≡ Menu

Companies paying dividends early to beat higher UK tax rates

special dividends

Ever heard the noise a fruit machine makes when you score three gold bars in a row?

Kerching! Kerching! Kerching!

Something similar can be heard gushing from the UK small cap sector at the moment, as public and private companies:

  • Bring forward paying their dividends ahead of April’s tax hike on income for £150,000+ earners.
  • Pay special dividends to get money out of the company and into shareholder’s hands, again ahead of that higher tax rate.

If you own shares in any small to mid cap companies, you should keep an eye open for dividend surprises.

A quick recap: A new top rate of tax comes into affect from April 6th. Anyone earning over £150,000 a year will see their highest rate rise from 40% to 50%. Dividend income tax in this band rises from 32.5% to 42.5%. (Here’s more on the higher dividend rate from Coutts).

People talk about taxes distorting people’s behaviour. Well, here’s a concrete example happening before our eyes!

Directors paying dividends to themselves

I’ve heard that special dividends to beat the higher rate are trendy with private companies right now.

Such companies are often owned by a handful of high-earning founders. By paying a big early dividend, those shareholders avoid paying an extra 10% in income tax compared to paying it out in just a few week’s time.

  • If you’re a private company shareholder in the higher rate bracket, call your accountant and ask them about it!

Paying special dividends is also happening with listed shares, albeit in some cases where the shareholders and the directors are one and the same.

The first company I saw going down this route was Goodwin, a splendid Northern engineer that makes huge valves for oil wells. (I hold).

Way back in August 2009, always innovative Goodwin announced it was paying an ‘extraordinary dividend’ to shareholders, adding:

The timing of this additional dividend payment will allow shareholders to maximise their position in relation to the 10% tax increase that the Government has implemented on dividends to help finance the banking crisis costs.

Goodwin is majority owned by the Goodwin family who run the company, so it’s true they’ll be rewarding themselves – and minimizing their own tax bills.

Good for them, I say. Goodwin has been prudently run for years, and I don’t see why the family should suffer because a less prudent Government now moves the goalposts.

Another company paying a special dividend ahead of April 6th is Hargreaves Lansdown, which is named after the two founders who still own more than 50% of the stock. Staff hold a further 15%.

According to the Financial Times, its special dividend will save Mr Hargreaves and Mr Lansdown a cool £1.2 million in taxes.

Paying dividends early to beat the 50% rate

As an alternative strategy, some companies are paying early dividends that aren’t due until after April 5th.

In a trading statement on February 17th, Churchill China said:

The Board has […] decided to bring forward the payment of the final dividend for 2009, normally payable in May 2010, to March 2010.

Another is Caledonia Investments, which announced yesterday it’s paying its second interim dividend early, adding:

The Board believes that it is in shareholders’ interests to accelerate the timing of this year’s final dividend payment and therefore the second interim dividend is intended to replace the final dividend that would normally be paid in August 2010.

According to Digital Look, companies as diverse as Abbey Protection, First Property, and UBC Media have all recently said their doing the same thing.

Meanwhile, the FT says Rathbone Brothers and MoneySupermarket.com are also paying early dividends.

I’m not surprised paying special dividends and paying dividends early is happening ahead of the tax hike. But I am surprised it’s not attracting more attention.

You can just see the headline’s screaming about greedy shareholders. Perhaps dividend tax rates are a bit complicated for the Six O’Clock News?

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • 1 FinEngr February 21, 2010, 5:38 am

    Very interesting article. Particularly since this appears to be a once only tax evasion maneuver, wonder why isn’t it getting more attention.

    Context plays such an important role. Maybe its because the difference between 40-50% seems small, and they’re neglecting those shareholders who own hundreds of thousands of shares!

    Here’s a comic which may explain why its too difficult for the 6 o’clock news. I’ll warn you beforehand, the joke is not PG.

    http://xkcd.com/558/

  • 2 Lemondy March 8, 2010, 11:14 pm

    Chalk up another one: EDIN, where the 3rd interim divi is normally paid in May and is coming in March this year.

    http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-news/news/market-news/market-news-detail.html?announcementId=10392304

  • 3 The Investor March 10, 2010, 1:31 am

    Good spot Lemondy! I considered buying some EDIN when Woodford took over, but he’s having to carry a big wodge of expensive looking debt.

  • 4 Franco August 23, 2012, 12:44 pm

    The government could easily have have stopped this evasive action by the top 1%, but it has not. As you see it is looking after its own as always.