≡ Menu

Investment trust discounts and premiums

Investment trusts can trade at a large gap to their actual value

Many investors are unnerved by investment trust discounts and premiums. But the concepts are quite simple and – assuming you’re not a pure passive investor1 – they shouldn’t put you off these interesting shares.

That said, not understanding the difference between discounts and premiums can cost you money. It’s all too easy to be confused, as some recent comments on Monevator revealed.

My previous articles on investment trusts should give anyone who needs it a primer on the basics.

Today I’ll focus on discounts and premiums.

What does your investment trust own?

We all (now!) know that an investment trust is a company that purchases assets to hold or trade.

Such assets could include equities, property, bonds, or even exotic fare like farmland or art, depending on the trust’s objectives.

When we buy shares in a particular investment trust, we become part-owners in the trust and so effectively have part-ownership of those underlying assets.

Our slice of the pie is in proportion to the percentage of the shares outstanding that we own. Most of us will only ever own a few thousand shares in an investment trust. But it’s the same principle, whether you hold 0.001% or 10% of the trust’s outstanding shares.

For example, equity income investment trusts own shares in large blue chip companies that pay good dividend yields.

As a shareholder in such a trust, you’ll typically be paid your proportion of the dividend income generated by those blue chip equities, minus costs and any income retained for the trust’s reserves.

Equity income trusts appeal to investors who want a diversified income. But as a shareholder, you’ll also benefit (or suffer!) from the rise and fall in the value of the portfolio of shares your trust owns.

Alternatively, you might buy an investment trust that owns property or miners or bonds, or pretty much anything else you can think of.

You might even buy an investment trust because you believe (rightly or wrongly) that the manager is an especially skilled one.

He or she may be buying the same sort of shares you could buy yourself – or that you could buy via a tracker fund – but you may believe the trust’s manager is more skillful at picking winners, and so you hope they will beat the market.

Net assets

In any case, the trust will own a lot of stuff, which are called its assets.

The trust may also have debt (also known as gearing), which would need to be repaid out of assets if the trust were ever to be wound up, before its owners could divide up whatever was left.


Net asset value (NAV) = Total assets minus debt

How to calculate the net asset value per share

While they amount to the same thing, it’s easier to think about what portion of the trust’s net assets each individual share is theoretically entitled to, rather to work off the whole trust’s market value.

Let’s consider an example.

Imagine the world’s simplest investment trust, Monevator Investments PLC.

This recklessly mismanaged operation owns shares in just two companies, Diageo and Glaxosmithkline. (Hey, it’s good to hedge your bets!)

Let’s say shares in Diageo are trading at £10 and Glaxosmithkline £12, and that the trust owns 100,000 shares of Diageo, and 50,000 shares of Glaxo.

The Diageo holding is worth £10 x 100,000 = £1 million

The Glaxo holding is worth £12 x 50,000 = £600,000

The Monevator trust has zero debts.

Therefore, the net assets of Monevator Investments is £1.6 million.

Now, let’s say this trust has 1 million shares in issue.

Net assets per share = £1.6 million / 1 million = 160p per share.

Each share is effectively a claim on 160p worth of assets owned by Monevator Investments.

So far so simple!

Investment trust share price versus NAV

Any share is worth whatever someone will pay for it. There’s no right or wrong value for any particular share that you can calculate with a formula.

This is why share prices are so volatile – the market is constantly trying to work out what’s the correct value of every company.

With a big drug maker like Glaxo, calculating its ‘right’ value is likely impossible. There are so many brands, new ventures, potential disasters and expired patients patents that can impact its profits from quarter-to-quarter. Changing sentiment about the company also continually alters the multiple (the P/E ratio) that investors are prepared to pay for a claim on those profits.

However with an investment trust like Monevator Investments, it should be easy to work out its value. You just look at its assets and debts, calculate the NAV like we’ve done above, and hey presto – you’ve got its value.

And that’s true2. Indeed you don’t even have to calculate the NAV per share if you don’t want to. Websites like the Association of Investment Companies collates those stats for you.

However, price is what you pay, value is what you get – and the two aren’t always in sync.

Discounts, premiums, and NAVs

In fact, it is often the case that the share price of an investment trust is less than its NAV per share.

For instance, Monevator Investments may be trading for £1.20 a share, despite anyone with a calculator (or the link above) being able to see that the NAV per share is £1.60.

So in this case, a buyer is getting £1.60 of underlying assets for just £1.20.

Bargain! The share is trading at a discount to NAV:

The discount is (£1.60-£1.20)/£1.60 = 25%

Less often you’ll find a trust with a share price greater than its NAV. (This is the case as I type with Terry Smith’s new Emerging Market Trust).

Let’s say Monevator Investments is trading at £1.80, but its net assets are still £1.60 per share.

Then the premium is (£1.80-£1.60)/£1.60 = 12.5%

In this case you’re paying 12.5% above what the shares would be worth if everything was sold off tomorrow.

Probably not such a good deal!

Discounts can be great for income investors, since the money you spend on your shares buys you more of the trust’s underlying income generating assets. For example, suppose a trust trading at £1 per share – the same as its NAV of 100p – owns a portfolio of blue chips that generates a 3% yield. If the share price falls to 90p to create a 10% discount to an unchanged NAV, then new buyers will enjoy a higher 3.33% yield from the trust. (i.e. 100/90*3). The opposite is true with premiums – they reduce the yield.

A few final tips on discounts and premiums

Here’s a few things you may be wondering about – or that maybe you should be wondering about if you’re not:

  • Typically a negative number – e.g. -5% or (5%) – indicates the level of discount to NAV.
  • In contrast a positive percentage indicates a premium to NAV.
  • As listed companies, investment trusts release regular RNS press releases to the stock market, which you can find on various websites. I always check these for the latest NAV per share, and I do the discount/premium calculations for myself, just to double check the online data sources and factsheets.
  • Another reason to check is that different data suppliers often treat debt and accrued income differently in their calculations. And sometimes they’re just wrong!
  • Why do investment trusts trade at discounts? And why on Earth would anyone pay more for a trust than its assets are worth? Great questions, which I’ve previously attempted to answer.

Opportunity knocks

The whole discounts and premiums malarkey was often pinned by old-school Independent Financial Advisers as a reason they put their customers’ money into unit trusts rather than investment trusts.

Clients were too easily confused, they said. (“Honest guv, nothing to do with the commission that unit trusts kicked back, but investment trusts could not…“)

Yet confusion, panic, and mispricing can be your friend if you’re involved in the quixotic and ill-advised game of active investing.

To that end, I think investment trusts and their mercurial discounts offer a dedicated active investor an interesting halfway house between open-ended funds and ETFs, and the outright stockpicking of single company shares.

  1. Investment trusts are companies that invest in other companies, so in effect they are actively managed funds. Passive investors prefer the warm comfort of very low fees to the potential (but in practice all too rare) upside from active management, and therefore would choose trackers and ETFs over investment trusts. []
  2. Ignoring for now more complicated trusts that invest in unquoted assets []
{ 6 comments… add one }
  • 1 ermine July 31, 2014, 11:16 pm

    A lovely summary of the investment trusts. The premium/discount stuff seems to make ITs more attractive in points of market turmoil. I’ve only ever bought them when the heat was on. And I still have all of them.

    And indeed I still have reason to be grateful for Monevator striking a light in the dark days of the Spring 2009 when it looked like all would fall. And I came across this article. And took appropriate action – I didn’t have a HYP to sell but I wanted one. and ITs made that cheaper to have at the time, plus some instant diversification.

  • 2 dearieme July 31, 2014, 11:36 pm

    There’s a rough-and-ready calculation I find handy. Suppose Monevator Investments trades at a 10% discount and holds shares that themselves yield 3% p.a. Then the buyer gets approx a 3.33% p.a. yield. Except that you have to subtract charges. Say those are 0.5% p.a.: then he gets 2.83% p.a. yield. Compared with what the underlying shares yield, it’s as if he got the 3% p.a. with o.17% p.a. subtracted in charges. Which means that it’s almost as cheap as some ETFs or index-tracking mutuals.

    You then have to ask what MI does that justifies that charge. For some people the income-smoothing might justify at least part of that. Or the ability to gear.

    Mind you, I’d be happier if I understood how the tax works on these things.

  • 3 The Investor August 1, 2014, 7:23 am

    @dearieme — Good reminder about yield, it’s been so long since it’s been a factor for equity income trusts due to the mania for dividends for the past few years that it slipped my mind to include it! 🙂 Have added a note about the yield-enhancing attractions of a discount to the article.

    @ermine — Thanks very much, I know you’ve long been a fan of investment trusts. There’s usually an unpopular sector somewhere — for example emerging market trusts at the tail end of last year. Of course there’s no guarantee that buying on a discount will lead to profits. Sometimes the market may be correctly anticipating trouble ahead, or poor value-destroying management. As ever, there’s an element of judgement (/luck) involved.

  • 4 Neverland August 1, 2014, 9:09 am

    The other thing to bear in mind with investment trusts is how often the stated net asset value is updated

    With big trusts investing in liquid quoted stocks this will usually be daily

    But some big trusts like RIT only update their net asset values monthly

    Once you are getting into smaller trusts investing in smaller companies the net asset value is only going to get updated 4/5 times a year

    Then you need to look at how the assets are being valued, easy enough if they are publicly traded but not so easy its non-quoted equity and debt investments in companies

    Also you need to look at the debt that investment trusts are using….many trusts issued long term debts instruments many years ago so they are now paying near double digit interest rates on their debt which will drag down their returns

    Investment trusts can be very complex and unless they trade at significant discounts (20%+ was not uncommon in the past) I’m not sure that the complexity is worth it in a world where low cost etfs are available

  • 5 dearieme August 2, 2014, 3:18 pm

    This morning’s paper reports that an Invesco property trust seems to be bust, with the shareholders to expect nothing back. They seem to have geared with appalling timing.

  • 6 dawn September 27, 2014, 9:50 pm

    hi , is an AMC of 1% ish too expensive for an investment trust or would I be better sticking to a tracker fund?

    from what ive found JP Morgan European income IT [JETI] is on a discount of about -8% at present and im looking for exposure to Europe and was considering vanguard Europe ex uk tracker fund. but then I found this IT.
    any thoughts ?

Leave a Comment