<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enough with the self-flagellation: We&#8217;ve just lived through a ten-year bear market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monevator.com/2009/06/10/ten-year-bear-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monevator.com/2009/06/10/ten-year-bear-market/</link>
	<description>Make more money, invest profitably, retire early</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Investor</title>
		<link>http://monevator.com/2009/06/10/ten-year-bear-market/comment-page-1/#comment-31321</link>
		<dc:creator>The Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monevator.com/?p=2013#comment-31321</guid>
		<description>Hi MoneyEnergy - Remember this article is 9 months old... I posted it on Twitter as a reminder of how far we&#039;ve come in less than a year. I&#039;m not quite so gung-ho after a huge rally in 12 months. I do think the ten years following the March lows will be good for shares, but we could well have had a few years worth of gains already...

Absolutely agree that trickling in an eschewing timing is the way to go. Unfortunately I dabble with timing and trading around the edges of my portfolio.

I say unfortunately not because it hasn&#039;t been profitable *so far*, but because a little luck is a dangerous thing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi MoneyEnergy &#8211; Remember this article is 9 months old&#8230; I posted it on Twitter as a reminder of how far we&#8217;ve come in less than a year. I&#8217;m not quite so gung-ho after a huge rally in 12 months. I do think the ten years following the March lows will be good for shares, but we could well have had a few years worth of gains already&#8230;</p>
<p>Absolutely agree that trickling in an eschewing timing is the way to go. Unfortunately I dabble with timing and trading around the edges of my portfolio.</p>
<p>I say unfortunately not because it hasn&#8217;t been profitable *so far*, but because a little luck is a dangerous thing <img src='http://monevator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyEnergy</title>
		<link>http://monevator.com/2009/06/10/ten-year-bear-market/comment-page-1/#comment-31237</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyEnergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monevator.com/?p=2013#comment-31237</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly what I do - drip in as I get the money...  I can&#039;t time or even pick out bull/bear markets anyways - these are just categories placed on the data after the fact - better to just look at fundamentals and whether there&#039;s a good growth story going forward for each stock.  I certainly hope you&#039;re right - and the one &quot;good&quot; thing about inflation is that it would lift all the stocks, too... it&#039;s about time we had some more dividend increases!
.-= MoneyEnergy on: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/moneyenergy/~3/XfPw9UhHSdc/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The US Will Never Again Run A Balanced Budget&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly what I do &#8211; drip in as I get the money&#8230;  I can&#8217;t time or even pick out bull/bear markets anyways &#8211; these are just categories placed on the data after the fact &#8211; better to just look at fundamentals and whether there&#8217;s a good growth story going forward for each stock.  I certainly hope you&#8217;re right &#8211; and the one &#8220;good&#8221; thing about inflation is that it would lift all the stocks, too&#8230; it&#8217;s about time we had some more dividend increases!<br />
.-= MoneyEnergy on: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/moneyenergy/~3/XfPw9UhHSdc/" rel="nofollow">The US Will Never Again Run A Balanced Budget</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care. (united health care, universal health care) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Welcome to Cavalcade of Risk, Version 81 (CoR.81)</title>
		<link>http://monevator.com/2009/06/10/ten-year-bear-market/comment-page-1/#comment-6163</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care. (united health care, universal health care) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Welcome to Cavalcade of Risk, Version 81 (CoR.81)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monevator.com/?p=2013#comment-6163</guid>
		<description>[...] yourself a savvy armchair investor? The DMCB doesn’t either, but if it did, it would appreciate this reminder from Monevator that intentional market timing is a mirage. A better approach to managing equities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yourself a savvy armchair investor? The DMCB doesn’t either, but if it did, it would appreciate this reminder from Monevator that intentional market timing is a mirage. A better approach to managing equities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Investor</title>
		<link>http://monevator.com/2009/06/10/ten-year-bear-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5975</link>
		<dc:creator>The Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monevator.com/?p=2013#comment-5975</guid>
		<description>Business Week now agrees with me:

“We need a 63.79% advance just to break-even for the decade,” Silverblatt says. That’s not going to happen by Dec. 31. “The last negative decade was the 1930s, -41.77%,” according to Silverblatt. Annualized, stocks lost 5.12% so far this decade; in the 1930s decade of the Great Depression they lost 5.26%.&quot;

(http://www.businessweek.com/investing/wall_street_news_blog/archives/2009/06/stock_market_ch.html?campaign_id=rss_daily)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business Week now agrees with me:</p>
<p>“We need a 63.79% advance just to break-even for the decade,” Silverblatt says. That’s not going to happen by Dec. 31. “The last negative decade was the 1930s, -41.77%,” according to Silverblatt. Annualized, stocks lost 5.12% so far this decade; in the 1930s decade of the Great Depression they lost 5.26%.&#8221;</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investing/wall_street_news_blog/archives/2009/06/stock_market_ch.html?campaign_id=rss_daily" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/investing/wall_street_news_blog/archives/2009/06/stock_market_ch.html?campaign_id=rss_daily</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

