fits the bill.
CSD are waiving their SIPP fees if you have £30,000 over all investments. .0.25% fee & a good range of funds.
@Linda – thanks! My understanding of the Fidelity offering is that it is capped at £45 for ETF SIPPs, but there is a 0.1% trading cost. So for £40,000/yr, it costs £85. As you point out, they have an acceptable range of funds, including the following (OCF values ranging 0.07 -0.25%):
HSBC FTSE 100 ETF
iShares Core S&P 500
iShares FTSE 100
Vanguard S&P 500
iShares Core FTSE 100
HSBC S&P 500 ETF
Vanguard FTSE 100
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50
HSBC MSCI World ETF
HSBC MSCI Japan ETF
HSBC MSCI Europe ETF
iShares Core MSCI Japan
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex-Japan
iShares Core MSCI World
iShares Core MSCI EM
iShares Physical Gold ETC
Vanguard FTSE All World GBP
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets GBP
Also, as I am transferring another pension, Fidelity pay cashback:
https://www.fidelity.co.uk/investor/investing-for-your-retirement.page
Although CSD’s platform charge of 0.25% is capped at £240, it’s still more than needed, but thank you for the suggestion.
I post the following in case someone else is thinking of doing something similar and it therefore helps …
On top of the transfer amount, I plan to invest £10,000 quarterly through two ETFs (using reg. inv. where available). On this basis I believe the costs are:
Selftrade: £118 + 8 x £1.50 = £130.
x-0: 8 x £5.95 = £47.60.
AJ Bell: £100 + 8 x £1.50 = £112.
Fidelity: £45 + £40 (0.1% of £40k) = £85 (but I will also get cashback).
[I already have an II SIPP].
Some comments on Fidelity:
1) They have a limited range of Investment Trusts (better than it was but still limited), and they use Bloomberg ticker/code for them. e.g. Aberdeen Asian Income fund (AAIF) become AAIFL! CTY becomes CTYLL etc Only site in UK I have come across that does that: potentially confusing. If you search their site using the code, it comes up with nothing.
2) If you do a fund switch, the amount just dissappears from your account for a few days. No way to easily track what is happening. Does not show up on on pending orders etc. Your account total just shows a lower figures for a while.
3) If you access Fidelity via Cavendish, you still get the old charges (I believe) – flat 0.25%, irrespective of ETF or ITs.
4) I understand from other sources that ETFs amd ITs are traded once per day, like funds, rather then real time.
I have used Fidelity for many years, (although have migrated most of my investments away) and have always had a feeling of frustration in the way they do things.
K
@Kraggash – agree with all that – which is why I moved my husband’s SIPP to BestInvest, though it’s taken 8 weeks to get the money over from Fidelity. Also worth noting is that they’re open to a deal – my husband’s SIPP only amounted to £50k, while their minimum is £75 – but they said ok, even though he took £18k in cash on transferring!
I forgot a few more:
5) their website is infuriatingly slow.
6) often, website buttons/functions do not work if you use Firefox. If you complain, “Firefox is not supported”
7) I have yet to find a simple way to see a record of dividend payments
8) If you sell all holdings in a fund, you cannot see a record of transactions in that fund anymore.
K
Something to be aware of with Alliance Trust Savings is that if you sell holdings and want to move the cash out, the only way to get it out with waiting weeks is to pay £20 for a same-day CHAPS transfer.
There’s no charge for BACS transfers, but they take 2-3 weeks! (Most of that must be delays with internal admin setting up the transfer.) That’s a ridiculous delay.
It isn’t just a one-off glitch. I spoke to them and they said their internal target is to complete BACS transfers within a month. (No mention of this in their Platform Guide.) They acknowledged that this is a pretty poor show.
Something to be aware of with Alliance Trust Savings is that if you sell holdings and want to move the cash out, the only way to get it out without waiting weeks is to pay £20 for a same-day CHAPS transfer.
There’s no charge for BACS transfers, but they take 2-3 weeks! (Most of that must be delays with internal admin setting up the transfer.) That’s a ridiculous delay.
It isn’t just a one-off glitch. I spoke to them and they said their internal target is to complete BACS transfers at the latest within a month, but faster if possible. (No mention of this in their Platform Guide.) They acknowledged that this is a pretty poor show.
sorry, I thought I had cancelled 1645 before it had implemented. So I corrected with to without.
I found ATS were not much better paying in either.
If you live abroad they will not accept a debit card payment even though i wanted to use a UK bank and it was my nominated account.
Also made a CHAP payment of £250k and they took days to allocate it to my account.”It is done manually from a printed list” was the best I got.Positively Dickension.
Question to anybody : ATS (and now i have moved) Sharecentre show no gain/loss on their platforms.I have to constantly check my average buying in price.In fact i use the Investor Chronicles subscriber platform for regular scrutiny.Is it as i suspect because if a client is maybe buying in on a regular basis in smallish parcels the fees show an immediate loss,only after some time does an investment begin to look worthwhile.It is really irritating if making a speculative trading purchase.
iweb ISA- they pay out with in 3 working days once request has been made on their website.
x-o sipp- No charges for holding the sipp.The foreign etfs are available off the exchange like fidelity/cavendish.
Vanguard UK have launched their brokerage at https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk
Unfortunately the fees are not what I was hoping for: 0.15% up to £250,000…
Looks like Vanguard platform is live.
From the article, “To access the funds, investors will pay an account administration fee of 0.15% per annum, capped at £375, in addition to the ongoing charges figure (OCF). However, no account fee will be charged above the first £250,000 invested.
There is a minimum investment of £500 to join the service or a monthly savings contribution of £100, which will provide access to the firm’s suite of funds including the LifeStrategy range, index funds, ETFs, Target Retirement Funds (TRFs) and actively-managed vehicles.”
http://www.investmentweek.co.uk/investment-week/news/3010136/vanguard-launches-d2c-platform-for-uk-clients?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=IW.Daily_RL.EU.A.U&utm_source=IW.DCM.Editors_Updates&im_edp=mitongroup.com&im_company=
I have a 6 figure sum invested in Vanguard ETFs in my SIPP and yet according to these figures it’s cheaper to hold them with AJ Bell Youinvest instead of directly with Vanguard. Not that Vanguard are able to offer a SIPP yet. Also, Vanguard UK is not a mutual company like Vanguard USA. Oh, and they don’t allow US citizens to open an account. I’m not impressed…
Yes, that’s a pretty high cap for ETFs. But for anyone investing in the Vanguard unit trust/OEICs, it is way cheaper than any of the other percentage fee brokers. And beats the fixed fee brokers for small portfolios.
@kragash – thanks for the qualitative feedback, that’s often overlooked when making these decisions.
Looks like no dealing fees on fund purchases on new Vanguard platform. Another advantage.
With ETF, there’s free dealing once per day. Or £7.50 to trade immediately.
The lang cat take on it:
http://www.langcatfinancial.co.uk/blog/thats-not-a-moon-thats-a-space-station-vanguard-launches-the-rebellion-weeps/
@all — Just given our take on the new Vanguard offering here:
http://monevator.com/vanguard-direct-uk/
Platform maven The Accumulator is doing honest labour in an office somewhere, so I had to write it. If I’ve missed anything, please do share in the comments below that article. 🙂
Does anyone know if the DeGiro spin-off DeZiro https://www.deziro.com/uk/ is likely to take off ever? They aim to offer fee-free trading and say that in ten years “.. the idea of having ever paid for online trading will be preposterous” https://www.finextra.com/news/announcement.aspx?pressreleaseid=61023
I’m tempted to sign up to be on their intial subscriber list, but hestitate as I can’t so far discover what or where the ‘custodian entity’ is where investments are held, supposedly making them totally ring-fenced. DeGiro even go so far as to say a 20,000 Euro investor compensation scheme offered by the Dutch government “.. is unnecessary for clients of DEGIRO due to the presence of the custodian and cash fund.” Hmm….
@IanH
My reading is that DeZiro will just be an advertising-subsidised version of DeGiro.
DeGiro in their client agreement here
https://www.degiro.co.uk/data/pdf/uk/Client_Agreement_Investment_Services_Terms_and_Conditions.pdf
defines SPV (the custodian – presumably SPV isn’t chosen by accident and literally indicates a Special Purpose Vehicle holding the funds) as
“SPV Long Only”: Stichting DEGIRO, a legal entity incorporated under Dutch law, with registered office in Amsterdam.
“SPV Long Short”: Stichting DEGIRO II respectively Stichting DEGIRO IIb, each a legal entity incorporated under Dutch law and with registered office in Amsterdam.
I don’t know if that will make you feel any more comfortable about the custodian arrangements though!
@premierfella thanks muchly for digging into this. I think you are right that it will be advert supported – I think it says so on their website. The TOC document is pretty clear about the relationship between the ‘entities’ and in the para after the one you quote they state (or claim…) “…the positions in Financial Instruments and money are segregated from the capital of DEGIRO and remain available for the customers of DEGIRO, even after insolvency of DEGIRO.” Yeah, right…
I guess this is pretty much what a lot of financial investment firms do though. I subsequently (re-)discovered there is a monevator article that covers this topic, which are also called nominee accounts so for people following this thread in years to come start here http://monevator.com/nominee-accounts/ in which the accumulator concludes “My best advice: Consider all the risks, diversify your holdings among a few brokers to reduce your risk, understand your right to compensation, and move on.”
I’m a bit slow reading the email from Selftrade, but they will be adding a 0.5% trading cost to ETF purchases after 31st May. This follows the same charge applied to ‘Overseas Securities’ last year.
@Jamie @Others — Can anyone else confirm this Selftrade change please, and share exact details? Is it on the website somewhere?
We’re set to publish a table update post tomorrow and it’d be good to have the exact details of this one before then.
@TI – given the FSCS £50,000 compensation limit is per person per firm declared in default, is it possible to add a column specifying the underlying firm a broker operates through? I understand some firms operate through multiple brokers so this could help decision making in terms of spreading risk.
If it’s unsuitable from a formatting point of view, maybe an article or other table?
@TI – Selftrade’s email on 4th May was titled ‘Trading in International ETFs” and said:
“We wrote to customers in May 2016 to advise changes in our pricing tariff which introduced an additional charge of 0.5% on trades in overseas securities. This has, until now, only been charged on overseas equities but will, with effect from 1 June 2017, be extended to include Exchange Traded Products. I am writing to you, as a matter of courtesy as you hold, or have recently held, a stock which will be affected by this change. If you sell the stock(s) on or before 31 May 2017, no additional charge will be levied.”
I asked them to confirm that the cost was only at the time of purchase (i.e. this wasn’t a platform charge). They replied today with:
“… can confirm that it only applies to the Purchase & Sale of eligible ETF’s, and is not an ongoing platform charge similar to the Funds Platform Fee. It will only be charged at the point of the trade taking place.”
I suspect the new charge will appear near the ‘Additional charge for overseas securities’ under ‘Other Dealing Fees’ shortly:
https://selftrade.co.uk/our-services/our-charges
@DW — Interesting point. Will highlight to @TA.
@Jamie — Thanks very much for coming back with that info! Will discuss with my co-blogger. (He’s under the cosh as ever at work, so might be left to me to try to kludge it into the table… 🙂 )
@ Jamie – Selftrade’s site doesn’t seem to be able to load its charges page at the mo’ – from the wording you pasted in above it seems to me that ‘international ETFs’ could well refer to ETFs that trade on overseas exchanges like NYSE. As opposed to ETFs trading on the London Stock Exchange that may be domiciled in Ireland. Have you had any information from Selftrade that could confirm that one way or the other?
Not quite sure of the judgement posted for Halifax SIPP. Looks ok to me.
@DW. Spoke to Halifax about this sometime ago. My impression was that all the Lloyd’s/Halifax offerings were under the one umbrella, ie one £50k cap for the aggregated lot. You would need to check to be sure, and I hesitate to take the word of a single ‘customer facing’ rep immediately available at the end of a telephone, however it was enough to put me off thinking of using iweb or any other of the family for a SIPP owing to ISA holdings with Halifax.
@TA – Sorry, all I can add is that apparently I hold stock caught by the change. I hold CSP1, VJPN and VMID.
Hi my wife uses Charles Stanley Direct. Why? Because they are one of the very very few brokers that allow a CREST account rather than a nominee account. Having her shares in a CREST account means that she is on the share register at each company and she feels more comfortable with this. But its not the default and I don’t think Charles Stanley advertise it. (It costs her £240 a year though for the pleasure.)
One minor correction to the Vanguard entry: free ETF dealing is twice daily.
This is based on the FAQ titled “Beyond the annual account fee, are there any other service (platform) charges?”
It says: “First, ETF dealing. As with dealing in and out of Vanguard OEICs and unit trusts, our standard ETF trading service is free. ETF trade instructions are batched and dealt at 10am or 2pm depending when we receive instructions. If you would prefer to buy or sell a Vanguard ETF at a live market price, there is a small dealing fee of £7.50 per transaction to cover our brokerage costs. “
Thanks Jamie, those are LSE ETFs so looks like my deduction was optimistic BS. Will keep an eye on Selftrade’s page. Thanks!
Thanks for the hard work. Still puzzled by the judgement against Halifax Sharedealing SIPP however.
Comparison table, SIPP under 50k.
For the over 50s, Saga’s Share Direct has a Nominee Dealing Account and a Shares ISA, provided by Equiniti Financial Services. For shares/ETFs there is currently no platform fee and online trades are £11.95 (lower charges for regular investment, dividend reinvestment, or high volume of trades). Works for me as a home for my Vanguard ETFs.
Not to be confused with Saga Investment Services, which is provided by Tilney Bestinvest and has a different charging structure.
Seltrade’s proposed 0.5% trading cost for ‘international ETFs’ is going to be dropped. The official message to customers will be coming out shortly (given that it was due to start tomorrow, presumably very shortly!).
GRG June 6, 2017, 3:30 pm
Now that the ii, TD deal has gone through and TD is being merged with ii they are both going to use the ii pricing structure, I will now be paying an account fee for my ETF only ISA. With TD there was no charge for holding ETFs so it looks like a move, as being a very infrequent trader the two free trades per quarter has no appeal. I’ve been looking at Saga Share Dealing & X-O as these don’t charge platform fees or inactivity charges. If anyone has had any dealings with them any information would be welcome.
@GRG Do you have a link to info confirming that change to TD pricing structure? It’d make sense for sure but does have me looking around for alternatives.
Unrelated question: what does the asterisk mean next to fees listed under the Dealing columns because I couldn’t see that explained anywhere? e.g. The II fees are listed as “£10* £10*” for fund/etf dealing.
*A frequent trader rate or bonus is also available.
@John. – Thanks.
@TA – Looks like Dealing fees for Halifax Share Dealing could use some asterisks.
@ Charlie there is a link to a welcome message and video by Richard Wilson on the TD account login page.
@GRG thanks again. It does sound like a move to II’s pricing model…
“Will my rates and charges change?
There are no immediate changes being made to rates and charges.
[…]
We will introduce a fixed fee per customer for our standard trading and investing services which will be held as a credit towards trade commissions for buying and selling.”
– https://www.tddirectinvesting.co.uk/customer-information
There’s a thread over at MSE discussing TD Direct changes:
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5540088
There’s mention of moving to IG Group, which I think would be worth adding to the Monevator table. For share/ETF portfolios there’s no platform fee so long as there is some account activity within a timespan of 2y – receipt of dividends counts as “activity”. There’s no fees for transferring in or out, a dealing charge of £8 and even some cashback available in return for transferring investments to them.
I’m pretty sure someone else has already brought up IG in the 1600+ comments here. They’re more known for roulette, sorry I meant spread-betting, but they now do “boring” S&S ISAs, SIPPs and dealing accounts too:
https://www.ig.com/uk/investments/isa/share-dealing
// Aside: I’ve had several “500 Internal Server Errors” when posting comment here recently. Posting comments still works but I just get dumped to an error page afterwards…
Have you considered including IG? No OEICs/UTs, but they look cheap (particularly so for non-sterling shares as currency conversion rate is 0.3%). No account fees as long as you make one trade or receive one dividend every 24 months. £8 a trade.
I might consider them seeing as I suspect III will change TDDirect to their (more expensive for me) charging structure.
https://www.ig.com/uk/investments/share-dealing/costs-fees
Make sure you resist the temptation to open a spread betting account!
Greg
Apologies. I seem to have not refreshed recently enough to see the comment immediately above mine. Take it as a seconding of Charlie’s comment!
(I also got a 500 after posting.)
This is my first post (on any financial blog!) so please excuse any naivete. But after looking at the table above, why would anyone with over £5,100 capital consider anything but TD Invest for their stocks & shares ISA?
I’ve got around £40k (entirely in Vanguard Lifestrategy) with Charles Stanley at a 0.25% fee. I’ve finally woken up and intend to move this to TD Invest right away. My question is: why doesn’t everyone else? Why is there excitement over Vanguard’s announcement to offer its own platform in the UK when it comes with a 0.15% fee whereas platform charges for TD are … zero if you hold slightly above £5,000.
Given my inexperience as an investor, am I missing something absurdly obvious? Thanks!
If you have funds as opposed to ETFs then you’ll pay 0.3% on first £250,000. If you trade ETFs then you’ll pay dealing charges. I think the ‘excitement’ over Vanguard is that they have weighed in with a good offer, although not the best as you rightly say, and they have a track record of pushing down costs over time. So they’re likely to get better and put the squeeze on any platform that thinks they can sit back and milk it.
@romiccio
iweb have a £25 joining fee, £5 dealing fee & no platform fee, so investing a couple of funds with them costs £35 then only the fund fees for the duration.
If you only have one Life strategy fund, then it is £25 to join, free to transfer in your fund and that is it! Just the 0.22% that Vanguard is charging you anyway.
Further to my comment from April 27 this year, Youinvest appear to have now gone live with their two-factor authentication, giving all customers the option now.
I have a specific query, if anyone would like to help please.
I need to buy, hold for almost a year, and then sell approx £100,000 of the following well known OEIC: “HSBC FTSE 250 Index Retail Accumulation”.
Outside of tax wrappers. All my other investments are direct shares which I hold for free, but my current broker would charge a % fee for holding an OEIC.
What do you think is the cheapest way to do this ? Is it Interactive Investor at £20/qtr – or am I missing a better option.
Thanks
Jamie, wouldn’t Halifax or iWeb be better?
Halifax would be £12.50 to buy + £12.50 to sell = £25
iWeb would be £25 signup + £5 to buy + £5 to sell = £35
Agree iWeb would be a better bet. Also if outside of tax wrappers I wouldn’t use an accumulating fund as it is more complicated to calculate dividends and capital growth.
@Jamie – Or buy and sell it with IG, which has no set-up fee and costs only £8 a trade (or, if you’re a gambling man, only £5 if you make the minimum of one spread bet a month). That’d be my choice for simplicity.
@ Jamie – Sorry, just realised you said ‘OEIC’ – but why not invest it in the equivalent ETF (VMID or others)?
I invariably buy accumulation units in any fund that I have to hold outside a tax wrapper, to avoid liability to income tax on the dividends.
Only if the capital gain on this particular OEIC is likely to exceed the annual CGT exemption and the owner is a low (or nil) income tax payer would it make sense to divert some of the growth into dividends by buying income units. Isn’t the holder’s highest rate of income tax likely to exceed the rate at which they’re liable to CGT, anyway?
Careful @DianaW!
http://monevator.com/income-tax-on-accumulation-unit/
“Are you an unwitting tax evader? I only ask because quite a few investors seem unaware that fund accumulation units attract income tax on dividends just as much their more transparent ‘income unit’ cousins.”
@DianaW – my understanding is that dividends automatically reinvested in accumulation units are subject to income tax in exactly the same way as dividends paid out in cash on income units. In either case the dividends need to be declared on the self-assessment tax return. The dividends automatically reinvested on accumulation units effectively amount to new capital purchases and increase the base purchase cost for CGT assessment purposes. It is this tracking of these frequent purchases which is a bit painful CGT reporting, as well as the pain of paying income tax on dividends not actually received directly as cash. The advantage of accumulation units is the lack of reinvestment expenses of the dividends but there is no tax advantage to these units.
Not declaring accumulation unit dividends for income tax under self-assessment would not be legal tax avoidance but illegal tax evasion, I believe.
Thanks for the heads-up, guys. It’s only something that I’d had to consider for the first time in the last few months, so not guilty of any tax evasion yet – but the complications of unravelling the potential tax liability sound ghastly! Time to review this over-simplified approach, clearly….
@DianaW. Charlie and Mike are correct – there’s no getting around dividends whether they come from Inc or Acc funds. Your broker should send you an annual statement which details what you need to declare. I’m with Hargreaves Lansdown and they do this with admiral clarity, usually a couple of months after the financial year end.
Of course, in the old days you had tax credits and now you have the Dividend Allowance. So depending on your income/tax/investments status you may not be owing any tax. The dividends still need to be declared, though…
Cheers
Richard
If I still used Hargreaves Lansdown, I’d be paying far more in fees than any potential tax liability!
There are only a few hundred pounds’ worth of dividends involved, going by the brokers’ consolidated tax statement that I’ve just checked. Fortunately, my tax status is so modest that that shouldn’t make any difference to my tax liability – but I appreciate the timely reminder to declare the dividends. Just when I hoped that I need never do an income tax return again…!
Looking for a little help from people with sharp eyes, the table is good, but I’m looking at several brokers with similar prices and trying to find the best choice for my circumstances.
I’d like to transfer an employer stakeholder pension into a SIPP (approximately £32k). I’ve also got a £3k SIPP with Best Invest that I’d consider consolidating, but the fees for transferring look to be a deal breaker).
Would Close Brothers be my best bet? I will be adding to the SIPP to supplement a new DB pension, but it will only be a few £k a year for the foreseeable future.
Any thoughts appreciated!
There seem to be numerous cutprice/zero commission stock brokers opening;
Trading212 offers 10 free trades per month https://www.trading212.com/en/Free-Stock-Trading
Freetrade is looking to open by the end of the year https://freetrade.io/
DeGiro is looking to open DeZiro for free trading, but no date yet https://www.deziro.com/uk/
DeGiro already offers free ETF trades on certain ETFs https://www.degiro.ie/data/pdf/ie/commission-free-etfs-list.pdf
The US already has Robbinhood which is expanding to Aus http://blog.robinhood.com/news/2015/5/4/onward which seems to have a similar business model to DeZiro and Freetrade, but does not take UK clients at the moment.
Hopefully all of these will help push prices down on all brokers http://monevator.com/investment-platforms-and-fund-managers-roughed-up-in-fca-final-report/
Does anyone have thoughts shout Cavendish asking to make a bank transfer of SIPP investment in your their account. I ffound it weird that they don’t withdraw the amount ftom the account themselves. I contacted Barclays where I hold current account and was advised not ti make a transfer because it becomes my responsibility if something goes wrong. Whilst if they withdraw from my account bank can help me. Is it a normal practice for Cavendish?
With regards to bank transfers into Cavendish (and other) SIPPs to make contributions, I think that’s perfectly acceptable. I actually prefer it that way because you have more control over the amount and timing. Note that with many SIPPs there will be a delay between when they receive your payment and when you get your tax reclaim from HMRC. This is because the platform makes a claim on your behalf on each payment, and it takes time for HMRC to respond. Again, perfectly normal for low cost SIPPs.
I’m new to the game of DIY investments so apologies if this has already been clarified.
Due to the organization I work for many of the brokers are off limits. I’ve ruled out HL due their costs being higher, this leaves with me with Self Trade on the % front and Alliance Trust on the fixed fee.
As I already have a SelfTrade account (holds some Barclays stock I acquired as part of a share save scheme from years ago) I’m leaning towards remaining with them for now, until my investments are over 50k.
I’m yet to decide on whether to go down the LS route or a more DIY portfolio holding several funds. If I was to go with a LS product and drip feed monthly what kind of fees would I be paying monthly with Self Trade? 0.3 percent of the total invested per year up to 50k. Dealing funds – 0 – Is dealing funds counted as me investing whatever amount per month into the LS? How about the ‘Regular Investing’ fee of 1.50 – is this the fee I’ pay each month for money invested into LS? If I wasn’t to go down the LS route and choose several funds to drip feed into each month, would I have to pay 1.50 for each fund I add money to?
Hey B80,
Chances are, most of the brokers are not off limits.
I have a feeling that you mean that you work in financial services and are required to have the broker copy all contract notes to your employer?
Almost all brokers offer this service (apart from anything else, if they didn’t their own employees wouldn’t be able to use their services), but most will only do it if you call customer services and ask; they don’t advertise it on their website. When you call, do check if they charge extra fees for this. Some do it free, some do it for a fixed fee per year and some do it by adding a charge onto each trade.
@A Different Richard
Is tax payable on dividends on Acc funds within an ISA?
@Linda
No – there’s no tax on dividends on funds (Inc or Acc) or individual shares held within an ISA (or a SIPP). You only need to declare dividends if you hold them outwith a tax wrapper (i.e. in a normal trading account). Even if held outwith a SIPP/ISA you will still get the Dividend Allowance.
Hope that helps!
Cheers
Richard
We have retired and we are trying to ‘increase our income’.
We are fully invested in ISAS.
From an Inland Revenue perspective – are dividends, from shares, unit trusts, OEICs, EFT’s treated in the same way.
For tax return purposes – which date is used – i.e the date the dividend declared, the date it is paid or the date it reaches your account.
Thank you in anticipation
Paul
The HMRC don’t care what dividends you receive within an ISA wrapper, they are all tax free and you don’t need report them. This is one of the great benefits of an ISA – less paperwork! Although, I still keep a record of all my dividends…. Note that if you’ve received a dividend outside an ISA wrapper (e.g. standard broker nominee account) then it’s the date as shown on your account statement that counts. Occasionally a dividend arrives a little late, but may be back-dated to the date it was supposed to have been paid, so it should usually be the same as the official “paid date”.
Hi Alex, I will check but I’m aware of colleagues that were ‘forced by the compliance team to move their investments from the Halifax platform when they joined recently. I work for a large American investment bank, the list of permitted brokers is circulated to us quarterly.
Hey B80, I’m in the exact same position, with those same options as approved brokers. Wonder if we’re working at the same bank…
Barclays Stockbroking is an approved broker on my list so I was tempted to go with them. They’ve just come out with a new platform with the following fees: https://www.smartinvestor.barclays.co.uk/invest/accounts/investment-isa/fees.html
So I was thinking of going with them and then transferring to Alliance once my pot is a little bigger.
You should be able to find me on the internal directory in case you want to chat. Would be great to meet someone else who’s interested in all this.
-Bruno T
Hi Bruno.
Good find, are they part of Barclays Stockbrokers as I the approved list specifically says Barclays Stockbrokers. I’ve dropped compliance an email to see what they say.
Looked up Bruno t on the directory… is the 2nd letter of your surname a?
Cheers
B80, yeah that should be me.
So I think Barclays Stockbroking is moving all their accounts onto this new platform later this month. So in theory they should both be accepted. Shoot me an email with what HR say, would be interested to know if they’ll accept it.
Hi
Really need to some help.
Working abroad from august for two years and after I’ve maxed out my current account I want to invest in some sort of pension or stocks and shares account but I’m non-resident so I can’t open an ISA or contribute to my existing one and can’t open a Vanguard account.
Can anyone suggest a good option for me to save some money away?
Thanks in advance.
Hi Bruno, yes it is indeed you… didn’t want to disclose your full name in case you wanted to keep it private. Compliance have advised it is fine as like you say it’s stockbrokers new platform.
I’m particularly interested in the vanguard ftse global all cap fund, but Barclays don’t offer it at present. I contacted Barclays and they advised they will look to add it soon and to call back next week.
It’s a shame compliance have no plans to add the vanguard platform yet, as the US version is available to US staff.
@Todd
I’m currently working abroad. You’re correct you cannot make any contributions to ISA accounts during the period you are non-resident. Unfortunately DIY platforms are few and far between for expats. Instead you will find an array of ‘off-shore’ saving products (usually insurance linked), with horrendous charges all pushed by ‘IFA’s’ with zero regulation and even less morals (shouldn’t tar all with the same brush but the good ones are few and far between. I wont bore you all with my story, but suffice to say my advice is stay well clear!
TD International are one option to look at. Then there is also Saxo. I dont know much about either of them so cant recommend one-way or the other. What I would suggest however is to consider just keeping a normal trading account with your current platform. Yes this will of course subject to tax, but if you are only taking a two year posting and are drip feeding each month, you may find any dividends earned in that account will be less than the allowance anyway. You can always transfer to your SIPP or ISA when you return and are entitled to make ISA contributions (depending on if you make maximum contributions usually or not). That may mean CGT but if you are a long-term buy and hold investor you probably find you won’t be using you £11,000(?) CGT allowance each year anyway.
Im going to check Saxo and TD International out over coming months as I’ll soon be at a stage where I’ll need to cap my standard trading account.
Good luck
@Sharepsur
Thanks but I am unable to open an account with Vanguard UK as I am technically non-resident in the U.K. Not sure which account to open up which is why I’m looking at an offshore one.
Am I missing something here?
x-o.co.uk charges no annual platform fee – surely that has to be a huge bonus for most investors (plus there is no entry fee).
Why would anyone bother with the flat fee or percentage fee brokers?
I appreciate it’s not possible to hold funds with x-o.co.uk – personally that doesn’t bother me (or maybe I just don’t fully understand the relative pros of index funds over ETFs…)
I’ve read Lars Kroijer’s ‘Investing Demystified’ and am trying my hardest to implement a ‘rational portfolio’.
As far as I can tell, this can be implemented completely using ETFs.
The infrequent trading of this passive approach means the lack of free trades with x-o.co.uk doesn’t concern me too much.
I’ve got an ISA, SIPP and trading account to transfer, currently held with Hargreaves Lansdown (oh dear!)
I think I will go with x-o.co.uk (providing they have the ETFs I want) unless I really am missing something here.
I don’t think you are missing anything at all Ruby, the lack of funds is the only downside. I’ve been using Jarvis, the parent of X-O, for years without a hitch, more recently branded ShareDeal Active. I have a trading account, SIPP and ISA there and I’ve managed to find ETFs that suit a ‘fix and forget’ style of investing which for me is based on Tim Hale’s book. The service from Jarvis has been excellent. I usually deal on line, but have telephoned on occasion and written requests to transfer from my trading to ISA account have all gone to plan.
I also maintain a trading account with HL to spread my investments between platforms, but only to buy ETFs.
Thanks Passive Pete,
I had a little interaction with x-o.co.uk, it made me laugh, but hasn’t really put me off them.
I sent a quick two line email:
“I am thinking of joining x-o (transferring my ISA, SIPP and trading account).
I would like to know the full list of ETFs that you offer – where can I get this information?”
They responded:
“Thank you for your email.
We are an execution only broker and do not offer the service you have requested.
All clients are advised to research the stock they wish to invest in. You can buy and sell shares in most companies that are listed in the UK. This includes dealing in equities, bonds, warrants, ETFs, investment trusts, shares listed on the IRS (International Retail Service) and CDIs of US stocks.
Please note that you cannot deal in foreign shares that are listed on overseas markets. If you wish to invest in a CDI of a US stock you will need to complete a Form W-8BEN before you can trade.”
I’m still none the wiser how one can find out which ETFs they offer before actually signing up with them. I appreciate they are an execution only broker and offer a no frills service and must keep costs to a minimum, but I thought I might get a more helpful response – I wasn’t asking them to be my financial advisor. 🙂
Hi Ruby
That’s unfortunate, it looks like a stock answer that has been provided by a robot. I guess that’s how costs are minimised.
If X-O have the same system as Jarvis then you might be able to open an account and use the Fantasy Portfolio facility to see whether all of your intended ETF’s are available on the platform before committing any cash. It’s your SIPP and ISA that is costing you more to hold with HL, so even if there are one or two ETF’s missing you might still hold these in your trading account with HL.
I’ve just checked my trading history for Jarvis and I’ve traded the following: VUSA.L, VWRL.L, VMID.L, VUKE.L, VHYL.L, VERX.L, VEVE.L, VFEM.L, IGLO.L, IEAG.A, ISXF.L, ISF.L, IS15.L, IGLS.L, XGIG.L and SGLN.L – just to give you an indication of what’s available.
Ruby,
I have my SIPP with X-O and haven’t experienced any issues with their service. In terms of ETFs, I would be surprised if they didn’t offer every ETF listed on the LSE. You’re probably aware but their answer was lifted from FAQ 12 – shame they couldn’t answer your actual question!
You could open a normal dealing account with no obligation just to check whether you can trade in the ETFs you want, you’d have to go through the usual KYC and AML checks though. If you list your tickers I can check for you, if you like?
And no, I can’t believe how cheap they are! I first used them to first convert then sell paper share certificates, which was a fraction of the price of the nominee service.
Hi
I am also with xo sipp since last year.They take couple of days to credit the amount in sipp.The most of London listed etfs are available and their Lse etf range is more wider than iweb. The foreign shares are available but trading on foreign exchange is not live unlike hl.Overall ,they are excellent for a passive investor and London based trading.
Thanks all, I’ve set up a trading account with x-o.co.uk so I can check things out 🙂
Here’s some easy reading tables for a quick overview comparison of the bigger ISA providers http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/isas/tables-the-cheapest-and-most-expensive-places-to-buy-an-isa/ and SIPP providers http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/sipps/in-tables-the-cheapest-sipp-firms–whether-youre-investing-5000/
They are a bit out of date as I couldn’t find a more recent version. It’s both interesting and scary to see how much some of the prices have changed since these were published!
Hi all,
I have what I imagine is quite a basic question. How do you pay the platform and OCR fees? I’m still in the research stage and new to investing, and from reading the above I would want a percentage fee broker. I’m thinking Cavendish Online due to being similar to Charles Stanley which the S&S portfolio uses but without the exit fee. However I don’t really understand how the buying side works. If I put money in monthly does it go into an account with the broker, and I can then distribute the money into my funds from there, in which case the broker takes their fee from that account? Or do they sell some of your units to cover the costs?
Thanks in advance
All these tables and comments are focussed on price and/or funds which can be traded. Is there a site which focusses on the facilities such as Watch Lists, Virtual Funds, Portfolio reporting facilties, etc?
Thanks
@Liam
Typically your money credits a cash account with the platform/broker and fund transactions are made via that.
Platform fees will usually be taken from your cash balance with the platform – fund units would only be sold if you didn’t have sufficient cash to cover them when they fall due (and there is often some penalty charge involved if that happens).
The OCF relates to the fund itself – direct fund charges are accounted for in the fund pricing, which is why they are often seen as a “hidden” cost (so OCF is not something to worry about in terms of the cash balance at the platform).
@premierfella
Fidelity/Cavendish sell some of your largest holding to pay for platform charges. There is no penalty for this, it is their normal way of operating. They take the platform fee monthly, from each type of account (funds, ISA, SIPP…) which results in lots of small transactions. That annoyed me a lot.
@Liam
Again, with Cavendish/Fidelity, normally you buy the funds you want directly via a debit card. You don’t normally put cash into the account and then buy. I guess you could do the same thing by buying into their cash fund, and then swapping from cash fund to stocks/shares fund when you wanted to, but it is an unneeded step.
With platforms such as iWeb, you have to put cash into the account first, and then use the cash to buy whatever.
Thanks @Kraggash. That is some crazy way of working at Fidelity – I know monthly fees are probably a drop in the ocean for many of their clients but that must surely drive those who manage their portfolio based on % weights nuts! I wasn’t aware that any platform did that, but if Fidelity do it I guess there may be others.
@Liam & premiumfella
Yea Cavendish/Fidelity are a bit of a pain on the SIPP front as well. They’re not well set up for monthly contributions for my needs. I make one SIPP contribution a year, when I have all my final accounts in and have a £ figure that maximizes tax efficiency. It goes to cash in the SIPP account. But Cavendish only allow a regular monthly fund purchase via a new contribution from a bank account, not directly from cash sitting on the account. So I have to set up a monthly alarm on my laptop to remind myself to login via cavendish and make a manual request for a cash to investment fund switch. It’s rather a faff. I think it would be possible to automate if I was investing directly with Fidelity, but the Fidelity site directs me back to Cavendish and their layer isn’t so well set up for automation. This situation probably applies to non SIPP accounts as well I think. I’m considering switching away from them for this reason, once I have worked up enough of a head of steam of irritation about it. No transfer costs to leave of course, which was one reason I joined them initially.
@premierfella
Yes, it is not so much the amount: I like to keep a close track of my holdings ‘offline’ (using MS Money), and with fund + ISA account for both self and wife, that was 96 (48 x 2 as each transaction is a sell, then pay fidelity) extra transactions per year to track. Each non- ISA transaction gave rise to a capital gain/loss.,,,,
@Pete @Kraggash @Premierfella
Thanks for the quick answers, I appreciate that. I’ve gone ahead and got it all set up now, as Kraggash said they took the payment direct from my debit card, there is the option of cash but as mentioned it seemed just a little more work, especially if they don’t charge a penalty. I’ve only got an ISA, with a handful of funds within, so am I correct in understanding that the one with the most money will be sold down the cover the fee once a month? And from what Kraggash said above it will show as two transactions? Fortunately I don’t have another 3 accounts to monitor as well!
Thanks
@ Liam
No, Fidelity will show it as one transaction, a ‘sell’ of some of your largest fund.
However, my records have to show it as a ‘sell’ (money into cash) and then a ‘debit’ (pay cash fee to Fidelity)
@karrash
I see, thank you very much for your help!
A question for anyone who is using or has used cavendish / fidelity.
I set up my funds within my ISA using cavendish online, although my account is with fidelity, when I want to add to my funds do I do it using the dealing & new accounts option on fidelity website, or go back to cavendish online, because I believe they charge different platform fees?
Thanks
@Liam go to Cavendish Online
@Liam
I do not think it matters, as your account will be marked as going through an intermediary, but for clarity probably best to go through Cavendish. Note, once you go through Cavendish portal, a cookie is added to your browser, so if you try to go to the Fidelity site, you are redirected to thje Cavendish ‘skinned’ version.
As an aside, I was a long term direct Fidelity customer, and latterly went through Cavendish to reduce ongoing costs. For some reason, when I access the Fidelity site, I can choose if I wanted to use the ‘direct’ or ‘via intermediary’ version. The former is a much updated site, and allows you to easily see e.g. capital gains realised so far in the current tax year and other good stuff which does not appear on the Cavendish/indirect site.
While I am at it…. when I moved to Cavendish, the call centre response was downgraded a bit. Did not worry me, as I seldom used it. However, I have noticed that now, if you send a secure message to Fidelity, you get a call back from an Indian call centre. If you are not vailable, they leave a number to call, plus a six digit extension number, plus a six digit issue code…. If you ignore it, they send the secure messaging response….
@Investor from KZ & @Kraggash
Thank you both for the help, and very good advice re any problems with Cavendish. Like you I hope to seldom use call centre, however good to know you can get a secure message response rather than a potentially difficult phone call!
I’m trying to find which platforms charge the least for UFPLS. It’s easy to find the cheapest annual platform fee but what we really need to know is charges when you start taking your pension.
Another question about Cavendish if I may @Kraggash (or anyone else).
I spent some of this morning on morningstar portfolio manager as I received an email from fidelity confirming my fund purchases today. I entered the number of shares and share price they were bought at along with charges etc and all funds are within £1 plus or minus of the intended amounts, however the total amount bought in the end came to 46p less than was debited from my card when I purchased them. Does this 46p disappear to cavendish / fidelity or is it mine still somewhere? (I realise 46p isn’t a lot, however if you purchase funds 4 times a year for 30 years or whatever I’d rather have it than not!)
Thanks
@Liam
In the past I have noticed a discrepancy in the immediate transaction details when the deal has just been done. I noticed that the details later (eg in the document they post on line, which follows a few days after the transaction) was correct. If I remember correctly, it was down to a difference in the number of significant digits after the decimal point provided for the fund price.
@Kraggish
Thanks, unfortunately that was the document they emailed me about, which has the price per unit to 4 decimal places, which still comes in 46p under the amount I paid. Perhaps I’ll be using the customer services quicker than planned!
I would be interested to know their answer!
@Adrian – This would be useful in a table but quite tricky to keep accurate.
You have platform costs varied by funds/shares (ETF/IT) and % v fixed cost models matched against drawdown costs. Some websites don’t even mention UFPLS by name so you need to contact them for clarity plus you also need to know their service accuracy for payments & tax issues.
Example: HL in drawdown phase have net charges similar to most other providers as their drawdown is free whilst others charge
Any clarity on the II and TD Direct merger and how it affects their pricing/platform/products yet?
I’m just at a stage with my ISA where it would be more beneficial to transfer my funds from CSD to a fixed fee platform and am eyeing either Halifax SD, II or TD Direct…
One big minus with iweb is that they charge a whopping 1.5% fee for both buying and selling foreign shares. Also the range of markets and etfs they support is quite low. Still, a good option for buying funds and UK stocks.
@Kraggash
I have a reply (via secure message after ignoring 3 phonecalls and voicemails from an Indian call centre!).
Basically I was doing the calculation the wrong way round. I was multiplying shares held (to 2 decimal places) and share price (to 4 decimal places) when actually I should have done transaction value divided by share price (to 4 decimal places). I assumed as they gave shares owned to 2 decimal places that was finite if you like, when actually shares held is the number that runs to many many decimal points. I hope that makes sense, I’ve written this out a couple of times to try to find the best way to explain!
Ah OK. Glad you got t sorted.
I might be missing something but Vanguard does not appear cheaper where it matters ie. ETFs than Hargreaves Lansdown, since there is no platform fee on HL for ETFs. Of course you’d generally only want to use Vanguard for ETFs so you’d pay the 0.15% platform fee plus the ETF annual charge of say 0.12%. With HL you just pay the 0.12% plus the share dealing price of £11.95 so assuming you’re investing enough, it would be more cost effective. Or have I missed something?
@Andy
As already discussed at monevator.com/vanguard-direct-uk/ (and earlier in this thread), there are a number of platforms that are potentially cheaper than Vanguard Direct for Vanguard ETFs, depending on size of portfolio and frequency of trading. But many people invest in Vanguard unit trusts, such as their extremely popular Lifestrategy funds.
Yeah looks like you’re right Andy. Had never noticed that outside of a ISA/SIPP then HL are actually a competitive flat-fee broker. Why do you say that you would only want ETF’s from Vanguard though? Their funds are very popular too e.g. Lifestrategy.
Hi ivanopinion & Robbo. Yes, I’d missed that. Only ever focused on the somewhat more straightforward ETFs.
Also one reason the funds may be preferred is that the ETF’s are domiciled in Ireland and the Irish compensation scheme only covers up to €20,000 where as the funds are UK domiciled and covered up to £50,000 by the FSCS.
You can find Vanguard’s defense of it’s investor protection strategy here:
https://www.vanguard.co.uk/documents/portal/literature/investor-protection.pdf
It admits that their Irish domiciled funds are not covered by the FSCS, but rightly explains that all underlying investments (UK and Irish) should be held by an “independent trustee or depositary” and as such should be “ring-fenced” even if the fund or Vanguard itself should fail.
IMHO the FSCS is primary their to deal with the risk of smaller operators going bust, but there have been some failures of some major institutions in the past. It these cases, governments stepped in anyway to bail them out. As for Vanguard, it probably has more financial clout than many sovereign governments…
Here’s one we did earlier on investor compensation:
http://monevator.com/investor-compensation-scheme/
@ Ruby,
Hi, I’m on the brink of transferring from TD to X-O but before I jump I was wondering as a newbie to X-O how have you found them, any issues?
X-O have been fine for me so far, the only slight problem was that it seemed to take them a long time to accept a payment into my SIPP.
Can I ask a question as a permanently confused, many times bitten, not exactly “new” investor?
My dad has always been very keen on “income” funds… my understanding is that these are funds which concentrate on companies which produce healthy dividends. But he has never really ventured away from the world of actively managed funds. He seems to have done pretty well over the years. But the case of Invesco Perpetual High Income (? I think it is this one) is salutary: it appears that since Woodford left it has not been performing particularly well. And this is of course one of the themes emphasised by Mr Monevator and others: with actives you have to keep an eye on “the management”.
Is there an equivalent to this “income” typology in the world of trackers and ETFs? I mean trackers which are somehow “income-focused”? How would I be able to work out that this is the case with a tracker? I mean, would it say something like “our algorithms direct us towards companies which produce healthy income” in the prospectus? Obviously if you are targeting income in some way you are not specifically targeting an index (unless there are indices which somehow rank companies by income…).
There are plenty of income focused tracker funds and ETFs. Personally I like iShares UK Dividend (IUKD), but there are others like the SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats. Most of the WisdomTree ETFs (which I like a lot) are dividend focused and cover most regions of the world. Just be aware that the dividends are not necessarily “healthy”. High dividends can be caused by companies that have gone “ex-growth” or shares that have dropped heavily in value, or so-called “value traps”. Also, don’t get too focused on “income” being the same as “dividends”. You can make your own income by selling shares to make withdrawals, especially within a tax wrapper. The above mentioned ETFs use differing levels of ‘quality’ filters to try to avoid duds, or use broker forecasts of forward dividend yield (which can be wrong). But, I actually prefer a well-designed filter to an expensive manager deciding which dividend shares to hold. My only fear is that with interest rates being so low, dividend-paying companies are all the rage and so could be over-valued.
@Jeff Thanks very much, that’s very useful indeed. If you have a moment could you just say where you get this sort of detail about ETFs? Are you a professional in the industry, do you subscribe to something like an online magazine which goes into this, or what do you do? Also, regarding ETFs generally, do you have any aversion to “synthetic” ETFs due to the counterparty risk thing…? When trying to research ETFs I often find it difficult to determine whether they are synthetic or physical (although the TrustNet site seems better than most about giving this sort of information).
@Mike, Monevator has a list of good low-cost funds and ETFs. JustETF.com has a good “screener” for different types of ETFs. Your brokerage will probably have an ETF screener also. I subscribe to both Money Week and Investors Chronicle, but you need to ignore most of the financial news “noise” and be skeptical of anyone trying to make money using your money. You can’t go far wrong by just choosing one of the Monevator sample portfolios. There’s no such thing as a perfect portfolio, but it needs to be simple enough and diversified enough that you are not tempted to trade too much or panic when there is a crash or high volatility. I spend a lot of time researching, but trade very rarely. No,
I’m not in the business, but I have a bookshelf full of personal finance and investing titles. Doing nothing is hard, but usually the best course of action.
Yes, I avoid synthetic ETFs. I prefer my money to be invested in the things I’m actually tracking.
@Mike — In addition to @Jeff’s excellent feedback, our contributor The Greybeard has been exploring some of this recently, too. See his recent articles via this link (scroll down):
http://monevator.com/tag/deaccumulation/
He is due to do another one on more income-focused ETFs shortly.
Thanks to both again.
@TheInvestor… in fact I had stumbled on one of these pages on “deaccumulation” and suspected it had something to do with the sort of thing I was wondering about… but the page in question, on investment trusts, is kind of beyond my understanding, and I’ve heard enough about ITs to make me just want to stick with dead boring alternatives. But now I see there’s a whole section on “deaccumulation” and I shall endeavour to understand as much as possible. In fact “deaccumulation” isn’t necessarily where I’m at: having had discussions with my dad about this kind of thing, it seems that maybe income-focused stocks (as opposed to growth-focused) should possibly form a fair part of anyone’s portfolio. Anyway, I’ll look forward to the promised article.
Just in case its of interest to anyone, HLs cashback offer for transferring investments in is back on at the moment (£20-£500 depending on the size of your transferred portfolio).
Details here: http://www.hl.co.uk/investment-services/vantage-service/transferring-your-existing-investments
I made use of it last time it was on given that it effectively covered a few years worth of the annual platform fee for my ETF (i.e. non-fund) ISA (capped at £45) as well as the exit charge if and when I transfer out elsewhere after the minimum 1 year term under the cashback deal.
@premierfella
Well, I see the splash on the landing page, but I see no details. or indeed any mention, of cashback anywhere else on the site!
@Mike Rodent – there’s an interesting article by Larry Swedroe on etf.com:
http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/swedroe-dividend-strategies-fall-short
where he finds that, risk and factor adjusted (i.e. for the same level of overall risk and accounting for the different returns from momentum, small and value stocks) there’s nothing special about dividend ETFs. As mentioned above, just sell what you require.
One thing missing above is that Bestinvest charge an additional £50 account closure for (J)ISAs and £75/£175 for SIPPs depending on how long you have had your account. This is on top of the £25 per line charge.
Thank you, Edge! Will pop that on
Is the comment on Halifax Sharedealing SIPP correct? Maybe it’s me but don’t see why the less than £50 k comment applies?
However, timely article and thanks for the good work.
Ps, any chance of you having another look at the HSBC global strategy funds at some time: they have added to the range and reduced costs. Your 2012 article wasn’t in favour but maybe things have changed 🙂
Point of note on Vanguard – the account fee capped at £375 applies across all accounts you hold with them. So you can have an ISA, taxable account and hopefully a SIPP soon and pay no more than £375 on investments in their funds and ETFs. I only recently noticed this as as is not always the case with other platforms. https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/what-we-offer/fees
Could someone clarify a couple of things for me. iWeb charge £5 for dealing funds but make no charge for regular investments so if I want to make monthly investments into my funds does it cost me £5 per month, or do I store up the cash & invest in a fund every quarter?
Second thing is Vanguard who have a zero charge for dealing ETFs twice per day but charge £7.50 at other times. Completely baffled by this one.
I’d second the request to revisit the HSBC global strategy funds.
@Mr Oprimistic, what has been added, and how have the costs been reduced?
TD Direct have told me via Twitter that “The current percent based platform fee is being removed and replaced with a flat commission, the same as trading shares.” when they move over to Interactive Investor.
@Linda
I didn’t think IWeb did regular investment anymore. If that is the case, the trading pattern would be down to you. So you could choose either to pay in and trade once a month (£5 per trade x 3 over a quarter) or pay in monthly (if that’s what you want to do) and trade once a quarter with the accumulated balance (£5 per trade x1 over a quarter). Which you choose would probably depend on how large that monthly investment is.
The Vanguard question is easy – the “free” investment option is a bulk trade, so you wouldn’t know what the price of the trade is when you place your order. The £7.50 trade is an instant individual trade, so you know what price the trade actions at. For large trades that £7.50 fee could be dwarfed by the change in price between you placing a trade request and the bulk deal being actioned on the market possibly a few hours later.
Do all brokers take the dealing commission from the amount you are investing? If so, why is this done rather than billing a debit card?
@Robbo – Good question. I’d like to see which brokers take investment fees from the amount being invested.
Interactive Investor take it from the trading credit first (refreshed every quarter from the £20 quarterly charge), then cash in your trading account, then registered debit card. If all those fail, only then to they subtract the fee from the actual investment.
Whereas for example Halifax take the fee from the amount being invested. So for someone regularly investing in one fund each month, your ISA contribution would be £24 less than £20k.
Why take it from the amount being invested? It doesn’t seem right!
Youinvest give you the option with normal trades to include or exclude the charges [not with Regular Investment though].
@DW Including or excluding charges makes no difference to where the trading charge is taken from. It just determines how many shares you are asking to trade. i.e. if the amount you want to spend includes the charge then you might only be able to buy (or sell) fewer shares.
A number of platforms have a single annual charge that pays for both a trading account and an ISA account, in which case this charge can be taken from the taxed account. Unfortunately, the trading charges are still taken from the actual pot where the shares are bought or sold.
@CisforV can confirm iWeb and TD Direct both take it from the amount being invested. As my investments are in an ISA I would much rather they bill my debit card than take it from my ISA. As you say, it doesn’t seem right!
Seems like TD Direct have confirmed a move the II pricing model:
https://www.tddirectinvesting.co.uk/future-of-ii/rates-and-charges
I’m thinking of moving my S&S ISA to ig.com. Anyone have experience of IG?
@Charlie sorry no experience but IG looks interesting at £8 a trade and no platform fee. I have only just opened a TD Direct account so it’s a bit of a pain that I’ll have to move it when they move to the ii pricing model. I was thinking X-O.co.uk at only £5.95 a trade?
@jonny. HSBC are in the process of adding a couple of additional portfolios, conservative and adventurous. Too new for much detail
http://www.assetmanagement.hsbc.com/uk/advisers/fund-range/global_strategy_funds.html
The charges were higher back when Monevator assessed them I believe. Now seem quite competitive.
Cheers for that @Mr Optimisitc. They look intriguing, and the new OCFs look tasty, though after re-reading the original article, they didn’t go down too well with @TA last time round (though I haven’t compared closely to see if things have changed).
@scott. Halifax Share Dealing SIPP in the table. Says good for portfolios less than £50k but it’s a flat fee provider isn’t it so would think it’s good for larger not smaller portfolios. I’ll double check
Appalling inaccurate feedback from the Interactive Investor “help” desk over several months!
I have been repeatedly been informed both on the phone and every 3 months that the £80 admin fee on my ISAs was being taken from my account associated debit card and then having this confirmed after the event.
However, the “help” desk have just actually discovered that they have been misinforming me and the £80 admin fee has, in fact, been taken from the ISA investment itself.
Obviously, if you want to maximise your investment in the ISA, this is the last thing you want.
The “help” desk have also now finally informed me that they can only take the £80 ISA admin fee from the associated debit card when the total investment in the ISA is less than the £80 investment charge!
Only if the debit card will then not cover the £80 admin charge will they draw this to my attention.
Do they have the slightest conscious awareness of what they are doing all day, every day?
@ Paul Shears – sounds like confusion in the wording resulted in a problem for you.
I have an ISA with II and find their system works very well and reliably.
1) They send a secure message stating the date the £20 quarterly amount is due.
2)I pay a day or two before said date via my debit card into my Trading account £20 (only use for Trading account)
3) II take the £20 and credit my ISA account with trading credit £20
So my Quarterly charges are outside my ISA allowance.
I guess the problem may be as you haven’t deposited the amount due into your Trading account.
I’ve still been unable to find a low cost online broker where i can buy some Vanguard funds from where i reside (Gibraltar). Would anyone here be able to recommend a reputable, low-cost platform? Many thanks!
PA
You are not understanding the situation.
Interactive Investor confirmed by phone that they would take the management charges (£80/quarter) from the associated debit cards and not from the invested amount.
They confirmed that this was the case by phone and repeatedly for many months by Email.
Pretty appalling behaviour on their part.
Paul Shears
I closed accounts with II due to several mistakes by their customer services – ranging from the trivial to really quite serious – I completely lost faith in their basic competence.
@Vanguardfan
Likewise, I am now also in the process of transferring two TDDI accounts before the incompetents gain full control.
On the subject of troublesome platforms, interesting line in Hargreaves Lansdown’s latest update to the market:
Trading update here: http://www.hl.co.uk/investor-relations/investor-news/2017
I’ve had some stick from readers for mentioning in the past that I’ve recommended HL to friends who feel they want a more fully-featured platform (for share trading etc) but am comfortable doing so, and they’re one of the several brokers I use, too. My co-blogger The Accumulator thinks customer service should be a very low priority for long-term passive investors — go cheapest and deal with the hassle once a decade is his view — but I am not sure that’s entirely true for most people, nor even me.
@The Investor – related to Barclays Smart Investor launch
See http://citywire.co.uk/money/hargreaves-cleans-up-after-botched-barclays-launch/a1057667?ref=citywire-money-latest-news-list
@PA — Ah yes, of course. Cheers for the reminder of that debacle!
The problem with HL is just that they are very expensive if you hold ‘funds’ i.e. Oeics/ unit trusts, on their platform. Their admin is good but I’m paying roughly £5000 pa less by using AJB. Over ten years that’s £50,000 less in fees which is too much to ignore. The admin needs to be adequate and AJB mostly pass that hurdle.
If I was starting from scratch I’d probably use Halifax Share Dealing, but they use AJB for their SIPP admin so there is a risk that they move closer to AJBs latest ‘percentage of funds’ pricing structure from the previous almost flat fee structure.
@Mikemusing — Evening! 🙂 Just curious how are you getting to that £5,000 saved sum? According to our table above, fees cap out at £4,000 for £2 million in assets with HL. That in itself is obviously less than £5,000.
That’s per account though, so I suppose you’re running multiple multi-million pound accounts and with AJB there’s no extra charge? Fair enough (and an enviable challenge to have 🙂 ) although I’d venture that talking about £50,000 over ten years in fees is a bit meaningless/misleading without a total assets context, given that £50,000 is far greater than most people’s entire private pension pots (unfortunately).
For the avoidance of doubt, I’d very probably also move to an almost-as-good and equally trusted platform if I had £50,000 in fees to save and I only needed to invest in funds. But to be honest at that level (£2-5+ million say that I was willing to invest in a single platform (I’d spread it around)) surely other factors come into play, too, which I’d have to think about, and which you surely already know more about than me. (e.g. Would ETFs be cheaper?)
The people I sometimes suggest HL to are novices with thousands / tens of thousands to invest, and a spectacular propensity to be confused by anything to do with investing. So clearly very apples and oranges! 🙂
@The Investor
SIPP, ISA, Dealing Account gives three accounts. If I had £2m in each (I don’t), in oeics, that would be roughly £12k annual fees on the,HL standard fee scale. AJB used to have a fee cap of £200 pa, per account. So £600 vs £12,000 with HL. So a £5k difference is well below the absolute maximum.
Really, the point is that fees matter and readers need to do their own research based on their own circumstances. And the information contained in this excellent blog gives some good pointers to the issues to consider.
Readers should also be aware that platforms do negotiate ‘special’ fee deals. HL and AJB certainly both have done so in the past.
@Mikesmusing — Ah, that’s quite a deal you have with AJB! Cheers for the further thoughts, and glad you find our site helpful.