- Monevator - https://monevator.com -

Weekend reading: Are REITs right when saving for a deposit?

Some good reading from around the Web.

After this week’s post on historical house prices [1], reader Guy asked if it was sensible [2] to use a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) to save for a deposit on a first home.

The big problem with this strategy in the UK is there are no residential REITs!

Some companies have made noises about launching them here, but currently all our REITs invest in commercial property – and the prices of offices and warehouses don’t move in tandem with suburban semis and Rose Cottages.

There are residential REITS in the US, however, and coincidentally Mike at Oblivious Investor looked at this same question [3] from a US perspective this week.

Mike concluded that it’s better to save for your house in cash, warning:

A REIT fund will likely earn you greater returns than a savings account would. But when I say “likely” here, all I mean is “greater than 50% probability.” It’s not at all something you can count on. And it makes the worst-case scenario significantly worse (home prices increasing while the value of your savings is decreasing — something that can’t happen with a savings account).

Of course, you could always do what I did: Save in cash for years, get fed up with chasing London prices, invest your warchest in shares and bonds and so on, and become obsessed with investment.

That can work – I could buy a modest first London home now without a mortgage. But there are other downsides, such as boring people at dinner parties with your talk of total expense ratios [4] and DIY Guaranteed Equity Bonds [5].

Still, it makes a change from the usual house price chat!

Investment and money blogs

Deal of the week: Gillian Tett’s excellent dissection of the financial crisis, Fool’s Gold, now costs just £4.99 on Kindle [15]

Mainstream media

Like these links? Subscribe [29] to get them every week.