- Monevator - https://monevator.com -

Weekend reading: Shopping or investing?

Some great money reads from around the web.

I have written before on Monevator about my in-built thrifty disposition, and how it probably veers towards tightness [1].

For this reason I was thrilled to see The Accumulator explaining how he saves money [2] this week. It’s vitally useful information that I just can’t share from experience.

My problem is spending it!

I have a soft spot for occasional black cabs after midnight and good food. Otherwise, the only thing I find easy to buy are equities.

Perhaps I’m like Warren Buffett in that regard – he used to refuse his wife a new sofa on the grounds that it would cost $1 million, after taking compound interest into account. (Alas I don’t share his prodigious mental abilities, and I can’t quite match his track record. At least not yet…)

This week I was reminded why equities are worth splashing out on through a short Forbes article [3]. In it we learn that if you’d:

…skipped the purchase of a $5,700 Apple PowerBook G3 250 in 1997 and put the money into Apple stock, and your shares would now be worth $330,563.

Even relatively new customers can find reasons for regret. If you’d skipped the purchase of an Apple Xserve G5 in 2005 for $3,999 and bought Apple stock instead, your investment would now be worth $33,877.

The data is based on Kyle Conroy’s clever table [4] of Apple products versus stock gains. It’s been around for a while, but now that Apple is the second most valuable company in the world, the numbers are becoming crazy. As someone who only ever buys Apple-made computers, I can relate.

Obviously few investments will do as well as Apple. Index investors [5] don’t even try to catch the best ones, but instead sensibly settle for market returns. Either way, over time buying equities will make you richer, not poorer.

I’m getting a little better at spending money as I get older. One of the scant consolations of seeing a close family member becoming mentally disabled overnight [6] is it puts everything into perspective.

But I’m not throwing money at toys for boys, and I’m not convinced by the spend it on experiences [7] argument, either.

I’d have failed as a human being if the only thing that gave me pleasure was receiving my dividend cheques, as J.D. Rockefeller famously quipped.

But on a relative basis, I’m happy to save my buyer’s remorse for consumables, and my retail therapy for my stock broking account.

From the money blogs

Mainstream money and investing articles

Like getting this digest? Subscribe [33] and never miss it!