≡ Menu

Bond death match: can index-linked bonds replace nominal bonds in your portfolio?

Is it okay to give nominal bonds the boot? Can they just be replaced wholesale by index-linked bonds, thus solving the glaring weakness of the 60/40 portfolio at a stroke?

What’s the glaring weakness again?”

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • 1 Brod June 10, 2026, 1:19 pm

    @TA – excellent! Thank you.

    For me though, retired at 60, linkers are guaranteed inflation-hedged cashflow. I’ve completed(?) my 7 year linker ladder that will take me from 67-73. I don’t count it as part of my portfolio at all but as term-limited guaranteed income. It is making me re-think my projected allocation to cash (or rather RL MM fund). Maybe a build out a small allocation to TR73 to capture the volatility? With interest rate rises predicted soon, now probably not the time though.

    Apparently 72 is my expected healthspan, and I can see my horizons gently reducing after that, so the SP and small DB will be sufficient for necessities and SIPP/ISAs for anything above that.

    Really looking forward to your article on a re-do of the defensive portion of the 60/40. Spicier assets – Nvidia? Options and currency trading? Shorting? Go big or go home! The mind boggles! 🙂