≡ Menu

I have just finished the The Snowball, the first biography Warren Buffett has cooperated with. It’s full of surprises, such as how Buffett had three leading ladies for two decades, and how his 1960s home was an accidental outpost of the counterculture.

But I’m more interested in how Buffett made his money. And while there’s few new facts about Buffett’s deals in The Snowball, the biographical format does put them into context. You get to see what makes him tick.

Here are seven interesting things I learned about Warren Buffett from The Snowball, and some ideas on how they can help your investing:

1. Buffett set goals young. (He really started, really young)

Buffet began obsessing over numbers as a child. He raced marbles with a stopwatch and calculated the lifespan of hymn composers when six-years old. He sold chewing gum at seven and Coca Cola when he was eight: the same year he began wearing a money-changer on his belt.

  • His dad was a stockbroker. This gave him an early view of the markets
  • At ten he was chalking stock prices at a local broker’s office
  • The same year he visited the New York Stock Exchange, and was asked for a tip by senior Goldman Sachs partner Sidney Weinberg – an experience he never forgot
  • His favourite childhood book was One Thousand Ways to Make $1,000
  • At 11 he announced he was going to be a millionaire at 35, a seemingly crazy goal in 1941 (when a million really was a million)
  • He filed his first tax return aged 14, having already made $1,000 (equivalent to around $12,500 in today’s money)

The takeaway: The power of compound interest takes years to work its magic. None of us has a time machine, so the main lesson is not to delay a day when investing for the future.

2. Buffett bought his first stock when he was 12-years old

Warren put everything his schemes had earned him into a stock, Cities Service Preferred, when he was 12. He also enrolled his sister, Doris.

Buffet was already learning how to hold shares through a slump

He paid $114.75 dollars for three shares, and watched the stock price fall from $38.25 to $27 a share. His sister Doris was not happy. When Cities Service went back up to $40, he sold. He made $5 a share profit, and got Doris off his back. After he sold, the stock rose to $202 a share.

Takeaway: We all learn the same lessons. Buffett’s business partner Charlie Munger says that because Warren started thinking about odds, stocks, and goals before he was a teenager, he’s years ahead of the rest of us.

I used to watch share prices rise and fall on the Teletext TV service when I was 11 or 12. At the same age Buffett was learning real-world lessons on holding shares through a slump and selling too soon.

You’ll only discover whether you have the stomach to invest through a bear market or whether you’ll be sucked up by the next property bubble by being an active investor. Start with small sums, sure, but don’t delay that start.

3. Buffet lied, shoplifted, and played truant as a kid

This one was a real surprise. As a teenager Buffett revealed a wild streak. He says:

“We’d steal stuff for which we had no use. We’d steal golf bags and golf clubs. I walked out of the lower level where the sporting goods were, up the stairway to the street, carrying a golf bag and golf clubs, and the club was stolen and so were the bags. I stole hundreds of golf balls.

“I made up this crazy story for my parents – I told them I had this friend, and his father had died. He kept finding more of these golf balls that his father had bought. Who knows what my parents talked about at night.”

Takeaway: Even Buffett had to learn to be Buffett. I don’t know about you, but I found this heartening to read. Together with discovering that Buffett was a shy child who enrolled himself in Dale Carnegie’s public speaking course, it made him seem more human.

It’s easy to feel you haven’t got what it takes to make money. Some are born special, you might conclude. But Buffett’s history shows that even the world’s richest and most admired investor had to iron out his kinks.

Buffett’s history also makes me proud to be an outsider. Many of my college classmates entered the city or became management consultants, and have earned six-figure salaries for a decade. When property prices were booming, I’d sometimes wonder if I’d made the wrong decision by deciding to go it alone – even though I know that working a nine-to-five in an office and answering to some buffoon of a manager would kill me.

Discovering Buffett made being his own boss a top priority puts me in good company. I also suspect the unusual structure of Berkshire Hathaway grew out of Buffett’s non-confirming mentality.

4. Buffett is a businessman first, investor second

You’ll often read that Buffett evaluates stocks as if he’s buying the whole business. What I realised after reading The Snowball was Buffett doesn’t do this because he’s an investor who thinks like a businessman. Buffett is a businessman who is also an investor.

  • Buffett ran multiple businesses while still a student: He sold refurbished golf balls, peddled stamps to collectors, ran a network of pinball machines when he was 17, owned a tenanted farm, and managed a 50-strong paperboy route
  • He dealt hands-on with strikes and turf wars at newspapers from The Washington Post to the Omaha Sun
  • Buffett didn’t just buy, hold and drink Coca-Cola – he engineered the replacement of its CEO
  • With all the new businesses, from See’s Candies to GEICO, he added everything from their stock level reports to weekly sales projections to his endless daily reading
  • Berkshire Hathaway is far from a simple holding pen for Buffett’s investments. He’s used his business acumen to produce an intricate money-making machine which takes cash from its subsidiaries and the float from its insurance businesses and reinvests it at higher rates of return, multiplying his returns

Takeway: Buffett’s success will never boil down to filters or ratios. Investors who try to ape him simply by reducing his methods to dubious cashflow projections or buying any old listed household name when its stock price falls 20 per cent will never replicate Buffett’s success. (Okay, rounding down roughly nobody is ever going to replicate Buffett’s success, but you know what I mean).

Buffett’s record suggests investors should spend as much time reading about business and management as they do calculating P/E ratios. The trouble is, all manner of financial ratios are available at a touch of a button. Buffett’s sense of business value is far harder to emulate.

5. Buffet makes mistakes

He really does! I was even more heartened by Buffett’s stinkers than by his golf ball robbery.

Some classic Buffett cock-ups include:

  • Him and his friends spending $25,000 in 1957 on four-cent Blue Eagle stamps that the US government was about to take out of circulation. By securing and controlling the supply, they destroyed any chance of the stamps becoming valuable. His partners in the caper were still mailing him with postage paid for by sheets of the stamps decades later.
  • He bought The Buffalo Evening News in 1977 and had lost $10 million within three years by becoming embroiled in a price war and a fight with the unions (though it later became very profitable)
  • Buffett’s firm Berkshire Hathaway is living testament to his biggest mistake – spending millions to gain control of a doomed textile manufacturer
  • Buying into Salomon Brothers in 1987 for $700 million eventually plunged him neck-deep into the Wall Street culture he so despised, when its rogue traders and poor management threatened his reputation and fortune

Takeaway: Mistakes happen even to the best of us. Sadly, having read The Snowball cover-to-cover I haven’t found a Buffett blunder to rank with my own worst investment (an iffy company called Homebuy that went bust overnight). But I saw plenty of examples where Buffett dusted himself down after an investment misfired and tried to learn from what went wrong.

Virtually all Buffett’s purchases of major insurance companies seem to have gone awry in the early years, for instance, and yet it’s by reinvesting all the cash thrown off by these companies that Buffett has maintained Berkshire Hathaway’s incredible growth rate.

The moral is to not despair when an investment turns out badly, but try to figure out what you can takeaway from it, as well as what you can salvage the situation.

6. Buffett considered quitting investing in his early 30s

In 1969 Buffett wrote to his investors that he was going to close their partnerships:

“I know I don’t want to be totally occupied with outpacing an investment rabbit all my life. The only way to slow down is to stop. I am not attuned to this market environment, and I don’t want to spoil a decent record by trying to play a game I don’t understand just so I can go out a hero.

“I do know that when I am sixty, I should be attempting to achieve different personals goals than those which had priority at twenty.”

Takeaway: What can anyone learn from this but humility? I already knew before reading The Snowball that Buffett wound down his partnerships in 1970 because he thought the market too over-valued to deliver an adequate return for his investors. That move alone would seal Buffett’s place in history among value investors, even if he had retired.

Of course, Buffett didn’t retire. He is still compounding his investments at an average rate of over 20% a year, nearly four decades later.

7. Buffett treats becoming the world’s richest man as a game

I couldn’t even begin to quote examples from The Snowball showing how Warren Buffett is in it for the scorecard, not for the payday: the entire biography is a testament to it.

No sports cars or private islands for Warren Buffett – even when he eventually bought a corporate jet he called it ‘The Indefensible’. For decades he bought suits from the everyman outfitter nearest his office, and his biography frequently mentions (and has photographic evidence of) his favourite threadbare jumper. And famously, his main residence is the first house he bought in 1961.

From setting that goal aged 11 of becoming a millionaire by 35, Buffett seems to treat investing as an intellectual challenge. He probably learned this from his great mentor Benjaman Graham, who seemed more bothered by being right than being rich, and for whom investing was just one of several high-end hobbies.

Buffett’s ‘inner scorecard’ helped him save and reinvest his money early on

Unlike Graham, however, Buffett really cares about every penny. From ‘Buffetting’ a few cents off the price he paid for stocks to demanding his friends sell him shares they’d bought in companies he was interested in, right up to his close personal friendship with his rival for the title of world’s richest man, Bill Gates, Buffett really wants to have the biggest snowball.

If you were to say there’s something rather peculiar about chasing money as a means to an end, I could certainly see your point. But when the recipient chooses to leave virtually all $62 billion of his winnings to charity, it’s hard to complain. I’d rather have Buffett as the world’s richest man than the Salomon traders who almost destroyed his reputation.

Takeaway: Spend less than you earn and reinvest the difference in the stock market. Buffett may have lived a remarkable life, but that central practice is something we can all aspire to.

Beyond that, I don’t want to get too moral. I’m happy to live below my means, but can I honestly say I’d be happy with Cherry Coke and a steak from the local shop if my means were sufficient to buy up The Maldives or launch me into space? Unfortunately I’m not qualified to comment.

I do think my attitude is closer to Buffett’s than to the more visible of the cityboys I’ve seen in London over the past few years, for whom cash is flash. Also, Buffett’s self-containment from materialism – he calls it his ‘inner scorecard’ – undoubtedly helped him save and reinvest his money early on, and got his investing career off to a flying start in his 20s. You have to accumulate before you can speculate. Good luck rolling your own snowball.

I can’t recommend The Snowball enough for anyone interested in business and investing. Obviously, anyone interested in Warren Buffett should buy it too, but I imagine you’ve all got two copies already (one for your library and one for your bathroom). The book is seemingly always discounted at Amazon (click through for the latest price at Amazon US or at Amazon UK) so there’s no excuse. Except, perhaps, it weighs a tonne, so you might put your back out while reading it.

{ 17 comments }

Learn how to get rich from a video game

Some folk in Fable II turn to desperate ways of making money

Some folk in Fable II are desperate to make money

Fable II is a video game, in which you play a hero and business mogul. In this post I’ll explain what it can teach you about making money.

Lesson 1: Jobs mean money, but gosh they can be dull

You begin Fable II as an orphan with a dog. Slaying bandits and collecting gold to buy food and drink is great fun.

Soon, though, you’ll want more. Fable II‘s shops brim with things you want to buy: weapons, potions. Then you’ll discover the shops and indeed the whole world of Albion is for sale! Me, I forget about being Conan the Barbarian and dreamed of becoming a mediaeval Donald Trump.

The quickest way to make money was is to pause my adventures, tie up the dog, and get a job working as a blacksmith:

Getting a job in Fable II reminded me that:

  • Trading your hours for money raises cash faster than hare-brained adventures
  • – but salaried work can be tedious and repetitive
  • If you work longer or improve your skills you can get better pay
  • – but those skills are no use outside of the workplace.
  • When you’re not at work, you earn nothing
  • It’s hard to make a fortune working 9-5 for someone else, because your earning limit is determined by your time

I’ve read you can buy everything for sale in Fable II for 100 million gold coins. You’ll never earn that as a blacksmith, however unrealistic Fable II is.

Lesson 2: Passive income beats earning a wage

Buy property and enjoy the passive incomeAfter an hour I was a three-star blacksmith, pulling down on average 100 gold coins every few seconds I spent as a blacksmith. I was also bored to tears.

It didn’t help me to hear my manager saying I was making great swords. He owned the blacksmiths and would benefit from my labour!

So I quit my job and bought myself some thigh-high boots. Then I hit the bars, before popping over to a pie shop.

As I was tucking in, I remembered I was earning money to invest in assets, not to spend on frivolities. So after charming the pie stall owner into lowering the price, I bought her stall.

[continue reading…]

{ 3 comments }

As a saver whose income is modestly into the higher tax bracket, yesterday’s pre-budget report wasn’t great. Here are the main measures designed to get Labour re-elected and stimulate the economy:

Spend now:

  • Temporary cut in VAT, from 17.5% to 15% (until December 2009)
  • Extra £60 to pensioners in January
  • Early increase in child tax credits
  • £120 basic rate tax rebate (introduced after the 10p farce) made permanent, which will increase to £145 in April
  • Proposed rise in tax for small businesses from 21p to 22p is deferred
  • £3 billion in government spending to be brought forward
  • Sundry other minor fiddling designed to get headlines (a green fund, phasing in changes on fuel duty)

Pay later:

  • Rise in income tax to 45% for those earning over £150,000 (April 2011)
  • National insurance increase of 0.5% for employers and employees (April 2011)
  • Cuts in the personal allowance for those earning over £100,000 (April 2010)
  • Government borrowing to rise to £118 billion in 2009 (8% of GDP!)
  • UK net debt as a share of GDP to rise to 57% by 2011

Why it’s a bad budget for me

Like many Monevator readers, I won’t benefit much from Gordon Brown’s giveaway:

  • I don’t benefit from the tax credit giveaways, since I don’t have kids and I’m not a pensioner.
  • Most years my income is modestly into the higher-rate tax bracket (around £40,000), which will mean higher taxes in a couple of years due to the National Insurance rise.
  • I save rather than spend, which means a VAT cut won’t help.
  • Long-term interest rates will rise because of all this borrowing, which means I’ll pay higher interest rates when it finally makes sense to buy a house rather than rent.
  • On a brighter note, I’ll see a small reduction in tax next year, due to the 10p rebate going permanent

Since I know my bills and expenses are going to rise in the future, the rational thing for me to do ahead of the downturn to save more today. This is the paradox of thrift, and it explains why I think the budget should have been aimed at getting money moving via infrastructural spending, rather than short-term VAT cuts.

Why it’s not the best budget for the country

I freely admit I’m not an economist, but the ‘big idea’ – the cut in VAT – doesn’t look like the best use of £12 billion from a national point of view, either.

Prices are already plunging in the shops, so who is going to notice a 2.5% reduction? Worse, retailers are going to have to spend money changing their signage and sticker prices. More likely most won’t, which means it’ll just bolster their margins. (Perhaps avoiding retail bankruptcies is the real motivation?)

I wrote before that I didn’t want the Government to cut my taxes, which is effectively what they’ve done with the VAT fiddling. Worse, Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling are actually putting taxes up for higher-rate earners, which might have some redistributive merit but isn’t going to raise much money and will only depress spending at the higher end.

On a more positive note, the Government is going to direct most money to the poor (who will spend it, which is what you want from a stimulus) and bring forward capital investment projects.

It should have done more such investment, targeting its spending to get lasting results as well as a stimulus.

President Elect Obama in the US is proposing to build thousands of wind turbines to create hundreds of thousands of jobs while reducing energy imports and carbon emmissions. Encouraging us to buy more tat in the shops with a VAT cut seems pretty pathetic in comparison.

For individuals, it’s best to ignore the VAT cuts. Instead, get out of debt, save more, and watch your mortgage, as I outlined in my four steps to tackling the credit crunch.

{ 1 comment }

Written in 1989, Liar’s Poker remains one of the best route maps around Wall Street’s corridors of ‘high’ finance: that is, the skullduggery that brought us the credit crunch and destroyed itself in the process.

Now Liar’s Poker author, Michael Lewis, has written on The End of Wall Street’s Boom in Portfolio magazine, and as you’d hope it’s a cracker.

Lewis says he’d hoped Liar’s Poker would warn people away from becoming investment bankers or bond traders, but that it only made people keener to follow the money:

Over and over again, the big Wall Street investment banks would be, in some narrow way, discredited. Yet they just kept on growing, along with the sums of money that they doled out to 26-year-olds to perform tasks of no obvious social utility. The rebellion by American youth against the money culture never happened. Why bother to overturn your parents’ world when you can buy it, slice it up into tranches, and sell off the pieces?

The whole article is a great read, especially the quotes about Steve Eisman, the professional bear who was one of the first to see through the Emperor’s new clothes:

“Steve’s fun to take to any Wall Street meeting. Because he’ll say ‘Explain that to me’ 30 different times. Or ‘Could you explain that more, in English?’ Because once you do that, there’s a few things you learn. For a start, you figure out if they even know what they’re talking about. And a lot of times, they don’t!”

As someone who has got many things wrong in life, but not the sheer absurdity of the global housing booms (my mistake being bearish too soon, but my reasoning that house prices were up to 45% too high was right), I liked the comments from Credit Suisse analyst Ivy Zelman:

There’s a simple measure of sanity in housing prices: the ratio of median home price to income. Historically, it runs around 3 to 1; by late 2004, it had risen nationally to 4 to 1. “All these people were saying it was nearly as high in some other countries,” Zelman says. “But the problem wasn’t just that it was 4 to 1. In Los Angeles, it was 10 to 1, and in Miami, 8.5 to 1. […] “You needed the occasional assurance that you weren’t nuts,” she says. She wasn’t nuts. The world was.

Even Eisman couldn’t figure out the full complicity stupidity of Wall Street, despite the fact he was already shorting sub-prime bonds as quickly as he could:

“We always asked the same question,” says Eisman. “Where are the rating agencies in all of this? And I’d always get the same reaction. It was a smirk.” He called Standard & Poor’s and asked what would happen to default rates if real estate prices fell. The man at S&P couldn’t say; its model for home prices had no ability to accept a negative number. “They were just assuming home prices would keep going up,” Eisman says.

Read the full story of how Wall Street met its maker, and then come back and be glad that Wall Street is paying the price for its folly.

{ 1 comment }