- Monevator - https://monevator.com -

Weekend reading: Lose the ‘lost decade’

Good reads from around the Web.

The best article I read this week was from Carl Richards, writing about diversification for The New York Times.

We often hear how the years from 2000 to 2010 were terrible for investors in shares, even from me [1].

But in his piece [2], Richards points out that for a properly diversified investor, there were still good equity returns to be had:

When you view this 10-year period from the perspective of a diversified and balanced portfolio, 2000-2010 was anything but a lost decade.

Consider the following (all numbers reflect annualized returns over 10 years and include reinvested dividends):

U.S. large stocks (the S.&P. 500) = 1.4 percent
U.S. small stocks (the Russell 2000 Index) = 6.3 percent
U.S. real estate stocks (the Dow Jones US REIT index) = 10.4 percent
International stocks (MSCI EAFE Index) = 3.9 percent
Emerging markets stocks (MSCI Emerging Markets Index) = 16.2 percent

Richards suggests that an investor who wanted to be reasonably diversified ten years ago might have simply split their money between these five asset classes. Then they left to compound, without trading or rebalancing or anything else.

The return for this diversified portfolio over the ‘lost decade’ was an annualized 8.35 percent!

Splitting the portfolio 60/40 between equities and bonds reduces the return to 7.83%.

Not a huge difference, and for many people a price well worth paying to reduce the pain of the declines in 2007 and 2008.

From the money blogs

Deal of the week: You can get 20% off [12] the price of a special leather cover when you buy a new Kindle at Amazon right now [12].

Mainstream media money

Like these links? Get them [26] every weekend.