Bond death match: can index-linked bonds replace nominal bonds in your portfolio?
For MAVENS and MOGULS by The Accumulator
on June 10, 2026
Is it okay to give nominal bonds the boot? Can they just be replaced wholesale by index-linked bonds, thus solving the glaring weakness of the 60/40 portfolio at a stroke?
“What’s the glaring weakness again?”
This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
Comments on this entry are closed.
@TA – excellent! Thank you.
For me though, retired at 60, linkers are guaranteed inflation-hedged cashflow. I’ve completed(?) my 7 year linker ladder that will take me from 67-73. I don’t count it as part of my portfolio at all but as term-limited guaranteed income. It is making me re-think my projected allocation to cash (or rather RL MM fund). Maybe a build out a small allocation to TR73 to capture the volatility? With interest rate rises predicted soon, now probably not the time though.
Apparently 72 is my expected healthspan, and I can see my horizons gently reducing after that, so the SP and small DB will be sufficient for necessities and SIPP/ISAs for anything above that.
Really looking forward to your article on a re-do of the defensive portion of the 60/40. Spicier assets – Nvidia? Options and currency trading? Shorting? Go big or go home! The mind boggles! 🙂