≡ Menu

How to improve your investment research process

“Data! Data! Data! I can’t make bricks without clay.”
– Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure of the Copper Beeches

A regular Monevator reader, G., recently wrote in with a question about how to properly organise the deluge of information he comes across in his investment research.

Indeed, all of the information available can easily produce, as G. called it, “paralysis by analysis” – that is, being so overwhelmed by data that you decide no decision is the best decision.

G. noted that this issue was starting to frustrate his active investing:

Whilst I am making progress on building a portfolio with ‘good’ dividend companies, I have created a problem with amassing a great deal of information during my research.

With this in mind I was wondering if there were any ‘tips’ on how best to organise this?

I have newspaper / magazine cutouts, information from various books written down on A4 pads, extracts from your website and many others.

The term paralysis by analysis springs to mind. I appreciate that this may not be a subject that you could provide a steer with. It’s just that it is starting to demotivate me on a subject that like.

Thank you for reading this message and keep up the excellent work.

I can certainly relate to the reader’s frustration, as I’m sure many of you can.

Even ten years ago, I would see my stock quotes just once a day in the morning newspaper. Sometimes I’d go to the local library to look up the by-then dated company information that was printed in a monthly shares magazine.

Today, by contrast, investors can have any piece of public information available with just a few keystrokes.

In some ways, this easy availability of financial data makes research less time-consuming.

However the amount of data can also unnecessarily obfuscate the process, and make investing decidedly less fun.

You call the shots

It’s important to start with the premise that investing is a decision-making business. As with most decisions you need to make, you’ll never have complete information nor will all of the data you compile necessarily lead to one conclusion.

Still, you must make a decision to either buy, sell, or do nothing.

What’s great about investing is that doing nothing is a valuable option for individual investors. As Warren Buffett said in 1999, “You don’t have to swing at everything (in the stock market) – you can wait for your pitch”.

In other words, when you’re managing your own money, you don’t need to buy or sell a share if you don’t want to.

This advantage for individual investors shouldn’t be underestimated.

Professional money managers don’t often have the luxury of doing nothing. Their clients usually insist they take action, any action, and falsely equate action with the manager earning his paycheck.

With that in mind, a key to good investing research is to relax.

There’s nothing wrong with saying, “I don’t understand this” or “this isn’t the right time to buy this share” and moving onto the next idea.

Keep the notes you’ve taken on that particular idea to review at a later date.

Go your own way

I believe the best way to reduce all the information you feel the need to keep track of is to focus your investment process.

Each investor’s research process is different. An investor taking a dividend-focused approach, for instance, will likely collect and process data differently than someone with a high-growth approach. That’s what makes a market.

What’s important is that you develop a process that’s repeatable and simple.

The start of a good, repeatable process is to establish some simple screening criteria that greatly reduce the thousands of available shares to a few dozen or so that more closely fit your objective.

To illustrate using a dividend-focused approach, I’ve previously outlined a few screening criteria. The next step in that process would be reviewing the screening results and identifying a few companies that are worthy of further research.

I suggest studying one company at a time, otherwise you’re likely to be overwhelmed.

Once you’ve found a company to research, read the last two or three annual reports and the most recent interim report to get a better feel for the company’s business. If you don’t understand how the company makes its money by that point, I’d pass on the idea.

If you still like the company at that point, take a closer look at the balance sheet, cash flow statement, management, and if you’re an income investor how the dividend has grown over time.

Another key to a good investing research is to focus on avoiding mistakes rather than seeking winners.

When you’re looking at the financial statements, you don’t need to get bogged down in the details (unless you’re an accountant by trade or really enjoy digging into the numbers).

You do, however, want to look closely enough to ensure that the company is profitable, that it generates solid cash flow, and has a balance sheet that’s appropriate for its line of business.

This should sound obvious, but it’s amazing how many messages I get from other investors suggesting I look into a company that has yet to generate a pound in profit.

How do they manage it?

I’d also suggest taking a closer look at the company’s management to see if the leaders of the company are properly incentivised and what major investment decisions (mergers, expansion plans, and so on) they’ve made in recent years.

Have a look through the board’s remuneration report found in the annual report (it’s found in the proxy filing in the U.S.).

Here are a few questions you’ll want to answer

  • How is management compensated relative to its major peers?
  • Upon which metrics are management’s annual bonuses based?
  • Are these the right metrics for this business?
  • Have management’s investment decisions made the company stronger or weaker compared to the competition?

Price is what you pay, value is what you get

If you still like the company at this point, I suggest getting a feel for the company’s valuation and comparing it to the market price.

Even the best company can make for a bad investment if you pay £1.50 for it when it’s really worth a pound.

Admittedly, valuation is part art and part science, but again, your aim should be avoiding mistakes – the purchase of overvalued shares – rather than seeking successes.

Anyone can make a share look cheap in a valuation model by changing a few assumptions. Err on the side of conservatism with your forecasts, and if the market seems to be assuming too much growth for now, consider waiting for a pullback in the share price.

The valuation phase is another area of the research process where I see too many investors being overwhelmed by the data or, alternatively, feeling that the more complex and detailed their models are the more likely they’ll be right.

In my experience, even simple models like the dividend discount model that use a few data points can tell you a lot about the market’s expectations and the company’s value.

Seek to follow the 80/20 rule – find the 20% of available data that explains 80% of the valuation.

Manage your time wisely

Finally, it’s important not to follow more companies than you can reasonably cover, given the time you have available for research.

It’s always fun buying new shares, but remember that each company requires what I call maintenance research – that is, reading the quarterly or half-year results, the annual reports, updating model assumptions, keeping up on management changes, and so on.

If you have only a few hours a month for research and you own 50 separate shares, you’ll certainly feel overwhelmed with all the data you need to analyse.

I’d much rather own five shares that I know very well and can reasonably manage than own shares in 50 companies but have little idea of what’s happening at each one.

You might ask, “But what about diversification?”

Well, that’s where index trackers can help even us active investors.

If you can only follow five companies, carve out a portion of your portfolio dedicated to active investments (say 40% of the total) that will contain those five companies. The balance can go into a broad-based tracker fund.

Back to basics

If you’re feeling overwhelmed by your investing process, remember to relax, focus on the parts that are repeatable (because your process should improve with each iteration), and seek to simplify rather than complicate it.

Please post any further thoughts or questions you have in the comments section below. It’d be great to hear from you.

It’s hard to believe it’s been a year since my previous post on Monevator! I promise not to make a habit of being away for so long.

Note: You can bookmark all The Analyst’s articles on dividend investing. The archive will be updated as new dividend articles are posted.

{ 6 comments }

Simple mind games to stop passive investors hitting self-destruct

Investing legend Benjamin Graham skewered the secret saboteur within all of us with this warning:

“The investor’s chief problem — and even his worst enemy — is likely to be himself.”

In other words, we’re all just a bunch of strategically-shaved apes, driven by instincts that are liable to nosedive our investment vehicles as surely as a chimp in charge of the space shuttle.

I felt my very own inner chimp stir recently, and it made me realise I’d invented a string of mind games to keep him diverted and out of investment mischief.

Game your primate brain with a string of short term rewards

Diversionary tactics are vital for the passive investor, because passive investing is famously dull. The slow-cooking of the investment world.

That’s just great if investing bores you rigid. You can leave things to stew without you, and you’re almost certainly not reading this sentence. But if you’re a hands-on kinda person, then those hands need to be kept busy, lest you’re gripped by the urge to market-time or chase performance.

My that gold looks shiny!

Game your brain

So I’ve been gaming myself. Video game designers know that to keep coaxing players onward to the ultimate goal of the final level, they need to lay a breadcrumb trail of little rewards along the way. Slaying orcs, collecting treasure – the kind of light relief that keeps your pleasure centres firing during the long trudge to the endgame.

What then are my investment orcs, so to speak? Here are my big three:

  1. Cost-cutting
  2. Money saving
  3. Diversification

Let’s look at each in turn.

“Take that, Inflated Fee Beast!”

Keeping investment costs low leads me to obsessively seek out tracker funds with:

When trading fees are involved, I use lump sums to dilute the cost of the fee and scour cyberspace to find the most competitive online brokers offering:

  • Low dealing fee – sub-£10 is possible
  • No annual management charge
  • Low dividend reinvestment charge
  • Regular trading scheme – £1.50 per trade is possible
  • No inactivity fee
  • Low transfer out charge – £10 per investment

To me it’s a shaving game: Every fraction I can trim from my costs is a small victory – like taking a tenth off my time in a marathon

It may amount to buttons over the years, or it may add up to a significant sum.

The main thing is it keeps me occupied.

“Have at you, Cash-Gobbling Monster!”

Then there’s the saving game. Saving is the foundation of investing. It’s only by saving hard that I have a monthly sum to invest. But happily, the savings habit can be reinforced by your investment plan.

Without my monthly drip-feed target to hit, I’d find it much harder NOT to blow my cash on good times and tat.

The ground rules of the savings game are:

  • Having a big enough goal (such as paying off the mortgage and/or a comfortable retirement) to convince me to defer gratification a while.
  • Measuring my savings rate as a percentage of income (or in pounds and pence) gives me a number to fight for. When the monthly number goes up, another battle is won.

“Begone, Highly-Concentrated Mutant!”

Diversification is a major tenet of passive investing. Happily, expanding your holdings into complementary asset classes also satisfies the basic human urge to collect.

Whether it’s trophies, stamps, or orcs’ heads, we all just love to accumulate.

Especially for a new investor, every new asset class acquired feels like a major accomplishment. Status is enhanced (as if we’ve gone up another level in a video game) and feelings of security strengthened, as if we’re building a mental bastion out of all that stuff.

My own passive portfolio owes much to Tim Hale’s Home Bias – Global Style Tilts portfolio. My rational self had good reasons to use it as a model – but there’s a fair chance that my primate brain also wanted to have 11 funds worth of empire-building fun.

Most passive investors can err on the side of simplicity. There’s no need to have that many funds, and eventually the law of diminishing returns and the danger of overlap dim diversity’s halo effect.

But I admit I’m an asset-class junkie. I’m always on the look out for new market segments that exhibit low correlation with my existing holdings.

That doesn’t mean I’m neck deep in ETF exotica – I’m still swimming in the broad asset classes. But I keep myself entertained with the thought that one day I might rope off 10% of my portfolio and invest it in more unusual areas, like frontier markets or timber.

“Behave yourself, strange ape-man!”

Those are not the only games I play to keep myself entertained.

Meticulous record-keeping, tax control, learning more about investing, and blogging about passive investing all offer little bio-chemical treats that help keep my brain in check.

The important thing is that each cheap trick employed offers a compound reward. The positive effects of cost-cutting, money-saving and diversification (within reason) build upon themselves over the years to help, not hinder, my investment goals.

So investor: Know thyself and develop your own mind games that can keep you on the straight and narrow. And if you’re already practised in the art of self-manipulation, I’d be fascinated to hear what techniques you use.

The Accumulator

{ 14 comments }
Weekend reading

Good reads from around the Web.

One of the many reasons I despair of the average private investor is because of their ridiculous attitude towards short-selling (that is, betting that a share will fall in value).

There’s a limited argument that can be made against short-selling in banks at times of financial crisis, because of the potential to cause self-reinforcing bank runs. There may also be arguments against “naked” short-selling, in situations where the survival of a company is precarious and based on the ongoing confidence of its investors.

Otherwise, shorting is a useful part of the market. Besides generally helping prices to stay efficient, shorters can help dampen down speculative manias and also provide more liquidity to the system.

It’s hard to see why short-sellers should be despised as cheaters. For a start they take bigger risks – because shares tend to rise, not fall, over the long-term, but also more importantly because a short-seller’s potential losses are infinite should a share price keep on rising.

Unfortunately, many stock picking active investors seem to fall in love with ‘story stocks’. They despise shorters because they believe bogus bulletin board chatter about shadowy cabals of market makers and hedge funds, and they seem to have little idea of what really drives the long-term value of their investments.

Short of common sense

You can see this in play whenever a high-profile shorter alights on a particularly beloved story stock, which is quite often because they are often the most over-valued.

Nowadays shorters tend to publish their thesis as part of their attempts to unmask the over-valuation, as they see it, at a company.

And that’s when the fun starts.

Almost immediately private investors call “foul!” They question the integrity of the shorter and anyone who gives two minutes to considering the short position, or writing about it. They even start petitions calling for short-selling to be banned.

This is ridiculous. We do not have a situation where an abundance of negative comment is written about companies – quite the opposite.

Besides, if your company is as good as you think it is, then short-sellers should be welcomed for driving down the price.

Buy more! If you’re right about your company, then the earnings will out in the end and you’ll make even more money.

Of course the suspicion must be that all their bluster hides the fact that the anti-shorters don’t really have much confidence or understanding to fall back on.

What they have are glossy and potentially bogus company presentations, big numbers bandied about by over-pushy CEOs, and some blue-sky vision of what would happen to the company’s bottom line if everyone in Eritrea bought its products.

That’s not an investing thesis. That’s a playground popularity contest.

Here’s one they did earlier

Time after time you see popular small-cap story stocks blow-up and the protestations die down.

Not every short call is right – far from it, as I say shorting is even harder than normal active management, because the market will less often bail you out. But a credible short-call allied to a lot of angry private shareholders should probably give you second thoughts about any company you own.

The chaps from Schroders just shared some thoughts on this, in the context of infamous short-seller Gotham City’s move on wi-fi firm Let’s Gowex:

Gotham City [says] it took some eight months of due-diligence work from the moment its eye was first caught by a little-known Spanish wifi provider called Let’s Gowex to the publication on 1 July of a scathing report, among the conclusions of which were “Over 90% of Gowex’s reported revenues do not exist” and “Gowex shares are worth €0.00 per share”.

Gowex’s immediate response was to come out with all guns blazing but, within a matter of days, it had been forced to declare bankruptcy and admit that its chief executive and founder Jenaro García Martín had made up its accounts for the last four years.

Channelling the spirit of its favourite superhero, Gotham commented: “It is not who we are underneath but what we do that defines us.”

As recently as February of this year, Gowex had a market capitalisation of almost €2bn (£1.58bn)  and had seen its share price rise more than 1,000% since the start of 2013 – taking it to the fringes of Spain’s principal IBEX 35 market and making it one of the best-performing shares in the world.

The average professional short-fund manager is to a noisy and angry punter in small cap shares what Superman is to your grandad in tights.

Okay, shorters are not super, nor even heroes, but it is certainly a mismatched battle of investing smarts – and I know who I’d put my money on any day.

[continue reading…]

{ 16 comments }
John Lee, Investor and Lord

One of the UK’s most famous – and famously successful – private investors is John Lee (aka Lord Lee of Trafford).

Thanks to more than a decade of writing about his portfolio for the Financial Times, Lee has became one of the handful of go-to guys when it comes to navigating the woefully under-covered UK small cap scene.

Lord Lee also made headlines when he revealed in 2003 that he was an ISA millionaire – an impressive sum to amass in just 16 years, given that he made this million by compounding the mere £126,000 he was allowed to put into ISAs in annual contributions by that date.

And Lord Lee hasn’t just shared his wisdom with investors. The House of Lords peer and former MP also gave his time to agitate for regulatory changes, in particular having a key role in a tweak to the law to allow AIM shares to be held in ISAs.

At a time when many in government seem almost hostile to private investing, we’ve been lucky to have him on our side.

John Lee’s 12 rules of successful investment

Lord Lee eventually tried to distill more than 50 years of his experiences as an active investor into his own book, How to Make a Million – Slowly, which was released in late 2013.

It’s not a definitive textbook on the dark art of active investing, but it is a very agreeable summary of the principles of investing in small caps, from an amiable, generous, and enthusiastic practitioner.

Read my review of his book if you’d like to know more.

As a taster, here are Lord Lee’s 12 guiding principles to successful investing:

1. Endeavour to buy shares at modest valuations – hopefully with an attractive yield and single-figure price earnings ratio and/or discount to net asset value / real worth.

2. Ignore the overall level of the stock market. Don’t make judgements on the macro outlook – leave that to commentators and economists. Focus on your particular selection.

3. Be prepared to hold for a minimum of five years.

4. Have a broad understanding of the PLC’s main business activity – one which makes sense to you.

5. Ignore minor share price movements. Looking back years hence you will have either got it right or wrong. Whether you originally paid, say, 55 pence rather than 50 pence will be totally irrelevant.

6. Seek out established companies with a record of profitability and dividend payments – avoid start-ups and biotech and exploration stocks.

7. Look for moderately optimistic or better chairman’s/CEO’s most recent comments.

8. Focus on preferably conservative, cash-rich companies or those with low levels of debt.

9. Ensure the directors have meaningful shareholdings themselves in the PLC and ‘clean’ reputations.

10. Look for a stable Board – infrequent directorate changes. Similarly with professional advisers.

11. Face up to poor decisions. Apply a 20% ‘stop loss’ – sell and move on. However, ignore the stop loss if there is a major overall market fall.

12. Let profitable holdings run. Don’t try to be too clever, i.e. selling and hoping the market will fall to buy back at a lower price.

It sounds straightforward, doesn’t it?

You just try being so sensible for 50 years!

A slow and steady way of active investing

I’ve been lucky enough to meet Lord Lee a couple of times, and he’s just as genuine in real-life as he comes across in his book – both in terms of his passion for investing, and in his surprisingly down-to-earth nature (especially for a multi-millionaire peer of the realm…)

As always the ‘house view’ of Monevator is that most people will do best by passively investing.

But if like me you’re one of life’s inveterate stock pickers, then I think you’ll find Lee’s sensible, business-focused investment rules are worth more than any number of bulletin board tips and irrelevant CNBC headlines.

{ 5 comments }