- Monevator - https://monevator.com -

Weekend reading: Drawdown dramas

Good reads from around the Web.

A post from UK blogger – and Monevator contributor – Retirement Investing Today took my recent article on sequence of return risk [1] a step further.

For his piece [2], RIT ran some numbers to see how a UK retiree accepting a P45 a year before the crash in 2008 would have fared with various simple stock/bond allocations.

Here’s the pain dealt out with a 4% withdrawal rate:

07-to-13-drawdown [3]

On the one hand, this is pretty sobering stuff. The heaviest 75% allocations to shares – represented by the green lines above – are down as much as 24%. That’s quite a drop in just six and a half years.

On the other hand, you could argue it’s reassuring how well the retiree’s position has held up, given the turmoil of 2008 and 2009.

Sure, it was a disastrous time for this hypothetical desk-dodger to go into retirement with his or her risk setting set to “Hell yeah!”

But thanks to the 25% bond allocation, it hasn’t yet been a total wipe-out. An income has been taken as planned, and there’s still some potential for shares to bounce back.

Of course many people who went gung-ho into OAP-hood with a 75% weighting towards stocks would take fright after a crash, and belatedly sell shares to buy bonds or an annuity. They’d therefore already have missed much of the rebound.

Far better to set your asset allocations prudently from day one.

A report from the retirement trenches

Another UK blogger, John Hulton, is already in income drawdown mode with his SIPP. He updated us this week [4] on his progress.

John retired last year, so he’s already off to a more fortunate start than those hapless share-heavy retirees of 2007, reporting:

Including income, the total return for the 12 months is over 20% which is obviously pleasing. The market generally has performed well over this period.

The technical term for this is “jammy”, when it comes to sequence of returns risk. Early gains are a boon once you’re in drawdown mode.

At the core of John’s SIPP strategy is a portfolio of income investment trusts [5] after my own heart.

Assuming I am rich and bold enough to have a healthy buffer zone when I eventually retire (and if not then something has gone very wrong!) then John’s approach is similar to what I’d do myself, with perhaps a few index funds in the mix, too.

By drawing income and leaving capital untouched, I believe you boost the chances of your retirement pot outlasting you – and I don’t care that Messrs Modigliai and Miller [6] won a Nobel Prize for saying otherwise

Live off your income but never touch your capital, if you’re rich enough.

It worked for the landed gentry for generations. I suspect it will work for us, too.

From the blogs

Making good use of the things that we find…

Passive investing

 Active investing

Other articles

Product of the week: Interested in buy-to-let? Mortgage deals are getting cheaper, reports This is Money [17], with The Mortgage Works [18] touting a rate of just 2.49%. (Beware the hefty 2.5% fee though).

Mainstream media money

Note: Some links are to Google search results – these enable you to click through to read the piece without you being a paid subscriber of the site.

Passive investing

Active investing

Other stuff worth reading

Book of the week: A lot of DIY stock pickers read share blogs and magazines, and occasionally even a company report, but they never read business books. Yet some of the great investors – Charlie Munger and David Gardner, for example – read nothing else. A good halfway house to start with is The Outsiders [33], the definitive book on CEOs who were also excellent capital allocators.

Like these links? Subscribe [34] to get them every week!