≡ Menu

The Slow and Steady passive portfolio update: Q1 2018

The Slow and Steady passive portfolio update: Q1 2018 post image

Well, well, our Slow & Steady portfolio has taken a little knock back – our first in nearly a year, and our second in nearly three.

It’s worth going back to those earlier posts in the series. They help put things in perspective. This is normal sailing weather.

The market decline of the last three months has knocked just north of 3% from our portfolio. Hardly the stuff of broken dreams, especially if you haven’t been living it every day. To be honest I haven’t looked at the portfolio’s returns since last quarter’s check-in, so I’m pleasantly surprised. The snatches I’ve overheard on the news prompted visions of worse.

Some friends who know that I invest talk to me like knowing how many points the FTSE fell in the last 24-hours is useful information. I think it’s as relevant as yesterday’s weather in Helsinki.

The market has a 50-50 chance of being down on any single day, so I’d rather skip that dose of disappointment and stick to more convivial time frames. Hell, there’s a one-in-three chance the market will kick sand in your face in any given year!

Given these odds, I’d be happy to check back in five years if I didn’t have to show you what a looming trade war looks like in Metric-Centric Compello-vision™:

Our portfolio is up 9.48% annualised

The Slow and Steady portfolio is Monevator’s model passive investing portfolio. It was set up at the start of 2011 with £3,000 and an extra £935 is invested every quarter into a diversified set of index funds, tilted towards equities. You can read the origin story and catch up on all the previous passive portfolio posts.

Our annualised return is still a very healthy 9.48% over seven years now. Sure it was 10.92% last time I reported and I liked that better. But if you’d offered me 9.48% seven years ago, I’d have bitten your hand off – and then reported for psychiatric treatment.

As it is, the prices we’re paying now look remarkably like the prices we paid at the end of September. We’ve only taken a few steps back.

A few other things catch the eye, apart from the Brexit Britain slow-bleed of UK equities. Conventional UK bonds (not the inflation-linked ones) were a bright spot – okay, not a bald spot – and so we caught a few crumbs from diversification’s free lunch. That is until global property forced us to choke them up again.

Property was a top performer in the portfolio a couple of years ago but it’s been our only losing asset over the last 12-months – down 8.03%. Over five years property is still up 5.84% annualised. I read a few years ago that property was a heavily overvalued asset class that wouldn’t fair well in a rising interest rate environment. So be it, I’m happy to take the pain in 7% of the portfolio, knowing that fortune will swing back, eventually.

Hey, and we know diversification is working when something is causing us pain, right?

The secret diary of T. Accumulator, aged 7 and 1/4

One thing that stands out as I look back through seven years of Slow & Steady portfolio reports is that it’s become the investment diary I would never have written on my own account.

Tracking the perihelion journeys of the asset classes is instructive. They wax, they wane. Emerging markets glow hot, then fizzle out, then catch light again. The US bubbles and boils. How long before we’re burned?

Everything we’re seeing is predicted by the physics of portfolios, although the Slow & Steady has yet to fully fall to Earth.

New transactions

Every quarter we shove another £935 into the cavernous cake hole of the capital markets. Our cash is divided between our seven funds according to our pre-determined asset allocation.

We use Larry Swedroe’s 5/25 rule to trigger rebalancing moves, but all’s quiet this quarter. We’re just topping up with new money as follows:

UK equity

Vanguard FTSE UK All-Share Index Trust – OCF 0.08%

Fund identifier: GB00B3X7QG63

New purchase: £56.10

Buy 0.294 units @ £190.61

Target allocation: 6%

Developed world ex-UK equities

Vanguard FTSE Developed World ex-UK Equity Index Fund – OCF 0.15%

Fund identifier: GB00B59G4Q73

New purchase: £336.60

Buy 1.071 units @ £314.33

Target allocation: 36%

Global small cap equities

Vanguard Global Small-Cap Index Fund – OCF 0.38%

Fund identifier: IE00B3X1NT05

New purchase: £65.45

Buy 0.243 units @ £269.92

Target allocation: 7%

Emerging market equities

iShares Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund D – OCF 0.25%

Fund identifier: GB00B84DY642

New purchase: £93.50

Buy 59.215 units @ £1.58

Target allocation: 10%

Global property

iShares Global Property Securities Equity Index Fund D – OCF 0.22%

Fund identifier: GB00B5BFJG71

New purchase: £65.45

Buy 36.16 units @ £1.81

Target allocation: 7%

UK gilts

Vanguard UK Government Bond Index – OCF 0.15%

Fund identifier: IE00B1S75374

New purchase: £261.80

Buy 1.602 units @ £163.47

Target allocation: 28%

UK index-linked gilts

Vanguard UK Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund – OCF 0.15%

Fund identifier: GB00B45Q9038

New purchase: £56.10

Buy 0.299 units @ £187.60

Target allocation: 6%

New investment = £935

Trading cost = £0

Platform fee = 0.25% per annum.

This model portfolio is notionally held with Charles Stanley Direct. You can use that company’s monthly investment option to invest from £50 per fund. Just cancel the option after you’ve traded if you don’t want to make the same investment next month.

Take a look at our online broker table or tool for other good platform options. Look at flat fee brokers if your ISA portfolio is worth substantially more than £25,000. The Slow & Steady portfolio is now worth over £38,000 but the fee saving isn’t juicy enough for us to push the button on the move yet.

Average portfolio OCF = 0.17%

If all this seems too much like hard work then you can buy a diversified portfolio using an all-in-one fund such as Vanguard’s LifeStrategy series.

Take it steady,
The Accumulator

{ 43 comments }

Weekend reading: Easter express edition

Weekend reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

This will be a busy Easter, so I’m getting Weekend Reading out of the way early. And when I say ‘busy’ I mostly mean ‘busy shopping’. I’ll be very glad when my new flat is done. I’m ready to begin laying down the avocado bathroom suite equivalent of the future.

Slightly fewer links than usual, so if you do spot something good I’ve missed, please add it in the comments below. 🙂

Happy Easter!

[continue reading…]

{ 17 comments }

Weekend reading: You are not average

Weekend reading: You are not average post image

What caught my eye this week.

You really ought to read You Are Not A Monte Carlo Simulation, an excellent post over at the Flirting With Models blog.

The article tackles a subject a lot of us struggle with – the mathematics behind the distribution of returns that mean the same investment can have a positive expected growth rate and yet wipe out most people who put money into it.

Sounds complicated, right? Fear not, the article makes it all pretty simple. (Not least thanks to some super crisp graphs that made me nostalgic for my Investing for Beginners series.)

As the author, Corey Hoffstein, notes:

Under the context of multi-period compounding results, “risk aversion” is not so foolish.

If we have our arm mauled off by a lion on the African veldt, we cannot simply “average” our experience with others in the tribe and end up with 97% of an arm.

We cannot “average” our experience across the infinite universes of other potential outcomes where we were not necessarily mauled. Rather, our state is permanently altered for life.

Don’t get mauled by a misunderstanding!

[continue reading…]

{ 26 comments }

Weekend reading: Where are all the billionaires?

Weekend reading: Where are all the billionaires? post image

What caught my eye this week.

How many more billionaires would there be if the millionaires of yesteryear had embraced passive investing1 and saved themselves a bundle?

That’s the provocative opener in this short video from Robin Powell, the man behind The Evidence-based Investor blog.

Robin’s subject – Victor Haghani of fund manager Elm Partners – makes plenty of sensible points about keeping costs low and investment aims simple. The video is a nice five-minute introduction to the case for passive investing.

However the class warrior in me is rather glad that the super-rich continue to pour billions into expensive hedge funds.

If we’re to ease wealth inequality, we certainly don’t want the 1% to care as much as us about getting their fees under 1%!

[continue reading…]

  1. Of course they couldn’t, over the time period discussed in the video featured here. Which isn’t just pedantry – it’s very possible that making investing easier and cheaper has reduced the expected returns for equities and other assets going forward. []
{ 33 comments }