≡ Menu
Weekend reading

Good reads from around the Web.

A warm welcome to you if you’ve found Monevator today after hearing Mark on Money Box on BBC Radio 4.

If you want to learn more about the pros and cons of discounted funds, check out our recent article.

And there’s plenty more to dig into after that…

Why you should read Monevator

Monevator is about investing money for the long-term, whether it be for your retirement, paying off your mortgage, financial freedom, or some other goal.

We also write about saving, property, entrepreneurship – and now and then just rant about whatever gets our goat.

It’s written by two ordinary people, from our perspective as savers and investors.

Most of our articles are long, a bit nerdy, but (we hope) always readable and entertaining.

We write long articles because while investing can be easy and simple, too many people have been confused, misled, or misguided over the years.

We’re doing our bit to put that right!

If you’re new to the site, you might get started with our guide to passive investing.

A few good reads to begin with include:

There are hundreds more articles in the archives, so please do dig around!

You should also check out our broker comparison table to find the cheapest home for your investments.

Make yourself at home

The rest of this post consists of links to money and investing articles on the web that I’ve found interesting this week.

I do this every Saturday morning, and there’s always something worth reading.

We have more information about investing at our fingertips than any previous generation. But at the same time it’s never been harder to know what to do with your money – nor more important to take charge of your financial future.

[continue reading…]

{ 26 comments }

Why investors should be wary of discounted funds

The big beast of British investment platforms, Hargreaves Lansdown, has revealed the special discount rates it has secured on index funds.

On the face of it, Hargreaves now hosts the cheapest trackers on the market. From UK equity to emerging markets you could easily put together a diversified portfolio using its range. A range that consists of reputable BlackRock and L&G index funds especially discounted, thanks to Hargreaves’ powers of persuasion and market dominance.

Sadly, while the funds are super competitively priced, Hargreaves’ charges for using their platform are not the best.

The reality is you can buy a much cheaper portfolio using standard-priced index funds from a broker that’s happy to keep a smaller slice of the pie for itself.

What they give with one hand they take away with the other

The table below shows the full cost picture once you add in platform fees.

Every Hargreaves Lansdown fund pick is more expensive overall in comparison to rival Charles Stanley Direct when you add the two fees together:

Hargreaves exclusive index funds OCF (%) Platform fee (%) Total (%) Charles Stanley
regular index funds
OCF (%) Platform fee (%) Total (%)
L&G UK Index C 0.1 0.45 0.55 Royal London UK All Share Tracker Z 0.14 0.25 0.39
L&G US Index C 0.12 0.45 0.57 BlackRock US Equity Tracker D 0.17 0.25 0.42
BlackRock Continental Euro Equity Tracker H 0.12 0.45 0.57 BlackRock Continental Euro Equity Tracker D 0.18 0.25 0.43
BlackRock Japan Equity Tracker H 0.12 0.45 0.57 BlackRock Japan Equity Tracker D 0.18 0.25 0.43
BlackRock Pacific ex Japan Equity Tracker H 0.15 0.45 0.60 BlackRock Pacific ex Japan Equity Tracker D 0.21 0.25 0.46
BlackRock Emerging Markets Tracker H1 0.25 0.45 0.70 BlackRock Emerging Markets Tracker D2 0.29 0.25 0.54
L&G International
Index C
0.2 0.45 0.65 Fidelity Index World Fund I 0.15 0.25 0.40
L&G All Stocks Gilt
Index C
0.1 0.45 0.55 Vanguard UK Government Bond 0.15 0.25 0.40

Note: Dealing costs are zero. The above table shows a representative sample of the full HL range.

What’s the difference?

You’d pay 34% more overall for the privilege of holding a portfolio of Hargreaves Lansdown’s “super low cost” trackers in comparison to their equivalents at Charles Stanley, using the following assumptions:

  • The portfolio equally weights the seven fund categories above (excluding the International fund which wouldn’t be needed).
  • Costs are calculated on a portfolio that’s smaller than £250,000. Both Hargreaves Lansdown and Charles Stanley offer reduced rate tiers beyond this figure.

The weighted total cost of the portfolios is 0.59% at Hargreaves Lansdown and 0.44% at Charles Stanley.

On a £10,000 portfolio that’s no big deal: you’d pay £59 to Hargreaves and £44 to Stanley. I wouldn’t rush for the door for the sake of £15, especially when may have to pay exit fees.

But as you go up the scale, the gulf widens. On a £50,000 portfolio you’d pay:

  • £295 p.a. to Hargreaves Lansdown
  • £220 p.a. to Charles Stanley
  • £99 p.a. to a fixed rate broker like Interactive Investor or iWeb (assuming you can keep your dealing costs within the £80 threshold, which is eminently doable for a passive investor).

Imagine your £50,000 portfolio made a return of 3% that year or £1,500. Hargreaves’ charges would snaffle 20% of that return. Charles Stanley would chomp 15% while Interactive Investor would take less than 7%.

That’s a big difference and it exemplifies why inertia and headline claims of “super low cost” deals are the investor’s enemy if left unchallenged.

Of course if we saw, say, a 20% year, then the percentage of returns eaten up by all these charges would be a lot lower. But you can count on returns closer to the 3% end of the spectrum than the 20% end over the long term.

Hi Fidelity

Fidelity is the other big player who is sounding the horn for its exclusive low cost trackers. Again, the manager’s special is a dish best served to someone else:

Fidelity exclusive funds OCF (%) Platform fee (%) Total (%) Charles Stanley
regular index funds
OCF (%) Platform fee (%) Total (%)
Fidelity Index UK 0.09 0.35 0.44 Royal London UK All Share Tracker Z 0.14 0.25 0.39
Fidelity Index US 0.09 0.35 0.44 BlackRock US Equity Tracker D 0.17 0.25 0.42
Fidelity Index Europe Ex UK 0.16 0.35 0.51 BlackRock Continental Euro Equity Tracker D 0.18 0.25 0.43
Fidelitity Index Japan
0.15 0.35 0.50 BlackRock Japan Equity Tracker D 0.18 0.25 0.43
Fidelity Index Pacific Ex Japan 0.2 0.35 0.55 BlackRock Pacific ex Japan Equity Tracker D 0.21 0.25 0.46
Emerging Markets3 0.27 0.35 0.62 BlackRock Emerging Markets Equity Tracker D 0.29 0.25 0.54
Fidelity Index World 0.18 0.35 0.53 Fidelity Index World Fund I 0.15 0.25 0.40

Note: Dealing costs are zero.

As with Hargreaves Lansdown, Fidelity is second class in every category. It even takes a beating from the institutional version of its own World index fund that’s available from Charles Stanley.

The weighted total cost of both portfolios is 0.51% vs 0.45%.4 In other words, you’ll pay 13% more for Fidelity’s exclusives.

That’s only £6 difference on a £10,000 portfolio but as your wealth heads north of £16,000 then you’re increasingly better off with a fixed fee broker.

Cleaning up

Don’t think you’re getting anything special with exclusives funds – sometimes described as Super Clean by an industry that believes you can shift anything as long as you market it correctly.

Super Clean funds are just low-price share classes of regular funds. In other words, they are exactly the same thing except for the discount.

If the discounted fund’s Ongoing Charge Figure (OCF) plus the platform fee amounts to more than you’d pay for much the same thing elsewhere then who wins? Not the investor that’s for sure.

(Ignore any references to Annual Management Charges (AMC) or any other fund fee formulation that isn’t labelled the OCF or Total Expense Ratio (TER) or “total cost of investing”. AMCs are just another little trick designed to wrong-foot unwary investors and to underplay the true costs of a fund).

What’s more, an ‘exclusive’ fund that’s not stocked by other platforms may cause problems if you decide to switch later on.

You may have to sell your exclusive into cash to facilitate the transfer and buy into a new fund that is more commonly available. That’s time out of the market that could cost you more money and may put you off a switch that would otherwise work in your favour.

So don’t be lured in by special offers designed to make you feel better about paying more for the same thing.

Big brands will always try to leverage their cachet but as savvy DIY investors we should seek out their hungrier, more competitive rivals who are prepared to do us the best deal.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. Full name is BlackRock Emerging Markets Equity Tracker H []
  2. Full name is BlackRock Emerging Markets Equity Tracker D []
  3. Full name is Fidelity Index Emerging Markets []
  4. The assumed portfolio consists of equal weightings of the six equity funds in the table once the World fund has been excluded. This is being generous to Fidelity as the portfolio doesn’t include a gilt fund, a common category where it does not offer a discount. []
{ 54 comments }
Weekend reading

Good reads from around the Web.

I don’t have a fixed routine for the weekend, besides writing this post of course. But where possible I like to watch videos of Nobel prize winners musing about the markets.

And here’s – eventually, after adverts that sound like a parody – Yale economics professor Robert Shiller, interviewed by US broadcaster Consuelo Mack:

I wish Shiller was my grandfather and that I went to his house for dinner on Sundays. Somebody out there is one lucky grandson!

[continue reading…]

{ 9 comments }
Warren Buffett is buying index funds

The world’s greatest investor, Warren Buffett, has often shared his thoughts on investing in index funds over the years.

And – perhaps surprisingly – he’s a mad fan of index tracker funds.

I say surprisingly, because Buffett has one of the best long-term records of any active manager ever.

Buffett’s superlative record of very nearly 20% annual returns a year since the 1960s has been achieved even as the money he manages has grown from its spare bedroom hedge fund beginnings into the vast $280 billion Berkshire Hathaway vehicle he runs today.

So if anyone deserves to strut about saying index investing is for idiots and active management is the way to go, it’s Buffett.

But he says the complete opposite.

Buffett says buy the whole buffet

In his 2014 letter to his shareholders, Warren Buffett has come out more explicitly than ever as index investing’s richest champion.

Buffett writes:

In aggregate, American business has done wonderfully over time and will continue to do so (though, most assuredly, in unpredictable fits and starts).

In the 20th century, the Dow Jones industrial index advanced from 66 to 11,497, paying a rising stream of dividends to boot. The 21st century will witness further gains, almost certain to be substantial.

The goal of the nonprofessional should not be to pick winners — neither he nor his “helpers” can do that — but should rather be to own a cross section of businesses that in aggregate are bound to do well.

A low-cost S&P 500 index fund will achieve this goal.

Buffett even reveals that the cash he is leaving his wife in his will1 is to be invested in bonds and a Vanguard index fund:

My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10% of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund. […]

I believe the trust’s long-term results from this policy will be superior to those attained by most investors — whether pension funds, institutions, or individuals — who employ high-fee managers.

Still think a very simple asset allocation is beneath you?

Admittedly Buffett has gone one step further in his will than I’d suggest is appropriate for most of us. He will invest all of his wife’s money in the US, and so eschew the benefits of investing overseas.

But remember that this will be a legacy for his wife, who is already in her late 60s. By investing for her entirely in America, Buffett sidesteps any worries about currency risk, which can be more of an issue when you’ve fewer years for your investing to play out.

And after several decades of urging his fellow countrymen to Buy America, it’s no surprise Buffett thinks it will do fine for a couple more decades after he’s gone.

Know nothing. Invest wisely. Retire richer.

As well as making the case for index funds, Buffett’s new letter stresses that your behaviour as an investor is just as important as how you invest.

To illustrate, he revives the late Barton Biggs’ quip about bull markets:

 “A bull market is like sex. It feels best just before it ends.”

Buffett says the main danger is that the timid or beginning investor will enter the market at a time of extreme exuberance and give up when he loses money. (The unfortunate opposite of buying more heavily in bear markets).

He argues:

The antidote to that kind of mistiming is for an investor to accumulate shares over a long period and never sell when the news is bad and stocks are well off their highs.

Following those rules, the “know-nothing” investor who both diversifies and keeps his costs minimal is virtually certain to get satisfactory results.

Indeed, the unsophisticated investor who is realistic about his shortcomings is likely to obtain better long-term results than the knowledgeable professional who is blind to even a single weakness.

To back up his case that a “know-nothing” investor can do fine with buy and hold, Buffett cites a farm he acquired in the 1980s, and also an investment he made in a New York apartment block in the early ’90s.

Buffett is no farmer, and having lived in the same house since the 1950s he’s clearly not obsessed with property, either.

Yet his farm has gone up five-fold since he bought – despite him only visiting it once – and his apartment block has paid out 150% of what he put in over the years as it’s been refinanced at lower interest rates, whilst annual dividends now exceed 35% of the initial investment!

He’s yet to visit the apartment.

My two purchases were made in 1986 and 1993. What the economy, interest rates, or the stock market might do in the years immediately following — 1987 and 1994 — was of no importance to me in determining the success of those investments.

I can’t remember what the headlines or pundits were saying at the time.

Whatever the chatter, corn would keep growing in Nebraska and tenants would flock to New York.

So Buffett bought and held.

Buy index funds

Of course, you might say Buffett’s promotion of index funds is just the ultimate in grandstanding for his own abilities as an active investor.

After all, he isn’t selling Berkshire’s assets to pump hundreds of billions into an S&P tracker fund. And he’s not suggested his shareholders swap their Berkshire stock for Vanguard index funds, either.

“Invest with me or give up!” would be a cynical summary of Buffett’s message.

Too cynical, I think. The fact is Buffett has long given great tips to anyone wondering how to invest their money, and he knows as well as anybody that the vast majority who choose to use active mangers will be disappointed.

He’s even in the middle of (almost certainly) winning a $1 million bet with a hedge fund manager, wagering index funds will beat the latter’s chosen hedge funds over ten years.

To conclude, I’ll paraphrase his famous rallying cry when the stock market crashed in 2008 and despair reigned:

Buy index funds. Buffett is.

  1. Buffett has to donate cash to provide such specific bequests, because most of his wealth is in Berkshire stock that is pledged mainly to Bill Gates’ charity. []
{ 21 comments }