≡ Menu

Weekend reading: shuffle bored employees stay put

Our investing and money articles link round-up logo

What caught my eye this week.

According to the BBC, the Great Resignation in the US is ‘over’:

Since the Covid-19 pandemic took hold in 2020, millions of workers have left their jobs.

In the US, 47 million people quit in 2021, and 50 million more in 2022, according to data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The continued exodus was so significant that in May 2021, Anthony Klotz, then-associate professor of management at Texas A&M University, coined the term ‘Great Resignation’ to put a name to the trend.

The Great Resignation was unprecedented – and particularly striking against a backdrop of incredible global uncertainty. Now, however, economists say it’s over.

Something similar happened in the UK to a lesser extent too. Employment has remained surprisingly resilient. And in a strong jobs market it’s obviously easier to switch jobs.

I’d also suggest inflation is an incentive and a driver. A company constitutionally equipped to give maximum pay rises of 5%, say, can quickly find most of its workforce disgruntled and playing job Frogger when inflation is nudging 10% and salaries at rivals have been re-calibrated accordingly.

Scrabble

What has apparently been distinctive with the UK’s post-Covid workforce – or otherwise – though is the rise in people too sick to work.

In November the ONS said 2.5m people cited long-term sickness as the reason for their economic inactivity. Before Covid that number was two million. Both the half-a-million increase and the total look pretty chunky, even in the context of the nearly nine million economically inactive overall.

Nobody seems quite sure what’s going on. Long Covid was blamed a lot at first, but a House of Lords committee recently concluded that early retirement among older workers was a bigger driver.

Either way, it’s interesting how the narrative has developed in the US versus the UK.

While older workers certainly left the workforce at an increased pace in the US too, the bigger spin was “Covid made me reevaluate my career and switch up” rather than the “Covid made me realise life is too short for more work so I quit” pieces that I’ve read many times in UK coverage.

A political take could be even our stretched welfare state better supports quitters than North America’s. There, poor, unhappy, and/or underpaid workers maybe have to job hop rather than drop out. Many of those who do want to quit can’t afford to – not without a generous state at their back.

A seductive theory, but there are plenty of ways to push back. Not least that many over-50s in the UK who did quit work early due to Covid now seem to be much poorer as a result.

Game of Life

I’ve a hunch that a deep dive into the statistics might reveal the bigger difference lies in the kinds of stories our two countries prefer to tell to and about ourselves.

Interestingly, some pundits believe US workers have stopped resigning because jobs have actually got better, thanks to a combination of working from home flexibility and the one-time job switches.

From the BBC article again:

Job satisfaction is now higher than it’s been in nearly four decades, according to survey data from the Conference Board, a non-profit think tank that has tracked job satisfaction since 1987.

In a late 2022 survey of nearly 2,000 US workers, more than 60% reported being content with their jobs, and some of the most satisfied are those who quit one job for a better one during the pandemic.

That would be an awfully happy outcome from a pretty terrible period. And a bit of a shame that the reluctant quitters amongst those over-50-year-olds in the UK couldn’t find a happier last hurrah. One that left them better able to retire eventually in more comfort.

But what do you reckon? Did you quit work outside of your goals or expectations over the past few years – or know others closely who did? Please share your thoughts in the comments below!

Have a great weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 50 comments }
Investment portfolio examples: asset allocation models for beginners post image

Sometimes you just need a little bit of inspiration. A template that you can adapt and make your own. That’s what these investment portfolio examples provide.

I’ve chosen them because each offers a different perspective on asset allocation that you can customise to suit your personal financial objectives, circumstances, and temperament.

The truth is there is no one portfolio to rule them all. Whichever load-out ‘won’ the last decade or three is unlikely to top the podium in the future.

Instead of dwelling on yesterday’s winners, this selection of model investment portfolios enables you to answer the question: “what does a rational, diversified asset allocation look like?”

The trick is to pick one that chimes with your attitude to risk, time horizon, and tolerance for complexity. From there, you can mould it around your situation as you gain in confidence and experience.

As ever we’ve created our investment portfolio examples with ETFs and index funds because we believe that a passive investing strategy is the best investment approach for most people.

We’ve also included shortcuts with each to a comparable portfolio on the low-cost InvestEngine platform, as an illustration.1

Note these are affiliate links. InvestEngine is currently offering a £25 welcome bonus when you sign up using our link. Also, if you set up a savings plan to regularly autoinvest with InvestEngine before 31 August, you’ll be in with a chance of winning £1,000 (Ts&Cs apply). You don’t have to sign up to see the investment portfolio examples. Remember that when investing, your capital is at risk.

Okay, let’s get stuck in!

Harry Markowitz Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
50% Developed world Amundi Prime Global ETF (PRWU) 0.05%
50% Medium bonds Invesco UK Gilts (GLTA) 0.06%

This easy-as-it-gets portfolio is based on the tale of how the father of Modern Portfolio Theory solved his own asset allocation dilemma. Unable to decide, Harry Markowitz simply split his money 50/50 between the two most important asset classes: equities and government bonds.

The Markowitz portfolio is particular suitable for first-timers who don’t know how they’ll react to market volatility. A 50% equity allocation is conservative enough that you’re unlikely to be frightened off shares for life if you’re whacked by a big crash early on.

Later, you can adjust your allocation in line with your risk tolerance when you know better how well you cope with turbulence.

From here, you can easily move up the gears to a classic 60/40 portfolio, or even more gung-ho allocations if you discover you’d sell your grandmother to buy more shares in a market meltdown.

Whatever you decide, investing doesn’t have to be more complicated than this. Developed World equities offer ample stock market diversification and growth potential, while government bonds are the keystone defensive asset class.

Lost in translation
Stateside writers typically recommend US stocks and government bonds. For UK investors this better translates to Developed World equities and gilts. For even greater diversification you can substitute global equities and global government bonds hedged to the pound. You’ll find trackers that fulfill that brief below. Finally, when we say bonds, we always mean government bonds with one exception: the total bond fund in the Income Investing Portfolio includes some corporate debt.

David Swensen’s Ivy League Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
30% Developed world Amundi Prime Global ETF (PRWU) 0.05%
15% UK equities

Vanguard FTSE UK All Share2

0.6%
5% Emerging markets Amundi Prime Emerging Markets ETF (PRAM) 0.1%
20% Global property Amundi ETF FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global ETF (EPRA) 0.24%
15% Medium bonds Invesco UK Gilts (GLTA) 0.06%
15% Short global index-linked bonds Lyxor Core Global Inflation-Linked 1-10Y Bond ETF (GISG) 0.22%

The famed Yale endowment fund manager came up with this portfolio for passive investors in his superb investing book Unconventional Success.3

Swensen’s model investment portfolio is much better diversified than Markowitz’s but that doesn’t always work to your advantage. UK equities, emerging markets, and property have endured a tough 15 years or so versus the developed world.

Perhaps that trend will mean revert – but there are no guarantees.

Also notice the common portfolio trope of splitting your bond allocation 50/50 between nominal bonds and their index-linked cousins. The nominals typically do better in a recession but get battered by soaring inflation. Meanwhile index-linked bonds have anti-inflation features built in.

Finally, 15% in UK equities looks chunky now our home stock market represents less than 5% of global market capitalisation. You could just as well decide to reallocate an extra 10% to developed world equities, and keep just 5% in Blighty.

Tim Hale Smarter Portfolio: global

Asset class ETF name OCF
27% Developed world Amundi Prime Global ETF (PRWU) 0.05%
21% Global multifactor

iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor (FSWD)

0.5%
6% Emerging markets Amundi Prime Emerging Markets ETF (PRAM) 0.1%
6% Global property Amundi ETF FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global ETF (EPRA) 0.24%
20% Medium global bonds £ hedged Amundi Index JP Morgan GBI Global Govies (GOVG) 0.15%
20% Short global index-linked bonds Lyxor Core Global Inflation-Linked 1-10Y Bond ETF (GISG) 0.22%

This portfolio is adapted from the British wealth manager’s excellent UK-focussed investment book, Smarter Investing.

The standout feature is the global multi-factor allocation, which nods to Hale’s belief in the value and small cap risk factors. These amount to informed bets on particular types of high-risk stocks that have historically outperformed the broader market over the long-run.

Hale’s tilt to the risk factors is grounded in strong evidence but it also comes with an advisory health warning. That’s because they’ve underperformed a straightforward developed world tracker for well over a decade now.

Perhaps patience will prove a virtue. But it’s worth remembering that the market can make a mockery of the best ideas. Moreover, the supposed benefits of complexity often prove illusory and there is nothing wrong with keeping things simple.

Harry Browne’s Permanent Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
25% Developed world Amundi Prime Global ETF (PRWU) 0.05%
25% Long bonds Vanguard UK Long-Duration Gilt4 0.12%
25% Gold Amundi Physical Gold (GLDA) 0.11%
25% Cash Lyxor Smart Overnight Return (CSH2) 0.07%

The Permanent Portfolio does something very different from the other investment portfolio examples. It deliberately underweights equities and focuses on suppressing the volatility that makes conventional portfolios such a rollercoaster.

That’s achieved via the large allocations to long bonds, gold, and cash. They guard your flanks against a panoply of economic threats:

  • Long bonds and cash ward off deflation and recessions.
  • Gold is meant to withstand high and unexpected inflation (although its record in this respect is patchy).
  • Equities are your growth engine as usual.

The Permanent Portfolio has a well-established track record and historically it has protected investors from the worst slumps (relative to conventional asset allocations).

That’s because the assets enjoy low correlations – they tend to behave quite differently from each other, so can cover for each other’s weaknesses – and also because the portfolio allocates an uncommonly small percentage to equities.

But the price you pay is lower expected long-term returns because the portfolio’s growth engine is under-powered.

That makes the Permanent Portfolio best suited to wealth preservers and the acutely risk-averse.

Note, we’ve used a money market fund in place of cash, but high-interest savings accounts will do just as nicely.

Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
30% Developed world Amundi Prime Global ETF (PRWU) 0.05%
40% Long bonds SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 15+ Year Gilt (GLTL) 0.15%
15% Medium bonds Invesco UK Gilts (GLTA) 0.06%
7.5% Broad commodities UBS CMCI Composite SF (UC15) 0.34%
7.5% Gold Amundi Physical Gold (GLDA) 0.11%

The All Weather portfolio is another of the investment portfolio examples that prioritises stability over booming returns.

Conceived by the Bridgewater hedge fund founder, Ray Dalio, it’s an evolution of Harry Browne’s insight: choose a carefully balanced set of uncorrelated assets so that something should always be working in your portfolio, regardless of the economic conditions.

The inclusion of commodities is the most notable difference.

Commodities are a strong diversifier that offer decent long-term returns and act as a partial inflation hedge. But they can also spend years underwater, so don’t invest in them without doing your research.

Long bonds are similarly a great equity diversifier and not for the faint-hearted. They’re particularly vulnerable when inflation and rising interest rates bite. Dig into these pieces on bond durations, yields, and prices for the lowdown.

Inflation-repelling index-linked bonds are an obvious All Weather addition, but they’re not officially featured. Personally I’d add a slug by paring back the long bond allocation.

Overall, this is another wealth-preservation portfolio, but only if you can see past the individual performances of its components.

The All Weather combines an extremely volatile mix of asset classes that gel because they should counterbalance each other over time.

The obverse is something in this portfolio will almost always be causing you pain. So you have to be able to view the portfolio holistically, or else you’ll resent it like carrying around a big umbrella on a sunny day.

A decumulator’s ‘Ready For Anything’ Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
60% Global equities HSBC FTSE All-World Index Fund C5 0.13%
10% Medium bonds Invesco UK Gilts (GLTA) 0.06%
10% Short global index-linked bonds Lyxor Core Global Inflation-Linked 1-10Y Bond ETF (GISG) 0.2%
10% Broad commodities UBS CMCI Composite SF (UC15) 0.34%
10% Cash Lyxor Smart Overnight Return (CSH2) 0.07%

This is my own take on a diversified portfolio suitable for an early retiree who needs a strong equity allocation to achieve their sustainable withdrawal rate. The diversifiers are chosen to diminish the threat of sequence of returns risk.

The medium-term bonds defend against downturns, without the eye-bleed inflation risk of their longer-dated cousins.

Broad commodities and index-linked bonds do their best to deal with the inflation monster. We’ve previously explained why we’d plump for global inflation-linked bond trackers over their UK equivalents.

Cash is there as an all-round workhorse providing for immediate liquidity and moderate recession protection. It’s also less vulnerable to inflation than medium bonds.

Potential tweaks? If you’re a fan of gold then you could swap it in for half or all of the portfolio’s broad commodities exposure.

Income Investing Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
50% Global high yield

Vanguard FTSE All World High Dividend (VHYG)

0.29%
20% UK high yield

Vanguard FTSE UK Equity Income6

0.14%
30% Total global bonds

Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M (AGHG)

0.08%

Income investing is a popular retirement strategy that swerves the risk of running out of money by leaving your capital untouched. Living expenses are funded purely from dividends and interest.

It sounds wonderful but the downside is you need a very large portfolio to generate enough income, even if you choose high-yielding dividend funds – as we’ve done for this load-out.

The SUV Portfolio

Asset class Index tracker OCF
15% UK equities Vanguard FTSE UK All Share7 0.06%
15% Developed world ex UK Vanguard FTSE Dev World ex-UK Equity8 0.14%
10% Property iShares UK Property ETF (IUKP) 0.4%
30% Short global index-linked bonds Lyxor Core Global Inflation-Linked 1-10Y Bond ETF (GISG) 0.22%
30% Short bonds L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year ETF (UKG5) 0.06%

Another of my creations, this 60% bond-weighted portfolio downgrades volatile equities in favour of the greater crash protection of fixed income.

Your portfolio could sensibly look something like this if you’re at or near-retirement. Essentially, you’ve hit your number, won the game, and don’t need to take big risks with your wealth anymore.

A solid slug in equities still offers some growth however, while the enlarged UK position reduces currency risk.

Also notice the short bond selection that acts more like cash and limits the portfolio’s susceptibility to inflation and rising interest rates.

The trade-off is short bonds don’t bounce as high as medium- or long-term bonds when stocks cave in.

Investment portfolio examples: key takeaways

An important principle underlying the investment portfolio examples is that there’s more than one way to cut the cake.

A retiree relying on their portfolio to pay the bills for the rest of their life has very different needs to a 20-something investor who can make good capital losses with pay rises to come.

Even then, while it’s commonly assumed young people can afford to take big and hairy investing risks, that entirely depends on an individual’s ability to remain calm when their stocks are being shredded by the market wood-chipper. In reality, not everyone sees that as the buying opportunity of a lifetime.

Meanwhile the investment psychology of a retiree living off a chunky defined benefits pension who’s managing an investment portfolio for fun money and legacy may have more in common with 100% equity flyboys than a normal decumulator.

So take the time to think about who you are and what you’re trying to achieve. If you don’t know yet, then the Markowitz portfolio is a great place to start.

Beyond that, we’ve tried to keep our investment portfolio example’s manageable. No more than six funds max. But note that the miracle of capitalism means you can actually diversify perfectly well with a single product, if you choose a multi-asset fund.

Please note that these investment portfolio examples are not investment advice, a recommendation, or an inducement to buy or sell financial instruments. If you’re unsure of the risk or suitability of an investment, seek advice from an independent financial adviser.

Build upon the basics

When considering your plan, remember that each asset class should play a strategic role in your portfolio.

In the broadest terms that means:

  • Global equities for growth grunt
  • Nominal government bonds protect against recessions and crashes
  • Index-linked bonds step in when unexpected inflation runs riot
  • Commodities and gold provide some inflation protection, but are really held to guard against scenarios when equities and bonds face-plant simultaneously

Fees matter so our product picks are typically the lowest-cost index funds or ETFs available.

That isn’t to say you can’t do better. Here are thoughts on how you might go about selecting:

Prepare to go live

If you’re struggling to push the button and finally invest for real, fear not. It happened to me and many better investors besides. You are not alone.

Focus on the right process and you won’t go far wrong:

I wish you the very best of luck. I well remember the flutters of excitement and nerves that accompanied my first jump off the investing diving board.

Investing has changed my life for the better and I sincerely hope it does the same for you.

Finally if you’re a Monevator veteran for whom these investment portfolio examples have been more a familiar ramble than wide-eyed adventure, then why not forward this article to a friend or family member who needs to get started?

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

Note: InvestEngine (UK) Limited is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, [FRN 801128].

  1. Equivalent index trackers are chosen when InvestEngine doesn’t stock the article’s suggested fund. []
  2. GB00B3X7QG63 []
  3. Swensen’s original US version featured 30% domestic equities and 15% developed world. That makes sense if you’re American because the US stock market is well-diversified. UK investors should flip these allocations around. []
  4. GB00B4M89245 []
  5. GB00BMJJJF91 []
  6. GB00B59G4H82 []
  7. GB00B3X7QG63 []
  8. GB00B59G4Q73 []
{ 85 comments }

Weekend reading: Inhuman investors

Weekend Reading links logo

What caught my eye this week.

The 1970s were a legendarily tough decade – for investors, for the UK economy, and for lovers of understated fashion. In his deep dives into the biggest equity swoons and bond market blow-ups, my co-blogger The Accumulator invariably showcases some horror story from the decade that time strives to forget.

Yet as parents and sports coaches alike counsel, it’s from the toughest times that we can draw the biggest lessons.

“High pressure makes diamonds” as people who fire themselves up in the mirror every morning before hitting the M25 like to say.

Which is all good reason to check out the extract from William Bernstein’s new book over on Humble Dollar this weekend.

Once more without feeling

In Courage Required, the veteran investing author reminds us that cheap markets aren’t so easily bought as they appear in hindsight.

Everyone thinks they will buy at the bottom. But in practice you’ll face both practical and psychological roadblocks.

Including Bernstein argues, human empathy:

Empathy […] at least financially, is one expensive emotion, since channeling the fear and greed of others often comes dear.

The corollary to human empathy is our evolutionarily derived tendency to imitate those around us, particularly if they all seem to be getting rich with tech stocks and cryptocurrency.

My own unscientific sampling of friends and colleagues suggests that the most empathetic tend to be the worst investors. Empathy is an extraordinarily difficult quality to self-assess, and it might be worthwhile to ask your most intimate and trusted family and friends where you fit on its scale.

To use a Yiddish word, the more of a mensch you are, the more likely you are to lose your critical faculties during a bubble and to lose your discipline during a bear market.

As somebody who has previously sold some possessions to buy more shares in the midst of bear markets, I’m not sure how to take this.

(Well, I guess I would take it personally, but my apparent lack of empathy protects me…)

Oh well, I’ve always known I think differently. And what equips one poorly for trouble-free dinner party conversation often seems me to be an advantage as an active investor.

Do read the full article over on Humble Dollar and consider getting the latest edition of Bernstein’s book – The Four Pillars of Investing – too.

(Or wait a bit. We might review it soon.)

Have a great weekend!

[continue reading…]

{ 35 comments }

Leveraged ETFs for the long run*

Let’s be clear: leveraged ETFs are hyper-controversial and not well understood. Nevertheless, in forthcoming articles from the Finumus camp about gearing up a portfolio and investing for different generations I intend to talk openly about them.

Hence I want to spend today explaining how they work. That way – with all the blood and gore out and on the table – we can hopefully in future have a grown-up conversation about their use.

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 65 comments }