≡ Menu

Our updated guide to help you find the best online broker

Attention UK investors! Remember our massive broker comparison table? Well, we’ve rolled up our sleeves and updated it again to help you find the best online broker for you.

Picking up autumn leaves with chopsticks would have been less tedious. But it would not have produced a quick and easy overview of all the main execution-only investment services.

Investment platforms, stock brokers, call ’em what you will… we’ve stripped ’em down to their undies for you to eyeball over a cup of tea and your favourite tranquillisers.

Online brokers laid bare in our comparison table

What’s changed with this update?

Neobank Revolut is in. Check out our review.

iWeb transforms into Scottish Widows Share Dealing on 18 October and has cut its regular investing fee to zero. There’s no platform fee either so it’s excellent value if you don’t need to trade at the drop of a hat.

Freetrade has also slashed its ISA charge to zero, so is well worth a look too.

Who’s the best broker?

It’s impossible to say. There are too many subtle differences in the offers. The UK’s brokers occupy more niches than the mammal family. And while I know which one is best for me, I can’t know which one is right for you.

What we have done is laser focus the comparison onto the most important factor in play: cost.

An execution-only broker is not on this Earth to hold anyone’s hand.

Yes, we want their websites to work. We’d prefer them to not screw us over, go bust, or send us to the seventh circle of call centre hell. These things we take for granted.

So customer service metrics are not included in this table. It’s purely a bare-knuckle contest of brute cost for services rendered.

On that basis we’ve updated our ‘Good for’ column as below.

Disclosure: Links to platforms may be affiliate links, where we may earn a commission. This article is not personal financial advice. When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. With commission-free brokers other fees may apply. See terms and fees. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.

Beginners

These are commission-free brokers. It’s always worth looking at a commission-free broker’s ‘How we make money’ page because – rest assured – they will be earning a buck, one way or another.

Just search that topic on their websites.

If commission-free brokers make you feel queasy then stay under the FSCS £85,000 investor compensation limit or use a broker that charges fees directly. You’ll find some very competitive offers in our table.

Beginners who prefer direct fees

  • Scottish Widows for ETFs and funds. (Alternatively: Trinity Bridge, Fidelity, plus Lloyds for SIPPs)

Established investors with portfolios worth £85,000+ who prefer to pay direct fees

The best choice for you depends on how often you trade, the value of your accounts, plus your personal priorities around customer service, family accounts, flexible ISAs, multi-currency accounts and so on.

Our ‘Good for’ choices are purely cost-based. We assume 12 buy and four sell trades per year. Buy trades use a broker’s regular investing scheme when available.

Using the full table

We divide the major UK brokers into four camps:

  • Flat-fee brokers – these charge one price for platform services, regardless of the size of your assets. In other words, they might charge you £100 per year, whether your portfolio is worth £1,000 or £1 million. Generally, if you’ve got a large portfolio then you definitely want to look here. Bear in mind that fixed fee doesn’t mean you won’t also be tapped up for dealing monies and a laundry list of other charges.
  • Percentage-fee brokers – this is where the wealthy need to be careful. These guys charge a percentage of your assets, say 0.3% per year. For a portfolio of £1,000 this would amount to a fee of £3 – but on £1 million you’d be paying £3,000. Small investors should generally use percentage-fee brokers. However even surprisingly moderate rollers are better off with fixed fees. Many percentage-fee brokers offer fee caps and tiered charges to limit the damage.
  • Commission-free brokers – these fresh upstarts apparently don’t charge you at all. Their marketing departments have it easy, simply pointing to £0 account charges and trading fees costing diddly squat. So why don’t these firms go bankrupt? Because they make up the difference using other methods. Revenue streams can include higher spreads, no interest on cash, and cross-selling more profitable services.
  • Trading platforms – brokerages that suit active investors who want to deal mostly in shares and more exotic securities besides. Think of noob-unfriendly sites like Interactive Brokers, Degiro, and friends.

Our table looks complex. But choosing the right broker needn’t be any more painful than checking it offers the investments you want and running a few numbers on your portfolio.

Help us find the best online broker for all of you

Our table’s ongoing vitality relies on crowd-sourcing.

We review the whole thing roughly every three months. But it can be kept permanently up-to-date if you contact us or leave a comment every time you find an inaccuracy, fresh information, or a platform you think should be added.

Thanks to your efforts as much as ours, our broker comparison table has become an invaluable resource for UK investors looking to find the best online broker.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

{ 381 comments }

Weekend Reading: Smarter spam

Weekend Reading logo

What caught my eye this week.

Working at the end of the age of publishing words has given me a lead on the post-LLM era.

I saw early on how ChatGPT had mined the web for everything ever written – well-enough to spit out answers about anything. And as a writer I had more incentive than most to panic.

It was also clear that Google search would be in trouble – and with it the pipes that had kept independent publishing alive on the web for decades.

My worries soon came to pass. People increasingly now get their knowledge direct from chatbots – whether Google or others. Those who wrote the articles the bots were trained on are withering on the vine.

Another thing I’ve wondered about is when AI spam will overwhelm the Monevator comments. Already on platforms like X, swathes of comments are written by robots.

We have protections in place. But I don’t know how long they will be practical when facing spam like this:

Such spam started appearing in the past month or so. It addresses me or my co-blogger accurately. It references the article.

Only the booby-trap at the end confirms its ill-intentions.

Check mate

You may say there’s something sloppy about this text. (Not to mention that it reads like @TA’s mum had a hand in it…)

Agreed, but remember you’re only have to sanity check one comment here.

I have to parse several hundred spam comments every day as a double-check. Both on spam that gets through our filters or is held for moderation, and also real comments that are incorrectly marked as spam. This is after software has already flagged the obvious offenders.

It’s burdensome, and the reason why I had to close comments on posts over three years old. To keep it vaguely manageable.

Spam comments like the one above stand out because they are still rare. But I imagine they will soon be the norm. (Well, presuming the economics of spamming still works if spammers are somehow paying for AI compute?)

I also expect bots to get clever enough to hide their intentions by posing as real readers, before finally inserting their spam links once they’re trusted.

Incidentally, we can see that’s a spammy link in my example. But if a reader posts a URL to data elsewhere about interest rates, say, it’s not so easy for software.

That’s why comments with links are already often held in moderation, especially from new commenters.

King sacrifice

Long story short: one day only logged-in Monevator members may be able to post comments. (I’m presuming the spammers won’t pay for the privilege!)

I’d be happy for commenting to be another perk for those who kindly support our efforts. It would make general moderation far easier, too.

Really, everyone who comments regularly on Monevator should already become a member. It costs much less than a High Street coffee a month. Even cheaper with annual membership!

With member-only commenting I know we’d lose some good comments, sadly. Although on the flip-side I suspect most discussions would be even more civil than we’re lucky enough to enjoy today.

The real downside would be fencing out non-regulars who bring one-off insights to a discussion. For example, a professional bond trader who arrives here via Google and educates us with a comment on an article about long-dated gilts.

That sort of thing is very valuable. I’m loathe to lose it. So for now the battle against spam continues!

Have a great weekend.

[continue reading…]

{ 49 comments }

Checking in on private companies and crowdfunded investments [Members]

Our Monevator Moguls logo

Forget 2022 – everything is awesome again! Sure, US politics may be a dumpster fire toasty enough to have Edward Gibbon warming up a new introduction to The Decline and Fall from beyond the grave. But you can’t argue with markets hitting all-time highs.

Or can you?

This article can be read by selected Monevator members. Please see our membership plans and consider joining! Already a member? Sign in here.
{ 10 comments }

The Slow and Steady passive portfolio update: Q3 2025

The Slow and Steady passive portfolio update: Q3 2025 post image

Well now, we’ve had quite a run since the shock of Trump’s tariffs scattered our forces back in April.

Monevator’s Slow & Steady passive portfolio has rebounded almost 13% since the aftermath of Liberal With The Truth Liberation Day. I hope yours has done at least as well.

Overall, the portfolio has grown 6% so far in 2025. Which feels odd given the 24/7 bombardment of pessimism that’s churning up my online world. It’s getting to the point where I’m turning to real life for an escape.

Anyway, here are the latest numbers fresh from the manna-sphere:

The Slow & Steady is Monevator’s model passive investing portfolio. It was set up at the start of 2011 with £3,000. An extra £1,310 is invested every quarter into a diversified set of index funds, tilted towards equities. You can read the origin story and find all the previous passive portfolio posts in the Monevator vaults. Last quarter’s instalment can be found here. Subtract about 3% from the portfolio’s annualised performance figure to estimate the real return after inflation.

Ignoring the third-quarter’s thrivers and divers for a moment, the thing that catches my eye is the portfolio has broken through six figures in total value. We’re clocking in at £100,713 on the table above.

That’s quite something for a portfolio launched in 2011 with £3,000. It’s been run passively ever since on an inflation-adjusted £250 per month in cash contributions.1

(Just to stress again, this is a model portfolio. The attached monetary values are entirely notional. But I used the same kind of passive investing strategy to grow my own wealth if you’re concerned about skin in the game.)

Growing modest savings into such a sum seemed unimaginable to a younger me. I had zero interest in the stock market and couldn’t stop splurging away everything I earned.

I thought investing was the preserve of the rich and highly informed financial experts. Ha!

Think again

But as millions of investors have already discovered – and our model portfolio is just the latest to demonstrate – it’s entirely possible to achieve good results by sticking to a passive plan:

The dark green line shows the portfolio’s return in nominal terms. The more important lower (lighter) inflation-adjusted line represents the Monevator model portfolio’s real annualised return of 4%.

We’re bang on the historical average for a 60/40 portfolio. Granted, that’s not spectacular – but this portfolio isn’t called Slow and Steady for nothing.

Of course, my inner critic is scornful. He casts brickbats like:

“You fool! What if you’d invested less in bonds?”

And:

“Why didn’t you foresee the AI revolution and invest 100% in Nvidia in 1999?”

But I look again at the chart above and I’m reminded of Charley Ellis’ brilliant description of investing as a loser’s game. By which he meant you win primarily by avoiding egregious mistakes.

In other words, you come through by playing the percentages and limiting your unforced errors. As opposed to trying to smash it with spectacular winners.

Ellis’ metaphorical inspiration was amateur tennis. If you’d seen me play tennis you’d understand why I’m happy with average.

New transactions

Every quarter we lob £1,310 over the investing net, hoping the rally keeps going. The cash is split between our seven funds, according to our predetermined asset allocation.

We rebalance using Larry Swedroe’s 5/25 rule. That hasn’t been activated this quarter, so the trades play out as follows:

Emerging market equities

iShares Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund D – OCF 0.2%

Fund identifier: GB00B84DY642

New purchase: £104.80

Buy 44.19 units @ £2.37

Target allocation: 8%

Global property

iShares Environment & Low Carbon Tilt Real Estate Index Fund – OCF 0.17%

Fund identifier: GB00B5BFJG71

New purchase: £65.50

Buy 27.68 units @ £2.37

Target allocation: 5%

Developed world ex-UK equities

Vanguard FTSE Developed World ex-UK Equity Index Fund – OCF 0.14%

Fund identifier: GB00B59G4Q73

New purchase: £484.70

Buy 0.625 units @ £775.82

Target allocation: 37%

UK equity

Vanguard FTSE UK All-Share Index Trust – OCF 0.06%

Fund identifier: GB00B3X7QG63

New purchase: £65.50

Buy 0.204 units @ £320.79

Target allocation: 5%

Global small cap equities

Vanguard Global Small-Cap Index Fund – OCF 0.29%

Fund identifier: IE00B3X1NT05

New purchase: £65.50

Buy 0.135 units @ £484.60

Target allocation: 5%

UK gilts

Vanguard UK Government Bond Index – OCF 0.12%

Fund identifier: IE00B1S75374

New purchase: £301.30

Buy 2.275 units @ £132.43

Target allocation: 23%

Global inflation-linked bonds

Royal London Short Duration Global Index-Linked Fund – OCF 0.27%

Fund identifier: GB00BD050F05

New purchase: £222.70

Buy 203.193 units @ £1.096

Target allocation: 17%

New investment contribution = £1,310

Trading cost = £0

Average portfolio OCF = 0.17%

User manual

Disclosure: Links to platforms may be affiliate links, where we may earn a commission. This article is not personal financial advice. When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. With commission-free brokers other fees may apply. See terms and fees. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.

Take a look at our broker comparison table for your best investment account options.

InvestEngine is currently cheapest if you’re happy to invest only in ETFs. Or learn more about choosing the cheapest stocks and shares ISA for your situation.

If this seems too complicated, check out our best multi-asset fund picks. These include all-in-one diversified portfolios such as the Vanguard LifeStrategy funds.

Interested in monitoring your own portfolio or using the Slow & Steady spreadsheet for yourself? Our piece on portfolio tracking shows you how.

You might also enjoy a refresher on why we think most people are best choosing passive vs active investing.

Take it steady,

The Accumulator

  1. Today’s £1310 quarterly investment is the inflation-adjusted equivalent of £750 per quarter in 2011. []
{ 33 comments }